Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing

We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2013-08, Vol.39 (4), p.1165-1180
Hauptverfasser: Rieth, Cory A., Huber, David E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1180
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1165
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
container_volume 39
creator Rieth, Cory A.
Huber, David E.
description We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short invalid and long valid condition, targets reliably appeared either at an uncued location after a short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; 100 ms) or at a cued location after a long SOA (350 ms). As revealed by postexperiment questioning, most participants were unaware of these manipulations. Whereas prior studies have examined reaction times during training, the current study examined the long-term effect of training on subsequent testing that removed these contingencies. An initial experiment found training effects only for the long SOAs that typically produce inhibition of return (IOR) effects. For instance, after short invalid and long valid training, there was a benefit at long SOAs rather than an IOR effect. A 2nd experiment ruled out target-cue overlap as an explanation of the difference between learning for long versus short SOAs. Rather than a mix of perfectly predictable spatiotemporal contingencies, Experiment 3 used only short SOA trials during training with a probabilistic spatial contingency. There was a smaller but reliable training effect in subsequent testing. These results demonstrate that implicit learning for specific combinations of location and SOA can affect behavior in spatial cueing paradigms, which is a necessary result if more generally spatial cueing reflects learned spatiotemporal regularities.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0030870
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558995944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1558995944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a472t-260398805f65d26ab4a763e4ad063e5afae4cf4dc00a8eee8be2bca8f15c5d523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtrFEEQB_AmGJI1EfwEYUACHhzT78dRlqiBhRzUc1PbUxM7zCvdM2C-vb3sxkAOal8Kun5UU_0n5C2jHxkV5gooFdQaekRWzAlXM27MK7Ki1OmaKS5Oyeuc72k5zKoTcsoFs0xbvSLrm37qYohztUFIQxzuqrGtvk0wx3HGfhoTdNV6HObSwSFEzFUc9v1dY8Fyf06OW-gyvjnUM_Lj8_X39dd6c_vlZv1pU4M0fK65psJZS1WrVcM1bCUYLVBCQ0tR0ALK0MomUAoWEe0W-TaAbZkKqilbnJH3-7lTGh8WzLPvYw7YdTDguGTPlLLOKSflv6nkpvyZ5v8xVTJNJddcF_ruBb0flzSUnXfKcq0Zk39VnFOltRP2-dmQxpwTtn5KsYf06Bn1u1D9U6iFXhwGLtsemz_wKcUCLg8AcoCuTVCSys_OKCOt2bkPewcT-Ck_BkhzDB3msKSEw-x__Zy8cF56xrQSvwFd2LV1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1220566938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Rieth, Cory A. ; Huber, David E.</creator><contributor>Enns, James T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rieth, Cory A. ; Huber, David E. ; Enns, James T</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short invalid and long valid condition, targets reliably appeared either at an uncued location after a short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; 100 ms) or at a cued location after a long SOA (350 ms). As revealed by postexperiment questioning, most participants were unaware of these manipulations. Whereas prior studies have examined reaction times during training, the current study examined the long-term effect of training on subsequent testing that removed these contingencies. An initial experiment found training effects only for the long SOAs that typically produce inhibition of return (IOR) effects. For instance, after short invalid and long valid training, there was a benefit at long SOAs rather than an IOR effect. A 2nd experiment ruled out target-cue overlap as an explanation of the difference between learning for long versus short SOAs. Rather than a mix of perfectly predictable spatiotemporal contingencies, Experiment 3 used only short SOA trials during training with a probabilistic spatial contingency. There was a smaller but reliable training effect in subsequent testing. These results demonstrate that implicit learning for specific combinations of location and SOA can affect behavior in spatial cueing paradigms, which is a necessary result if more generally spatial cueing reflects learned spatiotemporal regularities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0030870</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23181686</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Adult ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Contingencies ; Cueing ; Cues ; Experimental psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Implicit Learning ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Learning ; Learning - physiology ; Learning. Memory ; Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction times ; Sensory perception ; Space Perception - physiology ; Spatial Learning ; Time Perception - physiology ; Vigilance. Attention. Sleep ; Vision ; Visual task performance</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2013-08, Vol.39 (4), p.1165-1180</ispartof><rights>2012 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 APA, all rights reserved</rights><rights>2012, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a472t-260398805f65d26ab4a763e4ad063e5afae4cf4dc00a8eee8be2bca8f15c5d523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,30997,30998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27574876$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Enns, James T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rieth, Cory A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, David E.</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short invalid and long valid condition, targets reliably appeared either at an uncued location after a short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; 100 ms) or at a cued location after a long SOA (350 ms). As revealed by postexperiment questioning, most participants were unaware of these manipulations. Whereas prior studies have examined reaction times during training, the current study examined the long-term effect of training on subsequent testing that removed these contingencies. An initial experiment found training effects only for the long SOAs that typically produce inhibition of return (IOR) effects. For instance, after short invalid and long valid training, there was a benefit at long SOAs rather than an IOR effect. A 2nd experiment ruled out target-cue overlap as an explanation of the difference between learning for long versus short SOAs. Rather than a mix of perfectly predictable spatiotemporal contingencies, Experiment 3 used only short SOA trials during training with a probabilistic spatial contingency. There was a smaller but reliable training effect in subsequent testing. These results demonstrate that implicit learning for specific combinations of location and SOA can affect behavior in spatial cueing paradigms, which is a necessary result if more generally spatial cueing reflects learned spatiotemporal regularities.</description><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Contingencies</subject><subject>Cueing</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit Learning</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction times</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial Learning</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UtrFEEQB_AmGJI1EfwEYUACHhzT78dRlqiBhRzUc1PbUxM7zCvdM2C-vb3sxkAOal8Kun5UU_0n5C2jHxkV5gooFdQaekRWzAlXM27MK7Ki1OmaKS5Oyeuc72k5zKoTcsoFs0xbvSLrm37qYohztUFIQxzuqrGtvk0wx3HGfhoTdNV6HObSwSFEzFUc9v1dY8Fyf06OW-gyvjnUM_Lj8_X39dd6c_vlZv1pU4M0fK65psJZS1WrVcM1bCUYLVBCQ0tR0ALK0MomUAoWEe0W-TaAbZkKqilbnJH3-7lTGh8WzLPvYw7YdTDguGTPlLLOKSflv6nkpvyZ5v8xVTJNJddcF_ruBb0flzSUnXfKcq0Zk39VnFOltRP2-dmQxpwTtn5KsYf06Bn1u1D9U6iFXhwGLtsemz_wKcUCLg8AcoCuTVCSys_OKCOt2bkPewcT-Ck_BkhzDB3msKSEw-x__Zy8cF56xrQSvwFd2LV1</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Rieth, Cory A.</creator><creator>Huber, David E.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing</title><author>Rieth, Cory A. ; Huber, David E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a472t-260398805f65d26ab4a763e4ad063e5afae4cf4dc00a8eee8be2bca8f15c5d523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Contingencies</topic><topic>Cueing</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit Learning</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction times</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial Learning</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rieth, Cory A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, David E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rieth, Cory A.</au><au>Huber, David E.</au><au>Enns, James T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1165</spage><epage>1180</epage><pages>1165-1180</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short invalid and long valid condition, targets reliably appeared either at an uncued location after a short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; 100 ms) or at a cued location after a long SOA (350 ms). As revealed by postexperiment questioning, most participants were unaware of these manipulations. Whereas prior studies have examined reaction times during training, the current study examined the long-term effect of training on subsequent testing that removed these contingencies. An initial experiment found training effects only for the long SOAs that typically produce inhibition of return (IOR) effects. For instance, after short invalid and long valid training, there was a benefit at long SOAs rather than an IOR effect. A 2nd experiment ruled out target-cue overlap as an explanation of the difference between learning for long versus short SOAs. Rather than a mix of perfectly predictable spatiotemporal contingencies, Experiment 3 used only short SOA trials during training with a probabilistic spatial contingency. There was a smaller but reliable training effect in subsequent testing. These results demonstrate that implicit learning for specific combinations of location and SOA can affect behavior in spatial cueing paradigms, which is a necessary result if more generally spatial cueing reflects learned spatiotemporal regularities.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>23181686</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0030870</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-1523
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2013-08, Vol.39 (4), p.1165-1180
issn 0096-1523
1939-1277
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558995944
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Activity levels. Psychomotricity
Adult
Attention
Attention - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Contingencies
Cueing
Cues
Experimental psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Implicit Learning
Inhibition (Psychology)
Learning
Learning - physiology
Learning. Memory
Perception
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychomotor Performance - physiology
Reaction times
Sensory perception
Space Perception - physiology
Spatial Learning
Time Perception - physiology
Vigilance. Attention. Sleep
Vision
Visual task performance
title Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20Learning%20of%20Spatiotemporal%20Contingencies%20in%20Spatial%20Cueing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Rieth,%20Cory%20A.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1165&rft.epage=1180&rft.pages=1165-1180&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0030870&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1558995944%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1220566938&rft_id=info:pmid/23181686&rfr_iscdi=true