Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing
We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2013-08, Vol.39 (4), p.1165-1180 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1180 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1165 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Rieth, Cory A. Huber, David E. |
description | We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short invalid and long valid condition, targets reliably appeared either at an uncued location after a short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; 100 ms) or at a cued location after a long SOA (350 ms). As revealed by postexperiment questioning, most participants were unaware of these manipulations. Whereas prior studies have examined reaction times during training, the current study examined the long-term effect of training on subsequent testing that removed these contingencies. An initial experiment found training effects only for the long SOAs that typically produce inhibition of return (IOR) effects. For instance, after short invalid and long valid training, there was a benefit at long SOAs rather than an IOR effect. A 2nd experiment ruled out target-cue overlap as an explanation of the difference between learning for long versus short SOAs. Rather than a mix of perfectly predictable spatiotemporal contingencies, Experiment 3 used only short SOA trials during training with a probabilistic spatial contingency. There was a smaller but reliable training effect in subsequent testing. These results demonstrate that implicit learning for specific combinations of location and SOA can affect behavior in spatial cueing paradigms, which is a necessary result if more generally spatial cueing reflects learned spatiotemporal regularities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0030870 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558995944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1558995944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a472t-260398805f65d26ab4a763e4ad063e5afae4cf4dc00a8eee8be2bca8f15c5d523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0UtrFEEQB_AmGJI1EfwEYUACHhzT78dRlqiBhRzUc1PbUxM7zCvdM2C-vb3sxkAOal8Kun5UU_0n5C2jHxkV5gooFdQaekRWzAlXM27MK7Ki1OmaKS5Oyeuc72k5zKoTcsoFs0xbvSLrm37qYohztUFIQxzuqrGtvk0wx3HGfhoTdNV6HObSwSFEzFUc9v1dY8Fyf06OW-gyvjnUM_Lj8_X39dd6c_vlZv1pU4M0fK65psJZS1WrVcM1bCUYLVBCQ0tR0ALK0MomUAoWEe0W-TaAbZkKqilbnJH3-7lTGh8WzLPvYw7YdTDguGTPlLLOKSflv6nkpvyZ5v8xVTJNJddcF_ruBb0flzSUnXfKcq0Zk39VnFOltRP2-dmQxpwTtn5KsYf06Bn1u1D9U6iFXhwGLtsemz_wKcUCLg8AcoCuTVCSys_OKCOt2bkPewcT-Ck_BkhzDB3msKSEw-x__Zy8cF56xrQSvwFd2LV1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1220566938</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Rieth, Cory A. ; Huber, David E.</creator><contributor>Enns, James T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rieth, Cory A. ; Huber, David E. ; Enns, James T</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short invalid and long valid condition, targets reliably appeared either at an uncued location after a short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; 100 ms) or at a cued location after a long SOA (350 ms). As revealed by postexperiment questioning, most participants were unaware of these manipulations. Whereas prior studies have examined reaction times during training, the current study examined the long-term effect of training on subsequent testing that removed these contingencies. An initial experiment found training effects only for the long SOAs that typically produce inhibition of return (IOR) effects. For instance, after short invalid and long valid training, there was a benefit at long SOAs rather than an IOR effect. A 2nd experiment ruled out target-cue overlap as an explanation of the difference between learning for long versus short SOAs. Rather than a mix of perfectly predictable spatiotemporal contingencies, Experiment 3 used only short SOA trials during training with a probabilistic spatial contingency. There was a smaller but reliable training effect in subsequent testing. These results demonstrate that implicit learning for specific combinations of location and SOA can affect behavior in spatial cueing paradigms, which is a necessary result if more generally spatial cueing reflects learned spatiotemporal regularities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0030870</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23181686</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity ; Adult ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Contingencies ; Cueing ; Cues ; Experimental psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Implicit Learning ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Learning ; Learning - physiology ; Learning. Memory ; Perception ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction times ; Sensory perception ; Space Perception - physiology ; Spatial Learning ; Time Perception - physiology ; Vigilance. Attention. Sleep ; Vision ; Visual task performance</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2013-08, Vol.39 (4), p.1165-1180</ispartof><rights>2012 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 APA, all rights reserved</rights><rights>2012, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a472t-260398805f65d26ab4a763e4ad063e5afae4cf4dc00a8eee8be2bca8f15c5d523</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,30997,30998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27574876$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23181686$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Enns, James T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rieth, Cory A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, David E.</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short invalid and long valid condition, targets reliably appeared either at an uncued location after a short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; 100 ms) or at a cued location after a long SOA (350 ms). As revealed by postexperiment questioning, most participants were unaware of these manipulations. Whereas prior studies have examined reaction times during training, the current study examined the long-term effect of training on subsequent testing that removed these contingencies. An initial experiment found training effects only for the long SOAs that typically produce inhibition of return (IOR) effects. For instance, after short invalid and long valid training, there was a benefit at long SOAs rather than an IOR effect. A 2nd experiment ruled out target-cue overlap as an explanation of the difference between learning for long versus short SOAs. Rather than a mix of perfectly predictable spatiotemporal contingencies, Experiment 3 used only short SOA trials during training with a probabilistic spatial contingency. There was a smaller but reliable training effect in subsequent testing. These results demonstrate that implicit learning for specific combinations of location and SOA can affect behavior in spatial cueing paradigms, which is a necessary result if more generally spatial cueing reflects learned spatiotemporal regularities.</description><subject>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Contingencies</subject><subject>Cueing</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit Learning</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning - physiology</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction times</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Spatial Learning</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual task performance</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0UtrFEEQB_AmGJI1EfwEYUACHhzT78dRlqiBhRzUc1PbUxM7zCvdM2C-vb3sxkAOal8Kun5UU_0n5C2jHxkV5gooFdQaekRWzAlXM27MK7Ki1OmaKS5Oyeuc72k5zKoTcsoFs0xbvSLrm37qYohztUFIQxzuqrGtvk0wx3HGfhoTdNV6HObSwSFEzFUc9v1dY8Fyf06OW-gyvjnUM_Lj8_X39dd6c_vlZv1pU4M0fK65psJZS1WrVcM1bCUYLVBCQ0tR0ALK0MomUAoWEe0W-TaAbZkKqilbnJH3-7lTGh8WzLPvYw7YdTDguGTPlLLOKSflv6nkpvyZ5v8xVTJNJddcF_ruBb0flzSUnXfKcq0Zk39VnFOltRP2-dmQxpwTtn5KsYf06Bn1u1D9U6iFXhwGLtsemz_wKcUCLg8AcoCuTVCSys_OKCOt2bkPewcT-Ck_BkhzDB3msKSEw-x__Zy8cF56xrQSvwFd2LV1</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Rieth, Cory A.</creator><creator>Huber, David E.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing</title><author>Rieth, Cory A. ; Huber, David E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a472t-260398805f65d26ab4a763e4ad063e5afae4cf4dc00a8eee8be2bca8f15c5d523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Activity levels. Psychomotricity</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Contingencies</topic><topic>Cueing</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit Learning</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning - physiology</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction times</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Spatial Learning</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Vigilance. Attention. Sleep</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual task performance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rieth, Cory A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, David E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rieth, Cory A.</au><au>Huber, David E.</au><au>Enns, James T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1165</spage><epage>1180</epage><pages>1165-1180</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>We investigated the role of implicit spatiotemporal learning in the Posner spatial cueing of attention task. During initial training, the proportion of different trial types was altered to produce a complex pattern of spatiotemporal contingencies between cues and targets. For example, in the short invalid and long valid condition, targets reliably appeared either at an uncued location after a short stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; 100 ms) or at a cued location after a long SOA (350 ms). As revealed by postexperiment questioning, most participants were unaware of these manipulations. Whereas prior studies have examined reaction times during training, the current study examined the long-term effect of training on subsequent testing that removed these contingencies. An initial experiment found training effects only for the long SOAs that typically produce inhibition of return (IOR) effects. For instance, after short invalid and long valid training, there was a benefit at long SOAs rather than an IOR effect. A 2nd experiment ruled out target-cue overlap as an explanation of the difference between learning for long versus short SOAs. Rather than a mix of perfectly predictable spatiotemporal contingencies, Experiment 3 used only short SOA trials during training with a probabilistic spatial contingency. There was a smaller but reliable training effect in subsequent testing. These results demonstrate that implicit learning for specific combinations of location and SOA can affect behavior in spatial cueing paradigms, which is a necessary result if more generally spatial cueing reflects learned spatiotemporal regularities.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>23181686</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0030870</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2013-08, Vol.39 (4), p.1165-1180 |
issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558995944 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Activity levels. Psychomotricity Adult Attention Attention - physiology Biological and medical sciences Contingencies Cueing Cues Experimental psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Implicit Learning Inhibition (Psychology) Learning Learning - physiology Learning. Memory Perception Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reaction times Sensory perception Space Perception - physiology Spatial Learning Time Perception - physiology Vigilance. Attention. Sleep Vision Visual task performance |
title | Implicit Learning of Spatiotemporal Contingencies in Spatial Cueing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T23%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20Learning%20of%20Spatiotemporal%20Contingencies%20in%20Spatial%20Cueing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Rieth,%20Cory%20A.&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1165&rft.epage=1180&rft.pages=1165-1180&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0030870&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1558995944%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1220566938&rft_id=info:pmid/23181686&rfr_iscdi=true |