A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete

•When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2014-09, Vol.125 (1), p.18-25
Hauptverfasser: Gladstone, Eric, O’Connor, Kathleen M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 25
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Organizational behavior and human decision processes
container_volume 125
creator Gladstone, Eric
O’Connor, Kathleen M.
description •When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively more from feminine-featured counterparts. Early on, negotiators take each other’s measure, drawing inferences that shape subsequent decisions and behaviors. In two studies, we investigate whether impressions based on the facial femininity of counterparts affect negotiators’ behaviors. In our first experiment, we tested whether negotiators would choose counterparts with more feminine-featured faces over those with less feminine faces. As predicted, regardless of counterpart sex, negotiators preferred counterparts with more feminine-featured faces. When choosing agents, however, this preference reversed, indicating strategic decision making on the part of negotiators. In a second experiment, we tested our underlying claim that facial femininity evokes stereotypes of cooperativeness. It did, and in keeping with our main hypotheses, negotiators demanded more from their feminine-featured counterparts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558988529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749597814000338</els_id><sourcerecordid>1558988529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-2dd2d3c51a3e2dcff01f0381866057de051a958e6cc601389124f9620060d703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkbFuHCEQhlEUS7nYfgI3K7lJs5uBXVgoUliWnUQ6Kc21FsIwe-F0B2vgLLnza_j1_CTmcqlcRKko5vtnxPcTckGho0DF100X73-7uWNAhw54B0A_kAUFxVulGHwkCxgH1XI1yk_kc86bClABsCB3V42N-1AwzSaV1-eX3Ey488EHbCZjscl-Hcw2VyrOmEzxjxgw58YE12Co2WTWmJuA61i8KTHlpsRK72YseEZOphrG87_vKVnd3qyuf7TLX99_Xl8tWztwWlrmHHO95dT0yJydJqAT9JJKIYCPDqFOFJcorBVAe6koGyYlGIAAN0J_Sr4c184pPuwxF73z2eJ2awLGfdaUc6mk5Ez9DypYVSZlRS_foZv624OMSg1SjIrC4XZ_pGyKOSec9Jz8zqQnTUEfytEb_accfShHA9fVfU19O6awWnn0mHS2vupE5xPaol30_8y_ASQSmU8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1548679100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gladstone, Eric ; O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gladstone, Eric ; O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><description>•When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively more from feminine-featured counterparts. Early on, negotiators take each other’s measure, drawing inferences that shape subsequent decisions and behaviors. In two studies, we investigate whether impressions based on the facial femininity of counterparts affect negotiators’ behaviors. In our first experiment, we tested whether negotiators would choose counterparts with more feminine-featured faces over those with less feminine faces. As predicted, regardless of counterpart sex, negotiators preferred counterparts with more feminine-featured faces. When choosing agents, however, this preference reversed, indicating strategic decision making on the part of negotiators. In a second experiment, we tested our underlying claim that facial femininity evokes stereotypes of cooperativeness. It did, and in keeping with our main hypotheses, negotiators demanded more from their feminine-featured counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OBDPFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Competitive negotiation ; Concessions ; Cooperation ; Cooperative negotiation ; Decision making ; Experiments ; Facial-femininity ; Femininity ; Feminism ; Impressions ; Negotiation ; Organizational behavior ; Preferences ; Signals ; Stereotypes ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2014-09, Vol.125 (1), p.18-25</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Sep 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-2dd2d3c51a3e2dcff01f0381866057de051a958e6cc601389124f9620060d703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-2dd2d3c51a3e2dcff01f0381866057de051a958e6cc601389124f9620060d703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,31000,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gladstone, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><title>A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>•When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively more from feminine-featured counterparts. Early on, negotiators take each other’s measure, drawing inferences that shape subsequent decisions and behaviors. In two studies, we investigate whether impressions based on the facial femininity of counterparts affect negotiators’ behaviors. In our first experiment, we tested whether negotiators would choose counterparts with more feminine-featured faces over those with less feminine faces. As predicted, regardless of counterpart sex, negotiators preferred counterparts with more feminine-featured faces. When choosing agents, however, this preference reversed, indicating strategic decision making on the part of negotiators. In a second experiment, we tested our underlying claim that facial femininity evokes stereotypes of cooperativeness. It did, and in keeping with our main hypotheses, negotiators demanded more from their feminine-featured counterparts.</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Competitive negotiation</subject><subject>Concessions</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cooperative negotiation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Facial-femininity</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Impressions</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Signals</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkbFuHCEQhlEUS7nYfgI3K7lJs5uBXVgoUliWnUQ6Kc21FsIwe-F0B2vgLLnza_j1_CTmcqlcRKko5vtnxPcTckGho0DF100X73-7uWNAhw54B0A_kAUFxVulGHwkCxgH1XI1yk_kc86bClABsCB3V42N-1AwzSaV1-eX3Ey488EHbCZjscl-Hcw2VyrOmEzxjxgw58YE12Co2WTWmJuA61i8KTHlpsRK72YseEZOphrG87_vKVnd3qyuf7TLX99_Xl8tWztwWlrmHHO95dT0yJydJqAT9JJKIYCPDqFOFJcorBVAe6koGyYlGIAAN0J_Sr4c184pPuwxF73z2eJ2awLGfdaUc6mk5Ez9DypYVSZlRS_foZv624OMSg1SjIrC4XZ_pGyKOSec9Jz8zqQnTUEfytEb_accfShHA9fVfU19O6awWnn0mHS2vupE5xPaol30_8y_ASQSmU8</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Gladstone, Eric</creator><creator>O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete</title><author>Gladstone, Eric ; O’Connor, Kathleen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-2dd2d3c51a3e2dcff01f0381866057de051a958e6cc601389124f9620060d703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Competitive negotiation</topic><topic>Concessions</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cooperative negotiation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Facial-femininity</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Impressions</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Signals</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gladstone, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gladstone, Eric</au><au>O’Connor, Kathleen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>18-25</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><coden>OBDPFO</coden><abstract>•When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively more from feminine-featured counterparts. Early on, negotiators take each other’s measure, drawing inferences that shape subsequent decisions and behaviors. In two studies, we investigate whether impressions based on the facial femininity of counterparts affect negotiators’ behaviors. In our first experiment, we tested whether negotiators would choose counterparts with more feminine-featured faces over those with less feminine faces. As predicted, regardless of counterpart sex, negotiators preferred counterparts with more feminine-featured faces. When choosing agents, however, this preference reversed, indicating strategic decision making on the part of negotiators. In a second experiment, we tested our underlying claim that facial femininity evokes stereotypes of cooperativeness. It did, and in keeping with our main hypotheses, negotiators demanded more from their feminine-featured counterparts.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-5978
ispartof Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2014-09, Vol.125 (1), p.18-25
issn 0749-5978
1095-9920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558988529
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Bargaining
Competitive negotiation
Concessions
Cooperation
Cooperative negotiation
Decision making
Experiments
Facial-femininity
Femininity
Feminism
Impressions
Negotiation
Organizational behavior
Preferences
Signals
Stereotypes
Studies
title A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T23%3A30%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20counterpart%E2%80%99s%20feminine%20face%20signals%20cooperativeness%20and%20encourages%20negotiators%20to%20compete&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Gladstone,%20Eric&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=18-25&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft.coden=OBDPFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1558988529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1548679100&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0749597814000338&rfr_iscdi=true