A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete
•When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organizational behavior and human decision processes 2014-09, Vol.125 (1), p.18-25 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 25 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Organizational behavior and human decision processes |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Gladstone, Eric O’Connor, Kathleen M. |
description | •When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively more from feminine-featured counterparts.
Early on, negotiators take each other’s measure, drawing inferences that shape subsequent decisions and behaviors. In two studies, we investigate whether impressions based on the facial femininity of counterparts affect negotiators’ behaviors. In our first experiment, we tested whether negotiators would choose counterparts with more feminine-featured faces over those with less feminine faces. As predicted, regardless of counterpart sex, negotiators preferred counterparts with more feminine-featured faces. When choosing agents, however, this preference reversed, indicating strategic decision making on the part of negotiators. In a second experiment, we tested our underlying claim that facial femininity evokes stereotypes of cooperativeness. It did, and in keeping with our main hypotheses, negotiators demanded more from their feminine-featured counterparts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558988529</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749597814000338</els_id><sourcerecordid>1558988529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-2dd2d3c51a3e2dcff01f0381866057de051a958e6cc601389124f9620060d703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkbFuHCEQhlEUS7nYfgI3K7lJs5uBXVgoUliWnUQ6Kc21FsIwe-F0B2vgLLnza_j1_CTmcqlcRKko5vtnxPcTckGho0DF100X73-7uWNAhw54B0A_kAUFxVulGHwkCxgH1XI1yk_kc86bClABsCB3V42N-1AwzSaV1-eX3Ey488EHbCZjscl-Hcw2VyrOmEzxjxgw58YE12Co2WTWmJuA61i8KTHlpsRK72YseEZOphrG87_vKVnd3qyuf7TLX99_Xl8tWztwWlrmHHO95dT0yJydJqAT9JJKIYCPDqFOFJcorBVAe6koGyYlGIAAN0J_Sr4c184pPuwxF73z2eJ2awLGfdaUc6mk5Ez9DypYVSZlRS_foZv624OMSg1SjIrC4XZ_pGyKOSec9Jz8zqQnTUEfytEb_accfShHA9fVfU19O6awWnn0mHS2vupE5xPaol30_8y_ASQSmU8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1548679100</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gladstone, Eric ; O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gladstone, Eric ; O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><description>•When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively more from feminine-featured counterparts.
Early on, negotiators take each other’s measure, drawing inferences that shape subsequent decisions and behaviors. In two studies, we investigate whether impressions based on the facial femininity of counterparts affect negotiators’ behaviors. In our first experiment, we tested whether negotiators would choose counterparts with more feminine-featured faces over those with less feminine faces. As predicted, regardless of counterpart sex, negotiators preferred counterparts with more feminine-featured faces. When choosing agents, however, this preference reversed, indicating strategic decision making on the part of negotiators. In a second experiment, we tested our underlying claim that facial femininity evokes stereotypes of cooperativeness. It did, and in keeping with our main hypotheses, negotiators demanded more from their feminine-featured counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-5978</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OBDPFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bargaining ; Competitive negotiation ; Concessions ; Cooperation ; Cooperative negotiation ; Decision making ; Experiments ; Facial-femininity ; Femininity ; Feminism ; Impressions ; Negotiation ; Organizational behavior ; Preferences ; Signals ; Stereotypes ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2014-09, Vol.125 (1), p.18-25</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Sep 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-2dd2d3c51a3e2dcff01f0381866057de051a958e6cc601389124f9620060d703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-2dd2d3c51a3e2dcff01f0381866057de051a958e6cc601389124f9620060d703</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,30999,31000,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gladstone, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><title>A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete</title><title>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</title><description>•When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively more from feminine-featured counterparts.
Early on, negotiators take each other’s measure, drawing inferences that shape subsequent decisions and behaviors. In two studies, we investigate whether impressions based on the facial femininity of counterparts affect negotiators’ behaviors. In our first experiment, we tested whether negotiators would choose counterparts with more feminine-featured faces over those with less feminine faces. As predicted, regardless of counterpart sex, negotiators preferred counterparts with more feminine-featured faces. When choosing agents, however, this preference reversed, indicating strategic decision making on the part of negotiators. In a second experiment, we tested our underlying claim that facial femininity evokes stereotypes of cooperativeness. It did, and in keeping with our main hypotheses, negotiators demanded more from their feminine-featured counterparts.</description><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Competitive negotiation</subject><subject>Concessions</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Cooperative negotiation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Facial-femininity</subject><subject>Femininity</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Impressions</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Organizational behavior</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Signals</subject><subject>Stereotypes</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0749-5978</issn><issn>1095-9920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkbFuHCEQhlEUS7nYfgI3K7lJs5uBXVgoUliWnUQ6Kc21FsIwe-F0B2vgLLnza_j1_CTmcqlcRKko5vtnxPcTckGho0DF100X73-7uWNAhw54B0A_kAUFxVulGHwkCxgH1XI1yk_kc86bClABsCB3V42N-1AwzSaV1-eX3Ey488EHbCZjscl-Hcw2VyrOmEzxjxgw58YE12Co2WTWmJuA61i8KTHlpsRK72YseEZOphrG87_vKVnd3qyuf7TLX99_Xl8tWztwWlrmHHO95dT0yJydJqAT9JJKIYCPDqFOFJcorBVAe6koGyYlGIAAN0J_Sr4c184pPuwxF73z2eJ2awLGfdaUc6mk5Ez9DypYVSZlRS_foZv624OMSg1SjIrC4XZ_pGyKOSec9Jz8zqQnTUEfytEb_accfShHA9fVfU19O6awWnn0mHS2vupE5xPaol30_8y_ASQSmU8</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Gladstone, Eric</creator><creator>O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete</title><author>Gladstone, Eric ; O’Connor, Kathleen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-2dd2d3c51a3e2dcff01f0381866057de051a958e6cc601389124f9620060d703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Competitive negotiation</topic><topic>Concessions</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Cooperative negotiation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Facial-femininity</topic><topic>Femininity</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Impressions</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Organizational behavior</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Signals</topic><topic>Stereotypes</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gladstone, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connor, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gladstone, Eric</au><au>O’Connor, Kathleen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete</atitle><jtitle>Organizational behavior and human decision processes</jtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>18-25</pages><issn>0749-5978</issn><eissn>1095-9920</eissn><coden>OBDPFO</coden><abstract>•When people choose negotiation counterparts, they prefer men and women with more feminine faces.•Preferences for feminine faces are reversed when people select negotiation agents.•Negotiators believe feminine faced counterparts are going to behave more cooperatively.•Negotiators demand relatively more from feminine-featured counterparts.
Early on, negotiators take each other’s measure, drawing inferences that shape subsequent decisions and behaviors. In two studies, we investigate whether impressions based on the facial femininity of counterparts affect negotiators’ behaviors. In our first experiment, we tested whether negotiators would choose counterparts with more feminine-featured faces over those with less feminine faces. As predicted, regardless of counterpart sex, negotiators preferred counterparts with more feminine-featured faces. When choosing agents, however, this preference reversed, indicating strategic decision making on the part of negotiators. In a second experiment, we tested our underlying claim that facial femininity evokes stereotypes of cooperativeness. It did, and in keeping with our main hypotheses, negotiators demanded more from their feminine-featured counterparts.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-5978 |
ispartof | Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 2014-09, Vol.125 (1), p.18-25 |
issn | 0749-5978 1095-9920 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558988529 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Bargaining Competitive negotiation Concessions Cooperation Cooperative negotiation Decision making Experiments Facial-femininity Femininity Feminism Impressions Negotiation Organizational behavior Preferences Signals Stereotypes Studies |
title | A counterpart’s feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T23%3A30%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20counterpart%E2%80%99s%20feminine%20face%20signals%20cooperativeness%20and%20encourages%20negotiators%20to%20compete&rft.jtitle=Organizational%20behavior%20and%20human%20decision%20processes&rft.au=Gladstone,%20Eric&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=18-25&rft.issn=0749-5978&rft.eissn=1095-9920&rft.coden=OBDPFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1558988529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1548679100&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0749597814000338&rfr_iscdi=true |