New Population‐Based Reference Values for Spinal Mobility Measures Based on the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Objective To report population‐based percentile reference values for selected spinal mobility measures in a nationally representative sample of 5,001 US adults ages 20–69 years who were examined in the 2009–2010 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods Occiput‐to‐wall di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) N.J.), 2014-09, Vol.66 (9), p.2628-2637
Hauptverfasser: Assassi, Shervin, Weisman, Michael H., Lee, MinJae, Savage, Laurie, Diekman, Laura, Graham, Tiffany A., Rahbar, Mohammad H., Schall, Joan I., Gensler, Lianne S., Deodhar, Atul A., Clegg, Daniel O., Colbert, Robert A., Reveille, John D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2637
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2628
container_title Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)
container_volume 66
creator Assassi, Shervin
Weisman, Michael H.
Lee, MinJae
Savage, Laurie
Diekman, Laura
Graham, Tiffany A.
Rahbar, Mohammad H.
Schall, Joan I.
Gensler, Lianne S.
Deodhar, Atul A.
Clegg, Daniel O.
Colbert, Robert A.
Reveille, John D.
description Objective To report population‐based percentile reference values for selected spinal mobility measures in a nationally representative sample of 5,001 US adults ages 20–69 years who were examined in the 2009–2010 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods Occiput‐to‐wall distance (OWD), thoracic expansion (TE), and anterior lumbar flexion (ALF; by modified Schober test) were measured by trained examiners in a standardized manner. TE was measured at the xiphisternal level, while the lower reference point for ALF was a line marked at the level of the superior margin of the lateral iliac crests. We report reference values based on the 95th percentile for the OWD and the 5th percentile for TE and ALF, as well as other summary statistics for these measures, in the study population. Results An OWD of >0 was present in 3.8% of the participants, while 8.8% of them had out‐of‐range values for TE based on the commonly used threshold of 2.5 cm. The 95th percentile of the OWD measurement was 0, while the 5th percentile for TE and ALF were 1.9 cm and 2 cm, respectively. The spinal measures were significantly associated with sex, age, ethnicity, height, and body mass index (BMI). Exclusion of individuals with severe obesity (BMI >35 kg/m2) changed the proposed reference values for TE and ALF to 2.2 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively. Conclusion We verified a reference value of 0 for the OWD in the general population. Using the reported population‐based percentile values, new reference values for TE and ALF can be derived.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/art.38692
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558519497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3584405301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-8e3432cc80247482de5eb9c6b469a3fd89d0d2510db41bb74104e2f972e87e193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoKurCF5CAG12M5tomSx28gY7ibVvS9hQrmWZMWnV2PoEIvqFPYpyqC8Fscki-8x_-8yO0TskOJYTtGt_ucJVoNoeWGWfJQDIi539qqukSWgvhnsSjU5IQuYiWmEgV4zJZRq8jeMIXbtJZ09au-Xh52zcBSnwJFXhoCsC3xnYQcOU8vprUjbH4zOW1rdspPgMTOh8_-x7X4PYOMIuDPl7eGaEEj2aqsecYjG3vsGlKPOpaX38944NnM46Ks_qq848wXUULlbEB1r7vFXRzeHA9PB6cnh-dDPdOBwVXig0UcMFZUSgSnQjFSpCQ6yLJRaINr0qlS1IySUmZC5rnqaBEAKt0ykClQDVfQVu97sS7h2ivzcZ1KMBa04DrQkalVHF3QqcR3fyD3rvOR0-RSiSL2xZcRmq7pwrvQvBQZRNfj42fZpRkXzllMadsllNkN74Vu3wM5S_5k0oEdnvgqbYw_V8p27u87iU_Aa1AnPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652520435</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Population‐Based Reference Values for Spinal Mobility Measures Based on the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Assassi, Shervin ; Weisman, Michael H. ; Lee, MinJae ; Savage, Laurie ; Diekman, Laura ; Graham, Tiffany A. ; Rahbar, Mohammad H. ; Schall, Joan I. ; Gensler, Lianne S. ; Deodhar, Atul A. ; Clegg, Daniel O. ; Colbert, Robert A. ; Reveille, John D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Assassi, Shervin ; Weisman, Michael H. ; Lee, MinJae ; Savage, Laurie ; Diekman, Laura ; Graham, Tiffany A. ; Rahbar, Mohammad H. ; Schall, Joan I. ; Gensler, Lianne S. ; Deodhar, Atul A. ; Clegg, Daniel O. ; Colbert, Robert A. ; Reveille, John D.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To report population‐based percentile reference values for selected spinal mobility measures in a nationally representative sample of 5,001 US adults ages 20–69 years who were examined in the 2009–2010 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods Occiput‐to‐wall distance (OWD), thoracic expansion (TE), and anterior lumbar flexion (ALF; by modified Schober test) were measured by trained examiners in a standardized manner. TE was measured at the xiphisternal level, while the lower reference point for ALF was a line marked at the level of the superior margin of the lateral iliac crests. We report reference values based on the 95th percentile for the OWD and the 5th percentile for TE and ALF, as well as other summary statistics for these measures, in the study population. Results An OWD of &gt;0 was present in 3.8% of the participants, while 8.8% of them had out‐of‐range values for TE based on the commonly used threshold of 2.5 cm. The 95th percentile of the OWD measurement was 0, while the 5th percentile for TE and ALF were 1.9 cm and 2 cm, respectively. The spinal measures were significantly associated with sex, age, ethnicity, height, and body mass index (BMI). Exclusion of individuals with severe obesity (BMI &gt;35 kg/m2) changed the proposed reference values for TE and ALF to 2.2 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively. Conclusion We verified a reference value of 0 for the OWD in the general population. Using the reported population‐based percentile values, new reference values for TE and ALF can be derived.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2326-5191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-5205</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/art.38692</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24782356</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Body Mass Index ; Body Weight ; Children &amp; youth ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nutrition Surveys ; Population ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology ; Reference Values ; Spine - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Arthritis &amp; rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2014-09, Vol.66 (9), p.2628-2637</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the American College of Rheumatology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-8e3432cc80247482de5eb9c6b469a3fd89d0d2510db41bb74104e2f972e87e193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-8e3432cc80247482de5eb9c6b469a3fd89d0d2510db41bb74104e2f972e87e193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fart.38692$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fart.38692$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24782356$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Assassi, Shervin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisman, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, MinJae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savage, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Tiffany A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahbar, Mohammad H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schall, Joan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gensler, Lianne S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deodhar, Atul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, Daniel O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colbert, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reveille, John D.</creatorcontrib><title>New Population‐Based Reference Values for Spinal Mobility Measures Based on the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey</title><title>Arthritis &amp; rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Objective To report population‐based percentile reference values for selected spinal mobility measures in a nationally representative sample of 5,001 US adults ages 20–69 years who were examined in the 2009–2010 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods Occiput‐to‐wall distance (OWD), thoracic expansion (TE), and anterior lumbar flexion (ALF; by modified Schober test) were measured by trained examiners in a standardized manner. TE was measured at the xiphisternal level, while the lower reference point for ALF was a line marked at the level of the superior margin of the lateral iliac crests. We report reference values based on the 95th percentile for the OWD and the 5th percentile for TE and ALF, as well as other summary statistics for these measures, in the study population. Results An OWD of &gt;0 was present in 3.8% of the participants, while 8.8% of them had out‐of‐range values for TE based on the commonly used threshold of 2.5 cm. The 95th percentile of the OWD measurement was 0, while the 5th percentile for TE and ALF were 1.9 cm and 2 cm, respectively. The spinal measures were significantly associated with sex, age, ethnicity, height, and body mass index (BMI). Exclusion of individuals with severe obesity (BMI &gt;35 kg/m2) changed the proposed reference values for TE and ALF to 2.2 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively. Conclusion We verified a reference value of 0 for the OWD in the general population. Using the reported population‐based percentile values, new reference values for TE and ALF can be derived.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nutrition Surveys</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Spine - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2326-5191</issn><issn>2326-5205</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoKurCF5CAG12M5tomSx28gY7ibVvS9hQrmWZMWnV2PoEIvqFPYpyqC8Fscki-8x_-8yO0TskOJYTtGt_ucJVoNoeWGWfJQDIi539qqukSWgvhnsSjU5IQuYiWmEgV4zJZRq8jeMIXbtJZ09au-Xh52zcBSnwJFXhoCsC3xnYQcOU8vprUjbH4zOW1rdspPgMTOh8_-x7X4PYOMIuDPl7eGaEEj2aqsecYjG3vsGlKPOpaX38944NnM46Ks_qq848wXUULlbEB1r7vFXRzeHA9PB6cnh-dDPdOBwVXig0UcMFZUSgSnQjFSpCQ6yLJRaINr0qlS1IySUmZC5rnqaBEAKt0ykClQDVfQVu97sS7h2ivzcZ1KMBa04DrQkalVHF3QqcR3fyD3rvOR0-RSiSL2xZcRmq7pwrvQvBQZRNfj42fZpRkXzllMadsllNkN74Vu3wM5S_5k0oEdnvgqbYw_V8p27u87iU_Aa1AnPQ</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Assassi, Shervin</creator><creator>Weisman, Michael H.</creator><creator>Lee, MinJae</creator><creator>Savage, Laurie</creator><creator>Diekman, Laura</creator><creator>Graham, Tiffany A.</creator><creator>Rahbar, Mohammad H.</creator><creator>Schall, Joan I.</creator><creator>Gensler, Lianne S.</creator><creator>Deodhar, Atul A.</creator><creator>Clegg, Daniel O.</creator><creator>Colbert, Robert A.</creator><creator>Reveille, John D.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>New Population‐Based Reference Values for Spinal Mobility Measures Based on the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey</title><author>Assassi, Shervin ; Weisman, Michael H. ; Lee, MinJae ; Savage, Laurie ; Diekman, Laura ; Graham, Tiffany A. ; Rahbar, Mohammad H. ; Schall, Joan I. ; Gensler, Lianne S. ; Deodhar, Atul A. ; Clegg, Daniel O. ; Colbert, Robert A. ; Reveille, John D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3882-8e3432cc80247482de5eb9c6b469a3fd89d0d2510db41bb74104e2f972e87e193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nutrition Surveys</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Spine - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Assassi, Shervin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisman, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, MinJae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savage, Laurie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diekman, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Tiffany A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahbar, Mohammad H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schall, Joan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gensler, Lianne S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deodhar, Atul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clegg, Daniel O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colbert, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reveille, John D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis &amp; rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Assassi, Shervin</au><au>Weisman, Michael H.</au><au>Lee, MinJae</au><au>Savage, Laurie</au><au>Diekman, Laura</au><au>Graham, Tiffany A.</au><au>Rahbar, Mohammad H.</au><au>Schall, Joan I.</au><au>Gensler, Lianne S.</au><au>Deodhar, Atul A.</au><au>Clegg, Daniel O.</au><au>Colbert, Robert A.</au><au>Reveille, John D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Population‐Based Reference Values for Spinal Mobility Measures Based on the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis &amp; rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2628</spage><epage>2637</epage><pages>2628-2637</pages><issn>2326-5191</issn><eissn>2326-5205</eissn><abstract>Objective To report population‐based percentile reference values for selected spinal mobility measures in a nationally representative sample of 5,001 US adults ages 20–69 years who were examined in the 2009–2010 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Methods Occiput‐to‐wall distance (OWD), thoracic expansion (TE), and anterior lumbar flexion (ALF; by modified Schober test) were measured by trained examiners in a standardized manner. TE was measured at the xiphisternal level, while the lower reference point for ALF was a line marked at the level of the superior margin of the lateral iliac crests. We report reference values based on the 95th percentile for the OWD and the 5th percentile for TE and ALF, as well as other summary statistics for these measures, in the study population. Results An OWD of &gt;0 was present in 3.8% of the participants, while 8.8% of them had out‐of‐range values for TE based on the commonly used threshold of 2.5 cm. The 95th percentile of the OWD measurement was 0, while the 5th percentile for TE and ALF were 1.9 cm and 2 cm, respectively. The spinal measures were significantly associated with sex, age, ethnicity, height, and body mass index (BMI). Exclusion of individuals with severe obesity (BMI &gt;35 kg/m2) changed the proposed reference values for TE and ALF to 2.2 cm and 1.9 cm, respectively. Conclusion We verified a reference value of 0 for the OWD in the general population. Using the reported population‐based percentile values, new reference values for TE and ALF can be derived.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>24782356</pmid><doi>10.1002/art.38692</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2326-5191
ispartof Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2014-09, Vol.66 (9), p.2628-2637
issn 2326-5191
2326-5205
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1558519497
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
Children & youth
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nutrition Surveys
Population
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Reference Values
Spine - physiology
Young Adult
title New Population‐Based Reference Values for Spinal Mobility Measures Based on the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A20%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Population%E2%80%90Based%20Reference%20Values%20for%20Spinal%20Mobility%20Measures%20Based%20on%20the%202009%E2%80%932010%20National%20Health%20and%20Nutrition%20Examination%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20&%20rheumatology%20(Hoboken,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Assassi,%20Shervin&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2628&rft.epage=2637&rft.pages=2628-2637&rft.issn=2326-5191&rft.eissn=2326-5205&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/art.38692&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3584405301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652520435&rft_id=info:pmid/24782356&rfr_iscdi=true