Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization

Community-acquired pneumonia occurs 3 to 4 million times per year in the United States, accounting for about 500,000 hospitalizations annually. Empiric treatment is usually instituted because of a lack of early organism-specific diagnostic tests. This study compared empiric therapy with ofloxacin to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 1996, Vol.40 (5), p.1175-1179
Hauptverfasser: PLOUFFE, J. F, HERBERT, M. T, FILE, T. M, BAIRD, I, PARSONS, J. N, KAHN, J. B, RIELLY-GAUVIN, K. T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1179
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1175
container_title Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
container_volume 40
creator PLOUFFE, J. F
HERBERT, M. T
FILE, T. M
BAIRD, I
PARSONS, J. N
KAHN, J. B
RIELLY-GAUVIN, K. T
description Community-acquired pneumonia occurs 3 to 4 million times per year in the United States, accounting for about 500,000 hospitalizations annually. Empiric treatment is usually instituted because of a lack of early organism-specific diagnostic tests. This study compared empiric therapy with ofloxacin to standard antibiotic regimens (usually a beta-lactam with or without a macrolide) for patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Therapy was administered to 298 patients (146 receiving ofloxacin and 152 receiving standard therapy); 227 patients (ofloxacin, 109; standard treatment, 118) were evaluable for treatment efficacy. The most common pyogenic respiratory pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (30 isolates) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24 isolates). There was evidence of infection with either Mycoplasma pneumoniae (38 patients), Chlamydia pneumoniae (40 patients), or a Legionella sp. (8 patients) in a total of 79 patients (35%). The clinical success rates were similar in both groups among evaluable patients (92%, ofloxacin; 87%, standard therapy) and among patients with atypical respiratory pathogens (88%, ofloxacin; 81%, standard therapy). The mean numbers ( plus or minus the standard deviations) of intravenous doses of antibiotics were 7.5 plus or minus 8.0 in the ofloxacin group and 18.4 plus or minus 18.5 in the standard therapy group (P < 0.001); the mean number of oral doses of ofloxacin per patient was 19.7 plus or minus 11.2, compared with 30.2 plus or minus 16.0 oral antibiotic doses in the standard therapy group (P < 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated and associated with no significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities. The findings of this study indicate that ofloxacin is active against traditional bacterial pathogens as well as the major atypical respiratory pathogens. When given as monotherapy for the empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, ofloxacin is as effective as standard antimicrobial therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1175
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15578964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15578964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-7eb0624be7c345d237c4f888b0a25c8ca726b433ed991e1f34337887a4e3aaad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjDtPwzAUhS0EEqUwsntAbCl2bMfOWFW8pEpdYI5unBtqlDip7SDKryeITuf16RByy9mK89w8rNeblWQrNSetzsiCs9JkhSqLc7JgrCgyaZi8JFcxfrI5q5ItyH7XdsM3WOfpF4Y4RRoT-AZCQ9MeA4xHOk8pIKQefaJDS-3Q95N36ZiBPUwuYENHj1M_eAc04F_l_AfdD3F0CTr3A8kN_ppctNBFvDnpkrw_Pb5tXrLt7vl1s95mY85FyjTWrMhljdoKqZpcaCtbY0zNIFfWWNB5UUshsClLjrwVs9fGaJAoAKARS3L__zuG4TBhTFXvosWuA4_DFCuulDZlIWfw7gRCtNC1Abx1sRqD6yEcK8E0E6USv-kXaZo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15578964</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>PLOUFFE, J. F ; HERBERT, M. T ; FILE, T. M ; BAIRD, I ; PARSONS, J. N ; KAHN, J. B ; RIELLY-GAUVIN, K. T</creator><creatorcontrib>PLOUFFE, J. F ; HERBERT, M. T ; FILE, T. M ; BAIRD, I ; PARSONS, J. N ; KAHN, J. B ; RIELLY-GAUVIN, K. T</creatorcontrib><description>Community-acquired pneumonia occurs 3 to 4 million times per year in the United States, accounting for about 500,000 hospitalizations annually. Empiric treatment is usually instituted because of a lack of early organism-specific diagnostic tests. This study compared empiric therapy with ofloxacin to standard antibiotic regimens (usually a beta-lactam with or without a macrolide) for patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Therapy was administered to 298 patients (146 receiving ofloxacin and 152 receiving standard therapy); 227 patients (ofloxacin, 109; standard treatment, 118) were evaluable for treatment efficacy. The most common pyogenic respiratory pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (30 isolates) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24 isolates). There was evidence of infection with either Mycoplasma pneumoniae (38 patients), Chlamydia pneumoniae (40 patients), or a Legionella sp. (8 patients) in a total of 79 patients (35%). The clinical success rates were similar in both groups among evaluable patients (92%, ofloxacin; 87%, standard therapy) and among patients with atypical respiratory pathogens (88%, ofloxacin; 81%, standard therapy). The mean numbers ( plus or minus the standard deviations) of intravenous doses of antibiotics were 7.5 plus or minus 8.0 in the ofloxacin group and 18.4 plus or minus 18.5 in the standard therapy group (P &lt; 0.001); the mean number of oral doses of ofloxacin per patient was 19.7 plus or minus 11.2, compared with 30.2 plus or minus 16.0 oral antibiotic doses in the standard therapy group (P &lt; 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated and associated with no significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities. The findings of this study indicate that ofloxacin is active against traditional bacterial pathogens as well as the major atypical respiratory pathogens. When given as monotherapy for the empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, ofloxacin is as effective as standard antimicrobial therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/AAC.40.5.1175</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACHAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Antibacterial agents ; Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlamydia pneumoniae ; Haemophilus influenzae ; Medical sciences ; Mycoplasma pneumoniae ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Streptococcus pneumoniae</subject><ispartof>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1996, Vol.40 (5), p.1175-1179</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,4012,27910,27911,27912</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3070395$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PLOUFFE, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERBERT, M. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FILE, T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAIRD, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARSONS, J. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAHN, J. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIELLY-GAUVIN, K. T</creatorcontrib><title>Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization</title><title>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</title><description>Community-acquired pneumonia occurs 3 to 4 million times per year in the United States, accounting for about 500,000 hospitalizations annually. Empiric treatment is usually instituted because of a lack of early organism-specific diagnostic tests. This study compared empiric therapy with ofloxacin to standard antibiotic regimens (usually a beta-lactam with or without a macrolide) for patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Therapy was administered to 298 patients (146 receiving ofloxacin and 152 receiving standard therapy); 227 patients (ofloxacin, 109; standard treatment, 118) were evaluable for treatment efficacy. The most common pyogenic respiratory pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (30 isolates) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24 isolates). There was evidence of infection with either Mycoplasma pneumoniae (38 patients), Chlamydia pneumoniae (40 patients), or a Legionella sp. (8 patients) in a total of 79 patients (35%). The clinical success rates were similar in both groups among evaluable patients (92%, ofloxacin; 87%, standard therapy) and among patients with atypical respiratory pathogens (88%, ofloxacin; 81%, standard therapy). The mean numbers ( plus or minus the standard deviations) of intravenous doses of antibiotics were 7.5 plus or minus 8.0 in the ofloxacin group and 18.4 plus or minus 18.5 in the standard therapy group (P &lt; 0.001); the mean number of oral doses of ofloxacin per patient was 19.7 plus or minus 11.2, compared with 30.2 plus or minus 16.0 oral antibiotic doses in the standard therapy group (P &lt; 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated and associated with no significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities. The findings of this study indicate that ofloxacin is active against traditional bacterial pathogens as well as the major atypical respiratory pathogens. When given as monotherapy for the empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, ofloxacin is as effective as standard antimicrobial therapy.</description><subject>Antibacterial agents</subject><subject>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlamydia pneumoniae</subject><subject>Haemophilus influenzae</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Streptococcus pneumoniae</subject><issn>0066-4804</issn><issn>1098-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotjDtPwzAUhS0EEqUwsntAbCl2bMfOWFW8pEpdYI5unBtqlDip7SDKryeITuf16RByy9mK89w8rNeblWQrNSetzsiCs9JkhSqLc7JgrCgyaZi8JFcxfrI5q5ItyH7XdsM3WOfpF4Y4RRoT-AZCQ9MeA4xHOk8pIKQefaJDS-3Q95N36ZiBPUwuYENHj1M_eAc04F_l_AfdD3F0CTr3A8kN_ppctNBFvDnpkrw_Pb5tXrLt7vl1s95mY85FyjTWrMhljdoKqZpcaCtbY0zNIFfWWNB5UUshsClLjrwVs9fGaJAoAKARS3L__zuG4TBhTFXvosWuA4_DFCuulDZlIWfw7gRCtNC1Abx1sRqD6yEcK8E0E6USv-kXaZo</recordid><startdate>1996</startdate><enddate>1996</enddate><creator>PLOUFFE, J. F</creator><creator>HERBERT, M. T</creator><creator>FILE, T. M</creator><creator>BAIRD, I</creator><creator>PARSONS, J. N</creator><creator>KAHN, J. B</creator><creator>RIELLY-GAUVIN, K. T</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1996</creationdate><title>Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization</title><author>PLOUFFE, J. F ; HERBERT, M. T ; FILE, T. M ; BAIRD, I ; PARSONS, J. N ; KAHN, J. B ; RIELLY-GAUVIN, K. T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p213t-7eb0624be7c345d237c4f888b0a25c8ca726b433ed991e1f34337887a4e3aaad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Antibacterial agents</topic><topic>Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlamydia pneumoniae</topic><topic>Haemophilus influenzae</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mycoplasma pneumoniae</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PLOUFFE, J. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HERBERT, M. T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FILE, T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAIRD, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARSONS, J. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KAHN, J. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIELLY-GAUVIN, K. T</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PLOUFFE, J. F</au><au>HERBERT, M. T</au><au>FILE, T. M</au><au>BAIRD, I</au><au>PARSONS, J. N</au><au>KAHN, J. B</au><au>RIELLY-GAUVIN, K. T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization</atitle><jtitle>Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy</jtitle><date>1996</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1175</spage><epage>1179</epage><pages>1175-1179</pages><issn>0066-4804</issn><eissn>1098-6596</eissn><coden>AACHAX</coden><abstract>Community-acquired pneumonia occurs 3 to 4 million times per year in the United States, accounting for about 500,000 hospitalizations annually. Empiric treatment is usually instituted because of a lack of early organism-specific diagnostic tests. This study compared empiric therapy with ofloxacin to standard antibiotic regimens (usually a beta-lactam with or without a macrolide) for patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia. Therapy was administered to 298 patients (146 receiving ofloxacin and 152 receiving standard therapy); 227 patients (ofloxacin, 109; standard treatment, 118) were evaluable for treatment efficacy. The most common pyogenic respiratory pathogens were Haemophilus influenzae (30 isolates) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (24 isolates). There was evidence of infection with either Mycoplasma pneumoniae (38 patients), Chlamydia pneumoniae (40 patients), or a Legionella sp. (8 patients) in a total of 79 patients (35%). The clinical success rates were similar in both groups among evaluable patients (92%, ofloxacin; 87%, standard therapy) and among patients with atypical respiratory pathogens (88%, ofloxacin; 81%, standard therapy). The mean numbers ( plus or minus the standard deviations) of intravenous doses of antibiotics were 7.5 plus or minus 8.0 in the ofloxacin group and 18.4 plus or minus 18.5 in the standard therapy group (P &lt; 0.001); the mean number of oral doses of ofloxacin per patient was 19.7 plus or minus 11.2, compared with 30.2 plus or minus 16.0 oral antibiotic doses in the standard therapy group (P &lt; 0.001). All treatments were well tolerated and associated with no significant clinical or laboratory abnormalities. The findings of this study indicate that ofloxacin is active against traditional bacterial pathogens as well as the major atypical respiratory pathogens. When given as monotherapy for the empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, ofloxacin is as effective as standard antimicrobial therapy.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><doi>10.1128/AAC.40.5.1175</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0066-4804
ispartof Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1996, Vol.40 (5), p.1175-1179
issn 0066-4804
1098-6596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15578964
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Antibacterial agents
Antibiotics. Antiinfectious agents. Antiparasitic agents
Biological and medical sciences
Chlamydia pneumoniae
Haemophilus influenzae
Medical sciences
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Streptococcus pneumoniae
title Ofloxacin versus standard therapy in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ofloxacin%20versus%20standard%20therapy%20in%20treatment%20of%20community-acquired%20pneumonia%20requiring%20hospitalization&rft.jtitle=Antimicrobial%20agents%20and%20chemotherapy&rft.au=PLOUFFE,%20J.%20F&rft.date=1996&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1175&rft.epage=1179&rft.pages=1175-1179&rft.issn=0066-4804&rft.eissn=1098-6596&rft.coden=AACHAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/AAC.40.5.1175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E15578964%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15578964&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true