Evaluating the immortal strand hypothesis in cancer stem cells: Symmetric/self-renewal as the relevant surrogate marker of tumorigenicity

Stem cells subserve repair functions for the lifetime of the organism but, as a consequence of this responsibility, are candidate cells for accumulating numerous genetic and/or epigenetic aberrations leading to malignant transformation. However, given the importance of this guardian role, stem cells...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biochemical pharmacology 2014-09, Vol.91 (2), p.129-134
Hauptverfasser: Winquist, Raymond J., Hall, Amy B., Eustace, Brenda K., Furey, Brinley F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 2
container_start_page 129
container_title Biochemical pharmacology
container_volume 91
creator Winquist, Raymond J.
Hall, Amy B.
Eustace, Brenda K.
Furey, Brinley F.
description Stem cells subserve repair functions for the lifetime of the organism but, as a consequence of this responsibility, are candidate cells for accumulating numerous genetic and/or epigenetic aberrations leading to malignant transformation. However, given the importance of this guardian role, stem cells likely harbor some process for maintaining their precious genetic code such as non-random segregation of chromatid strands as predicted by the Immortal Strand Hypothesis (ISH). Discerning such non-random chromosomal segregation and asymmetric cell division in normal or cancer stem cells has been complicated by methodological shortcomings but also by differing division kinetics amongst tissues and the likelihood that both asymmetric and symmetric cell divisions, dictated by local extrinsic factors, are operant in these cells. Recent data suggest that cancer stem cells demonstrate a higher incidence of symmetric versus asymmetric cell division with both daughter cells retaining self-renewal characteristics, a profile which may underlie poorly differentiated morphology and marked clonal diversity in tumors. Pathways and targets are beginning to emerge which may provide opportunities for preventing such a predilection in cancer stem cells and that will hopefully translate into new classes of chemotherapeutics in oncology. Thus, although the existence of the ISH remains controversial, the shift of cell division dynamics to symmetric random chromosome segregation/self-renewal, which would negate any likelihood of template strand retention, appears to be a surrogate marker for the presence of highly malignant tumorigenic cell populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.06.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1555628312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006295214003505</els_id><sourcerecordid>1555628312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d3b0d3f073b2b0a6fb9dfa3258e9303746ff4bf6734247c08cd1597eef737b403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS1URKeFB2BTedlN0ms7sRNYoaq0lSqxANaW41xPPc3PYDuD5hF4azxM2yUr_53zXd97CPnIoGTA5NWm7Oy25MCqEmQJoN6QFWuUKHgrmxOyAgCZ9zU_JWcxbg7HRrJ35JRXrWKK1Svy52ZnhsUkP61pekTqx3EOyQw0pmCmnj7ut3O-jz5SP1FrJoshv-FILQ5D_ES_78cRU_D2KuLgioAT_s52E__hAg64M1OicQlhXpuEdDThKTNmR9OSa_k1Tt76tH9P3jozRPzwvJ6Tn19vflzfFQ_fbu-vvzwUVjQyFb3ooBcOlOh4B0a6ru2dEbxusBUgVCWdqzonlah4pSw0tmd1qxCdEqqrQJyTyyN3G-ZfC8akRx8PzZgJ5yVqVte15I1gPEvZUWrDHGNAp7fB5__vNQN9SEBvdE5AHxLQIHVOIHsunvFLN2L_6ngZeRZ8PgowN7nzGHS0HvNcex_QJt3P_j_4vw-umcw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1555628312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the immortal strand hypothesis in cancer stem cells: Symmetric/self-renewal as the relevant surrogate marker of tumorigenicity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Winquist, Raymond J. ; Hall, Amy B. ; Eustace, Brenda K. ; Furey, Brinley F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Winquist, Raymond J. ; Hall, Amy B. ; Eustace, Brenda K. ; Furey, Brinley F.</creatorcontrib><description>Stem cells subserve repair functions for the lifetime of the organism but, as a consequence of this responsibility, are candidate cells for accumulating numerous genetic and/or epigenetic aberrations leading to malignant transformation. However, given the importance of this guardian role, stem cells likely harbor some process for maintaining their precious genetic code such as non-random segregation of chromatid strands as predicted by the Immortal Strand Hypothesis (ISH). Discerning such non-random chromosomal segregation and asymmetric cell division in normal or cancer stem cells has been complicated by methodological shortcomings but also by differing division kinetics amongst tissues and the likelihood that both asymmetric and symmetric cell divisions, dictated by local extrinsic factors, are operant in these cells. Recent data suggest that cancer stem cells demonstrate a higher incidence of symmetric versus asymmetric cell division with both daughter cells retaining self-renewal characteristics, a profile which may underlie poorly differentiated morphology and marked clonal diversity in tumors. Pathways and targets are beginning to emerge which may provide opportunities for preventing such a predilection in cancer stem cells and that will hopefully translate into new classes of chemotherapeutics in oncology. Thus, although the existence of the ISH remains controversial, the shift of cell division dynamics to symmetric random chromosome segregation/self-renewal, which would negate any likelihood of template strand retention, appears to be a surrogate marker for the presence of highly malignant tumorigenic cell populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-2952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2968</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.06.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24971715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Asymmetric cell division ; Biomarkers ; Cancer ; Cancer stem cells ; Carcinogenesis ; Cell Proliferation ; DNA Replication ; Humans ; Immortal Strand Hypothesis ; Neoplastic Stem Cells - physiology ; Symmetric cell division ; Tumorigenicity</subject><ispartof>Biochemical pharmacology, 2014-09, Vol.91 (2), p.129-134</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d3b0d3f073b2b0a6fb9dfa3258e9303746ff4bf6734247c08cd1597eef737b403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d3b0d3f073b2b0a6fb9dfa3258e9303746ff4bf6734247c08cd1597eef737b403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2014.06.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24971715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winquist, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Amy B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Brenda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furey, Brinley F.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the immortal strand hypothesis in cancer stem cells: Symmetric/self-renewal as the relevant surrogate marker of tumorigenicity</title><title>Biochemical pharmacology</title><addtitle>Biochem Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Stem cells subserve repair functions for the lifetime of the organism but, as a consequence of this responsibility, are candidate cells for accumulating numerous genetic and/or epigenetic aberrations leading to malignant transformation. However, given the importance of this guardian role, stem cells likely harbor some process for maintaining their precious genetic code such as non-random segregation of chromatid strands as predicted by the Immortal Strand Hypothesis (ISH). Discerning such non-random chromosomal segregation and asymmetric cell division in normal or cancer stem cells has been complicated by methodological shortcomings but also by differing division kinetics amongst tissues and the likelihood that both asymmetric and symmetric cell divisions, dictated by local extrinsic factors, are operant in these cells. Recent data suggest that cancer stem cells demonstrate a higher incidence of symmetric versus asymmetric cell division with both daughter cells retaining self-renewal characteristics, a profile which may underlie poorly differentiated morphology and marked clonal diversity in tumors. Pathways and targets are beginning to emerge which may provide opportunities for preventing such a predilection in cancer stem cells and that will hopefully translate into new classes of chemotherapeutics in oncology. Thus, although the existence of the ISH remains controversial, the shift of cell division dynamics to symmetric random chromosome segregation/self-renewal, which would negate any likelihood of template strand retention, appears to be a surrogate marker for the presence of highly malignant tumorigenic cell populations.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Asymmetric cell division</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer stem cells</subject><subject>Carcinogenesis</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>DNA Replication</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immortal Strand Hypothesis</subject><subject>Neoplastic Stem Cells - physiology</subject><subject>Symmetric cell division</subject><subject>Tumorigenicity</subject><issn>0006-2952</issn><issn>1873-2968</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS1URKeFB2BTedlN0ms7sRNYoaq0lSqxANaW41xPPc3PYDuD5hF4azxM2yUr_53zXd97CPnIoGTA5NWm7Oy25MCqEmQJoN6QFWuUKHgrmxOyAgCZ9zU_JWcxbg7HRrJ35JRXrWKK1Svy52ZnhsUkP61pekTqx3EOyQw0pmCmnj7ut3O-jz5SP1FrJoshv-FILQ5D_ES_78cRU_D2KuLgioAT_s52E__hAg64M1OicQlhXpuEdDThKTNmR9OSa_k1Tt76tH9P3jozRPzwvJ6Tn19vflzfFQ_fbu-vvzwUVjQyFb3ooBcOlOh4B0a6ru2dEbxusBUgVCWdqzonlah4pSw0tmd1qxCdEqqrQJyTyyN3G-ZfC8akRx8PzZgJ5yVqVte15I1gPEvZUWrDHGNAp7fB5__vNQN9SEBvdE5AHxLQIHVOIHsunvFLN2L_6ngZeRZ8PgowN7nzGHS0HvNcex_QJt3P_j_4vw-umcw</recordid><startdate>20140915</startdate><enddate>20140915</enddate><creator>Winquist, Raymond J.</creator><creator>Hall, Amy B.</creator><creator>Eustace, Brenda K.</creator><creator>Furey, Brinley F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140915</creationdate><title>Evaluating the immortal strand hypothesis in cancer stem cells: Symmetric/self-renewal as the relevant surrogate marker of tumorigenicity</title><author>Winquist, Raymond J. ; Hall, Amy B. ; Eustace, Brenda K. ; Furey, Brinley F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-d3b0d3f073b2b0a6fb9dfa3258e9303746ff4bf6734247c08cd1597eef737b403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Asymmetric cell division</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer stem cells</topic><topic>Carcinogenesis</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>DNA Replication</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immortal Strand Hypothesis</topic><topic>Neoplastic Stem Cells - physiology</topic><topic>Symmetric cell division</topic><topic>Tumorigenicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winquist, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Amy B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eustace, Brenda K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furey, Brinley F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biochemical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winquist, Raymond J.</au><au>Hall, Amy B.</au><au>Eustace, Brenda K.</au><au>Furey, Brinley F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the immortal strand hypothesis in cancer stem cells: Symmetric/self-renewal as the relevant surrogate marker of tumorigenicity</atitle><jtitle>Biochemical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Biochem Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2014-09-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>129-134</pages><issn>0006-2952</issn><eissn>1873-2968</eissn><abstract>Stem cells subserve repair functions for the lifetime of the organism but, as a consequence of this responsibility, are candidate cells for accumulating numerous genetic and/or epigenetic aberrations leading to malignant transformation. However, given the importance of this guardian role, stem cells likely harbor some process for maintaining their precious genetic code such as non-random segregation of chromatid strands as predicted by the Immortal Strand Hypothesis (ISH). Discerning such non-random chromosomal segregation and asymmetric cell division in normal or cancer stem cells has been complicated by methodological shortcomings but also by differing division kinetics amongst tissues and the likelihood that both asymmetric and symmetric cell divisions, dictated by local extrinsic factors, are operant in these cells. Recent data suggest that cancer stem cells demonstrate a higher incidence of symmetric versus asymmetric cell division with both daughter cells retaining self-renewal characteristics, a profile which may underlie poorly differentiated morphology and marked clonal diversity in tumors. Pathways and targets are beginning to emerge which may provide opportunities for preventing such a predilection in cancer stem cells and that will hopefully translate into new classes of chemotherapeutics in oncology. Thus, although the existence of the ISH remains controversial, the shift of cell division dynamics to symmetric random chromosome segregation/self-renewal, which would negate any likelihood of template strand retention, appears to be a surrogate marker for the presence of highly malignant tumorigenic cell populations.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24971715</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bcp.2014.06.007</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-2952
ispartof Biochemical pharmacology, 2014-09, Vol.91 (2), p.129-134
issn 0006-2952
1873-2968
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1555628312
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Asymmetric cell division
Biomarkers
Cancer
Cancer stem cells
Carcinogenesis
Cell Proliferation
DNA Replication
Humans
Immortal Strand Hypothesis
Neoplastic Stem Cells - physiology
Symmetric cell division
Tumorigenicity
title Evaluating the immortal strand hypothesis in cancer stem cells: Symmetric/self-renewal as the relevant surrogate marker of tumorigenicity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A16%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20immortal%20strand%20hypothesis%20in%20cancer%20stem%20cells:%20Symmetric/self-renewal%20as%20the%20relevant%20surrogate%20marker%20of%20tumorigenicity&rft.jtitle=Biochemical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Winquist,%20Raymond%20J.&rft.date=2014-09-15&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=129-134&rft.issn=0006-2952&rft.eissn=1873-2968&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bcp.2014.06.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1555628312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1555628312&rft_id=info:pmid/24971715&rft_els_id=S0006295214003505&rfr_iscdi=true