Cost effectiveness of a benzodiazepine vs a nonbenzodiazepine-based sedation regimen for mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults

Abstract Purpose Nonbenzodiazepine sedation (eg, dexmedetomidine or propofol) may be more cost effective than benzodiazepine (BZ) sedation despite its higher acquisition cost. Materials and methods A cost effectiveness (CE) analysis of noncardiac surgery, critically ill adults requiring at least 1 d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Journal of critical care 2014-10, Vol.29 (5), p.753-757
Hauptverfasser:	Bioc, Justin J., PharmD, Magee, Chelsea, PharmD, Cucchi, James, PharmD, Fraser, Gilles L., PharmD, Dasta, Joseph F., MSc, Edwards, Roger A., DSc, Devlin, John W., PharmD
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Anesthesia Benzodiazepines - administration & dosage Benzodiazepines - economics Clinical Protocols Cost effectiveness Cost estimates Cost-Benefit Analysis Critical Care Critical Illness Delirium Dexmedetomidine Dexmedetomidine - administration & dosage Dexmedetomidine - economics Drug Costs Heart surgery Hospitalization Hospitals Humans Hypnotics and Sedatives - administration & dosage Hypnotics and Sedatives - economics Intensive care unit Intensive Care Units - economics Lorazepam Markov Chains Meta-analysis Midazolam Mortality Patients Propofol Propofol - administration & dosage Propofol - economics Respiration, Artificial - economics Respiration, Artificial - methods Sensitivity and Specificity Studies
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!