Methodologic Standards for Interpreting Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency Medicine: 2014 Update
Clinical decision rules are increasingly prominent in medicine, particularly in emergency care. The quality, use, and impact of current published decision rules widely vary, requiring clinicians to be critical consumers. We present an approach to assist in the appraisal of clinical decision rules an...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of emergency medicine 2014-09, Vol.64 (3), p.286-291 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 291 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 286 |
| container_title | Annals of emergency medicine |
| container_volume | 64 |
| creator | Green, Steven M., MD Schriger, David L., MD, MPH Yealy, Donald M., MD |
| description | Clinical decision rules are increasingly prominent in medicine, particularly in emergency care. The quality, use, and impact of current published decision rules widely vary, requiring clinicians to be critical consumers. We present an approach to assist in the appraisal of clinical decision rules and in judging when to use such rules. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.016 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1555619930</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S019606441400078X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1555619930</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d18d7ed9f494179b3ae844932c6e1a1c9c9d675ebd2a3c63dcc733558595019a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd9qFDEUxoNY7Fr7CjLeeTNrzuTPTLwQZK1aaBGshd6FbHJ2zTqbrMmMsG_TZ-mTmWG3ULwSDuQi3_nz_T5C3gCdAwX5bjM3IeAW03qLbt5Q4HMKpeQzMgOq2lq2kj4nMwpK1lRyfkpe5ryhlCrewAty2nDBKNBuRtw1Dj-ji31ce1vdDCY4k1yuVjFVl2HAtEs4-LCuFr0P3pq--oTWZx9D9X3sMT_c-_BwfzHdgsHuq2t03vqA76vprOp258yAr8jJyvQZz4_vGbn9fPFj8bW--vblcvHxqraCNkPtoHMtOrXiikOrlsxgx7lijZUIBqyyyslW4NI1hlnJnLUtY0J0Qoli1bAz8vYwd5fi7xHzoLc-W-x7EzCOWYMQQoJSjBapOkhtijknXOld8luT9hqoniDrjX4CWU9uNIVSsvS-Pq4Zl9PfY-cj1SJYHARYzP7xmHS2vuApbBLaQbvo_2vNh3-m2GMGv3CPeRPHFApNDTo3muqbKe0pbOAl6La7Y38BLNep8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1555619930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodologic Standards for Interpreting Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency Medicine: 2014 Update</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Green, Steven M., MD ; Schriger, David L., MD, MPH ; Yealy, Donald M., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Green, Steven M., MD ; Schriger, David L., MD, MPH ; Yealy, Donald M., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Clinical decision rules are increasingly prominent in medicine, particularly in emergency care. The quality, use, and impact of current published decision rules widely vary, requiring clinicians to be critical consumers. We present an approach to assist in the appraisal of clinical decision rules and in judging when to use such rules.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24530108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Decision Support Techniques ; Emergency ; Emergency Medical Services - standards ; Emergency Medicine - standards ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 2014-09, Vol.64 (3), p.286-291</ispartof><rights>American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>2014 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d18d7ed9f494179b3ae844932c6e1a1c9c9d675ebd2a3c63dcc733558595019a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d18d7ed9f494179b3ae844932c6e1a1c9c9d675ebd2a3c63dcc733558595019a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24530108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Green, Steven M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriger, David L., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yealy, Donald M., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Methodologic Standards for Interpreting Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency Medicine: 2014 Update</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Clinical decision rules are increasingly prominent in medicine, particularly in emergency care. The quality, use, and impact of current published decision rules widely vary, requiring clinicians to be critical consumers. We present an approach to assist in the appraisal of clinical decision rules and in judging when to use such rules.</description><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd9qFDEUxoNY7Fr7CjLeeTNrzuTPTLwQZK1aaBGshd6FbHJ2zTqbrMmMsG_TZ-mTmWG3ULwSDuQi3_nz_T5C3gCdAwX5bjM3IeAW03qLbt5Q4HMKpeQzMgOq2lq2kj4nMwpK1lRyfkpe5ryhlCrewAty2nDBKNBuRtw1Dj-ji31ce1vdDCY4k1yuVjFVl2HAtEs4-LCuFr0P3pq--oTWZx9D9X3sMT_c-_BwfzHdgsHuq2t03vqA76vprOp258yAr8jJyvQZz4_vGbn9fPFj8bW--vblcvHxqraCNkPtoHMtOrXiikOrlsxgx7lijZUIBqyyyslW4NI1hlnJnLUtY0J0Qoli1bAz8vYwd5fi7xHzoLc-W-x7EzCOWYMQQoJSjBapOkhtijknXOld8luT9hqoniDrjX4CWU9uNIVSsvS-Pq4Zl9PfY-cj1SJYHARYzP7xmHS2vuApbBLaQbvo_2vNh3-m2GMGv3CPeRPHFApNDTo3muqbKe0pbOAl6La7Y38BLNep8A</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Green, Steven M., MD</creator><creator>Schriger, David L., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Yealy, Donald M., MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Methodologic Standards for Interpreting Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency Medicine: 2014 Update</title><author>Green, Steven M., MD ; Schriger, David L., MD, MPH ; Yealy, Donald M., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-d18d7ed9f494179b3ae844932c6e1a1c9c9d675ebd2a3c63dcc733558595019a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Green, Steven M., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schriger, David L., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yealy, Donald M., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Green, Steven M., MD</au><au>Schriger, David L., MD, MPH</au><au>Yealy, Donald M., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodologic Standards for Interpreting Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency Medicine: 2014 Update</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>286-291</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><abstract>Clinical decision rules are increasingly prominent in medicine, particularly in emergency care. The quality, use, and impact of current published decision rules widely vary, requiring clinicians to be critical consumers. We present an approach to assist in the appraisal of clinical decision rules and in judging when to use such rules.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>24530108</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.016</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0196-0644 |
| ispartof | Annals of emergency medicine, 2014-09, Vol.64 (3), p.286-291 |
| issn | 0196-0644 1097-6760 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1555619930 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Cost-Benefit Analysis Decision Support Techniques Emergency Emergency Medical Services - standards Emergency Medicine - standards Evaluation Studies as Topic Humans |
| title | Methodologic Standards for Interpreting Clinical Decision Rules in Emergency Medicine: 2014 Update |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodologic%20Standards%20for%20Interpreting%20Clinical%20Decision%20Rules%C2%A0in%C2%A0Emergency%20Medicine:%202014%20Update&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Green,%20Steven%20M.,%20MD&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=286-291&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1555619930%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1555619930&rft_id=info:pmid/24530108&rft_els_id=S019606441400078X&rfr_iscdi=true |