Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?
Sustainability and sustainable behaviour is of crucial importance in the management of Fennoscandian forests and forest-related industries. This paper reviews a number of voluntary instruments, which aim at promoting or assessing sustainability impacts at different levels. The multitude of available...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2014-01, Vol.6 (1), p.18-49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 49 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Tuomasjukka, Diana Berg, Staffan Lindner, Marcus |
description | Sustainability and sustainable behaviour is of crucial importance in the management of Fennoscandian forests and forest-related industries. This paper reviews a number of voluntary instruments, which aim at promoting or assessing sustainability impacts at different levels. The multitude of available instruments brings confusion in practice, where companies, consumers and investors meet legal and different voluntary regulatory and non-regulatory instruments. The practical suitability and covered sustainability dimension for each instrument is reviewed with an analysis of strengths, weaknesses, actors and purposes for assessing different aspects of sustainability. Each of them is compared against the other in an overview about which sustainability dimensions they cover (workplace, human rights, community, market place, environment, economy). Results highlight covered, overlapping and missing aspects for each approach and how they can support or reinforce each other. Special attention is given to current approaches in impact assessment, particularly on their areas of application (companies, NGOs, products, operations, production practices, etc.), and recommendations for supplementing it with sustainability impact assessment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su6010018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1554948905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3339719831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-7f0d59047d92f86b32caca3723ef27212964baf24a5c61be277564d1e7f2d28d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0c1LwzAUAPAgCo65g_9BwIse6vLRNI0XGcOpMFFwY8eSpsma0SUzaZH993ZORHyX98GPx4MHwCVGt5QKNI5dhjBCOD8BA4I4TjBi6PRPfQ5GMW5QH5RigbMBiC_SybV1a_jexVZaJ0vb2HYPvYEz7ZyPSrrKSgdnPujYRti3cFFrG-Ayalju4Vx-HoZjH-BkHbTeatfeHThc1X777Ve1VTV868LOR31_Ac6MbKIe_eQhWM4eFtOnZP76-DydzBNFCWsTblDFBEp5JYjJs5ISJZWknFBtCCeYiCwtpSGpZCrDpSacsyytsOaGVCSv6BBcH_fugv_o-uOLrY1KN4102nexwIylIs0FYj29-kc3vguuv65XlKdEiBT16uaoVPAxBm2KXbBbGfYFRsXhA8XvB-gX4c53Ew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1537429940</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Tuomasjukka, Diana ; Berg, Staffan ; Lindner, Marcus</creator><creatorcontrib>Tuomasjukka, Diana ; Berg, Staffan ; Lindner, Marcus</creatorcontrib><description>Sustainability and sustainable behaviour is of crucial importance in the management of Fennoscandian forests and forest-related industries. This paper reviews a number of voluntary instruments, which aim at promoting or assessing sustainability impacts at different levels. The multitude of available instruments brings confusion in practice, where companies, consumers and investors meet legal and different voluntary regulatory and non-regulatory instruments. The practical suitability and covered sustainability dimension for each instrument is reviewed with an analysis of strengths, weaknesses, actors and purposes for assessing different aspects of sustainability. Each of them is compared against the other in an overview about which sustainability dimensions they cover (workplace, human rights, community, market place, environment, economy). Results highlight covered, overlapping and missing aspects for each approach and how they can support or reinforce each other. Special attention is given to current approaches in impact assessment, particularly on their areas of application (companies, NGOs, products, operations, production practices, etc.), and recommendations for supplementing it with sustainability impact assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su6010018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2014-01, Vol.6 (1), p.18-49</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-7f0d59047d92f86b32caca3723ef27212964baf24a5c61be277564d1e7f2d28d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-7f0d59047d92f86b32caca3723ef27212964baf24a5c61be277564d1e7f2d28d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0770-003X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,777,781,789,27903,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tuomasjukka, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Staffan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindner, Marcus</creatorcontrib><title>Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Sustainability and sustainable behaviour is of crucial importance in the management of Fennoscandian forests and forest-related industries. This paper reviews a number of voluntary instruments, which aim at promoting or assessing sustainability impacts at different levels. The multitude of available instruments brings confusion in practice, where companies, consumers and investors meet legal and different voluntary regulatory and non-regulatory instruments. The practical suitability and covered sustainability dimension for each instrument is reviewed with an analysis of strengths, weaknesses, actors and purposes for assessing different aspects of sustainability. Each of them is compared against the other in an overview about which sustainability dimensions they cover (workplace, human rights, community, market place, environment, economy). Results highlight covered, overlapping and missing aspects for each approach and how they can support or reinforce each other. Special attention is given to current approaches in impact assessment, particularly on their areas of application (companies, NGOs, products, operations, production practices, etc.), and recommendations for supplementing it with sustainability impact assessment.</description><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0c1LwzAUAPAgCo65g_9BwIse6vLRNI0XGcOpMFFwY8eSpsma0SUzaZH993ZORHyX98GPx4MHwCVGt5QKNI5dhjBCOD8BA4I4TjBi6PRPfQ5GMW5QH5RigbMBiC_SybV1a_jexVZaJ0vb2HYPvYEz7ZyPSrrKSgdnPujYRti3cFFrG-Ayalju4Vx-HoZjH-BkHbTeatfeHThc1X777Ve1VTV868LOR31_Ac6MbKIe_eQhWM4eFtOnZP76-DydzBNFCWsTblDFBEp5JYjJs5ISJZWknFBtCCeYiCwtpSGpZCrDpSacsyytsOaGVCSv6BBcH_fugv_o-uOLrY1KN4102nexwIylIs0FYj29-kc3vguuv65XlKdEiBT16uaoVPAxBm2KXbBbGfYFRsXhA8XvB-gX4c53Ew</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Tuomasjukka, Diana</creator><creator>Berg, Staffan</creator><creator>Lindner, Marcus</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0770-003X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?</title><author>Tuomasjukka, Diana ; Berg, Staffan ; Lindner, Marcus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-7f0d59047d92f86b32caca3723ef27212964baf24a5c61be277564d1e7f2d28d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tuomasjukka, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, Staffan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindner, Marcus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tuomasjukka, Diana</au><au>Berg, Staffan</au><au>Lindner, Marcus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>18-49</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Sustainability and sustainable behaviour is of crucial importance in the management of Fennoscandian forests and forest-related industries. This paper reviews a number of voluntary instruments, which aim at promoting or assessing sustainability impacts at different levels. The multitude of available instruments brings confusion in practice, where companies, consumers and investors meet legal and different voluntary regulatory and non-regulatory instruments. The practical suitability and covered sustainability dimension for each instrument is reviewed with an analysis of strengths, weaknesses, actors and purposes for assessing different aspects of sustainability. Each of them is compared against the other in an overview about which sustainability dimensions they cover (workplace, human rights, community, market place, environment, economy). Results highlight covered, overlapping and missing aspects for each approach and how they can support or reinforce each other. Special attention is given to current approaches in impact assessment, particularly on their areas of application (companies, NGOs, products, operations, production practices, etc.), and recommendations for supplementing it with sustainability impact assessment.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su6010018</doi><tpages>32</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0770-003X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2014-01, Vol.6 (1), p.18-49 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1554948905 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Sustainability |
title | Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T13%3A04%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managing%20Sustainability%20of%20Fennoscandian%20Forests%20and%20Their%20Use%20by%20Law%20and/or%20Agreement:%20For%20Whom%20and%20Which%20Purpose?&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Tuomasjukka,%20Diana&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=18-49&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su6010018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3339719831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1537429940&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |