Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI

To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovaria...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 2014-01, Vol.41 (4), p.384-388
1. Verfasser: Esinler, I
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue 4
container_start_page 384
container_title Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology
container_volume 41
creator Esinler, I
description To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovarian response were enrolled. Group 1 (MF GnRH agonist group) constituted 64 patients (135 cycles) who underwent MF GnRH agonist protocol. Group 2 (flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist group) constituted 48 patients (82 cycles) who underwent flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol. The duration of stimulation (d) (11.5 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.7, p < 0.01) and the total dose of gonadotropin used (IU) (5,892.9 +/- 1,725.7 vs. 4,367.5 +/- 1,582.1, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 2 when compared to Group 1. The numbers of retrieved oocyte-cumulus complexes (4.5 +/- 3.6 vs. 5.9 +/- 4.9, p < 0.05), metaphase II oocytes (3.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 4.9 +/- 4.2, p < 0.05), two pronucleated oocytes (2.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.0 +/- 3.4, p < 0.05), the number of available embryos at day 3 (2.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 3.2, p < 0.05) and the rate of embryos with > or = seven blastomeres and < 10% fragmentation at day 3 (35.9% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. The number of embryos transferred (2.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.9), the clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (16.3% vs. 25.8%), and the implantation rate (8.6% vs. 12.2%) were comparable between groups. Although the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol produced better oocyte and embryo parameters, the clinical pregnancy rate and the implantation rates were comparable between the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist and MF protocols in poor responder patients.
doi_str_mv 10.12891/ceog16572014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1554939916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1554939916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-1a3a6c699f5d4345234629009c4bde5a6022ba54b2f46a5fdcb4295d1b0bdea23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtPwzAQhH0A0VI4ckU-cknxu_URVdBWKkLicY4cZ1OC0jjYDoV_j2kL4rKr2RmNVh9CF5SMKZtqem3BramSE0aoOEJDwjXJlFJ8gE5DeCNEiImiJ2jAJOWCTekQ-fvaele6ALhqjIes7_BHGCcBn3XRQLbpm1jv_Hn7uMCmjWbt2jpE3HkXnXVNwJXzuHNpeAida0tI0sQa2hjw9tXh_ue0TRIvZ0_LM3RcmSbA-WGP0Mvd7fNska0e5svZzSqznLOYUcONskrrSpaCC8m4UEwToq0oSpBGEcYKI0XBKqGMrEpbCKZlSQuSfMP4CF3te9Oj7z2EmG_qYKFpTAuuDzmVUmiuNVUpmu2jiUUIHqq88_XG-K-cknyHNv-PNuUvD9V9sYHyL_3LlX8DeWR4dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554939916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Esinler, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Esinler, I</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovarian response were enrolled. Group 1 (MF GnRH agonist group) constituted 64 patients (135 cycles) who underwent MF GnRH agonist protocol. Group 2 (flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist group) constituted 48 patients (82 cycles) who underwent flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol. The duration of stimulation (d) (11.5 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.7, p < 0.01) and the total dose of gonadotropin used (IU) (5,892.9 +/- 1,725.7 vs. 4,367.5 +/- 1,582.1, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 2 when compared to Group 1. The numbers of retrieved oocyte-cumulus complexes (4.5 +/- 3.6 vs. 5.9 +/- 4.9, p < 0.05), metaphase II oocytes (3.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 4.9 +/- 4.2, p < 0.05), two pronucleated oocytes (2.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.0 +/- 3.4, p < 0.05), the number of available embryos at day 3 (2.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 3.2, p < 0.05) and the rate of embryos with > or = seven blastomeres and < 10% fragmentation at day 3 (35.9% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. The number of embryos transferred (2.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.9), the clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (16.3% vs. 25.8%), and the implantation rate (8.6% vs. 12.2%) were comparable between groups. Although the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol produced better oocyte and embryo parameters, the clinical pregnancy rate and the implantation rates were comparable between the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist and MF protocols in poor responder patients.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0390-6663</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12891/ceog16572014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25134281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada</publisher><subject>Clinical Protocols ; Embryo Implantation ; Female ; Fertility Agents, Female - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; Leuprolide - administration &amp; dosage ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental obstetrics &amp; gynecology, 2014-01, Vol.41 (4), p.384-388</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-1a3a6c699f5d4345234629009c4bde5a6022ba54b2f46a5fdcb4295d1b0bdea23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25134281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Esinler, I</creatorcontrib><title>Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI</title><title>Clinical and experimental obstetrics &amp; gynecology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovarian response were enrolled. Group 1 (MF GnRH agonist group) constituted 64 patients (135 cycles) who underwent MF GnRH agonist protocol. Group 2 (flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist group) constituted 48 patients (82 cycles) who underwent flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol. The duration of stimulation (d) (11.5 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.7, p < 0.01) and the total dose of gonadotropin used (IU) (5,892.9 +/- 1,725.7 vs. 4,367.5 +/- 1,582.1, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 2 when compared to Group 1. The numbers of retrieved oocyte-cumulus complexes (4.5 +/- 3.6 vs. 5.9 +/- 4.9, p < 0.05), metaphase II oocytes (3.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 4.9 +/- 4.2, p < 0.05), two pronucleated oocytes (2.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.0 +/- 3.4, p < 0.05), the number of available embryos at day 3 (2.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 3.2, p < 0.05) and the rate of embryos with > or = seven blastomeres and < 10% fragmentation at day 3 (35.9% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. The number of embryos transferred (2.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.9), the clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (16.3% vs. 25.8%), and the implantation rate (8.6% vs. 12.2%) were comparable between groups. Although the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol produced better oocyte and embryo parameters, the clinical pregnancy rate and the implantation rates were comparable between the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist and MF protocols in poor responder patients.]]></description><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility Agents, Female - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leuprolide - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><issn>0390-6663</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtPwzAQhH0A0VI4ckU-cknxu_URVdBWKkLicY4cZ1OC0jjYDoV_j2kL4rKr2RmNVh9CF5SMKZtqem3BramSE0aoOEJDwjXJlFJ8gE5DeCNEiImiJ2jAJOWCTekQ-fvaele6ALhqjIes7_BHGCcBn3XRQLbpm1jv_Hn7uMCmjWbt2jpE3HkXnXVNwJXzuHNpeAida0tI0sQa2hjw9tXh_ue0TRIvZ0_LM3RcmSbA-WGP0Mvd7fNska0e5svZzSqznLOYUcONskrrSpaCC8m4UEwToq0oSpBGEcYKI0XBKqGMrEpbCKZlSQuSfMP4CF3te9Oj7z2EmG_qYKFpTAuuDzmVUmiuNVUpmu2jiUUIHqq88_XG-K-cknyHNv-PNuUvD9V9sYHyL_3LlX8DeWR4dg</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Esinler, I</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI</title><author>Esinler, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-1a3a6c699f5d4345234629009c4bde5a6022ba54b2f46a5fdcb4295d1b0bdea23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility Agents, Female - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leuprolide - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Esinler, I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Esinler, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>384</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>384-388</pages><issn>0390-6663</issn><abstract><![CDATA[To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovarian response were enrolled. Group 1 (MF GnRH agonist group) constituted 64 patients (135 cycles) who underwent MF GnRH agonist protocol. Group 2 (flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist group) constituted 48 patients (82 cycles) who underwent flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol. The duration of stimulation (d) (11.5 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.7, p < 0.01) and the total dose of gonadotropin used (IU) (5,892.9 +/- 1,725.7 vs. 4,367.5 +/- 1,582.1, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 2 when compared to Group 1. The numbers of retrieved oocyte-cumulus complexes (4.5 +/- 3.6 vs. 5.9 +/- 4.9, p < 0.05), metaphase II oocytes (3.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 4.9 +/- 4.2, p < 0.05), two pronucleated oocytes (2.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.0 +/- 3.4, p < 0.05), the number of available embryos at day 3 (2.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 3.2, p < 0.05) and the rate of embryos with > or = seven blastomeres and < 10% fragmentation at day 3 (35.9% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. The number of embryos transferred (2.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.9), the clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (16.3% vs. 25.8%), and the implantation rate (8.6% vs. 12.2%) were comparable between groups. Although the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol produced better oocyte and embryo parameters, the clinical pregnancy rate and the implantation rates were comparable between the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist and MF protocols in poor responder patients.]]></abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pmid>25134281</pmid><doi>10.12891/ceog16572014</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0390-6663
ispartof Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology, 2014-01, Vol.41 (4), p.384-388
issn 0390-6663
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1554939916
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Clinical Protocols
Embryo Implantation
Female
Fertility Agents, Female - administration & dosage
Humans
Leuprolide - administration & dosage
Ovulation Induction - methods
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
title Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A02%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microdose%20flare-up%20vs.%20flexible-multidose%20GnRH%20antagonist%20protocols%20for%20poor%20responder%20patients%20who%20underwent%20ICSI&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Esinler,%20I&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=384&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=384-388&rft.issn=0390-6663&rft_id=info:doi/10.12891/ceog16572014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1554939916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554939916&rft_id=info:pmid/25134281&rfr_iscdi=true