Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI
To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovaria...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology 2014-01, Vol.41 (4), p.384-388 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 388 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 384 |
container_title | Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Esinler, I |
description | To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovarian response were enrolled. Group 1 (MF GnRH agonist group) constituted 64 patients (135 cycles) who underwent MF GnRH agonist protocol. Group 2 (flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist group) constituted 48 patients (82 cycles) who underwent flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol.
The duration of stimulation (d) (11.5 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.7, p < 0.01) and the total dose of gonadotropin used (IU) (5,892.9 +/- 1,725.7 vs. 4,367.5 +/- 1,582.1, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 2 when compared to Group 1. The numbers of retrieved oocyte-cumulus complexes (4.5 +/- 3.6 vs. 5.9 +/- 4.9, p < 0.05), metaphase II oocytes (3.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 4.9 +/- 4.2, p < 0.05), two pronucleated oocytes (2.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.0 +/- 3.4, p < 0.05), the number of available embryos at day 3 (2.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 3.2, p < 0.05) and the rate of embryos with > or = seven blastomeres and < 10% fragmentation at day 3 (35.9% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. The number of embryos transferred (2.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.9), the clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (16.3% vs. 25.8%), and the implantation rate (8.6% vs. 12.2%) were comparable between groups.
Although the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol produced better oocyte and embryo parameters, the clinical pregnancy rate and the implantation rates were comparable between the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist and MF protocols in poor responder patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.12891/ceog16572014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1554939916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1554939916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-1a3a6c699f5d4345234629009c4bde5a6022ba54b2f46a5fdcb4295d1b0bdea23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEtPwzAQhH0A0VI4ckU-cknxu_URVdBWKkLicY4cZ1OC0jjYDoV_j2kL4rKr2RmNVh9CF5SMKZtqem3BramSE0aoOEJDwjXJlFJ8gE5DeCNEiImiJ2jAJOWCTekQ-fvaele6ALhqjIes7_BHGCcBn3XRQLbpm1jv_Hn7uMCmjWbt2jpE3HkXnXVNwJXzuHNpeAida0tI0sQa2hjw9tXh_ue0TRIvZ0_LM3RcmSbA-WGP0Mvd7fNska0e5svZzSqznLOYUcONskrrSpaCC8m4UEwToq0oSpBGEcYKI0XBKqGMrEpbCKZlSQuSfMP4CF3te9Oj7z2EmG_qYKFpTAuuDzmVUmiuNVUpmu2jiUUIHqq88_XG-K-cknyHNv-PNuUvD9V9sYHyL_3LlX8DeWR4dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554939916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Esinler, I</creator><creatorcontrib>Esinler, I</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovarian response were enrolled. Group 1 (MF GnRH agonist group) constituted 64 patients (135 cycles) who underwent MF GnRH agonist protocol. Group 2 (flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist group) constituted 48 patients (82 cycles) who underwent flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol.
The duration of stimulation (d) (11.5 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.7, p < 0.01) and the total dose of gonadotropin used (IU) (5,892.9 +/- 1,725.7 vs. 4,367.5 +/- 1,582.1, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 2 when compared to Group 1. The numbers of retrieved oocyte-cumulus complexes (4.5 +/- 3.6 vs. 5.9 +/- 4.9, p < 0.05), metaphase II oocytes (3.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 4.9 +/- 4.2, p < 0.05), two pronucleated oocytes (2.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.0 +/- 3.4, p < 0.05), the number of available embryos at day 3 (2.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 3.2, p < 0.05) and the rate of embryos with > or = seven blastomeres and < 10% fragmentation at day 3 (35.9% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. The number of embryos transferred (2.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.9), the clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (16.3% vs. 25.8%), and the implantation rate (8.6% vs. 12.2%) were comparable between groups.
Although the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol produced better oocyte and embryo parameters, the clinical pregnancy rate and the implantation rates were comparable between the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist and MF protocols in poor responder patients.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0390-6663</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12891/ceog16572014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25134281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada</publisher><subject>Clinical Protocols ; Embryo Implantation ; Female ; Fertility Agents, Female - administration & dosage ; Humans ; Leuprolide - administration & dosage ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology, 2014-01, Vol.41 (4), p.384-388</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-1a3a6c699f5d4345234629009c4bde5a6022ba54b2f46a5fdcb4295d1b0bdea23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25134281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Esinler, I</creatorcontrib><title>Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI</title><title>Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description><![CDATA[To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovarian response were enrolled. Group 1 (MF GnRH agonist group) constituted 64 patients (135 cycles) who underwent MF GnRH agonist protocol. Group 2 (flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist group) constituted 48 patients (82 cycles) who underwent flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol.
The duration of stimulation (d) (11.5 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.7, p < 0.01) and the total dose of gonadotropin used (IU) (5,892.9 +/- 1,725.7 vs. 4,367.5 +/- 1,582.1, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 2 when compared to Group 1. The numbers of retrieved oocyte-cumulus complexes (4.5 +/- 3.6 vs. 5.9 +/- 4.9, p < 0.05), metaphase II oocytes (3.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 4.9 +/- 4.2, p < 0.05), two pronucleated oocytes (2.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.0 +/- 3.4, p < 0.05), the number of available embryos at day 3 (2.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 3.2, p < 0.05) and the rate of embryos with > or = seven blastomeres and < 10% fragmentation at day 3 (35.9% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. The number of embryos transferred (2.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.9), the clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (16.3% vs. 25.8%), and the implantation rate (8.6% vs. 12.2%) were comparable between groups.
Although the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol produced better oocyte and embryo parameters, the clinical pregnancy rate and the implantation rates were comparable between the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist and MF protocols in poor responder patients.]]></description><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility Agents, Female - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leuprolide - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</subject><issn>0390-6663</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkEtPwzAQhH0A0VI4ckU-cknxu_URVdBWKkLicY4cZ1OC0jjYDoV_j2kL4rKr2RmNVh9CF5SMKZtqem3BramSE0aoOEJDwjXJlFJ8gE5DeCNEiImiJ2jAJOWCTekQ-fvaele6ALhqjIes7_BHGCcBn3XRQLbpm1jv_Hn7uMCmjWbt2jpE3HkXnXVNwJXzuHNpeAida0tI0sQa2hjw9tXh_ue0TRIvZ0_LM3RcmSbA-WGP0Mvd7fNska0e5svZzSqznLOYUcONskrrSpaCC8m4UEwToq0oSpBGEcYKI0XBKqGMrEpbCKZlSQuSfMP4CF3te9Oj7z2EmG_qYKFpTAuuDzmVUmiuNVUpmu2jiUUIHqq88_XG-K-cknyHNv-PNuUvD9V9sYHyL_3LlX8DeWR4dg</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Esinler, I</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI</title><author>Esinler, I</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-1a3a6c699f5d4345234629009c4bde5a6022ba54b2f46a5fdcb4295d1b0bdea23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility Agents, Female - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leuprolide - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Esinler, I</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Esinler, I</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>384</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>384-388</pages><issn>0390-6663</issn><abstract><![CDATA[To compare the performance of microdose flare-up (MF) and flexible-multidose gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocols in poor responder patients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
One hundred and 12 consecutive patients (217 cycles) suspected to have poor ovarian response were enrolled. Group 1 (MF GnRH agonist group) constituted 64 patients (135 cycles) who underwent MF GnRH agonist protocol. Group 2 (flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist group) constituted 48 patients (82 cycles) who underwent flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol.
The duration of stimulation (d) (11.5 +/- 2.1 vs. 10.4 +/- 2.7, p < 0.01) and the total dose of gonadotropin used (IU) (5,892.9 +/- 1,725.7 vs. 4,367.5 +/- 1,582.1, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 2 when compared to Group 1. The numbers of retrieved oocyte-cumulus complexes (4.5 +/- 3.6 vs. 5.9 +/- 4.9, p < 0.05), metaphase II oocytes (3.6 +/- 3.1 vs. 4.9 +/- 4.2, p < 0.05), two pronucleated oocytes (2.6 +/- 2.3 vs. 4.0 +/- 3.4, p < 0.05), the number of available embryos at day 3 (2.6 +/- 2.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 3.2, p < 0.05) and the rate of embryos with > or = seven blastomeres and < 10% fragmentation at day 3 (35.9% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.05) were significantly lower in Group 1 when compared to Group 2. The number of embryos transferred (2.2 +/- 1.3 vs. 2.4 +/- 0.9), the clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (16.3% vs. 25.8%), and the implantation rate (8.6% vs. 12.2%) were comparable between groups.
Although the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocol produced better oocyte and embryo parameters, the clinical pregnancy rate and the implantation rates were comparable between the flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist and MF protocols in poor responder patients.]]></abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pmid>25134281</pmid><doi>10.12891/ceog16572014</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0390-6663 |
ispartof | Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology, 2014-01, Vol.41 (4), p.384-388 |
issn | 0390-6663 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1554939916 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Clinical Protocols Embryo Implantation Female Fertility Agents, Female - administration & dosage Humans Leuprolide - administration & dosage Ovulation Induction - methods Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic |
title | Microdose flare-up vs. flexible-multidose GnRH antagonist protocols for poor responder patients who underwent ICSI |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A02%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microdose%20flare-up%20vs.%20flexible-multidose%20GnRH%20antagonist%20protocols%20for%20poor%20responder%20patients%20who%20underwent%20ICSI&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Esinler,%20I&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=384&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=384-388&rft.issn=0390-6663&rft_id=info:doi/10.12891/ceog16572014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1554939916%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554939916&rft_id=info:pmid/25134281&rfr_iscdi=true |