Quantitative analysis of exhaled carbonyl compounds distinguishes benign from malignant pulmonary disease

Objectives The analysis of exhaled breath is a promising noninvasive tool for the diagnosis of lung cancer, but its clinical relevance has yet to be established. We report the analysis of exhaled volatile carbonyl compounds for the identification of specific carbonyl cancer markers to differentiate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 2014-09, Vol.148 (3), p.1074-1081
Hauptverfasser: Bousamra, Michael, MD, Schumer, Erin, MS, MD, Li, Mingxiao, PhD, Knipp, Ralph J., MS, Nantz, Michael H., PhD, van Berkel, Victor, MD, PhD, Fu, Xiao-An, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1081
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1074
container_title The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
container_volume 148
creator Bousamra, Michael, MD
Schumer, Erin, MS, MD
Li, Mingxiao, PhD
Knipp, Ralph J., MS
Nantz, Michael H., PhD
van Berkel, Victor, MD, PhD
Fu, Xiao-An, PhD
description Objectives The analysis of exhaled breath is a promising noninvasive tool for the diagnosis of lung cancer, but its clinical relevance has yet to be established. We report the analysis of exhaled volatile carbonyl compounds for the identification of specific carbonyl cancer markers to differentiate benign pulmonary disease from early-stage lung cancer and to compare its diagnostic accuracy with positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Methods Aminooxy-coated silicon microchips were used for the selective capture of exhaled carbonyls by an oximation reaction. Breath samples were collected then directed through the silicon chips by applying a vacuum. Carbonyl adducts were analyzed by Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Eighty-eight control subjects, 107 patients with lung cancer (64 stage 0, I, or II), 40 patients with benign pulmonary disease, and 7 patients with a solitary pulmonary metastasis participated. Analysis of cancer markers was performed blinded to the pathologic results. Results Four carbonyls were defined as cancer markers with significantly higher concentrations in patients with lung cancer. The number of increased cancer markers distinguished benign disease from both early and stage III and IV lung cancer. For early-stage disease, defining greater than 2 increased markers as diagnostic of lung cancer resulted in 83% sensitivity and 74% specificity. PET scans for this same cohort resulted in 90% sensitivity but only 39% specificity. Markers normalized for 3 of the 4 markers after resection of the lung cancer. Conclusions Analysis of specific exhaled carbonyls can differentiate early lung cancer from benign pulmonary disease. Breath analysis was more specific than PET for a lung cancer diagnosis. Judicious use of these data may expedite the care of patients with lung cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1554475107</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0022522314007351</els_id><sourcerecordid>1554475107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-497656117fc62831f7378a65fe0f85fae210f54f0432fc8f9eac62aae89905013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMoznX0FwiSpZvWk7Rpm4WCDH7BgIgK7kJuejKTmibXpL14_72pd3ThxtU5i-c9H-9LyFMGNQPWvZjqaTHHXHNgbQ1dDdDdIzsGsq-6QXy7T3YAnFeC8-aCPMp5AoAemHxILrhgXAopd8R9WnVY3KIXd0Sqg_an7DKNluLPW-1xpEanfQwnT02cD3ENY6ajy4sLN6vLt5jpHoO7CdSmONNZ-9KXifSw-jkGnU4bjTrjY_LAap_xyV29JF_fvvly9b66_vjuw9Xr68q0Qi5VK_tOdIz11nR8aJjtm37QnbAIdhBWI2dgRWuhbbg1g5WoC6g1DlKCANZckufnuYcUf6yYFzW7bNB7HTCuWTEh2rYXDPqCNmfUpJhzQqsOyc3lZsVAbR6rSf32WG0eK-hU8biont0tWPczjn81f0wtwMszgOXNo8OksnEYDI4uoVnUGN1_Frz6R2-8C85o_x1PmKe4ppJT-URlrkB93mLeUmZtCbgRrPkF4jelaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1554475107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative analysis of exhaled carbonyl compounds distinguishes benign from malignant pulmonary disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Bousamra, Michael, MD ; Schumer, Erin, MS, MD ; Li, Mingxiao, PhD ; Knipp, Ralph J., MS ; Nantz, Michael H., PhD ; van Berkel, Victor, MD, PhD ; Fu, Xiao-An, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Bousamra, Michael, MD ; Schumer, Erin, MS, MD ; Li, Mingxiao, PhD ; Knipp, Ralph J., MS ; Nantz, Michael H., PhD ; van Berkel, Victor, MD, PhD ; Fu, Xiao-An, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The analysis of exhaled breath is a promising noninvasive tool for the diagnosis of lung cancer, but its clinical relevance has yet to be established. We report the analysis of exhaled volatile carbonyl compounds for the identification of specific carbonyl cancer markers to differentiate benign pulmonary disease from early-stage lung cancer and to compare its diagnostic accuracy with positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Methods Aminooxy-coated silicon microchips were used for the selective capture of exhaled carbonyls by an oximation reaction. Breath samples were collected then directed through the silicon chips by applying a vacuum. Carbonyl adducts were analyzed by Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Eighty-eight control subjects, 107 patients with lung cancer (64 stage 0, I, or II), 40 patients with benign pulmonary disease, and 7 patients with a solitary pulmonary metastasis participated. Analysis of cancer markers was performed blinded to the pathologic results. Results Four carbonyls were defined as cancer markers with significantly higher concentrations in patients with lung cancer. The number of increased cancer markers distinguished benign disease from both early and stage III and IV lung cancer. For early-stage disease, defining greater than 2 increased markers as diagnostic of lung cancer resulted in 83% sensitivity and 74% specificity. PET scans for this same cohort resulted in 90% sensitivity but only 39% specificity. Markers normalized for 3 of the 4 markers after resection of the lung cancer. Conclusions Analysis of specific exhaled carbonyls can differentiate early lung cancer from benign pulmonary disease. Breath analysis was more specific than PET for a lung cancer diagnosis. Judicious use of these data may expedite the care of patients with lung cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-685X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25129599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Breath Tests ; Cardiothoracic Surgery ; Case-Control Studies ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Exhalation ; Fourier Analysis ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Neoplasms - metabolism ; Lung Neoplasms - secondary ; Mass Spectrometry ; Microchip Analytical Procedures ; Middle Aged ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnosis ; Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging ; Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - metabolism ; Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - pathology ; Volatile Organic Compounds - metabolism</subject><ispartof>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2014-09, Vol.148 (3), p.1074-1081</ispartof><rights>The American Association for Thoracic Surgery</rights><rights>2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-497656117fc62831f7378a65fe0f85fae210f54f0432fc8f9eac62aae89905013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-497656117fc62831f7378a65fe0f85fae210f54f0432fc8f9eac62aae89905013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25129599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bousamra, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumer, Erin, MS, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Mingxiao, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knipp, Ralph J., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nantz, Michael H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Berkel, Victor, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Xiao-An, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative analysis of exhaled carbonyl compounds distinguishes benign from malignant pulmonary disease</title><title>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</title><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Objectives The analysis of exhaled breath is a promising noninvasive tool for the diagnosis of lung cancer, but its clinical relevance has yet to be established. We report the analysis of exhaled volatile carbonyl compounds for the identification of specific carbonyl cancer markers to differentiate benign pulmonary disease from early-stage lung cancer and to compare its diagnostic accuracy with positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Methods Aminooxy-coated silicon microchips were used for the selective capture of exhaled carbonyls by an oximation reaction. Breath samples were collected then directed through the silicon chips by applying a vacuum. Carbonyl adducts were analyzed by Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Eighty-eight control subjects, 107 patients with lung cancer (64 stage 0, I, or II), 40 patients with benign pulmonary disease, and 7 patients with a solitary pulmonary metastasis participated. Analysis of cancer markers was performed blinded to the pathologic results. Results Four carbonyls were defined as cancer markers with significantly higher concentrations in patients with lung cancer. The number of increased cancer markers distinguished benign disease from both early and stage III and IV lung cancer. For early-stage disease, defining greater than 2 increased markers as diagnostic of lung cancer resulted in 83% sensitivity and 74% specificity. PET scans for this same cohort resulted in 90% sensitivity but only 39% specificity. Markers normalized for 3 of the 4 markers after resection of the lung cancer. Conclusions Analysis of specific exhaled carbonyls can differentiate early lung cancer from benign pulmonary disease. Breath analysis was more specific than PET for a lung cancer diagnosis. Judicious use of these data may expedite the care of patients with lung cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Breath Tests</subject><subject>Cardiothoracic Surgery</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Exhalation</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Microchip Analytical Procedures</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnosis</subject><subject>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - metabolism</subject><subject>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - pathology</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - metabolism</subject><issn>0022-5223</issn><issn>1097-685X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAUhoMoznX0FwiSpZvWk7Rpm4WCDH7BgIgK7kJuejKTmibXpL14_72pd3ThxtU5i-c9H-9LyFMGNQPWvZjqaTHHXHNgbQ1dDdDdIzsGsq-6QXy7T3YAnFeC8-aCPMp5AoAemHxILrhgXAopd8R9WnVY3KIXd0Sqg_an7DKNluLPW-1xpEanfQwnT02cD3ENY6ajy4sLN6vLt5jpHoO7CdSmONNZ-9KXifSw-jkGnU4bjTrjY_LAap_xyV29JF_fvvly9b66_vjuw9Xr68q0Qi5VK_tOdIz11nR8aJjtm37QnbAIdhBWI2dgRWuhbbg1g5WoC6g1DlKCANZckufnuYcUf6yYFzW7bNB7HTCuWTEh2rYXDPqCNmfUpJhzQqsOyc3lZsVAbR6rSf32WG0eK-hU8biont0tWPczjn81f0wtwMszgOXNo8OksnEYDI4uoVnUGN1_Frz6R2-8C85o_x1PmKe4ppJT-URlrkB93mLeUmZtCbgRrPkF4jelaA</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Bousamra, Michael, MD</creator><creator>Schumer, Erin, MS, MD</creator><creator>Li, Mingxiao, PhD</creator><creator>Knipp, Ralph J., MS</creator><creator>Nantz, Michael H., PhD</creator><creator>van Berkel, Victor, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Fu, Xiao-An, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>Quantitative analysis of exhaled carbonyl compounds distinguishes benign from malignant pulmonary disease</title><author>Bousamra, Michael, MD ; Schumer, Erin, MS, MD ; Li, Mingxiao, PhD ; Knipp, Ralph J., MS ; Nantz, Michael H., PhD ; van Berkel, Victor, MD, PhD ; Fu, Xiao-An, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-497656117fc62831f7378a65fe0f85fae210f54f0432fc8f9eac62aae89905013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Breath Tests</topic><topic>Cardiothoracic Surgery</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Exhalation</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Microchip Analytical Procedures</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnosis</topic><topic>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - metabolism</topic><topic>Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - pathology</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bousamra, Michael, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schumer, Erin, MS, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Mingxiao, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knipp, Ralph J., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nantz, Michael H., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Berkel, Victor, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Xiao-An, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bousamra, Michael, MD</au><au>Schumer, Erin, MS, MD</au><au>Li, Mingxiao, PhD</au><au>Knipp, Ralph J., MS</au><au>Nantz, Michael H., PhD</au><au>van Berkel, Victor, MD, PhD</au><au>Fu, Xiao-An, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative analysis of exhaled carbonyl compounds distinguishes benign from malignant pulmonary disease</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>148</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1074</spage><epage>1081</epage><pages>1074-1081</pages><issn>0022-5223</issn><eissn>1097-685X</eissn><abstract>Objectives The analysis of exhaled breath is a promising noninvasive tool for the diagnosis of lung cancer, but its clinical relevance has yet to be established. We report the analysis of exhaled volatile carbonyl compounds for the identification of specific carbonyl cancer markers to differentiate benign pulmonary disease from early-stage lung cancer and to compare its diagnostic accuracy with positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Methods Aminooxy-coated silicon microchips were used for the selective capture of exhaled carbonyls by an oximation reaction. Breath samples were collected then directed through the silicon chips by applying a vacuum. Carbonyl adducts were analyzed by Fourier transform mass spectrometry. Eighty-eight control subjects, 107 patients with lung cancer (64 stage 0, I, or II), 40 patients with benign pulmonary disease, and 7 patients with a solitary pulmonary metastasis participated. Analysis of cancer markers was performed blinded to the pathologic results. Results Four carbonyls were defined as cancer markers with significantly higher concentrations in patients with lung cancer. The number of increased cancer markers distinguished benign disease from both early and stage III and IV lung cancer. For early-stage disease, defining greater than 2 increased markers as diagnostic of lung cancer resulted in 83% sensitivity and 74% specificity. PET scans for this same cohort resulted in 90% sensitivity but only 39% specificity. Markers normalized for 3 of the 4 markers after resection of the lung cancer. Conclusions Analysis of specific exhaled carbonyls can differentiate early lung cancer from benign pulmonary disease. Breath analysis was more specific than PET for a lung cancer diagnosis. Judicious use of these data may expedite the care of patients with lung cancer.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>25129599</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5223
ispartof The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2014-09, Vol.148 (3), p.1074-1081
issn 0022-5223
1097-685X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1554475107
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism
Breath Tests
Cardiothoracic Surgery
Case-Control Studies
Diagnosis, Differential
Exhalation
Fourier Analysis
Humans
Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Lung Neoplasms - metabolism
Lung Neoplasms - secondary
Mass Spectrometry
Microchip Analytical Procedures
Middle Aged
Positron-Emission Tomography
Predictive Value of Tests
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnosis
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - diagnostic imaging
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - metabolism
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - pathology
Volatile Organic Compounds - metabolism
title Quantitative analysis of exhaled carbonyl compounds distinguishes benign from malignant pulmonary disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A44%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20analysis%20of%20exhaled%20carbonyl%20compounds%20distinguishes%20benign%20from%20malignant%20pulmonary%20disease&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20thoracic%20and%20cardiovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Bousamra,%20Michael,%20MD&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=148&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1074&rft.epage=1081&rft.pages=1074-1081&rft.issn=0022-5223&rft.eissn=1097-685X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.06.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1554475107%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1554475107&rft_id=info:pmid/25129599&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0022522314007351&rfr_iscdi=true