Surgical outcomes in cystic vestibular schwannoma versus solid vestibular schwannoma

To review the postoperative surgical outcomes of cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs), especially facial nerve outcomes, and compare these results with those from matched solid vestibular schwannomas (SVS) resected during the same period at a tertiary referral center. Retrospective case series. One...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otology & neurotology 2014-08, Vol.35 (7), p.1266-1270
Hauptverfasser: Tang, Ing Ping, Freeman, Simon R, Rutherford, Scott A, King, Andrew T, Ramsden, Richard T, Lloyd, Simon K W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1270
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1266
container_title Otology & neurotology
container_volume 35
creator Tang, Ing Ping
Freeman, Simon R
Rutherford, Scott A
King, Andrew T
Ramsden, Richard T
Lloyd, Simon K W
description To review the postoperative surgical outcomes of cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs), especially facial nerve outcomes, and compare these results with those from matched solid vestibular schwannomas (SVS) resected during the same period at a tertiary referral center. Retrospective case series. One hundred thirty-one surgically managed patients with cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs) were age, sex, and tumor size matched to 131 surgically managed patients with solid vestibular schwannomas (SVSs). Demographics, tumor morphology, surgical approach, extent of resection, facial and nonfacial complications, and recurrence rates were compared between the 2 groups. Subtotal removal was defined as removal of at least 95% of the tumor. The mean maximal tumor diameter was 2.8 cm for both groups. For CVS, gross total tumor resection (GTR) was achieved in 92 patients (70.2%), and subtotal tumor resection (STR) was achieved in 39 patients (29.8%). Postoperative facial nerve outcomes at 1-year follow-up were good (HB Grade I-III) in 116 (88.5%) of 131 CVS patients. Twenty-three patients developed nonfacial nerve-related complications (17.6%). For SVS, GTR was achieved in 102 patients (77.9%), and STR was achieved in 29 patients (22.1%). Postoperative facial nerve outcomes at 1-year follow-up were good (HB Grade I-III) in 118 (90.1%) of 131 SVS patients. Nonfacial nerve related complications occurred in 14 patients (10.7%). None of the differences in outcome between the 2 groups were statistically significant. The difference in surgical outcomes is minimal between patients with CVS and those with SVS, not reaching statistical significance. We think, with judicious surgical management, similar outcomes can be achieved in cystic tumors and solid tumors.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000435
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1553319517</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1553319517</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f422a726a964084c95d1b18cd02d857d6894a6d8491364eba142d961c4767ce33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtKAzEUhoMotlbfQGSWbqbm5DpZlmJVqHRhXYdMkurIXGrSKH17R1tFxLP5D4f_3D6EzgGPASt5dT9ZjPHvYJQfoCFwKnPGMT_8yiGXQNQAncT4gjFIyuUxGhBWMFAED9HyIYWnypo669LGdo2PWdVmdhs3lc3efC9lqk3Ion1-N23bNaavhphiFru6cv9bTtHRytTRn-11hB5n18vpbT5f3NxNJ_PcUik3-YoRYiQRRgmGC2YVd1BCYR0mruDSiUIxI1zBFFDBfGmAEacEWCaFtJ7SEbrczV2H7jX1l-imitbXtWl9l6IGzikFxfu3R4jtrDZ0MQa_0utQNSZsNWD9yVP3PPVfnn3bxX5DKhvvfpq-AdIPLuRw3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1553319517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical outcomes in cystic vestibular schwannoma versus solid vestibular schwannoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Tang, Ing Ping ; Freeman, Simon R ; Rutherford, Scott A ; King, Andrew T ; Ramsden, Richard T ; Lloyd, Simon K W</creator><creatorcontrib>Tang, Ing Ping ; Freeman, Simon R ; Rutherford, Scott A ; King, Andrew T ; Ramsden, Richard T ; Lloyd, Simon K W</creatorcontrib><description>To review the postoperative surgical outcomes of cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs), especially facial nerve outcomes, and compare these results with those from matched solid vestibular schwannomas (SVS) resected during the same period at a tertiary referral center. Retrospective case series. One hundred thirty-one surgically managed patients with cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs) were age, sex, and tumor size matched to 131 surgically managed patients with solid vestibular schwannomas (SVSs). Demographics, tumor morphology, surgical approach, extent of resection, facial and nonfacial complications, and recurrence rates were compared between the 2 groups. Subtotal removal was defined as removal of at least 95% of the tumor. The mean maximal tumor diameter was 2.8 cm for both groups. For CVS, gross total tumor resection (GTR) was achieved in 92 patients (70.2%), and subtotal tumor resection (STR) was achieved in 39 patients (29.8%). Postoperative facial nerve outcomes at 1-year follow-up were good (HB Grade I-III) in 116 (88.5%) of 131 CVS patients. Twenty-three patients developed nonfacial nerve-related complications (17.6%). For SVS, GTR was achieved in 102 patients (77.9%), and STR was achieved in 29 patients (22.1%). Postoperative facial nerve outcomes at 1-year follow-up were good (HB Grade I-III) in 118 (90.1%) of 131 SVS patients. Nonfacial nerve related complications occurred in 14 patients (10.7%). None of the differences in outcome between the 2 groups were statistically significant. The difference in surgical outcomes is minimal between patients with CVS and those with SVS, not reaching statistical significance. We think, with judicious surgical management, similar outcomes can be achieved in cystic tumors and solid tumors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1531-7129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-4505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24841920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Facial Nerve Injuries - etiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neuroma, Acoustic - pathology ; Neuroma, Acoustic - surgery ; Otologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Postoperative Period ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Otology &amp; neurotology, 2014-08, Vol.35 (7), p.1266-1270</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f422a726a964084c95d1b18cd02d857d6894a6d8491364eba142d961c4767ce33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f422a726a964084c95d1b18cd02d857d6894a6d8491364eba142d961c4767ce33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24841920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tang, Ing Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Simon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsden, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Simon K W</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical outcomes in cystic vestibular schwannoma versus solid vestibular schwannoma</title><title>Otology &amp; neurotology</title><addtitle>Otol Neurotol</addtitle><description>To review the postoperative surgical outcomes of cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs), especially facial nerve outcomes, and compare these results with those from matched solid vestibular schwannomas (SVS) resected during the same period at a tertiary referral center. Retrospective case series. One hundred thirty-one surgically managed patients with cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs) were age, sex, and tumor size matched to 131 surgically managed patients with solid vestibular schwannomas (SVSs). Demographics, tumor morphology, surgical approach, extent of resection, facial and nonfacial complications, and recurrence rates were compared between the 2 groups. Subtotal removal was defined as removal of at least 95% of the tumor. The mean maximal tumor diameter was 2.8 cm for both groups. For CVS, gross total tumor resection (GTR) was achieved in 92 patients (70.2%), and subtotal tumor resection (STR) was achieved in 39 patients (29.8%). Postoperative facial nerve outcomes at 1-year follow-up were good (HB Grade I-III) in 116 (88.5%) of 131 CVS patients. Twenty-three patients developed nonfacial nerve-related complications (17.6%). For SVS, GTR was achieved in 102 patients (77.9%), and STR was achieved in 29 patients (22.1%). Postoperative facial nerve outcomes at 1-year follow-up were good (HB Grade I-III) in 118 (90.1%) of 131 SVS patients. Nonfacial nerve related complications occurred in 14 patients (10.7%). None of the differences in outcome between the 2 groups were statistically significant. The difference in surgical outcomes is minimal between patients with CVS and those with SVS, not reaching statistical significance. We think, with judicious surgical management, similar outcomes can be achieved in cystic tumors and solid tumors.</description><subject>Facial Nerve Injuries - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neuroma, Acoustic - pathology</subject><subject>Neuroma, Acoustic - surgery</subject><subject>Otologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1531-7129</issn><issn>1537-4505</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkMtKAzEUhoMotlbfQGSWbqbm5DpZlmJVqHRhXYdMkurIXGrSKH17R1tFxLP5D4f_3D6EzgGPASt5dT9ZjPHvYJQfoCFwKnPGMT_8yiGXQNQAncT4gjFIyuUxGhBWMFAED9HyIYWnypo669LGdo2PWdVmdhs3lc3efC9lqk3Ion1-N23bNaavhphiFru6cv9bTtHRytTRn-11hB5n18vpbT5f3NxNJ_PcUik3-YoRYiQRRgmGC2YVd1BCYR0mruDSiUIxI1zBFFDBfGmAEacEWCaFtJ7SEbrczV2H7jX1l-imitbXtWl9l6IGzikFxfu3R4jtrDZ0MQa_0utQNSZsNWD9yVP3PPVfnn3bxX5DKhvvfpq-AdIPLuRw3w</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Tang, Ing Ping</creator><creator>Freeman, Simon R</creator><creator>Rutherford, Scott A</creator><creator>King, Andrew T</creator><creator>Ramsden, Richard T</creator><creator>Lloyd, Simon K W</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Surgical outcomes in cystic vestibular schwannoma versus solid vestibular schwannoma</title><author>Tang, Ing Ping ; Freeman, Simon R ; Rutherford, Scott A ; King, Andrew T ; Ramsden, Richard T ; Lloyd, Simon K W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-f422a726a964084c95d1b18cd02d857d6894a6d8491364eba142d961c4767ce33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Facial Nerve Injuries - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neuroma, Acoustic - pathology</topic><topic>Neuroma, Acoustic - surgery</topic><topic>Otologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tang, Ing Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Simon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutherford, Scott A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Andrew T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsden, Richard T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Simon K W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Otology &amp; neurotology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tang, Ing Ping</au><au>Freeman, Simon R</au><au>Rutherford, Scott A</au><au>King, Andrew T</au><au>Ramsden, Richard T</au><au>Lloyd, Simon K W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical outcomes in cystic vestibular schwannoma versus solid vestibular schwannoma</atitle><jtitle>Otology &amp; neurotology</jtitle><addtitle>Otol Neurotol</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1266</spage><epage>1270</epage><pages>1266-1270</pages><issn>1531-7129</issn><eissn>1537-4505</eissn><abstract>To review the postoperative surgical outcomes of cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs), especially facial nerve outcomes, and compare these results with those from matched solid vestibular schwannomas (SVS) resected during the same period at a tertiary referral center. Retrospective case series. One hundred thirty-one surgically managed patients with cystic vestibular schwannomas (CVSs) were age, sex, and tumor size matched to 131 surgically managed patients with solid vestibular schwannomas (SVSs). Demographics, tumor morphology, surgical approach, extent of resection, facial and nonfacial complications, and recurrence rates were compared between the 2 groups. Subtotal removal was defined as removal of at least 95% of the tumor. The mean maximal tumor diameter was 2.8 cm for both groups. For CVS, gross total tumor resection (GTR) was achieved in 92 patients (70.2%), and subtotal tumor resection (STR) was achieved in 39 patients (29.8%). Postoperative facial nerve outcomes at 1-year follow-up were good (HB Grade I-III) in 116 (88.5%) of 131 CVS patients. Twenty-three patients developed nonfacial nerve-related complications (17.6%). For SVS, GTR was achieved in 102 patients (77.9%), and STR was achieved in 29 patients (22.1%). Postoperative facial nerve outcomes at 1-year follow-up were good (HB Grade I-III) in 118 (90.1%) of 131 SVS patients. Nonfacial nerve related complications occurred in 14 patients (10.7%). None of the differences in outcome between the 2 groups were statistically significant. The difference in surgical outcomes is minimal between patients with CVS and those with SVS, not reaching statistical significance. We think, with judicious surgical management, similar outcomes can be achieved in cystic tumors and solid tumors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>24841920</pmid><doi>10.1097/MAO.0000000000000435</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1531-7129
ispartof Otology & neurotology, 2014-08, Vol.35 (7), p.1266-1270
issn 1531-7129
1537-4505
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1553319517
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Facial Nerve Injuries - etiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology
Neuroma, Acoustic - pathology
Neuroma, Acoustic - surgery
Otologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Postoperative Period
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Surgical outcomes in cystic vestibular schwannoma versus solid vestibular schwannoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T12%3A36%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20outcomes%20in%20cystic%20vestibular%20schwannoma%20versus%20solid%20vestibular%20schwannoma&rft.jtitle=Otology%20&%20neurotology&rft.au=Tang,%20Ing%20Ping&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1266&rft.epage=1270&rft.pages=1266-1270&rft.issn=1531-7129&rft.eissn=1537-4505&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1553319517%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1553319517&rft_id=info:pmid/24841920&rfr_iscdi=true