Getting consent into perspective

Getting consent into perspective

This article continues a debate with Gareth Jones about the ethics of anatomy. The article discusses the distinction between direct and indirect reasons to require the deceased's consent prior to anatomical use. Getting this distinction wrong has potentially radical and unwelcome implications f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2014-09, Vol.27 (6), p.844-846
1. Verfasser: Wilkinson, Timothy M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Anatomy - ethics
Attitude to Death
Cadaver
consent
ethics
Family
Humans
Informed Consent - ethics
public display
society
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 846
container_issue 6
container_start_page 844
container_title Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 27
creator Wilkinson, Timothy M.
description This article continues a debate with Gareth Jones about the ethics of anatomy. The article discusses the distinction between direct and indirect reasons to require the deceased's consent prior to anatomical use. Getting this distinction wrong has potentially radical and unwelcome implications for the ethics of many uses of dead bodies. The article then exposes an ambiguity in asking what anatomical uses are ethical: we must distinguish between, on the one hand, who ought to have the power to make decisions and, on the other, how those with power ought to exercise it. It then applies this distinction to the ethics of the public display of bodies for entertainment. Clin. Anat. 27:844–846, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ca.22412
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1553107515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3398145201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3872-7f04a57061adfa060464667dc0a935b41fab5b5aea948525e3d4157bb6e810ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLw0AUhuFBFFur4C-QgBs3qXOfZFmKVqFVEcXlMJmcSGqaxJlE7b83tRdBcHU2Dy-HD6FTgocEY3ppzZBSTuge6hMcRyFlgu2jPo5iFbIIyx468n6OMSFcRYeoR7mKFadxHwUTaJq8fA1sVXoomyAvmyqowfkabJN_wDE6yEzh4WRzB-j5-uppfBNO7ye349E0tCxSNFQZ5kYoLIlJM4Ml5pJLqVKLTcxEwklmEpEIAybmkaACWMqJUEkiISI4MWyALtbd2lXvLfhGL3JvoShMCVXrNRGCEawEER09_0PnVevK7ruVokzyDv4Grau8d5Dp2uUL45aaYL1aTVujf1br6Nkm2CYLSHdwO1MHwjX4zAtY_hvS49E2uPG5b-Br541701IxJfTL3UTH42g6mz1S_cC-AT0qgQ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552364107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Getting consent into perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Wilkinson, Timothy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><description>This article continues a debate with Gareth Jones about the ethics of anatomy. The article discusses the distinction between direct and indirect reasons to require the deceased's consent prior to anatomical use. Getting this distinction wrong has potentially radical and unwelcome implications for the ethics of many uses of dead bodies. The article then exposes an ambiguity in asking what anatomical uses are ethical: we must distinguish between, on the one hand, who ought to have the power to make decisions and, on the other, how those with power ought to exercise it. It then applies this distinction to the ethics of the public display of bodies for entertainment. Clin. Anat. 27:844–846, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ca.22412</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24797429</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLANE8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anatomy - ethics ; Attitude to Death ; Cadaver ; consent ; ethics ; Family ; Humans ; Informed Consent - ethics ; public display ; society</subject><ispartof>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2014-09, Vol.27 (6), p.844-846</ispartof><rights>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3872-7f04a57061adfa060464667dc0a935b41fab5b5aea948525e3d4157bb6e810ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3872-7f04a57061adfa060464667dc0a935b41fab5b5aea948525e3d4157bb6e810ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fca.22412$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fca.22412$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24797429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Getting consent into perspective</title><title>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Clin. Anat</addtitle><description>This article continues a debate with Gareth Jones about the ethics of anatomy. The article discusses the distinction between direct and indirect reasons to require the deceased's consent prior to anatomical use. Getting this distinction wrong has potentially radical and unwelcome implications for the ethics of many uses of dead bodies. The article then exposes an ambiguity in asking what anatomical uses are ethical: we must distinguish between, on the one hand, who ought to have the power to make decisions and, on the other, how those with power ought to exercise it. It then applies this distinction to the ethics of the public display of bodies for entertainment. Clin. Anat. 27:844–846, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Anatomy - ethics</subject><subject>Attitude to Death</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>consent</subject><subject>ethics</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed Consent - ethics</subject><subject>public display</subject><subject>society</subject><issn>0897-3806</issn><issn>1098-2353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EtLw0AUhuFBFFur4C-QgBs3qXOfZFmKVqFVEcXlMJmcSGqaxJlE7b83tRdBcHU2Dy-HD6FTgocEY3ppzZBSTuge6hMcRyFlgu2jPo5iFbIIyx468n6OMSFcRYeoR7mKFadxHwUTaJq8fA1sVXoomyAvmyqowfkabJN_wDE6yEzh4WRzB-j5-uppfBNO7ye349E0tCxSNFQZ5kYoLIlJM4Ml5pJLqVKLTcxEwklmEpEIAybmkaACWMqJUEkiISI4MWyALtbd2lXvLfhGL3JvoShMCVXrNRGCEawEER09_0PnVevK7ruVokzyDv4Grau8d5Dp2uUL45aaYL1aTVujf1br6Nkm2CYLSHdwO1MHwjX4zAtY_hvS49E2uPG5b-Br541701IxJfTL3UTH42g6mz1S_cC-AT0qgQ0</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Wilkinson, Timothy M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Getting consent into perspective</title><author>Wilkinson, Timothy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3872-7f04a57061adfa060464667dc0a935b41fab5b5aea948525e3d4157bb6e810ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anatomy - ethics</topic><topic>Attitude to Death</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>consent</topic><topic>ethics</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed Consent - ethics</topic><topic>public display</topic><topic>society</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilkinson, Timothy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Getting consent into perspective</atitle><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin. Anat</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>844</spage><epage>846</epage><pages>844-846</pages><issn>0897-3806</issn><eissn>1098-2353</eissn><coden>CLANE8</coden><abstract>This article continues a debate with Gareth Jones about the ethics of anatomy. The article discusses the distinction between direct and indirect reasons to require the deceased's consent prior to anatomical use. Getting this distinction wrong has potentially radical and unwelcome implications for the ethics of many uses of dead bodies. The article then exposes an ambiguity in asking what anatomical uses are ethical: we must distinguish between, on the one hand, who ought to have the power to make decisions and, on the other, how those with power ought to exercise it. It then applies this distinction to the ethics of the public display of bodies for entertainment. Clin. Anat. 27:844–846, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24797429</pmid><doi>10.1002/ca.22412</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0897-3806
ispartof Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2014-09, Vol.27 (6), p.844-846
issn 0897-3806
1098-2353
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1553107515
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Anatomy - ethics
Attitude to Death
Cadaver
consent
ethics
Family
Humans
Informed Consent - ethics
public display
society
title Getting consent into perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T17%3A35%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Getting%20consent%20into%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20anatomy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Wilkinson,%20Timothy%20M.&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=844&rft.epage=846&rft.pages=844-846&rft.issn=0897-3806&rft.eissn=1098-2353&rft.coden=CLANE8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ca.22412&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3398145201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552364107&rft_id=info:pmid/24797429&rfr_iscdi=true