Localization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. A prospective study

Abstract Introduction Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for staging axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer and clinically negative nodes. It is associated with reduced arm morbidity, moderated or severe lymphoedema, and a better quality of life in comparison with st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of surgery (London, England) England), 2014, Vol.12, p.S162-S164
Hauptverfasser: Marrazzo, Antonio, Palumbo, Vincenzo Davide, Marrazzo, Emilia, Taormina, Pietra, Damiano, Giuseppe, Buscemi, Salvatore, Buscemi, Giuseppe, Lo Monte, Attilio Ignazio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S164
container_issue
container_start_page S162
container_title International journal of surgery (London, England)
container_volume 12
creator Marrazzo, Antonio
Palumbo, Vincenzo Davide
Marrazzo, Emilia
Taormina, Pietra
Damiano, Giuseppe
Buscemi, Salvatore
Buscemi, Giuseppe
Lo Monte, Attilio Ignazio
description Abstract Introduction Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for staging axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer and clinically negative nodes. It is associated with reduced arm morbidity, moderated or severe lymphoedema, and a better quality of life in comparison with standard axillary treatment. Unfortunately, skip metastases makes all minimally invasive approaches, such as axillary sampling, unreliable. The aim of the present clinical prospective study is to evaluate the position of SLN in an important number of cases and establish the real incidence of skip metastases in clinically node-negative patients. Patients and methods A cohort of 898 female patients with breast carcinoma was considered, from 2001 to 2008. Once SLN was localized, by means of radio-colloid or blue dye staining, and isolated, a biopsy was performed. Only those positive for metastases were submitted to axillary dissection. Results Only in nine cases a SLN was not isolated. We had 819 cases of first level SLN (group A) and 69 cases of second level SLN (group B). Considering all of 889 cases, SLN was localized in the second level in 69 patients (7.8%); but if we consider metastatic SLN alone (340 cases), it was in the second level in 23 subjects (6.8%). In total, we had a positive second level SLN in 2.3% of cases (23/889). Conclusion Second level SLN could be considered only an anomalous lymphatic axillary drainage and it does not linked to particular histological variants of the primitive tumour. In our study, skip metastases were recognized in only 2.6% of cases, therefore, whenever a SLN is not isolated for any reason, the first level sampling represent a viable operative choice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1552806751</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1743919114001198</els_id><sourcerecordid>1552806751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-8f8e54b6611dc4d8fafddc4711b6de99e8f46e2192f088ed6fc8118b6cdc894a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTFrHDEQhUVIiB0nf8BFUJnm1hqdpNNCMBiTxIYDF0lqoZVGROs97UXaNVx-vbWc48KFq5nivcfM9wg5B9YAA3XRN7Evc8MZiIbJhnH2hpzCRqxXLcj27fPewgn5UErPmGAa9HtywoVWim3UKbndjs4O8Z-d4pjoGGjBNMWEAx0Ou_0fmkaPNCbaZbRlos4mh7mhV3Sfx7JHN8UHpGWa_eEjeRfsUPDT0zwjv79_-3V9s9re_bi9vtqunORyWumgUYpOKQDvhNfBBl-XDUCnPLYt6iAUcmh5YFqjV8FpAN0p551uhV2fkS_H3HrB3xnLZHaxOBwGm3CciwEpuWZqI6FK-VHq6rElYzD7HHc2HwwwsyA0vVkQmgWhYdJUhNX0-Sl_7nbony3_mVXB16MA65cPEbMpLmLl4mOuQIwf4-v5ly_sbogp1hbu8YClH-ecKj8DpnDDzM-lxKVDEIwBtHr9CFzzl8k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552806751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Localization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. A prospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Marrazzo, Antonio ; Palumbo, Vincenzo Davide ; Marrazzo, Emilia ; Taormina, Pietra ; Damiano, Giuseppe ; Buscemi, Salvatore ; Buscemi, Giuseppe ; Lo Monte, Attilio Ignazio</creator><creatorcontrib>Marrazzo, Antonio ; Palumbo, Vincenzo Davide ; Marrazzo, Emilia ; Taormina, Pietra ; Damiano, Giuseppe ; Buscemi, Salvatore ; Buscemi, Giuseppe ; Lo Monte, Attilio Ignazio</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Introduction Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for staging axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer and clinically negative nodes. It is associated with reduced arm morbidity, moderated or severe lymphoedema, and a better quality of life in comparison with standard axillary treatment. Unfortunately, skip metastases makes all minimally invasive approaches, such as axillary sampling, unreliable. The aim of the present clinical prospective study is to evaluate the position of SLN in an important number of cases and establish the real incidence of skip metastases in clinically node-negative patients. Patients and methods A cohort of 898 female patients with breast carcinoma was considered, from 2001 to 2008. Once SLN was localized, by means of radio-colloid or blue dye staining, and isolated, a biopsy was performed. Only those positive for metastases were submitted to axillary dissection. Results Only in nine cases a SLN was not isolated. We had 819 cases of first level SLN (group A) and 69 cases of second level SLN (group B). Considering all of 889 cases, SLN was localized in the second level in 69 patients (7.8%); but if we consider metastatic SLN alone (340 cases), it was in the second level in 23 subjects (6.8%). In total, we had a positive second level SLN in 2.3% of cases (23/889). Conclusion Second level SLN could be considered only an anomalous lymphatic axillary drainage and it does not linked to particular histological variants of the primitive tumour. In our study, skip metastases were recognized in only 2.6% of cases, therefore, whenever a SLN is not isolated for any reason, the first level sampling represent a viable operative choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-9191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24866076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Axilla ; Axillary sampling ; Breast carcinoma ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymph Nodes - surgery ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Skip metastases ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>International journal of surgery (London, England), 2014, Vol.12, p.S162-S164</ispartof><rights>Surgical Associates Ltd</rights><rights>2014 Surgical Associates Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-8f8e54b6611dc4d8fafddc4711b6de99e8f46e2192f088ed6fc8118b6cdc894a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-8f8e54b6611dc4d8fafddc4711b6de99e8f46e2192f088ed6fc8118b6cdc894a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24866076$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marrazzo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Vincenzo Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrazzo, Emilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taormina, Pietra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damiano, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buscemi, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buscemi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Monte, Attilio Ignazio</creatorcontrib><title>Localization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. A prospective study</title><title>International journal of surgery (London, England)</title><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Introduction Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for staging axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer and clinically negative nodes. It is associated with reduced arm morbidity, moderated or severe lymphoedema, and a better quality of life in comparison with standard axillary treatment. Unfortunately, skip metastases makes all minimally invasive approaches, such as axillary sampling, unreliable. The aim of the present clinical prospective study is to evaluate the position of SLN in an important number of cases and establish the real incidence of skip metastases in clinically node-negative patients. Patients and methods A cohort of 898 female patients with breast carcinoma was considered, from 2001 to 2008. Once SLN was localized, by means of radio-colloid or blue dye staining, and isolated, a biopsy was performed. Only those positive for metastases were submitted to axillary dissection. Results Only in nine cases a SLN was not isolated. We had 819 cases of first level SLN (group A) and 69 cases of second level SLN (group B). Considering all of 889 cases, SLN was localized in the second level in 69 patients (7.8%); but if we consider metastatic SLN alone (340 cases), it was in the second level in 23 subjects (6.8%). In total, we had a positive second level SLN in 2.3% of cases (23/889). Conclusion Second level SLN could be considered only an anomalous lymphatic axillary drainage and it does not linked to particular histological variants of the primitive tumour. In our study, skip metastases were recognized in only 2.6% of cases, therefore, whenever a SLN is not isolated for any reason, the first level sampling represent a viable operative choice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Axillary sampling</subject><subject>Breast carcinoma</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - surgery</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Skip metastases</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>1743-9191</issn><issn>1743-9159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTFrHDEQhUVIiB0nf8BFUJnm1hqdpNNCMBiTxIYDF0lqoZVGROs97UXaNVx-vbWc48KFq5nivcfM9wg5B9YAA3XRN7Evc8MZiIbJhnH2hpzCRqxXLcj27fPewgn5UErPmGAa9HtywoVWim3UKbndjs4O8Z-d4pjoGGjBNMWEAx0Ou_0fmkaPNCbaZbRlos4mh7mhV3Sfx7JHN8UHpGWa_eEjeRfsUPDT0zwjv79_-3V9s9re_bi9vtqunORyWumgUYpOKQDvhNfBBl-XDUCnPLYt6iAUcmh5YFqjV8FpAN0p551uhV2fkS_H3HrB3xnLZHaxOBwGm3CciwEpuWZqI6FK-VHq6rElYzD7HHc2HwwwsyA0vVkQmgWhYdJUhNX0-Sl_7nbony3_mVXB16MA65cPEbMpLmLl4mOuQIwf4-v5ly_sbogp1hbu8YClH-ecKj8DpnDDzM-lxKVDEIwBtHr9CFzzl8k</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Marrazzo, Antonio</creator><creator>Palumbo, Vincenzo Davide</creator><creator>Marrazzo, Emilia</creator><creator>Taormina, Pietra</creator><creator>Damiano, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Buscemi, Salvatore</creator><creator>Buscemi, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Lo Monte, Attilio Ignazio</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Localization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. A prospective study</title><author>Marrazzo, Antonio ; Palumbo, Vincenzo Davide ; Marrazzo, Emilia ; Taormina, Pietra ; Damiano, Giuseppe ; Buscemi, Salvatore ; Buscemi, Giuseppe ; Lo Monte, Attilio Ignazio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-8f8e54b6611dc4d8fafddc4711b6de99e8f46e2192f088ed6fc8118b6cdc894a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Axillary sampling</topic><topic>Breast carcinoma</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - surgery</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Skip metastases</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marrazzo, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Vincenzo Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrazzo, Emilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taormina, Pietra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damiano, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buscemi, Salvatore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buscemi, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo Monte, Attilio Ignazio</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marrazzo, Antonio</au><au>Palumbo, Vincenzo Davide</au><au>Marrazzo, Emilia</au><au>Taormina, Pietra</au><au>Damiano, Giuseppe</au><au>Buscemi, Salvatore</au><au>Buscemi, Giuseppe</au><au>Lo Monte, Attilio Ignazio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Localization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. A prospective study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of surgery (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Surg</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>S162</spage><epage>S164</epage><pages>S162-S164</pages><issn>1743-9191</issn><eissn>1743-9159</eissn><abstract>Abstract Introduction Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for staging axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer and clinically negative nodes. It is associated with reduced arm morbidity, moderated or severe lymphoedema, and a better quality of life in comparison with standard axillary treatment. Unfortunately, skip metastases makes all minimally invasive approaches, such as axillary sampling, unreliable. The aim of the present clinical prospective study is to evaluate the position of SLN in an important number of cases and establish the real incidence of skip metastases in clinically node-negative patients. Patients and methods A cohort of 898 female patients with breast carcinoma was considered, from 2001 to 2008. Once SLN was localized, by means of radio-colloid or blue dye staining, and isolated, a biopsy was performed. Only those positive for metastases were submitted to axillary dissection. Results Only in nine cases a SLN was not isolated. We had 819 cases of first level SLN (group A) and 69 cases of second level SLN (group B). Considering all of 889 cases, SLN was localized in the second level in 69 patients (7.8%); but if we consider metastatic SLN alone (340 cases), it was in the second level in 23 subjects (6.8%). In total, we had a positive second level SLN in 2.3% of cases (23/889). Conclusion Second level SLN could be considered only an anomalous lymphatic axillary drainage and it does not linked to particular histological variants of the primitive tumour. In our study, skip metastases were recognized in only 2.6% of cases, therefore, whenever a SLN is not isolated for any reason, the first level sampling represent a viable operative choice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24866076</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.020</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-9191
ispartof International journal of surgery (London, England), 2014, Vol.12, p.S162-S164
issn 1743-9191
1743-9159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1552806751
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Axilla
Axillary sampling
Breast carcinoma
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymph Nodes - surgery
Lymphatic Metastasis
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Skip metastases
Surgery
title Localization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer. A prospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A40%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Localization%20of%20sentinel%20lymph%20node%20in%20breast%20cancer.%20A%20prospective%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20surgery%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Marrazzo,%20Antonio&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=S162&rft.epage=S164&rft.pages=S162-S164&rft.issn=1743-9191&rft.eissn=1743-9159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1552806751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552806751&rft_id=info:pmid/24866076&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1743919114001198&rfr_iscdi=true