Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: a systematic review
Purpose Distal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 %) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality of life research 2013-11, Vol.22 (9), p.2399-2416 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2416 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2399 |
container_title | Quality of life research |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Van Son, M. A. C. De Vries, J. Roukema, J. A. Den Oudsten, B. L. |
description | Purpose Distal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 %) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) the HS and (HR)QOL outcomes following DRF, (2) sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with HS and (HR)QOL, and to (3) evaluate the conceptualization of HS and (HR)QOL in these studies. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO (January 1976–July 2012). A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Results Twenty-six studies were included with a mean quality score of 7.7 (SD = 1.7). The majority of studies had a low methodological quality. Twenty-three studies (88.5 %) focused exclusively on HS and only three studies examined (HR)QOL. However, 34.8 % of the outcomes were labeled as (HR)QOL by the authors, while in fact, HS was assessed. Sex, age, educational level, living situation, and radiocarpal arthritis were associated with HS. In general, no differences were found in HS and (HR)QOL when comparing different treatment modalities. Conclusions The focus of outcome research in DRF is mainly on HS instead of (HR)QOL. HS instruments were often mislabeled as (HR)QOL instruments. With inconclusive results of mostly low-quality studies, there is a need for high-quality prospective follow-up studies measuring HS and/or (HR)QOL while using the correct terminology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11136-013-0391-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1552377826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24725463</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24725463</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5f32fa9664ca0430918875dd8d18502dbd6e6d0590b1e8a1f885dfca3290e6953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EomnhAViALLEpC4P_x-4OVYUiVWIDa8sZXxNHk0xqe4LSp8fplB-xgJWl6-98V_ZB6AWjbxml3bvCGBOaUCYIFZaRu0dowVQnCNfSPkYLajUnVkhxgk5LWVNKjaX8KTrhQjFrO71A-2vwQ13hUn2dCvbbgM9X9yOSYfAVwht8O_kh1QMeIx5SBBymnLbfcF0BztCPe8j3dyE1yYCzD6mZYvZ9nTKUC-xxOZQKG19T3xL7BN-foSfRDwWeP5xn6OuHqy-X1-Tm88dPl-9vSC95V4mKgkdvtZa9p1JQy4zpVAgmMKMoD8ugQQeqLF0yMJ5FY1SIvRfcUtBWiTN0Pnt3ebydoFS3SaWHYfBbGKfimFJcdJ3h-v-o1Mpopoxs6Ou_0PU45W17SBO2rzVNKhrFZqrPYykZotvltPH54Bh1x_7c3J9r_bljf-6uZV49mKflBsKvxM_CGsBnoOyOJUD-Y_U_rC_n0LrUMf-Wyo4rqYX4Aa91r1o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1535185233</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Van Son, M. A. C. ; De Vries, J. ; Roukema, J. A. ; Den Oudsten, B. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Son, M. A. C. ; De Vries, J. ; Roukema, J. A. ; Den Oudsten, B. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Distal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 %) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) the HS and (HR)QOL outcomes following DRF, (2) sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with HS and (HR)QOL, and to (3) evaluate the conceptualization of HS and (HR)QOL in these studies. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO (January 1976–July 2012). A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Results Twenty-six studies were included with a mean quality score of 7.7 (SD = 1.7). The majority of studies had a low methodological quality. Twenty-three studies (88.5 %) focused exclusively on HS and only three studies examined (HR)QOL. However, 34.8 % of the outcomes were labeled as (HR)QOL by the authors, while in fact, HS was assessed. Sex, age, educational level, living situation, and radiocarpal arthritis were associated with HS. In general, no differences were found in HS and (HR)QOL when comparing different treatment modalities. Conclusions The focus of outcome research in DRF is mainly on HS instead of (HR)QOL. HS instruments were often mislabeled as (HR)QOL instruments. With inconclusive results of mostly low-quality studies, there is a need for high-quality prospective follow-up studies measuring HS and/or (HR)QOL while using the correct terminology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0391-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23519976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Bone fractures ; Disabilities ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Fractures ; Health Status ; Health surveys ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Operating rooms ; Patients ; Psychological aspects ; Public Health ; Quality of Life ; Quality of Life Research ; Questionnaires ; Radius ; Radius fractures ; Radius Fractures - complications ; Radius Fractures - physiopathology ; Review ; Sociology ; Surgical specialties ; Systematic review ; Trauma ; Treatment Outcome ; Wrist</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2013-11, Vol.22 (9), p.2399-2416</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5f32fa9664ca0430918875dd8d18502dbd6e6d0590b1e8a1f885dfca3290e6953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5f32fa9664ca0430918875dd8d18502dbd6e6d0590b1e8a1f885dfca3290e6953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24725463$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24725463$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23519976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Son, M. A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vries, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roukema, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Den Oudsten, B. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: a systematic review</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose Distal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 %) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) the HS and (HR)QOL outcomes following DRF, (2) sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with HS and (HR)QOL, and to (3) evaluate the conceptualization of HS and (HR)QOL in these studies. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO (January 1976–July 2012). A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Results Twenty-six studies were included with a mean quality score of 7.7 (SD = 1.7). The majority of studies had a low methodological quality. Twenty-three studies (88.5 %) focused exclusively on HS and only three studies examined (HR)QOL. However, 34.8 % of the outcomes were labeled as (HR)QOL by the authors, while in fact, HS was assessed. Sex, age, educational level, living situation, and radiocarpal arthritis were associated with HS. In general, no differences were found in HS and (HR)QOL when comparing different treatment modalities. Conclusions The focus of outcome research in DRF is mainly on HS instead of (HR)QOL. HS instruments were often mislabeled as (HR)QOL instruments. With inconclusive results of mostly low-quality studies, there is a need for high-quality prospective follow-up studies measuring HS and/or (HR)QOL while using the correct terminology.</description><subject>Bone fractures</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Operating rooms</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radius</subject><subject>Radius fractures</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - complications</subject><subject>Radius Fractures - physiopathology</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Surgical specialties</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EomnhAViALLEpC4P_x-4OVYUiVWIDa8sZXxNHk0xqe4LSp8fplB-xgJWl6-98V_ZB6AWjbxml3bvCGBOaUCYIFZaRu0dowVQnCNfSPkYLajUnVkhxgk5LWVNKjaX8KTrhQjFrO71A-2vwQ13hUn2dCvbbgM9X9yOSYfAVwht8O_kh1QMeIx5SBBymnLbfcF0BztCPe8j3dyE1yYCzD6mZYvZ9nTKUC-xxOZQKG19T3xL7BN-foSfRDwWeP5xn6OuHqy-X1-Tm88dPl-9vSC95V4mKgkdvtZa9p1JQy4zpVAgmMKMoD8ugQQeqLF0yMJ5FY1SIvRfcUtBWiTN0Pnt3ebydoFS3SaWHYfBbGKfimFJcdJ3h-v-o1Mpopoxs6Ou_0PU45W17SBO2rzVNKhrFZqrPYykZotvltPH54Bh1x_7c3J9r_bljf-6uZV49mKflBsKvxM_CGsBnoOyOJUD-Y_U_rC_n0LrUMf-Wyo4rqYX4Aa91r1o</recordid><startdate>20131101</startdate><enddate>20131101</enddate><creator>Van Son, M. A. C.</creator><creator>De Vries, J.</creator><creator>Roukema, J. A.</creator><creator>Den Oudsten, B. L.</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131101</creationdate><title>Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: a systematic review</title><author>Van Son, M. A. C. ; De Vries, J. ; Roukema, J. A. ; Den Oudsten, B. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c427t-5f32fa9664ca0430918875dd8d18502dbd6e6d0590b1e8a1f885dfca3290e6953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bone fractures</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Operating rooms</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radius</topic><topic>Radius fractures</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - complications</topic><topic>Radius Fractures - physiopathology</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Surgical specialties</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Son, M. A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Vries, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roukema, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Den Oudsten, B. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Son, M. A. C.</au><au>De Vries, J.</au><au>Roukema, J. A.</au><au>Den Oudsten, B. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2013-11-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2399</spage><epage>2416</epage><pages>2399-2416</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose Distal radius fractures (DRF) cause long-term functional limitations. A subgroup (21.2 %) will never fully recover after DRF. Therefore, it is important to consider the health status (HS) and (health-related) quality of life (HR)QOL of these patients. The aim of this systematic review was to describe (1) the HS and (HR)QOL outcomes following DRF, (2) sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with HS and (HR)QOL, and to (3) evaluate the conceptualization of HS and (HR)QOL in these studies. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO (January 1976–July 2012). A criteria list was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Results Twenty-six studies were included with a mean quality score of 7.7 (SD = 1.7). The majority of studies had a low methodological quality. Twenty-three studies (88.5 %) focused exclusively on HS and only three studies examined (HR)QOL. However, 34.8 % of the outcomes were labeled as (HR)QOL by the authors, while in fact, HS was assessed. Sex, age, educational level, living situation, and radiocarpal arthritis were associated with HS. In general, no differences were found in HS and (HR)QOL when comparing different treatment modalities. Conclusions The focus of outcome research in DRF is mainly on HS instead of (HR)QOL. HS instruments were often mislabeled as (HR)QOL instruments. With inconclusive results of mostly low-quality studies, there is a need for high-quality prospective follow-up studies measuring HS and/or (HR)QOL while using the correct terminology.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>23519976</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-013-0391-z</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-9343 |
ispartof | Quality of life research, 2013-11, Vol.22 (9), p.2399-2416 |
issn | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1552377826 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Bone fractures Disabilities Female Follow-Up Studies Fractures Health Status Health surveys Hospitals Humans Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Operating rooms Patients Psychological aspects Public Health Quality of Life Quality of Life Research Questionnaires Radius Radius fractures Radius Fractures - complications Radius Fractures - physiopathology Review Sociology Surgical specialties Systematic review Trauma Treatment Outcome Wrist |
title | Health status and (health-related) quality of life during the recovery of distal radius fractures: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T15%3A44%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20status%20and%20(health-related)%20quality%20of%20life%20during%20the%20recovery%20of%20distal%20radius%20fractures:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Van%20Son,%20M.%20A.%20C.&rft.date=2013-11-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2399&rft.epage=2416&rft.pages=2399-2416&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-013-0391-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24725463%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1535185233&rft_id=info:pmid/23519976&rft_jstor_id=24725463&rfr_iscdi=true |