Group Prenatal Care: Review of Outcomes and Recommendations for Model Implementation
The intent and delivery of prenatal care have evolved since its formal inception in the early 1900s. Group prenatal care offers an alternative care delivery model to the currently dominant prenatal care model. The group model has been associated with a number of improved perinatal outcomes including...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrical & gynecological survey 2014-01, Vol.69 (1), p.46-55 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 55 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 46 |
| container_title | Obstetrical & gynecological survey |
| container_volume | 69 |
| creator | Tilden, Ellen L Hersh, Sally R Emeis, Cathy L Weinstein, Sarah R Caughey, Aaron B |
| description | The intent and delivery of prenatal care have evolved since its formal inception in the early 1900s. Group prenatal care offers an alternative care delivery model to the currently dominant prenatal care model. The group model has been associated with a number of improved perinatal outcomes including decreased preterm birth, higher birth weight, improved breast-feeding initiation and duration, decreased cesarean delivery, and greater patient satisfaction. This article outlines the tenets of CenteringPregnancy, the current dominant form of group prenatal care, reviews literature regarding perinatal outcomes related to group prenatal care, suggests future research agendas, and highlights relevant considerations when implementing this alternate model of prenatal health care delivery.
TARGET AUDIENCEObstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians
LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter completing this CME activity, physicians should be better able to identify the elements of the CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care model, evaluate which perinatal outcomes have been associated with CenteringPregnancy and similar group prenatal care models, and compare the benefits and risks to implementing a group prenatal care model. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000025 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1552371656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1552371656</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2167-e7ed8cdd6cb3619021360410c5f774e4d0d14fe69d2abd37d57d65974d9f245b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUF1LwzAUDaLonP4DkTz60pnvtL7J0DlQJqLgW8maW5ymzUxah__eOKeiF-73uefCQeiIkhElhT6dTR5H5I8xuYUGVHKeFblS22iQRkWmc5bvof0YnxMk54Lsoj0mKWEpDND9JPh-iW8DtKYzDo9NgDN8B28LWGFf41nfVb6BiE1r0zjVDbTWdAvfRlz7gG-8BYenzdJB2nTrzQHaqY2LcLjJQ_RweXE_vsquZ5Pp-Pw6qxhVOgMNNq-sVdWcK1oQRrkigpJK1loLEJZYKmpQhWVmbrm2UlslCy1sUTMh53yITr54l8G_9hC7slnECpwzLfg-llRKxjVVUiWo-IJWwccYoC6XYdGY8F5SUn7qWSY9y_96prPjzYd-3oD9OfoW8Jd35V0HIb64fgWhfALjuqc1n2JSZIxQQWjqsuRU8w-4bn9o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552371656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Group Prenatal Care: Review of Outcomes and Recommendations for Model Implementation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Tilden, Ellen L ; Hersh, Sally R ; Emeis, Cathy L ; Weinstein, Sarah R ; Caughey, Aaron B</creator><creatorcontrib>Tilden, Ellen L ; Hersh, Sally R ; Emeis, Cathy L ; Weinstein, Sarah R ; Caughey, Aaron B</creatorcontrib><description>The intent and delivery of prenatal care have evolved since its formal inception in the early 1900s. Group prenatal care offers an alternative care delivery model to the currently dominant prenatal care model. The group model has been associated with a number of improved perinatal outcomes including decreased preterm birth, higher birth weight, improved breast-feeding initiation and duration, decreased cesarean delivery, and greater patient satisfaction. This article outlines the tenets of CenteringPregnancy, the current dominant form of group prenatal care, reviews literature regarding perinatal outcomes related to group prenatal care, suggests future research agendas, and highlights relevant considerations when implementing this alternate model of prenatal health care delivery.
TARGET AUDIENCEObstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians
LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter completing this CME activity, physicians should be better able to identify the elements of the CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care model, evaluate which perinatal outcomes have been associated with CenteringPregnancy and similar group prenatal care models, and compare the benefits and risks to implementing a group prenatal care model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7828</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-9866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25102251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Appointments and Schedules ; Breast Feeding ; Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration ; Female ; Goals ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Infant, Low Birth Weight ; Models, Organizational ; Pregnancy ; Premature Birth - prevention & control ; Prenatal Care - methods</subject><ispartof>Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 2014-01, Vol.69 (1), p.46-55</ispartof><rights>2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2167-e7ed8cdd6cb3619021360410c5f774e4d0d14fe69d2abd37d57d65974d9f245b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25102251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tilden, Ellen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hersh, Sally R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emeis, Cathy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caughey, Aaron B</creatorcontrib><title>Group Prenatal Care: Review of Outcomes and Recommendations for Model Implementation</title><title>Obstetrical & gynecological survey</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol Surv</addtitle><description>The intent and delivery of prenatal care have evolved since its formal inception in the early 1900s. Group prenatal care offers an alternative care delivery model to the currently dominant prenatal care model. The group model has been associated with a number of improved perinatal outcomes including decreased preterm birth, higher birth weight, improved breast-feeding initiation and duration, decreased cesarean delivery, and greater patient satisfaction. This article outlines the tenets of CenteringPregnancy, the current dominant form of group prenatal care, reviews literature regarding perinatal outcomes related to group prenatal care, suggests future research agendas, and highlights relevant considerations when implementing this alternate model of prenatal health care delivery.
TARGET AUDIENCEObstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians
LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter completing this CME activity, physicians should be better able to identify the elements of the CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care model, evaluate which perinatal outcomes have been associated with CenteringPregnancy and similar group prenatal care models, and compare the benefits and risks to implementing a group prenatal care model.</description><subject>Appointments and Schedules</subject><subject>Breast Feeding</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Goals</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Low Birth Weight</subject><subject>Models, Organizational</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Premature Birth - prevention & control</subject><subject>Prenatal Care - methods</subject><issn>0029-7828</issn><issn>1533-9866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUF1LwzAUDaLonP4DkTz60pnvtL7J0DlQJqLgW8maW5ymzUxah__eOKeiF-73uefCQeiIkhElhT6dTR5H5I8xuYUGVHKeFblS22iQRkWmc5bvof0YnxMk54Lsoj0mKWEpDND9JPh-iW8DtKYzDo9NgDN8B28LWGFf41nfVb6BiE1r0zjVDbTWdAvfRlz7gG-8BYenzdJB2nTrzQHaqY2LcLjJQ_RweXE_vsquZ5Pp-Pw6qxhVOgMNNq-sVdWcK1oQRrkigpJK1loLEJZYKmpQhWVmbrm2UlslCy1sUTMh53yITr54l8G_9hC7slnECpwzLfg-llRKxjVVUiWo-IJWwccYoC6XYdGY8F5SUn7qWSY9y_96prPjzYd-3oD9OfoW8Jd35V0HIb64fgWhfALjuqc1n2JSZIxQQWjqsuRU8w-4bn9o</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Tilden, Ellen L</creator><creator>Hersh, Sally R</creator><creator>Emeis, Cathy L</creator><creator>Weinstein, Sarah R</creator><creator>Caughey, Aaron B</creator><general>by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>Group Prenatal Care: Review of Outcomes and Recommendations for Model Implementation</title><author>Tilden, Ellen L ; Hersh, Sally R ; Emeis, Cathy L ; Weinstein, Sarah R ; Caughey, Aaron B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2167-e7ed8cdd6cb3619021360410c5f774e4d0d14fe69d2abd37d57d65974d9f245b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Appointments and Schedules</topic><topic>Breast Feeding</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Goals</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Low Birth Weight</topic><topic>Models, Organizational</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Premature Birth - prevention & control</topic><topic>Prenatal Care - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tilden, Ellen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hersh, Sally R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emeis, Cathy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Sarah R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caughey, Aaron B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrical & gynecological survey</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tilden, Ellen L</au><au>Hersh, Sally R</au><au>Emeis, Cathy L</au><au>Weinstein, Sarah R</au><au>Caughey, Aaron B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Group Prenatal Care: Review of Outcomes and Recommendations for Model Implementation</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrical & gynecological survey</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol Surv</addtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>55</epage><pages>46-55</pages><issn>0029-7828</issn><eissn>1533-9866</eissn><abstract>The intent and delivery of prenatal care have evolved since its formal inception in the early 1900s. Group prenatal care offers an alternative care delivery model to the currently dominant prenatal care model. The group model has been associated with a number of improved perinatal outcomes including decreased preterm birth, higher birth weight, improved breast-feeding initiation and duration, decreased cesarean delivery, and greater patient satisfaction. This article outlines the tenets of CenteringPregnancy, the current dominant form of group prenatal care, reviews literature regarding perinatal outcomes related to group prenatal care, suggests future research agendas, and highlights relevant considerations when implementing this alternate model of prenatal health care delivery.
TARGET AUDIENCEObstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians
LEARNING OBJECTIVESAfter completing this CME activity, physicians should be better able to identify the elements of the CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care model, evaluate which perinatal outcomes have been associated with CenteringPregnancy and similar group prenatal care models, and compare the benefits and risks to implementing a group prenatal care model.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>25102251</pmid><doi>10.1097/OGX.0000000000000025</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0029-7828 |
| ispartof | Obstetrical & gynecological survey, 2014-01, Vol.69 (1), p.46-55 |
| issn | 0029-7828 1533-9866 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1552371656 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Appointments and Schedules Breast Feeding Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration Female Goals Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Infant, Low Birth Weight Models, Organizational Pregnancy Premature Birth - prevention & control Prenatal Care - methods |
| title | Group Prenatal Care: Review of Outcomes and Recommendations for Model Implementation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T00%3A35%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Group%20Prenatal%20Care:%20Review%20of%20Outcomes%20and%20Recommendations%20for%20Model%20Implementation&rft.jtitle=Obstetrical%20&%20gynecological%20survey&rft.au=Tilden,%20Ellen%20L&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=55&rft.pages=46-55&rft.issn=0029-7828&rft.eissn=1533-9866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1552371656%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552371656&rft_id=info:pmid/25102251&rfr_iscdi=true |