Chemicals for preventing moulding in damp hay

Fewer than one third of more than 100 chemicals tested prevented moulding when 0.5% of active ingredient was added to hay containing 35% water or, alternatively, when 0.02% of active ingredient was added with 0.2% propionic acid or ammonium propionate. Chemicals which prevented moulding in these tes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal feed science and technology 1981-01, Vol.6 (4), p.323-336
Hauptverfasser: Lacey, J., Lord, K.A., Cayley, G.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 336
container_issue 4
container_start_page 323
container_title Animal feed science and technology
container_volume 6
creator Lacey, J.
Lord, K.A.
Cayley, G.R.
description Fewer than one third of more than 100 chemicals tested prevented moulding when 0.5% of active ingredient was added to hay containing 35% water or, alternatively, when 0.02% of active ingredient was added with 0.2% propionic acid or ammonium propionate. Chemicals which prevented moulding in these tests when used alone included aliphatic acids with 2–6 carbon atoms, sorbic acid, short chain aldehydes and phenols, propionic acid, fully or half-neutralized with ammonia, and 8-quinolinol and its derivatives. Formic acid, aliphatic acids with 7–9 carbon atoms, longer chain aldehydes and some fungicides delayed moulding for one to two weeks. Only formaldehyde, 8-quinolinol and its derivatives, and p-nitrophenol increased the activity of 0.2% propionic acid. Although the effective doses of propionic acid, ammonium propionate, and propionic acid, half-neutralised with ammonia, were similar, there was evidence that the presence of free acid in the formulation aided redistribution to overcome undertreatment of pockets in the hay. Further tests of 2-phenyl phenol, phenyl propionate and 8-quinolinol showed that the latter was the best candidate for development. Fungi of the Aspergillus glaucus group were first to colonise most tests that failed, indicating their high degree of tolerance of a wide range of chemicals, and their value as test organisms for prospective preservatives.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0377-8401(81)90011-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15522279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0377840181900110</els_id><sourcerecordid>15522279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-16f8d4d2f5f69a1fceef336606950eadcb44364905d65105d500144d241c45d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouFb_gYeeRA_VTL7aXgRZ_IIFL3oONZm4kX6ZdBf235u64tHLzDA87zDvS8g50GugoG4oL8uiEhQuK7iqKQUo6AFZQFXygjFQh2TxhxyTkxg_E8MqzhakWK6x86ZpY-6GkI8Bt9hPvv_Iu2HT2nnwfW6bbszXze6UHLmE4tlvz8jbw_3r8qlYvTw-L-9WheFcTgUoV1lhmZNO1Q04g-g4V4qqWlJsrHkXgitRU2mVhFRl-kckgQAjpC15Ri72d8cwfG0wTrrz0WDbNj0Om6hBSsZYWSdQ7EEThhgDOj0G3zVhp4HqORs9G9ezcV2B_skmrTJyu5dhMrH1GHQ0HnuD1gc0k7aD___AN--yaPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15522279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemicals for preventing moulding in damp hay</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Collection</source><creator>Lacey, J. ; Lord, K.A. ; Cayley, G.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lacey, J. ; Lord, K.A. ; Cayley, G.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Fewer than one third of more than 100 chemicals tested prevented moulding when 0.5% of active ingredient was added to hay containing 35% water or, alternatively, when 0.02% of active ingredient was added with 0.2% propionic acid or ammonium propionate. Chemicals which prevented moulding in these tests when used alone included aliphatic acids with 2–6 carbon atoms, sorbic acid, short chain aldehydes and phenols, propionic acid, fully or half-neutralized with ammonia, and 8-quinolinol and its derivatives. Formic acid, aliphatic acids with 7–9 carbon atoms, longer chain aldehydes and some fungicides delayed moulding for one to two weeks. Only formaldehyde, 8-quinolinol and its derivatives, and p-nitrophenol increased the activity of 0.2% propionic acid. Although the effective doses of propionic acid, ammonium propionate, and propionic acid, half-neutralised with ammonia, were similar, there was evidence that the presence of free acid in the formulation aided redistribution to overcome undertreatment of pockets in the hay. Further tests of 2-phenyl phenol, phenyl propionate and 8-quinolinol showed that the latter was the best candidate for development. Fungi of the Aspergillus glaucus group were first to colonise most tests that failed, indicating their high degree of tolerance of a wide range of chemicals, and their value as test organisms for prospective preservatives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0377-8401</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2216</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0377-8401(81)90011-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><ispartof>Animal feed science and technology, 1981-01, Vol.6 (4), p.323-336</ispartof><rights>1981</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-16f8d4d2f5f69a1fceef336606950eadcb44364905d65105d500144d241c45d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-16f8d4d2f5f69a1fceef336606950eadcb44364905d65105d500144d241c45d73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0377840181900110$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lacey, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayley, G.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Chemicals for preventing moulding in damp hay</title><title>Animal feed science and technology</title><description>Fewer than one third of more than 100 chemicals tested prevented moulding when 0.5% of active ingredient was added to hay containing 35% water or, alternatively, when 0.02% of active ingredient was added with 0.2% propionic acid or ammonium propionate. Chemicals which prevented moulding in these tests when used alone included aliphatic acids with 2–6 carbon atoms, sorbic acid, short chain aldehydes and phenols, propionic acid, fully or half-neutralized with ammonia, and 8-quinolinol and its derivatives. Formic acid, aliphatic acids with 7–9 carbon atoms, longer chain aldehydes and some fungicides delayed moulding for one to two weeks. Only formaldehyde, 8-quinolinol and its derivatives, and p-nitrophenol increased the activity of 0.2% propionic acid. Although the effective doses of propionic acid, ammonium propionate, and propionic acid, half-neutralised with ammonia, were similar, there was evidence that the presence of free acid in the formulation aided redistribution to overcome undertreatment of pockets in the hay. Further tests of 2-phenyl phenol, phenyl propionate and 8-quinolinol showed that the latter was the best candidate for development. Fungi of the Aspergillus glaucus group were first to colonise most tests that failed, indicating their high degree of tolerance of a wide range of chemicals, and their value as test organisms for prospective preservatives.</description><issn>0377-8401</issn><issn>1873-2216</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouFb_gYeeRA_VTL7aXgRZ_IIFL3oONZm4kX6ZdBf235u64tHLzDA87zDvS8g50GugoG4oL8uiEhQuK7iqKQUo6AFZQFXygjFQh2TxhxyTkxg_E8MqzhakWK6x86ZpY-6GkI8Bt9hPvv_Iu2HT2nnwfW6bbszXze6UHLmE4tlvz8jbw_3r8qlYvTw-L-9WheFcTgUoV1lhmZNO1Q04g-g4V4qqWlJsrHkXgitRU2mVhFRl-kckgQAjpC15Ri72d8cwfG0wTrrz0WDbNj0Om6hBSsZYWSdQ7EEThhgDOj0G3zVhp4HqORs9G9ezcV2B_skmrTJyu5dhMrH1GHQ0HnuD1gc0k7aD___AN--yaPg</recordid><startdate>19810101</startdate><enddate>19810101</enddate><creator>Lacey, J.</creator><creator>Lord, K.A.</creator><creator>Cayley, G.R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19810101</creationdate><title>Chemicals for preventing moulding in damp hay</title><author>Lacey, J. ; Lord, K.A. ; Cayley, G.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-16f8d4d2f5f69a1fceef336606950eadcb44364905d65105d500144d241c45d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lacey, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lord, K.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cayley, G.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lacey, J.</au><au>Lord, K.A.</au><au>Cayley, G.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemicals for preventing moulding in damp hay</atitle><jtitle>Animal feed science and technology</jtitle><date>1981-01-01</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>336</epage><pages>323-336</pages><issn>0377-8401</issn><eissn>1873-2216</eissn><abstract>Fewer than one third of more than 100 chemicals tested prevented moulding when 0.5% of active ingredient was added to hay containing 35% water or, alternatively, when 0.02% of active ingredient was added with 0.2% propionic acid or ammonium propionate. Chemicals which prevented moulding in these tests when used alone included aliphatic acids with 2–6 carbon atoms, sorbic acid, short chain aldehydes and phenols, propionic acid, fully or half-neutralized with ammonia, and 8-quinolinol and its derivatives. Formic acid, aliphatic acids with 7–9 carbon atoms, longer chain aldehydes and some fungicides delayed moulding for one to two weeks. Only formaldehyde, 8-quinolinol and its derivatives, and p-nitrophenol increased the activity of 0.2% propionic acid. Although the effective doses of propionic acid, ammonium propionate, and propionic acid, half-neutralised with ammonia, were similar, there was evidence that the presence of free acid in the formulation aided redistribution to overcome undertreatment of pockets in the hay. Further tests of 2-phenyl phenol, phenyl propionate and 8-quinolinol showed that the latter was the best candidate for development. Fungi of the Aspergillus glaucus group were first to colonise most tests that failed, indicating their high degree of tolerance of a wide range of chemicals, and their value as test organisms for prospective preservatives.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0377-8401(81)90011-0</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0377-8401
ispartof Animal feed science and technology, 1981-01, Vol.6 (4), p.323-336
issn 0377-8401
1873-2216
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15522279
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Collection
title Chemicals for preventing moulding in damp hay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemicals%20for%20preventing%20moulding%20in%20damp%20hay&rft.jtitle=Animal%20feed%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Lacey,%20J.&rft.date=1981-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=336&rft.pages=323-336&rft.issn=0377-8401&rft.eissn=1873-2216&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0377-8401(81)90011-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E15522279%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15522279&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0377840181900110&rfr_iscdi=true