Tidal signature recorded in burrow fill

The arrangement of sediment couplets preserved in Thalassinoides shafts suggests that tides regulated the passive filling of these trace fossils and, thus, represent tubular tidalites. The thickness variation in individual layers and couplets implies a mixed diurnal, semi‐diurnal tidal signature whe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sedimentology 2014-08, Vol.61 (5), p.1198-1210
Hauptverfasser: Wetzel, Andreas, Carmona, Noelia, Ponce, Juan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1210
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1198
container_title Sedimentology
container_volume 61
creator Wetzel, Andreas
Carmona, Noelia
Ponce, Juan
description The arrangement of sediment couplets preserved in Thalassinoides shafts suggests that tides regulated the passive filling of these trace fossils and, thus, represent tubular tidalites. The thickness variation in individual layers and couplets implies a mixed diurnal, semi‐diurnal tidal signature where packages of either thick‐layered or thin‐layered couplets alternate. Calcarenitic sediment accumulated when tidal current velocity was too high to allow deposition of mud, whereas a marly mud layer is interpreted to have formed during more tranquil times of a tidal cycle (in particular, low‐tide slack water). The tidal record within the burrows covers a few weeks and the corresponding spring–neap cycles. The fill of the Thalassinoides shafts is the only known record to decipher the tidal signature from otherwise totally bioturbated sediments. These deposits accumulated in a lower‐shoreface to upper‐offshore setting during the late Miocene on a shallow shelf extending from the Atlantic Ocean to the west into northern Patagonia. The fill of all investigated burrows started around spring tide and, thus, the behaviour of the burrow producers – probably crustaceans – is speculated to have been affected by tides or the high water level because all studied burrows became abandoned around the same period of a tidal cycle.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sed.12097
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551639187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1551639187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4967-53b5b01cc43b161571526e94b1d7776014268c02c63f3cd376eb18843f818bcc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgUQpDLxBJAZgSOsb_yUjKqUgCqhQhMRiJY6DXNKk2IlK3x5DgAEJL3f5ztX1QegQ8AD8GzqdDyDCidhCPSCchQQnsI16GBMRYkH5LtpzboExcBonPXQ8N3laBs68VGnTWh1YrWqb6zwwVZC11tbroDBluY92irR0-uB79tHjxXg-ugynd5Or0dk0TGnCRchIxjIMSlGSAQcmgEVcJzSDXAjBMdCIxwpHipOCqJwIrjOIY0qKGOJMKdJHJ93ela3fWu0auTRO6bJMK123TgJjwEkCsfD06A9d1K2t_HVeUUbAfxG8Ou2UsrVzVhdyZc0ytRsJWH5WJn1l8qsyb4edXZtSb_6H8mF8_pMIu4RxjX7_TaT2VXJBBJNPtxM5vZ7dsNnsXj6TD1SReQU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1545311641</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tidal signature recorded in burrow fill</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Wetzel, Andreas ; Carmona, Noelia ; Ponce, Juan</creator><contributor>Mallinson, Dave</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wetzel, Andreas ; Carmona, Noelia ; Ponce, Juan ; Mallinson, Dave</creatorcontrib><description>The arrangement of sediment couplets preserved in Thalassinoides shafts suggests that tides regulated the passive filling of these trace fossils and, thus, represent tubular tidalites. The thickness variation in individual layers and couplets implies a mixed diurnal, semi‐diurnal tidal signature where packages of either thick‐layered or thin‐layered couplets alternate. Calcarenitic sediment accumulated when tidal current velocity was too high to allow deposition of mud, whereas a marly mud layer is interpreted to have formed during more tranquil times of a tidal cycle (in particular, low‐tide slack water). The tidal record within the burrows covers a few weeks and the corresponding spring–neap cycles. The fill of the Thalassinoides shafts is the only known record to decipher the tidal signature from otherwise totally bioturbated sediments. These deposits accumulated in a lower‐shoreface to upper‐offshore setting during the late Miocene on a shallow shelf extending from the Atlantic Ocean to the west into northern Patagonia. The fill of all investigated burrows started around spring tide and, thus, the behaviour of the burrow producers – probably crustaceans – is speculated to have been affected by tides or the high water level because all studied burrows became abandoned around the same period of a tidal cycle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sed.12097</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SEDIAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madrid: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Marine ; Miocene ; mixed tides ; Patagonia ; Thalassinoides ; tidal bundles ; Tides ; tubular tidalites</subject><ispartof>Sedimentology, 2014-08, Vol.61 (5), p.1198-1210</ispartof><rights>2013 The Authors Sedimentology © 2013 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><rights>Journal compilation © 2014 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4967-53b5b01cc43b161571526e94b1d7776014268c02c63f3cd376eb18843f818bcc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4967-53b5b01cc43b161571526e94b1d7776014268c02c63f3cd376eb18843f818bcc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsed.12097$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsed.12097$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Mallinson, Dave</contributor><creatorcontrib>Wetzel, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Noelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce, Juan</creatorcontrib><title>Tidal signature recorded in burrow fill</title><title>Sedimentology</title><addtitle>Sedimentology</addtitle><description>The arrangement of sediment couplets preserved in Thalassinoides shafts suggests that tides regulated the passive filling of these trace fossils and, thus, represent tubular tidalites. The thickness variation in individual layers and couplets implies a mixed diurnal, semi‐diurnal tidal signature where packages of either thick‐layered or thin‐layered couplets alternate. Calcarenitic sediment accumulated when tidal current velocity was too high to allow deposition of mud, whereas a marly mud layer is interpreted to have formed during more tranquil times of a tidal cycle (in particular, low‐tide slack water). The tidal record within the burrows covers a few weeks and the corresponding spring–neap cycles. The fill of the Thalassinoides shafts is the only known record to decipher the tidal signature from otherwise totally bioturbated sediments. These deposits accumulated in a lower‐shoreface to upper‐offshore setting during the late Miocene on a shallow shelf extending from the Atlantic Ocean to the west into northern Patagonia. The fill of all investigated burrows started around spring tide and, thus, the behaviour of the burrow producers – probably crustaceans – is speculated to have been affected by tides or the high water level because all studied burrows became abandoned around the same period of a tidal cycle.</description><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Miocene</subject><subject>mixed tides</subject><subject>Patagonia</subject><subject>Thalassinoides</subject><subject>tidal bundles</subject><subject>Tides</subject><subject>tubular tidalites</subject><issn>0037-0746</issn><issn>1365-3091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10L1OwzAUBWALgUQpDLxBJAZgSOsb_yUjKqUgCqhQhMRiJY6DXNKk2IlK3x5DgAEJL3f5ztX1QegQ8AD8GzqdDyDCidhCPSCchQQnsI16GBMRYkH5LtpzboExcBonPXQ8N3laBs68VGnTWh1YrWqb6zwwVZC11tbroDBluY92irR0-uB79tHjxXg-ugynd5Or0dk0TGnCRchIxjIMSlGSAQcmgEVcJzSDXAjBMdCIxwpHipOCqJwIrjOIY0qKGOJMKdJHJ93ela3fWu0auTRO6bJMK123TgJjwEkCsfD06A9d1K2t_HVeUUbAfxG8Ou2UsrVzVhdyZc0ytRsJWH5WJn1l8qsyb4edXZtSb_6H8mF8_pMIu4RxjX7_TaT2VXJBBJNPtxM5vZ7dsNnsXj6TD1SReQU</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Wetzel, Andreas</creator><creator>Carmona, Noelia</creator><creator>Ponce, Juan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Tidal signature recorded in burrow fill</title><author>Wetzel, Andreas ; Carmona, Noelia ; Ponce, Juan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4967-53b5b01cc43b161571526e94b1d7776014268c02c63f3cd376eb18843f818bcc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Miocene</topic><topic>mixed tides</topic><topic>Patagonia</topic><topic>Thalassinoides</topic><topic>tidal bundles</topic><topic>Tides</topic><topic>tubular tidalites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wetzel, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Noelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ponce, Juan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wetzel, Andreas</au><au>Carmona, Noelia</au><au>Ponce, Juan</au><au>Mallinson, Dave</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tidal signature recorded in burrow fill</atitle><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle><addtitle>Sedimentology</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1198</spage><epage>1210</epage><pages>1198-1210</pages><issn>0037-0746</issn><eissn>1365-3091</eissn><coden>SEDIAT</coden><abstract>The arrangement of sediment couplets preserved in Thalassinoides shafts suggests that tides regulated the passive filling of these trace fossils and, thus, represent tubular tidalites. The thickness variation in individual layers and couplets implies a mixed diurnal, semi‐diurnal tidal signature where packages of either thick‐layered or thin‐layered couplets alternate. Calcarenitic sediment accumulated when tidal current velocity was too high to allow deposition of mud, whereas a marly mud layer is interpreted to have formed during more tranquil times of a tidal cycle (in particular, low‐tide slack water). The tidal record within the burrows covers a few weeks and the corresponding spring–neap cycles. The fill of the Thalassinoides shafts is the only known record to decipher the tidal signature from otherwise totally bioturbated sediments. These deposits accumulated in a lower‐shoreface to upper‐offshore setting during the late Miocene on a shallow shelf extending from the Atlantic Ocean to the west into northern Patagonia. The fill of all investigated burrows started around spring tide and, thus, the behaviour of the burrow producers – probably crustaceans – is speculated to have been affected by tides or the high water level because all studied burrows became abandoned around the same period of a tidal cycle.</abstract><cop>Madrid</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/sed.12097</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-0746
ispartof Sedimentology, 2014-08, Vol.61 (5), p.1198-1210
issn 0037-0746
1365-3091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551639187
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Marine
Miocene
mixed tides
Patagonia
Thalassinoides
tidal bundles
Tides
tubular tidalites
title Tidal signature recorded in burrow fill
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T02%3A22%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tidal%20signature%20recorded%20in%20burrow%20fill&rft.jtitle=Sedimentology&rft.au=Wetzel,%20Andreas&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1198&rft.epage=1210&rft.pages=1198-1210&rft.issn=0037-0746&rft.eissn=1365-3091&rft.coden=SEDIAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sed.12097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1551639187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1545311641&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true