Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging
With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2013-08, Vol.54 (8), p.1464-1471 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1471 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1464 |
container_title | Journal of Nuclear Medicine |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Ziegler, Susanne Braun, Harald Ritt, Philipp Hocke, Carsten Kuwert, Torsten Quick, Harald H |
description | With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and vice versa. In this study, different approaches to fluid selection were considered and systematically evaluated with respect to their usability for simultaneous PET/MR phantom imaging.
Demineralized water, water with increased electrical conductivity, a water-oil emulsion, and monoethylene and triethylene glycol were investigated in MR and PET measurements using the most common PET tracer (18)F-FDG. As an alternative to (18)F-FDG, a modified PET tracer ((18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex) was investigated toward its ability to dissolve in pure oil, which provides good signal homogeneity in MR imaging. Measurements were performed on a 3.0 T integrated PET/MR whole-body system using a National Electrical Manufacturers Association quality-standard phantom.
All tested fluids dissolved the radiotracer (18)F-FDG homogeneously. Regarding their suitability for MR at 3.0 T, all fluids significantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the tested phantom by a factor of 2.0). When the use of (18)F-FDG was preferred, triethylene glycol provided the best compromise (flip angle increase by a factor of 1.13). The potential alternative tracer, (18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex, dissolved in pure oil; however, it is not optimal in its tested composition because it accumulates at the bottom of the phantom during the time of measurement.
This study provides a systematic approach toward phantom fluid selection for imaging a given quality-standard body phantom--and phantoms of comparable size--at 3.0 T. For simultaneous PET/MR scans using the standard tracer (18)F-FDG, an alternative fluid to water and oil is proposed that serves as a viable option for both imaging modalities. Nevertheless, when water is preferred, ways to improve MR image homogeneity are presented. The tested alternative PET tracer enables the use of pure oil in combined scans, but the tracer composition needs to be optimized for phantom measurement applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2967/jnumed.112.116376 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551615486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1417533732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5e75fc6a92617ea6a8684c6444635512a34223bf6ba50428f9853d9ff3647fab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLAzEQx4MotlY_gBcJePGy7eY1yR6l1AfUB1rPS3abtFv2UTcbod_elG0vXjyECcxv_szwQ-iaxGOagJxsal-Z5ZgQGh4wCSdoSAQTkQCQp2gYEyCRELEYoAvnNnEcg1LqHA0okwmlUg3R6-fOdabSXZFj86NLH35NjRuLt2tdd02FbemLpcO2abErKl92ujaNd_h9tpi8fOD1LmuLJS4qvSrq1SU6s7p05upQR-jrYbaYPkXzt8fn6f08yrkkXSSMFDYHnVAg0mjQChTPgXMOTAhCNeOUssxCpkXMqbKJEmyZWMuAS6szNkJ3fe62bb69cV1aFS43Zdkvl5KQAkRwBf-jnEjBmGQ0oLd_0E3j2zocEijKJQBRe4r0VN42zrXGpts2nN_uUhKney9p7yUNXtLeS5i5OST7bN86ThxFsF9Ra4hx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1424766182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ziegler, Susanne ; Braun, Harald ; Ritt, Philipp ; Hocke, Carsten ; Kuwert, Torsten ; Quick, Harald H</creator><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Susanne ; Braun, Harald ; Ritt, Philipp ; Hocke, Carsten ; Kuwert, Torsten ; Quick, Harald H</creatorcontrib><description>With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and vice versa. In this study, different approaches to fluid selection were considered and systematically evaluated with respect to their usability for simultaneous PET/MR phantom imaging.
Demineralized water, water with increased electrical conductivity, a water-oil emulsion, and monoethylene and triethylene glycol were investigated in MR and PET measurements using the most common PET tracer (18)F-FDG. As an alternative to (18)F-FDG, a modified PET tracer ((18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex) was investigated toward its ability to dissolve in pure oil, which provides good signal homogeneity in MR imaging. Measurements were performed on a 3.0 T integrated PET/MR whole-body system using a National Electrical Manufacturers Association quality-standard phantom.
All tested fluids dissolved the radiotracer (18)F-FDG homogeneously. Regarding their suitability for MR at 3.0 T, all fluids significantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the tested phantom by a factor of 2.0). When the use of (18)F-FDG was preferred, triethylene glycol provided the best compromise (flip angle increase by a factor of 1.13). The potential alternative tracer, (18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex, dissolved in pure oil; however, it is not optimal in its tested composition because it accumulates at the bottom of the phantom during the time of measurement.
This study provides a systematic approach toward phantom fluid selection for imaging a given quality-standard body phantom--and phantoms of comparable size--at 3.0 T. For simultaneous PET/MR scans using the standard tracer (18)F-FDG, an alternative fluid to water and oil is proposed that serves as a viable option for both imaging modalities. Nevertheless, when water is preferred, ways to improve MR image homogeneity are presented. The tested alternative PET tracer enables the use of pure oil in combined scans, but the tracer composition needs to be optimized for phantom measurement applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.116376</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23792278</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Conductivity ; Feasibility Studies ; Fluorides ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Measurement ; Medical imaging ; Nuclear medicine ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2013-08, Vol.54 (8), p.1464-1471</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Aug 1, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5e75fc6a92617ea6a8684c6444635512a34223bf6ba50428f9853d9ff3647fab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5e75fc6a92617ea6a8684c6444635512a34223bf6ba50428f9853d9ff3647fab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23792278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritt, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocke, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwert, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quick, Harald H</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and vice versa. In this study, different approaches to fluid selection were considered and systematically evaluated with respect to their usability for simultaneous PET/MR phantom imaging.
Demineralized water, water with increased electrical conductivity, a water-oil emulsion, and monoethylene and triethylene glycol were investigated in MR and PET measurements using the most common PET tracer (18)F-FDG. As an alternative to (18)F-FDG, a modified PET tracer ((18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex) was investigated toward its ability to dissolve in pure oil, which provides good signal homogeneity in MR imaging. Measurements were performed on a 3.0 T integrated PET/MR whole-body system using a National Electrical Manufacturers Association quality-standard phantom.
All tested fluids dissolved the radiotracer (18)F-FDG homogeneously. Regarding their suitability for MR at 3.0 T, all fluids significantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the tested phantom by a factor of 2.0). When the use of (18)F-FDG was preferred, triethylene glycol provided the best compromise (flip angle increase by a factor of 1.13). The potential alternative tracer, (18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex, dissolved in pure oil; however, it is not optimal in its tested composition because it accumulates at the bottom of the phantom during the time of measurement.
This study provides a systematic approach toward phantom fluid selection for imaging a given quality-standard body phantom--and phantoms of comparable size--at 3.0 T. For simultaneous PET/MR scans using the standard tracer (18)F-FDG, an alternative fluid to water and oil is proposed that serves as a viable option for both imaging modalities. Nevertheless, when water is preferred, ways to improve MR image homogeneity are presented. The tested alternative PET tracer enables the use of pure oil in combined scans, but the tracer composition needs to be optimized for phantom measurement applications.</description><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Fluorides</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLAzEQx4MotlY_gBcJePGy7eY1yR6l1AfUB1rPS3abtFv2UTcbod_elG0vXjyECcxv_szwQ-iaxGOagJxsal-Z5ZgQGh4wCSdoSAQTkQCQp2gYEyCRELEYoAvnNnEcg1LqHA0okwmlUg3R6-fOdabSXZFj86NLH35NjRuLt2tdd02FbemLpcO2abErKl92ujaNd_h9tpi8fOD1LmuLJS4qvSrq1SU6s7p05upQR-jrYbaYPkXzt8fn6f08yrkkXSSMFDYHnVAg0mjQChTPgXMOTAhCNeOUssxCpkXMqbKJEmyZWMuAS6szNkJ3fe62bb69cV1aFS43Zdkvl5KQAkRwBf-jnEjBmGQ0oLd_0E3j2zocEijKJQBRe4r0VN42zrXGpts2nN_uUhKney9p7yUNXtLeS5i5OST7bN86ThxFsF9Ra4hx</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Ziegler, Susanne</creator><creator>Braun, Harald</creator><creator>Ritt, Philipp</creator><creator>Hocke, Carsten</creator><creator>Kuwert, Torsten</creator><creator>Quick, Harald H</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging</title><author>Ziegler, Susanne ; Braun, Harald ; Ritt, Philipp ; Hocke, Carsten ; Kuwert, Torsten ; Quick, Harald H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5e75fc6a92617ea6a8684c6444635512a34223bf6ba50428f9853d9ff3647fab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Fluorides</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritt, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocke, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwert, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quick, Harald H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ziegler, Susanne</au><au>Braun, Harald</au><au>Ritt, Philipp</au><au>Hocke, Carsten</au><au>Kuwert, Torsten</au><au>Quick, Harald H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1464</spage><epage>1471</epage><pages>1464-1471</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and vice versa. In this study, different approaches to fluid selection were considered and systematically evaluated with respect to their usability for simultaneous PET/MR phantom imaging.
Demineralized water, water with increased electrical conductivity, a water-oil emulsion, and monoethylene and triethylene glycol were investigated in MR and PET measurements using the most common PET tracer (18)F-FDG. As an alternative to (18)F-FDG, a modified PET tracer ((18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex) was investigated toward its ability to dissolve in pure oil, which provides good signal homogeneity in MR imaging. Measurements were performed on a 3.0 T integrated PET/MR whole-body system using a National Electrical Manufacturers Association quality-standard phantom.
All tested fluids dissolved the radiotracer (18)F-FDG homogeneously. Regarding their suitability for MR at 3.0 T, all fluids significantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the tested phantom by a factor of 2.0). When the use of (18)F-FDG was preferred, triethylene glycol provided the best compromise (flip angle increase by a factor of 1.13). The potential alternative tracer, (18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex, dissolved in pure oil; however, it is not optimal in its tested composition because it accumulates at the bottom of the phantom during the time of measurement.
This study provides a systematic approach toward phantom fluid selection for imaging a given quality-standard body phantom--and phantoms of comparable size--at 3.0 T. For simultaneous PET/MR scans using the standard tracer (18)F-FDG, an alternative fluid to water and oil is proposed that serves as a viable option for both imaging modalities. Nevertheless, when water is preferred, ways to improve MR image homogeneity are presented. The tested alternative PET tracer enables the use of pure oil in combined scans, but the tracer composition needs to be optimized for phantom measurement applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>23792278</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.112.116376</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0161-5505 |
ispartof | Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2013-08, Vol.54 (8), p.1464-1471 |
issn | 0161-5505 1535-5667 2159-662X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551615486 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Conductivity Feasibility Studies Fluorides Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Magnetic fields Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation Measurement Medical imaging Nuclear medicine Phantoms, Imaging Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation Time Factors |
title | Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A57%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20evaluation%20of%20phantom%20fluids%20for%20simultaneous%20PET/MR%20hybrid%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Ziegler,%20Susanne&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1464&rft.epage=1471&rft.pages=1464-1471&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.112.116376&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1417533732%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1424766182&rft_id=info:pmid/23792278&rfr_iscdi=true |