Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging

With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2013-08, Vol.54 (8), p.1464-1471
Hauptverfasser: Ziegler, Susanne, Braun, Harald, Ritt, Philipp, Hocke, Carsten, Kuwert, Torsten, Quick, Harald H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1471
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1464
container_title Journal of Nuclear Medicine
container_volume 54
creator Ziegler, Susanne
Braun, Harald
Ritt, Philipp
Hocke, Carsten
Kuwert, Torsten
Quick, Harald H
description With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and vice versa. In this study, different approaches to fluid selection were considered and systematically evaluated with respect to their usability for simultaneous PET/MR phantom imaging. Demineralized water, water with increased electrical conductivity, a water-oil emulsion, and monoethylene and triethylene glycol were investigated in MR and PET measurements using the most common PET tracer (18)F-FDG. As an alternative to (18)F-FDG, a modified PET tracer ((18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex) was investigated toward its ability to dissolve in pure oil, which provides good signal homogeneity in MR imaging. Measurements were performed on a 3.0 T integrated PET/MR whole-body system using a National Electrical Manufacturers Association quality-standard phantom. All tested fluids dissolved the radiotracer (18)F-FDG homogeneously. Regarding their suitability for MR at 3.0 T, all fluids significantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the tested phantom by a factor of 2.0). When the use of (18)F-FDG was preferred, triethylene glycol provided the best compromise (flip angle increase by a factor of 1.13). The potential alternative tracer, (18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex, dissolved in pure oil; however, it is not optimal in its tested composition because it accumulates at the bottom of the phantom during the time of measurement. This study provides a systematic approach toward phantom fluid selection for imaging a given quality-standard body phantom--and phantoms of comparable size--at 3.0 T. For simultaneous PET/MR scans using the standard tracer (18)F-FDG, an alternative fluid to water and oil is proposed that serves as a viable option for both imaging modalities. Nevertheless, when water is preferred, ways to improve MR image homogeneity are presented. The tested alternative PET tracer enables the use of pure oil in combined scans, but the tracer composition needs to be optimized for phantom measurement applications.
doi_str_mv 10.2967/jnumed.112.116376
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551615486</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1417533732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5e75fc6a92617ea6a8684c6444635512a34223bf6ba50428f9853d9ff3647fab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLAzEQx4MotlY_gBcJePGy7eY1yR6l1AfUB1rPS3abtFv2UTcbod_elG0vXjyECcxv_szwQ-iaxGOagJxsal-Z5ZgQGh4wCSdoSAQTkQCQp2gYEyCRELEYoAvnNnEcg1LqHA0okwmlUg3R6-fOdabSXZFj86NLH35NjRuLt2tdd02FbemLpcO2abErKl92ujaNd_h9tpi8fOD1LmuLJS4qvSrq1SU6s7p05upQR-jrYbaYPkXzt8fn6f08yrkkXSSMFDYHnVAg0mjQChTPgXMOTAhCNeOUssxCpkXMqbKJEmyZWMuAS6szNkJ3fe62bb69cV1aFS43Zdkvl5KQAkRwBf-jnEjBmGQ0oLd_0E3j2zocEijKJQBRe4r0VN42zrXGpts2nN_uUhKney9p7yUNXtLeS5i5OST7bN86ThxFsF9Ra4hx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1424766182</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ziegler, Susanne ; Braun, Harald ; Ritt, Philipp ; Hocke, Carsten ; Kuwert, Torsten ; Quick, Harald H</creator><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Susanne ; Braun, Harald ; Ritt, Philipp ; Hocke, Carsten ; Kuwert, Torsten ; Quick, Harald H</creatorcontrib><description>With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and vice versa. In this study, different approaches to fluid selection were considered and systematically evaluated with respect to their usability for simultaneous PET/MR phantom imaging. Demineralized water, water with increased electrical conductivity, a water-oil emulsion, and monoethylene and triethylene glycol were investigated in MR and PET measurements using the most common PET tracer (18)F-FDG. As an alternative to (18)F-FDG, a modified PET tracer ((18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex) was investigated toward its ability to dissolve in pure oil, which provides good signal homogeneity in MR imaging. Measurements were performed on a 3.0 T integrated PET/MR whole-body system using a National Electrical Manufacturers Association quality-standard phantom. All tested fluids dissolved the radiotracer (18)F-FDG homogeneously. Regarding their suitability for MR at 3.0 T, all fluids significantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the tested phantom by a factor of 2.0). When the use of (18)F-FDG was preferred, triethylene glycol provided the best compromise (flip angle increase by a factor of 1.13). The potential alternative tracer, (18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex, dissolved in pure oil; however, it is not optimal in its tested composition because it accumulates at the bottom of the phantom during the time of measurement. This study provides a systematic approach toward phantom fluid selection for imaging a given quality-standard body phantom--and phantoms of comparable size--at 3.0 T. For simultaneous PET/MR scans using the standard tracer (18)F-FDG, an alternative fluid to water and oil is proposed that serves as a viable option for both imaging modalities. Nevertheless, when water is preferred, ways to improve MR image homogeneity are presented. The tested alternative PET tracer enables the use of pure oil in combined scans, but the tracer composition needs to be optimized for phantom measurement applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2159-662X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.112.116376</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23792278</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMEAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Conductivity ; Feasibility Studies ; Fluorides ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Magnetic fields ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation ; Measurement ; Medical imaging ; Nuclear medicine ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2013-08, Vol.54 (8), p.1464-1471</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Aug 1, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5e75fc6a92617ea6a8684c6444635512a34223bf6ba50428f9853d9ff3647fab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5e75fc6a92617ea6a8684c6444635512a34223bf6ba50428f9853d9ff3647fab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23792278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritt, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocke, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwert, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quick, Harald H</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging</title><title>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><description>With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and vice versa. In this study, different approaches to fluid selection were considered and systematically evaluated with respect to their usability for simultaneous PET/MR phantom imaging. Demineralized water, water with increased electrical conductivity, a water-oil emulsion, and monoethylene and triethylene glycol were investigated in MR and PET measurements using the most common PET tracer (18)F-FDG. As an alternative to (18)F-FDG, a modified PET tracer ((18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex) was investigated toward its ability to dissolve in pure oil, which provides good signal homogeneity in MR imaging. Measurements were performed on a 3.0 T integrated PET/MR whole-body system using a National Electrical Manufacturers Association quality-standard phantom. All tested fluids dissolved the radiotracer (18)F-FDG homogeneously. Regarding their suitability for MR at 3.0 T, all fluids significantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the tested phantom by a factor of 2.0). When the use of (18)F-FDG was preferred, triethylene glycol provided the best compromise (flip angle increase by a factor of 1.13). The potential alternative tracer, (18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex, dissolved in pure oil; however, it is not optimal in its tested composition because it accumulates at the bottom of the phantom during the time of measurement. This study provides a systematic approach toward phantom fluid selection for imaging a given quality-standard body phantom--and phantoms of comparable size--at 3.0 T. For simultaneous PET/MR scans using the standard tracer (18)F-FDG, an alternative fluid to water and oil is proposed that serves as a viable option for both imaging modalities. Nevertheless, when water is preferred, ways to improve MR image homogeneity are presented. The tested alternative PET tracer enables the use of pure oil in combined scans, but the tracer composition needs to be optimized for phantom measurement applications.</description><subject>Conductivity</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Fluorides</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><issn>2159-662X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLAzEQx4MotlY_gBcJePGy7eY1yR6l1AfUB1rPS3abtFv2UTcbod_elG0vXjyECcxv_szwQ-iaxGOagJxsal-Z5ZgQGh4wCSdoSAQTkQCQp2gYEyCRELEYoAvnNnEcg1LqHA0okwmlUg3R6-fOdabSXZFj86NLH35NjRuLt2tdd02FbemLpcO2abErKl92ujaNd_h9tpi8fOD1LmuLJS4qvSrq1SU6s7p05upQR-jrYbaYPkXzt8fn6f08yrkkXSSMFDYHnVAg0mjQChTPgXMOTAhCNeOUssxCpkXMqbKJEmyZWMuAS6szNkJ3fe62bb69cV1aFS43Zdkvl5KQAkRwBf-jnEjBmGQ0oLd_0E3j2zocEijKJQBRe4r0VN42zrXGpts2nN_uUhKney9p7yUNXtLeS5i5OST7bN86ThxFsF9Ra4hx</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>Ziegler, Susanne</creator><creator>Braun, Harald</creator><creator>Ritt, Philipp</creator><creator>Hocke, Carsten</creator><creator>Kuwert, Torsten</creator><creator>Quick, Harald H</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging</title><author>Ziegler, Susanne ; Braun, Harald ; Ritt, Philipp ; Hocke, Carsten ; Kuwert, Torsten ; Quick, Harald H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-5e75fc6a92617ea6a8684c6444635512a34223bf6ba50428f9853d9ff3647fab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Conductivity</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Fluorides</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ziegler, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braun, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritt, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hocke, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuwert, Torsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quick, Harald H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ziegler, Susanne</au><au>Braun, Harald</au><au>Ritt, Philipp</au><au>Hocke, Carsten</au><au>Kuwert, Torsten</au><au>Quick, Harald H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1464</spage><epage>1471</epage><pages>1464-1471</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><eissn>2159-662X</eissn><coden>JNMEAQ</coden><abstract>With the recent advent of integrated PET/MR hybrid systems, the need for simultaneous PET and MR phantom measurements arises. Phantom fluids that are used in stand-alone MR systems, especially in larger phantoms and at a high magnetic field strength, are not necessarily applicable in PET imaging and vice versa. In this study, different approaches to fluid selection were considered and systematically evaluated with respect to their usability for simultaneous PET/MR phantom imaging. Demineralized water, water with increased electrical conductivity, a water-oil emulsion, and monoethylene and triethylene glycol were investigated in MR and PET measurements using the most common PET tracer (18)F-FDG. As an alternative to (18)F-FDG, a modified PET tracer ((18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex) was investigated toward its ability to dissolve in pure oil, which provides good signal homogeneity in MR imaging. Measurements were performed on a 3.0 T integrated PET/MR whole-body system using a National Electrical Manufacturers Association quality-standard phantom. All tested fluids dissolved the radiotracer (18)F-FDG homogeneously. Regarding their suitability for MR at 3.0 T, all fluids significantly improved the homogeneity compared to pure water (increase of excitation flip angle within the tested phantom by a factor of 2.0). When the use of (18)F-FDG was preferred, triethylene glycol provided the best compromise (flip angle increase by a factor of 1.13). The potential alternative tracer, (18)F-fluoride Kryptofix 222 complex, dissolved in pure oil; however, it is not optimal in its tested composition because it accumulates at the bottom of the phantom during the time of measurement. This study provides a systematic approach toward phantom fluid selection for imaging a given quality-standard body phantom--and phantoms of comparable size--at 3.0 T. For simultaneous PET/MR scans using the standard tracer (18)F-FDG, an alternative fluid to water and oil is proposed that serves as a viable option for both imaging modalities. Nevertheless, when water is preferred, ways to improve MR image homogeneity are presented. The tested alternative PET tracer enables the use of pure oil in combined scans, but the tracer composition needs to be optimized for phantom measurement applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub><pmid>23792278</pmid><doi>10.2967/jnumed.112.116376</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2013-08, Vol.54 (8), p.1464-1471
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
2159-662X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551615486
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Conductivity
Feasibility Studies
Fluorides
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Magnetic fields
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - instrumentation
Measurement
Medical imaging
Nuclear medicine
Phantoms, Imaging
Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation
Time Factors
title Systematic evaluation of phantom fluids for simultaneous PET/MR hybrid imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T02%3A57%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20evaluation%20of%20phantom%20fluids%20for%20simultaneous%20PET/MR%20hybrid%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Ziegler,%20Susanne&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1464&rft.epage=1471&rft.pages=1464-1471&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft.coden=JNMEAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.2967/jnumed.112.116376&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1417533732%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1424766182&rft_id=info:pmid/23792278&rfr_iscdi=true