Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia

Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of antimicrobial agents 2014-08, Vol.44 (2), p.105-111
Hauptverfasser: Abraham, Sam, Trott, Darren J, Jordan, David, Gordon, David M, Groves, Mitchell D, Fairbrother, John M, Smith, Matthew G, Zhang, Ren, Chapman, Toni A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
container_title International journal of antimicrobial agents
container_volume 44
creator Abraham, Sam
Trott, Darren J
Jordan, David
Gordon, David M
Groves, Mitchell D
Fairbrother, John M
Smith, Matthew G
Zhang, Ren
Chapman, Toni A
description Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin, integron and antimicrobial resistance gene typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility phenotyping. Isolates of the most commonly observed O serogroup (O149) were highly clonal with a lower frequency of antimicrobial resistance compared with the less common O141 serogroup isolates, which were more genetically diverse and resistant to a greater array of antimicrobials. The O149 and O141 isolates belonged to sequence types (STs) ST100 and ST1260, respectively. A small number of new STs were identified for the least common serogroups, including O157 (ST4245), O138 (ST4244), O139 (ST4246) and O8 (ST4247). A high frequency of plasmid replicons was observed among all ETEC isolates. However, O149 isolates predominantly carried IncFIB, I1, HI1 and FIC, whereas O141 isolates carried a more varied array, including IncI1, FIB, FIC, HI1, I1, Y and, most significantly, A/C. O141 isolates also possessed a greater diversity of bacteriocins, with almost one-half of the isolates carrying colicin E3 (44.4%; 12/27) and E7 (48.1%; 13/27). This study shows that Australian porcine ETEC are distinct from isolates obtained in other parts of the world with respect to the MLST profile and the absence of resistance to critically important antimicrobials, including third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551329280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092485791400140X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1551329280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-9b45134b24264ce819d5fcd6cc478d191f06fd48a8cc0c671ea2944d2a762a1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk2LFDEQbURxZ1f_grQ3Lz2mMumvi7AMqyssKKjgLWQq1TM1pjtjkl6cs3_cDLOKeBIKEsKrV5X3XlG8BLEEAc3r_ZL3Zko8MprtUgpQS5EL4FGxgK6VVdvD6nGxEL1UVVe3_UVxGeNeCKhXqn5aXEjVq_zeLYqfH3dH57c0UWIszWTL0TvC2ZlQ8hR5u0sxX5Iv045KuvduTuyn0g_lOLvENszbKlDkmPJG5cEH5CkDp0TBJ_-DM3Umvom4o8C4Y1Oid5wpy-s5pmAcm2fFk8G4SM8fzqviy9ubz-vb6u7Du_fr67sKa2hS1W9UDSu1kUo2CqmD3tYD2gZRtZ2FHgbRDFZ1pkMU2LRARvZKWWnaRhqwq6vi1Zn3EPz3mWLSI0ck58xEfo4a6swve9mJDO3PUAw-xkCDPgQeTThqEPrkgd7rvzzQJw-0yAWQe188jJk3I9k_nb9Fz4D1GUD5s_dMQUdkmpAsB8Kkref_GvPmHxZ0nLU27hsdKe79HKaspgYdpRb60ykMpyyAyjlQ4uvqF42Ntsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1551329280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Abraham, Sam ; Trott, Darren J ; Jordan, David ; Gordon, David M ; Groves, Mitchell D ; Fairbrother, John M ; Smith, Matthew G ; Zhang, Ren ; Chapman, Toni A</creator><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Sam ; Trott, Darren J ; Jordan, David ; Gordon, David M ; Groves, Mitchell D ; Fairbrother, John M ; Smith, Matthew G ; Zhang, Ren ; Chapman, Toni A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin, integron and antimicrobial resistance gene typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility phenotyping. Isolates of the most commonly observed O serogroup (O149) were highly clonal with a lower frequency of antimicrobial resistance compared with the less common O141 serogroup isolates, which were more genetically diverse and resistant to a greater array of antimicrobials. The O149 and O141 isolates belonged to sequence types (STs) ST100 and ST1260, respectively. A small number of new STs were identified for the least common serogroups, including O157 (ST4245), O138 (ST4244), O139 (ST4246) and O8 (ST4247). A high frequency of plasmid replicons was observed among all ETEC isolates. However, O149 isolates predominantly carried IncFIB, I1, HI1 and FIC, whereas O141 isolates carried a more varied array, including IncI1, FIB, FIC, HI1, I1, Y and, most significantly, A/C. O141 isolates also possessed a greater diversity of bacteriocins, with almost one-half of the isolates carrying colicin E3 (44.4%; 12/27) and E7 (48.1%; 13/27). This study shows that Australian porcine ETEC are distinct from isolates obtained in other parts of the world with respect to the MLST profile and the absence of resistance to critically important antimicrobials, including third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-8579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24948578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antimicrobial resistance ; Australia - epidemiology ; Cluster Analysis ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - classification ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification ; Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary ; Evolution, Molecular ; Genes, Bacterial ; Genotype ; IncA/C ; Infectious Disease ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Molecular Epidemiology ; Multilocus Sequence Typing ; Plasmids ; Porcine ; Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique ; Serogroup ; Serogroups ; Swine ; Swine Diseases - epidemiology ; Swine Diseases - microbiology ; Virulence Factors - genetics</subject><ispartof>International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2014-08, Vol.44 (2), p.105-111</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-9b45134b24264ce819d5fcd6cc478d191f06fd48a8cc0c671ea2944d2a762a1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-9b45134b24264ce819d5fcd6cc478d191f06fd48a8cc0c671ea2944d2a762a1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24948578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trott, Darren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, Mitchell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairbrother, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Toni A</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia</title><title>International journal of antimicrobial agents</title><addtitle>Int J Antimicrob Agents</addtitle><description>Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin, integron and antimicrobial resistance gene typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility phenotyping. Isolates of the most commonly observed O serogroup (O149) were highly clonal with a lower frequency of antimicrobial resistance compared with the less common O141 serogroup isolates, which were more genetically diverse and resistant to a greater array of antimicrobials. The O149 and O141 isolates belonged to sequence types (STs) ST100 and ST1260, respectively. A small number of new STs were identified for the least common serogroups, including O157 (ST4245), O138 (ST4244), O139 (ST4246) and O8 (ST4247). A high frequency of plasmid replicons was observed among all ETEC isolates. However, O149 isolates predominantly carried IncFIB, I1, HI1 and FIC, whereas O141 isolates carried a more varied array, including IncI1, FIB, FIC, HI1, I1, Y and, most significantly, A/C. O141 isolates also possessed a greater diversity of bacteriocins, with almost one-half of the isolates carrying colicin E3 (44.4%; 12/27) and E7 (48.1%; 13/27). This study shows that Australian porcine ETEC are distinct from isolates obtained in other parts of the world with respect to the MLST profile and the absence of resistance to critically important antimicrobials, including third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - classification</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Genes, Bacterial</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>IncA/C</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Molecular Epidemiology</subject><subject>Multilocus Sequence Typing</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Porcine</subject><subject>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</subject><subject>Serogroup</subject><subject>Serogroups</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Virulence Factors - genetics</subject><issn>0924-8579</issn><issn>1872-7913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk2LFDEQbURxZ1f_grQ3Lz2mMumvi7AMqyssKKjgLWQq1TM1pjtjkl6cs3_cDLOKeBIKEsKrV5X3XlG8BLEEAc3r_ZL3Zko8MprtUgpQS5EL4FGxgK6VVdvD6nGxEL1UVVe3_UVxGeNeCKhXqn5aXEjVq_zeLYqfH3dH57c0UWIszWTL0TvC2ZlQ8hR5u0sxX5Iv045KuvduTuyn0g_lOLvENszbKlDkmPJG5cEH5CkDp0TBJ_-DM3Umvom4o8C4Y1Oid5wpy-s5pmAcm2fFk8G4SM8fzqviy9ubz-vb6u7Du_fr67sKa2hS1W9UDSu1kUo2CqmD3tYD2gZRtZ2FHgbRDFZ1pkMU2LRARvZKWWnaRhqwq6vi1Zn3EPz3mWLSI0ck58xEfo4a6swve9mJDO3PUAw-xkCDPgQeTThqEPrkgd7rvzzQJw-0yAWQe188jJk3I9k_nb9Fz4D1GUD5s_dMQUdkmpAsB8Kkref_GvPmHxZ0nLU27hsdKe79HKaspgYdpRb60ykMpyyAyjlQ4uvqF42Ntsw</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Abraham, Sam</creator><creator>Trott, Darren J</creator><creator>Jordan, David</creator><creator>Gordon, David M</creator><creator>Groves, Mitchell D</creator><creator>Fairbrother, John M</creator><creator>Smith, Matthew G</creator><creator>Zhang, Ren</creator><creator>Chapman, Toni A</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia</title><author>Abraham, Sam ; Trott, Darren J ; Jordan, David ; Gordon, David M ; Groves, Mitchell D ; Fairbrother, John M ; Smith, Matthew G ; Zhang, Ren ; Chapman, Toni A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-9b45134b24264ce819d5fcd6cc478d191f06fd48a8cc0c671ea2944d2a762a1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - classification</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Genes, Bacterial</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>IncA/C</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Molecular Epidemiology</topic><topic>Multilocus Sequence Typing</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Porcine</topic><topic>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</topic><topic>Serogroup</topic><topic>Serogroups</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Virulence Factors - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trott, Darren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, Mitchell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairbrother, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Toni A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of antimicrobial agents</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abraham, Sam</au><au>Trott, Darren J</au><au>Jordan, David</au><au>Gordon, David M</au><au>Groves, Mitchell D</au><au>Fairbrother, John M</au><au>Smith, Matthew G</au><au>Zhang, Ren</au><au>Chapman, Toni A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia</atitle><jtitle>International journal of antimicrobial agents</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Antimicrob Agents</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>105-111</pages><issn>0924-8579</issn><eissn>1872-7913</eissn><abstract>Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin, integron and antimicrobial resistance gene typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility phenotyping. Isolates of the most commonly observed O serogroup (O149) were highly clonal with a lower frequency of antimicrobial resistance compared with the less common O141 serogroup isolates, which were more genetically diverse and resistant to a greater array of antimicrobials. The O149 and O141 isolates belonged to sequence types (STs) ST100 and ST1260, respectively. A small number of new STs were identified for the least common serogroups, including O157 (ST4245), O138 (ST4244), O139 (ST4246) and O8 (ST4247). A high frequency of plasmid replicons was observed among all ETEC isolates. However, O149 isolates predominantly carried IncFIB, I1, HI1 and FIC, whereas O141 isolates carried a more varied array, including IncI1, FIB, FIC, HI1, I1, Y and, most significantly, A/C. O141 isolates also possessed a greater diversity of bacteriocins, with almost one-half of the isolates carrying colicin E3 (44.4%; 12/27) and E7 (48.1%; 13/27). This study shows that Australian porcine ETEC are distinct from isolates obtained in other parts of the world with respect to the MLST profile and the absence of resistance to critically important antimicrobials, including third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24948578</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-8579
ispartof International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2014-08, Vol.44 (2), p.105-111
issn 0924-8579
1872-7913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551329280
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animals
Antimicrobial resistance
Australia - epidemiology
Cluster Analysis
Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - classification
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics
Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification
Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology
Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology
Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary
Evolution, Molecular
Genes, Bacterial
Genotype
IncA/C
Infectious Disease
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Molecular Epidemiology
Multilocus Sequence Typing
Plasmids
Porcine
Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
Serogroup
Serogroups
Swine
Swine Diseases - epidemiology
Swine Diseases - microbiology
Virulence Factors - genetics
title Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A41%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenetic%20and%20molecular%20insights%20into%20the%20evolution%20of%20multidrug-resistant%20porcine%20enterotoxigenic%20Escherichia%20coli%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20agents&rft.au=Abraham,%20Sam&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=105-111&rft.issn=0924-8579&rft.eissn=1872-7913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1551329280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1551329280&rft_id=info:pmid/24948578&rft_els_id=S092485791400140X&rfr_iscdi=true