Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia
Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of antimicrobial agents 2014-08, Vol.44 (2), p.105-111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 111 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | International journal of antimicrobial agents |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Abraham, Sam Trott, Darren J Jordan, David Gordon, David M Groves, Mitchell D Fairbrother, John M Smith, Matthew G Zhang, Ren Chapman, Toni A |
description | Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin, integron and antimicrobial resistance gene typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility phenotyping. Isolates of the most commonly observed O serogroup (O149) were highly clonal with a lower frequency of antimicrobial resistance compared with the less common O141 serogroup isolates, which were more genetically diverse and resistant to a greater array of antimicrobials. The O149 and O141 isolates belonged to sequence types (STs) ST100 and ST1260, respectively. A small number of new STs were identified for the least common serogroups, including O157 (ST4245), O138 (ST4244), O139 (ST4246) and O8 (ST4247). A high frequency of plasmid replicons was observed among all ETEC isolates. However, O149 isolates predominantly carried IncFIB, I1, HI1 and FIC, whereas O141 isolates carried a more varied array, including IncI1, FIB, FIC, HI1, I1, Y and, most significantly, A/C. O141 isolates also possessed a greater diversity of bacteriocins, with almost one-half of the isolates carrying colicin E3 (44.4%; 12/27) and E7 (48.1%; 13/27). This study shows that Australian porcine ETEC are distinct from isolates obtained in other parts of the world with respect to the MLST profile and the absence of resistance to critically important antimicrobials, including third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551329280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092485791400140X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1551329280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-9b45134b24264ce819d5fcd6cc478d191f06fd48a8cc0c671ea2944d2a762a1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk2LFDEQbURxZ1f_grQ3Lz2mMumvi7AMqyssKKjgLWQq1TM1pjtjkl6cs3_cDLOKeBIKEsKrV5X3XlG8BLEEAc3r_ZL3Zko8MprtUgpQS5EL4FGxgK6VVdvD6nGxEL1UVVe3_UVxGeNeCKhXqn5aXEjVq_zeLYqfH3dH57c0UWIszWTL0TvC2ZlQ8hR5u0sxX5Iv045KuvduTuyn0g_lOLvENszbKlDkmPJG5cEH5CkDp0TBJ_-DM3Umvom4o8C4Y1Oid5wpy-s5pmAcm2fFk8G4SM8fzqviy9ubz-vb6u7Du_fr67sKa2hS1W9UDSu1kUo2CqmD3tYD2gZRtZ2FHgbRDFZ1pkMU2LRARvZKWWnaRhqwq6vi1Zn3EPz3mWLSI0ck58xEfo4a6swve9mJDO3PUAw-xkCDPgQeTThqEPrkgd7rvzzQJw-0yAWQe188jJk3I9k_nb9Fz4D1GUD5s_dMQUdkmpAsB8Kkref_GvPmHxZ0nLU27hsdKe79HKaspgYdpRb60ykMpyyAyjlQ4uvqF42Ntsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1551329280</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Abraham, Sam ; Trott, Darren J ; Jordan, David ; Gordon, David M ; Groves, Mitchell D ; Fairbrother, John M ; Smith, Matthew G ; Zhang, Ren ; Chapman, Toni A</creator><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Sam ; Trott, Darren J ; Jordan, David ; Gordon, David M ; Groves, Mitchell D ; Fairbrother, John M ; Smith, Matthew G ; Zhang, Ren ; Chapman, Toni A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin, integron and antimicrobial resistance gene typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility phenotyping. Isolates of the most commonly observed O serogroup (O149) were highly clonal with a lower frequency of antimicrobial resistance compared with the less common O141 serogroup isolates, which were more genetically diverse and resistant to a greater array of antimicrobials. The O149 and O141 isolates belonged to sequence types (STs) ST100 and ST1260, respectively. A small number of new STs were identified for the least common serogroups, including O157 (ST4245), O138 (ST4244), O139 (ST4246) and O8 (ST4247). A high frequency of plasmid replicons was observed among all ETEC isolates. However, O149 isolates predominantly carried IncFIB, I1, HI1 and FIC, whereas O141 isolates carried a more varied array, including IncI1, FIB, FIC, HI1, I1, Y and, most significantly, A/C. O141 isolates also possessed a greater diversity of bacteriocins, with almost one-half of the isolates carrying colicin E3 (44.4%; 12/27) and E7 (48.1%; 13/27). This study shows that Australian porcine ETEC are distinct from isolates obtained in other parts of the world with respect to the MLST profile and the absence of resistance to critically important antimicrobials, including third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-8579</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24948578</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antimicrobial resistance ; Australia - epidemiology ; Cluster Analysis ; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - classification ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics ; Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification ; Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary ; Evolution, Molecular ; Genes, Bacterial ; Genotype ; IncA/C ; Infectious Disease ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Molecular Epidemiology ; Multilocus Sequence Typing ; Plasmids ; Porcine ; Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique ; Serogroup ; Serogroups ; Swine ; Swine Diseases - epidemiology ; Swine Diseases - microbiology ; Virulence Factors - genetics</subject><ispartof>International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2014-08, Vol.44 (2), p.105-111</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-9b45134b24264ce819d5fcd6cc478d191f06fd48a8cc0c671ea2944d2a762a1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-9b45134b24264ce819d5fcd6cc478d191f06fd48a8cc0c671ea2944d2a762a1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24948578$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trott, Darren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, Mitchell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairbrother, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Toni A</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia</title><title>International journal of antimicrobial agents</title><addtitle>Int J Antimicrob Agents</addtitle><description>Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin, integron and antimicrobial resistance gene typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility phenotyping. Isolates of the most commonly observed O serogroup (O149) were highly clonal with a lower frequency of antimicrobial resistance compared with the less common O141 serogroup isolates, which were more genetically diverse and resistant to a greater array of antimicrobials. The O149 and O141 isolates belonged to sequence types (STs) ST100 and ST1260, respectively. A small number of new STs were identified for the least common serogroups, including O157 (ST4245), O138 (ST4244), O139 (ST4246) and O8 (ST4247). A high frequency of plasmid replicons was observed among all ETEC isolates. However, O149 isolates predominantly carried IncFIB, I1, HI1 and FIC, whereas O141 isolates carried a more varied array, including IncI1, FIB, FIC, HI1, I1, Y and, most significantly, A/C. O141 isolates also possessed a greater diversity of bacteriocins, with almost one-half of the isolates carrying colicin E3 (44.4%; 12/27) and E7 (48.1%; 13/27). This study shows that Australian porcine ETEC are distinct from isolates obtained in other parts of the world with respect to the MLST profile and the absence of resistance to critically important antimicrobials, including third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antimicrobial resistance</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - classification</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics</subject><subject>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Genes, Bacterial</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>IncA/C</subject><subject>Infectious Disease</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Molecular Epidemiology</subject><subject>Multilocus Sequence Typing</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>Porcine</subject><subject>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</subject><subject>Serogroup</subject><subject>Serogroups</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Swine Diseases - microbiology</subject><subject>Virulence Factors - genetics</subject><issn>0924-8579</issn><issn>1872-7913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk2LFDEQbURxZ1f_grQ3Lz2mMumvi7AMqyssKKjgLWQq1TM1pjtjkl6cs3_cDLOKeBIKEsKrV5X3XlG8BLEEAc3r_ZL3Zko8MprtUgpQS5EL4FGxgK6VVdvD6nGxEL1UVVe3_UVxGeNeCKhXqn5aXEjVq_zeLYqfH3dH57c0UWIszWTL0TvC2ZlQ8hR5u0sxX5Iv045KuvduTuyn0g_lOLvENszbKlDkmPJG5cEH5CkDp0TBJ_-DM3Umvom4o8C4Y1Oid5wpy-s5pmAcm2fFk8G4SM8fzqviy9ubz-vb6u7Du_fr67sKa2hS1W9UDSu1kUo2CqmD3tYD2gZRtZ2FHgbRDFZ1pkMU2LRARvZKWWnaRhqwq6vi1Zn3EPz3mWLSI0ck58xEfo4a6swve9mJDO3PUAw-xkCDPgQeTThqEPrkgd7rvzzQJw-0yAWQe188jJk3I9k_nb9Fz4D1GUD5s_dMQUdkmpAsB8Kkref_GvPmHxZ0nLU27hsdKe79HKaspgYdpRb60ykMpyyAyjlQ4uvqF42Ntsw</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Abraham, Sam</creator><creator>Trott, Darren J</creator><creator>Jordan, David</creator><creator>Gordon, David M</creator><creator>Groves, Mitchell D</creator><creator>Fairbrother, John M</creator><creator>Smith, Matthew G</creator><creator>Zhang, Ren</creator><creator>Chapman, Toni A</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia</title><author>Abraham, Sam ; Trott, Darren J ; Jordan, David ; Gordon, David M ; Groves, Mitchell D ; Fairbrother, John M ; Smith, Matthew G ; Zhang, Ren ; Chapman, Toni A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-9b45134b24264ce819d5fcd6cc478d191f06fd48a8cc0c671ea2944d2a762a1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antimicrobial resistance</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - classification</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics</topic><topic>Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Genes, Bacterial</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>IncA/C</topic><topic>Infectious Disease</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Molecular Epidemiology</topic><topic>Multilocus Sequence Typing</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>Porcine</topic><topic>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</topic><topic>Serogroup</topic><topic>Serogroups</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Swine Diseases - microbiology</topic><topic>Virulence Factors - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abraham, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trott, Darren J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groves, Mitchell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairbrother, John M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Matthew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Toni A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of antimicrobial agents</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abraham, Sam</au><au>Trott, Darren J</au><au>Jordan, David</au><au>Gordon, David M</au><au>Groves, Mitchell D</au><au>Fairbrother, John M</au><au>Smith, Matthew G</au><au>Zhang, Ren</au><au>Chapman, Toni A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia</atitle><jtitle>International journal of antimicrobial agents</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Antimicrob Agents</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>105-111</pages><issn>0924-8579</issn><eissn>1872-7913</eissn><abstract>Abstract This study investigated the phylogeny and molecular epidemiology of Australian porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) isolates ( n = 70) by performing multilocus sequence typing (MLST), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, virulence gene analysis, plasmid, bacteriocin, integron and antimicrobial resistance gene typing, and antimicrobial susceptibility phenotyping. Isolates of the most commonly observed O serogroup (O149) were highly clonal with a lower frequency of antimicrobial resistance compared with the less common O141 serogroup isolates, which were more genetically diverse and resistant to a greater array of antimicrobials. The O149 and O141 isolates belonged to sequence types (STs) ST100 and ST1260, respectively. A small number of new STs were identified for the least common serogroups, including O157 (ST4245), O138 (ST4244), O139 (ST4246) and O8 (ST4247). A high frequency of plasmid replicons was observed among all ETEC isolates. However, O149 isolates predominantly carried IncFIB, I1, HI1 and FIC, whereas O141 isolates carried a more varied array, including IncI1, FIB, FIC, HI1, I1, Y and, most significantly, A/C. O141 isolates also possessed a greater diversity of bacteriocins, with almost one-half of the isolates carrying colicin E3 (44.4%; 12/27) and E7 (48.1%; 13/27). This study shows that Australian porcine ETEC are distinct from isolates obtained in other parts of the world with respect to the MLST profile and the absence of resistance to critically important antimicrobials, including third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24948578</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0924-8579 |
ispartof | International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2014-08, Vol.44 (2), p.105-111 |
issn | 0924-8579 1872-7913 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551329280 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animals Antimicrobial resistance Australia - epidemiology Cluster Analysis Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - classification Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - drug effects Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology Escherichia coli Infections - veterinary Evolution, Molecular Genes, Bacterial Genotype IncA/C Infectious Disease Microbial Sensitivity Tests Molecular Epidemiology Multilocus Sequence Typing Plasmids Porcine Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique Serogroup Serogroups Swine Swine Diseases - epidemiology Swine Diseases - microbiology Virulence Factors - genetics |
title | Phylogenetic and molecular insights into the evolution of multidrug-resistant porcine enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in Australia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T19%3A41%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenetic%20and%20molecular%20insights%20into%20the%20evolution%20of%20multidrug-resistant%20porcine%20enterotoxigenic%20Escherichia%20coli%20in%20Australia&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20antimicrobial%20agents&rft.au=Abraham,%20Sam&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=105-111&rft.issn=0924-8579&rft.eissn=1872-7913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.04.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1551329280%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1551329280&rft_id=info:pmid/24948578&rft_els_id=S092485791400140X&rfr_iscdi=true |