Grief, Consolation, and Religions: A Conceptual Framework
Consolation is grief's traditional amelioration, but contemporary bereavement theory lacks a conceptual framework to include it. The article begins to develop that framework. The article argues that grief is inter-subjective, even at the biological level. Consolation and grief happen in the sam...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 2014-01, Vol.69 (1), p.1-18 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 18 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Omega: Journal of Death and Dying |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Klass, Dennis |
description | Consolation is grief's traditional amelioration, but contemporary bereavement theory lacks a conceptual framework to include it. The article begins to develop that framework. The article argues that grief is inter-subjective, even at the biological level. Consolation and grief happen in the same inter-subjective space. Material from the histories of several religions sets the article in a cross-cultural and historical environment. The article examines consolation in interpersonal relationships, and then moves to consolation in cultural/religious resources that range from the literal image of God as an idealized parent to the abstract architecture of Brahm's Requiem. The most common consolation in the histories of religions comes within continuing bonds that are accessed in a wide variety of beliefs, rituals, and devotional objects. The article closes by briefly drawing the connection between consolation and faith. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2190/OM.69.1.a |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551327112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.2190_OM.69.1.a</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1551327112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-588fb1dfe6f000cc3fba1580075c1dfde6a8079c19d7cd9258b2e863ffc392a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0NFKwzAUBuAgipvTC19ACoIorDVJmzTxbgynwsZA9DqkaTI622YmLeLbm7Epork5JPn4z-EAcI5gghGHt8tFQnmCEnkAhohkKE5zmh2CIYQpjDHGbABOvF_DcDjNjsEAE8iyHNIh4A-u0mYcTW3rbS27yrbjSLZl9KzrahVu_i6abH-V3nS9rKOZk43-sO7tFBwZWXt9tq8j8Dq7f5k-xvPlw9N0Mo9VRmgXE8ZMgUqjqQntlUpNIRFhEOZEhedSU8lgzhXiZa5KjgkrsGY0NUalHMssHYHrXe7G2fde-040lVe6rmWrbe8FIgSlOEcIB3r5h65t79ow3VbhLIUc0aBudko5673TRmxc1Uj3KRAU232K5UJQLpCQwV7sE_ui0eWP_F5gAFc74OVK_2r3L-kLWT96bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1552430916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grief, Consolation, and Religions: A Conceptual Framework</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Klass, Dennis</creator><creatorcontrib>Klass, Dennis</creatorcontrib><description>Consolation is grief's traditional amelioration, but contemporary bereavement theory lacks a conceptual framework to include it. The article begins to develop that framework. The article argues that grief is inter-subjective, even at the biological level. Consolation and grief happen in the same inter-subjective space. Material from the histories of several religions sets the article in a cross-cultural and historical environment. The article examines consolation in interpersonal relationships, and then moves to consolation in cultural/religious resources that range from the literal image of God as an idealized parent to the abstract architecture of Brahm's Requiem. The most common consolation in the histories of religions comes within continuing bonds that are accessed in a wide variety of beliefs, rituals, and devotional objects. The article closes by briefly drawing the connection between consolation and faith.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-2228</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-3764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2190/OM.69.1.a</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25084706</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OMGABX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Attitude to Death ; Belief & doubt ; Bereavement ; Death & dying ; Faith ; Family - psychology ; Grief ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Object Attachment ; Religion ; Religion and Psychology ; Social Support</subject><ispartof>Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 2014-01, Vol.69 (1), p.1-18</ispartof><rights>2014 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>Copyright Baywood Publishing Co., Inc. 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-588fb1dfe6f000cc3fba1580075c1dfde6a8079c19d7cd9258b2e863ffc392a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-588fb1dfe6f000cc3fba1580075c1dfde6a8079c19d7cd9258b2e863ffc392a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2190/OM.69.1.a$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2190/OM.69.1.a$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,30999,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25084706$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klass, Dennis</creatorcontrib><title>Grief, Consolation, and Religions: A Conceptual Framework</title><title>Omega: Journal of Death and Dying</title><addtitle>Omega (Westport)</addtitle><description>Consolation is grief's traditional amelioration, but contemporary bereavement theory lacks a conceptual framework to include it. The article begins to develop that framework. The article argues that grief is inter-subjective, even at the biological level. Consolation and grief happen in the same inter-subjective space. Material from the histories of several religions sets the article in a cross-cultural and historical environment. The article examines consolation in interpersonal relationships, and then moves to consolation in cultural/religious resources that range from the literal image of God as an idealized parent to the abstract architecture of Brahm's Requiem. The most common consolation in the histories of religions comes within continuing bonds that are accessed in a wide variety of beliefs, rituals, and devotional objects. The article closes by briefly drawing the connection between consolation and faith.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Attitude to Death</subject><subject>Belief & doubt</subject><subject>Bereavement</subject><subject>Death & dying</subject><subject>Faith</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Grief</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religion and Psychology</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><issn>0030-2228</issn><issn>1541-3764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpl0NFKwzAUBuAgipvTC19ACoIorDVJmzTxbgynwsZA9DqkaTI622YmLeLbm7Epork5JPn4z-EAcI5gghGHt8tFQnmCEnkAhohkKE5zmh2CIYQpjDHGbABOvF_DcDjNjsEAE8iyHNIh4A-u0mYcTW3rbS27yrbjSLZl9KzrahVu_i6abH-V3nS9rKOZk43-sO7tFBwZWXt9tq8j8Dq7f5k-xvPlw9N0Mo9VRmgXE8ZMgUqjqQntlUpNIRFhEOZEhedSU8lgzhXiZa5KjgkrsGY0NUalHMssHYHrXe7G2fde-040lVe6rmWrbe8FIgSlOEcIB3r5h65t79ow3VbhLIUc0aBudko5673TRmxc1Uj3KRAU232K5UJQLpCQwV7sE_ui0eWP_F5gAFc74OVK_2r3L-kLWT96bg</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Klass, Dennis</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Grief, Consolation, and Religions: A Conceptual Framework</title><author>Klass, Dennis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-588fb1dfe6f000cc3fba1580075c1dfde6a8079c19d7cd9258b2e863ffc392a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Attitude to Death</topic><topic>Belief & doubt</topic><topic>Bereavement</topic><topic>Death & dying</topic><topic>Faith</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Grief</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religion and Psychology</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klass, Dennis</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Omega: Journal of Death and Dying</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klass, Dennis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Grief, Consolation, and Religions: A Conceptual Framework</atitle><jtitle>Omega: Journal of Death and Dying</jtitle><addtitle>Omega (Westport)</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>18</epage><pages>1-18</pages><issn>0030-2228</issn><eissn>1541-3764</eissn><coden>OMGABX</coden><abstract>Consolation is grief's traditional amelioration, but contemporary bereavement theory lacks a conceptual framework to include it. The article begins to develop that framework. The article argues that grief is inter-subjective, even at the biological level. Consolation and grief happen in the same inter-subjective space. Material from the histories of several religions sets the article in a cross-cultural and historical environment. The article examines consolation in interpersonal relationships, and then moves to consolation in cultural/religious resources that range from the literal image of God as an idealized parent to the abstract architecture of Brahm's Requiem. The most common consolation in the histories of religions comes within continuing bonds that are accessed in a wide variety of beliefs, rituals, and devotional objects. The article closes by briefly drawing the connection between consolation and faith.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>25084706</pmid><doi>10.2190/OM.69.1.a</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-2228 |
ispartof | Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 2014-01, Vol.69 (1), p.1-18 |
issn | 0030-2228 1541-3764 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551327112 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; EBSCOhost Education Source; SAGE Journals |
subjects | Adaptation, Psychological Attitude to Death Belief & doubt Bereavement Death & dying Faith Family - psychology Grief Humans Interpersonal Relations Object Attachment Religion Religion and Psychology Social Support |
title | Grief, Consolation, and Religions: A Conceptual Framework |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A52%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grief,%20Consolation,%20and%20Religions:%20A%20Conceptual%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Omega:%20Journal%20of%20Death%20and%20Dying&rft.au=Klass,%20Dennis&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=18&rft.pages=1-18&rft.issn=0030-2228&rft.eissn=1541-3764&rft.coden=OMGABX&rft_id=info:doi/10.2190/OM.69.1.a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1551327112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1552430916&rft_id=info:pmid/25084706&rft_sage_id=10.2190_OM.69.1.a&rfr_iscdi=true |