The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. Comment on Stelfox and Straus

The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. Comment on Stelfox and Straus

According to the IOM, a comprehensive indicator set covers the following dimensions [5]: safety, effectiveness, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. [...]one of our goals is to establish this evidence by gathering the relevant data and thus improving the validity of future qualit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2014-09, Vol.67 (9), p.963-964
Hauptverfasser: Doggen, Kris, Lavens, Astrid, Van Casteren, Viviane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Accountability
Consumer organizations
End users
Epidemiology
Humans
Internal Medicine
Needs Assessment
Quality Indicators, Health Care - organization & administration
Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards
Validity
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 964
container_issue 9
container_start_page 963
container_title Journal of clinical epidemiology
container_volume 67
creator Doggen, Kris
Lavens, Astrid
Van Casteren, Viviane
description According to the IOM, a comprehensive indicator set covers the following dimensions [5]: safety, effectiveness, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. [...]one of our goals is to establish this evidence by gathering the relevant data and thus improving the validity of future quality measurements.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551019844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0895435614000699</els_id><sourcerecordid>3388889131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-41d17c01a5435acc29043a16c41ece5941163d090b7c08fc7b69fbbf10e7c9d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstu3SAQhlHVqjlN-woRUjfd2AUbbNNF1eioNylSF0nXCMPQ4NrGARz1vEift1gnFymbLhAIvn-GmX8QOqOkpIQ274dy0KObYXFlRSgrSV0SQp-hHe3aruCios_RjnSCF6zmzQl6FeOQgZa0_CU6qVjbNVw0O_T36hpwcL-uE3azcVolH7DNK-X7wfcfsHHWQoA54RFuYYzY202QkUkdcA9YLUvwS3AqwYPSbKhfpk2W-ZtVjS4dHlPEEu_9dHye8WWC0fo_WM0mn4Na42v0wqoxwpu7_RT9_PL5av-tuPjx9fv-_KLQvKKpYNTQVhOqeK5SaV0JwmpFG80oaOCCUdrUhgjSZ6qzuu0bYfveUgKtFqaqT9G7Y9xcws0KMcnJRQ3jqGbwa5SU89xu0TGW0bdP0MGvYc6_yxQTgletqDPVHCkdfIwBrMydmVQ4SErk5pwc5L1zcnNOklpmY7Lw7C782k9gHmT3VmXg0xHIHsCtgyCjdjBrMC6ATtJ49_8cH5-E2KjsyPgbDhAf65GxkkRebvOzjQ9lhJBGiPof70HD0g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1549952793</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. Comment on Stelfox and Straus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Doggen, Kris ; Lavens, Astrid ; Van Casteren, Viviane</creator><creatorcontrib>Doggen, Kris ; Lavens, Astrid ; Van Casteren, Viviane</creatorcontrib><description>According to the IOM, a comprehensive indicator set covers the following dimensions [5]: safety, effectiveness, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. [...]one of our goals is to establish this evidence by gathering the relevant data and thus improving the validity of future quality measurements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24786596</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Consumer organizations ; End users ; Epidemiology ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Needs Assessment ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - organization &amp; administration ; Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014-09, Vol.67 (9), p.963-964</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Sep 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-41d17c01a5435acc29043a16c41ece5941163d090b7c08fc7b69fbbf10e7c9d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-41d17c01a5435acc29043a16c41ece5941163d090b7c08fc7b69fbbf10e7c9d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1549952793?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995,64385,64387,64389,72469</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24786596$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doggen, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavens, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Casteren, Viviane</creatorcontrib><title>The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. Comment on Stelfox and Straus</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>According to the IOM, a comprehensive indicator set covers the following dimensions [5]: safety, effectiveness, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. [...]one of our goals is to establish this evidence by gathering the relevant data and thus improving the validity of future quality measurements.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Consumer organizations</subject><subject>End users</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkstu3SAQhlHVqjlN-woRUjfd2AUbbNNF1eioNylSF0nXCMPQ4NrGARz1vEift1gnFymbLhAIvn-GmX8QOqOkpIQ274dy0KObYXFlRSgrSV0SQp-hHe3aruCios_RjnSCF6zmzQl6FeOQgZa0_CU6qVjbNVw0O_T36hpwcL-uE3azcVolH7DNK-X7wfcfsHHWQoA54RFuYYzY202QkUkdcA9YLUvwS3AqwYPSbKhfpk2W-ZtVjS4dHlPEEu_9dHye8WWC0fo_WM0mn4Na42v0wqoxwpu7_RT9_PL5av-tuPjx9fv-_KLQvKKpYNTQVhOqeK5SaV0JwmpFG80oaOCCUdrUhgjSZ6qzuu0bYfveUgKtFqaqT9G7Y9xcws0KMcnJRQ3jqGbwa5SU89xu0TGW0bdP0MGvYc6_yxQTgletqDPVHCkdfIwBrMydmVQ4SErk5pwc5L1zcnNOklpmY7Lw7C782k9gHmT3VmXg0xHIHsCtgyCjdjBrMC6ATtJ49_8cH5-E2KjsyPgbDhAf65GxkkRebvOzjQ9lhJBGiPof70HD0g</recordid><startdate>20140901</startdate><enddate>20140901</enddate><creator>Doggen, Kris</creator><creator>Lavens, Astrid</creator><creator>Van Casteren, Viviane</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140901</creationdate><title>The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. Comment on Stelfox and Straus</title><author>Doggen, Kris ; Lavens, Astrid ; Van Casteren, Viviane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-41d17c01a5435acc29043a16c41ece5941163d090b7c08fc7b69fbbf10e7c9d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Consumer organizations</topic><topic>End users</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doggen, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavens, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Casteren, Viviane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doggen, Kris</au><au>Lavens, Astrid</au><au>Van Casteren, Viviane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. Comment on Stelfox and Straus</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2014-09-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>963</spage><epage>964</epage><pages>963-964</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>According to the IOM, a comprehensive indicator set covers the following dimensions [5]: safety, effectiveness, patient-centredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity. [...]one of our goals is to establish this evidence by gathering the relevant data and thus improving the validity of future quality measurements.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>24786596</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.001</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-4356
ispartof Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2014-09, Vol.67 (9), p.963-964
issn 0895-4356
1878-5921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551019844
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Accountability
Consumer organizations
End users
Epidemiology
Humans
Internal Medicine
Needs Assessment
Quality Indicators, Health Care - organization & administration
Quality Indicators, Health Care - standards
Validity
title The right indicator for the job: different levels of rigor may be appropriate for the development of quality indicators. Comment on Stelfox and Straus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T10%3A47%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20right%20indicator%20for%20the%20job:%20different%20levels%20of%20rigor%20may%20be%20appropriate%20for%20the%20development%20of%20quality%20indicators.%20Comment%20on%20Stelfox%20and%20Straus&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Doggen,%20Kris&rft.date=2014-09-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=963&rft.epage=964&rft.pages=963-964&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3388889131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1549952793&rft_id=info:pmid/24786596&rft_els_id=S0895435614000699&rfr_iscdi=true