Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research

The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of sociology of education 2013-01, Vol.34 (1), p.20-38
Hauptverfasser: Boone, Simon, Van Houtte, Mieke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 38
container_issue 1
container_start_page 20
container_title British journal of sociology of education
container_volume 34
creator Boone, Simon
Van Houtte, Mieke
description The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and Germany are partly determined by pupils' social background, studies that inquire into the causes of this social bias seem to be virtually inexistent. This study aims to examine whether teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders (northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) are also socially biased, and if so what causes these differentials in advice, using a mixed-methods design. We found the advice given by primary school teachers to be partly determined by pupils' social background. Analysis of the qualitative data suggests that teachers tend to evaluate pupils from low socio-economic status backgrounds less positively, due to their emphasis on specific pupil characteristics.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/01425692.2012.704720
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551002755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23357006</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23357006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-c0ab40998a102a622313b854cf3e887621195c7111f61acab9a94de516514e3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3DAUhUVpodOk_6AFQSl048m9etlehRD6gkA3DVmaO7KMPdhWKmloZtW_XrmetNBFuxLS-c7RlQ5jrxC2CBVcACqhTS22AlBsS1ClgCdsg8roQkplnrLNghQL85y9iHEPAAY0btiPu_7IKTieHNneBR6c9dPk5pbS4OfIKfHUZznQHIfliHfBT_w-DBOFI0-ex-zIeN649mB_2Xj0dqBxPPLdQNG1l_yKT8ODa4vJpd63MV8THQXbn7NnHY3RvTytZ-z2w_uv15-Kmy8fP19f3RRWaZkKC7RTUNcVIQgyQkiUu0or20lXVaURiLW2JSJ2BsnSrqZatU6j0aic7OQZe7fm3gf_7eBiaqYhWjeONDt_iA1qjQCi1Pr_qKgEKCgVZvTNX-jeH8KcH5IpJaXRuhSZUitlg48xuK45_V6D0CwFNo8FNkuBzVpgtr09hVO0NHa5ATvE315RosjTqsy9Xrl9TD780aXUZa4565erPsydDxN992Fsm0TH0YfHUPnPSX4C8Wm3zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1243365572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Boone, Simon ; Van Houtte, Mieke</creator><creatorcontrib>Boone, Simon ; Van Houtte, Mieke</creatorcontrib><description>The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and Germany are partly determined by pupils' social background, studies that inquire into the causes of this social bias seem to be virtually inexistent. This study aims to examine whether teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders (northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) are also socially biased, and if so what causes these differentials in advice, using a mixed-methods design. We found the advice given by primary school teachers to be partly determined by pupils' social background. Analysis of the qualitative data suggests that teachers tend to evaluate pupils from low socio-economic status backgrounds less positively, due to their emphasis on specific pupil characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3346</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2012.704720</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSEDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>allocation ; Belgium ; Bias ; Classes, stratification, mobility ; Educational sociology ; Elementary School Teachers ; Elementary schools ; Evaluation ; Flanders ; France ; Germany ; Individualized Instruction ; Inequality ; mixed-methods research ; Prejudice ; Primary education ; Pupils ; Research methods ; Secondary Education ; Social Background ; Social organization. Social system. Social structure ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic Status ; Sociology ; Sociology of Education ; Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education ; standards of evaluation ; Students ; Teachers ; Transitions</subject><ispartof>British journal of sociology of education, 2013-01, Vol.34 (1), p.20-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-c0ab40998a102a622313b854cf3e887621195c7111f61acab9a94de516514e3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-c0ab40998a102a622313b854cf3e887621195c7111f61acab9a94de516514e3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23357006$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23357006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,33751,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27125534$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boone, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Houtte, Mieke</creatorcontrib><title>Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research</title><title>British journal of sociology of education</title><description>The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and Germany are partly determined by pupils' social background, studies that inquire into the causes of this social bias seem to be virtually inexistent. This study aims to examine whether teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders (northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) are also socially biased, and if so what causes these differentials in advice, using a mixed-methods design. We found the advice given by primary school teachers to be partly determined by pupils' social background. Analysis of the qualitative data suggests that teachers tend to evaluate pupils from low socio-economic status backgrounds less positively, due to their emphasis on specific pupil characteristics.</description><subject>allocation</subject><subject>Belgium</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Classes, stratification, mobility</subject><subject>Educational sociology</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flanders</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>mixed-methods research</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Primary education</subject><subject>Pupils</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Secondary Education</subject><subject>Social Background</subject><subject>Social organization. Social system. Social structure</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Status</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of Education</subject><subject>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</subject><subject>standards of evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Transitions</subject><issn>0142-5692</issn><issn>1465-3346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3DAUhUVpodOk_6AFQSl048m9etlehRD6gkA3DVmaO7KMPdhWKmloZtW_XrmetNBFuxLS-c7RlQ5jrxC2CBVcACqhTS22AlBsS1ClgCdsg8roQkplnrLNghQL85y9iHEPAAY0btiPu_7IKTieHNneBR6c9dPk5pbS4OfIKfHUZznQHIfliHfBT_w-DBOFI0-ex-zIeN649mB_2Xj0dqBxPPLdQNG1l_yKT8ODa4vJpd63MV8THQXbn7NnHY3RvTytZ-z2w_uv15-Kmy8fP19f3RRWaZkKC7RTUNcVIQgyQkiUu0or20lXVaURiLW2JSJ2BsnSrqZatU6j0aic7OQZe7fm3gf_7eBiaqYhWjeONDt_iA1qjQCi1Pr_qKgEKCgVZvTNX-jeH8KcH5IpJaXRuhSZUitlg48xuK45_V6D0CwFNo8FNkuBzVpgtr09hVO0NHa5ATvE315RosjTqsy9Xrl9TD780aXUZa4565erPsydDxN992Fsm0TH0YfHUPnPSX4C8Wm3zQ</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Boone, Simon</creator><creator>Van Houtte, Mieke</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research</title><author>Boone, Simon ; Van Houtte, Mieke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-c0ab40998a102a622313b854cf3e887621195c7111f61acab9a94de516514e3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>allocation</topic><topic>Belgium</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Classes, stratification, mobility</topic><topic>Educational sociology</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flanders</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>mixed-methods research</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Primary education</topic><topic>Pupils</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Secondary Education</topic><topic>Social Background</topic><topic>Social organization. Social system. Social structure</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Status</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of Education</topic><topic>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</topic><topic>standards of evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Transitions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boone, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Houtte, Mieke</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>British journal of sociology of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boone, Simon</au><au>Van Houtte, Mieke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research</atitle><jtitle>British journal of sociology of education</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>20-38</pages><issn>0142-5692</issn><eissn>1465-3346</eissn><coden>BJSEDB</coden><abstract>The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and Germany are partly determined by pupils' social background, studies that inquire into the causes of this social bias seem to be virtually inexistent. This study aims to examine whether teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders (northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) are also socially biased, and if so what causes these differentials in advice, using a mixed-methods design. We found the advice given by primary school teachers to be partly determined by pupils' social background. Analysis of the qualitative data suggests that teachers tend to evaluate pupils from low socio-economic status backgrounds less positively, due to their emphasis on specific pupil characteristics.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01425692.2012.704720</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0142-5692
ispartof British journal of sociology of education, 2013-01, Vol.34 (1), p.20-38
issn 0142-5692
1465-3346
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551002755
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts
subjects allocation
Belgium
Bias
Classes, stratification, mobility
Educational sociology
Elementary School Teachers
Elementary schools
Evaluation
Flanders
France
Germany
Individualized Instruction
Inequality
mixed-methods research
Prejudice
Primary education
Pupils
Research methods
Secondary Education
Social Background
Social organization. Social system. Social structure
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomic Status
Sociology
Sociology of Education
Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education
standards of evaluation
Students
Teachers
Transitions
title Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T19%3A30%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20are%20teacher%20recommendations%20at%20the%20transition%20from%20primary%20to%20secondary%20education%20socially%20biased?%20A%20mixed-methods%20research&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20sociology%20of%20education&rft.au=Boone,%20Simon&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=20-38&rft.issn=0142-5692&rft.eissn=1465-3346&rft.coden=BJSEDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01425692.2012.704720&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23357006%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1243365572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23357006&rfr_iscdi=true