Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research
The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of sociology of education 2013-01, Vol.34 (1), p.20-38 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 38 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | British journal of sociology of education |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Boone, Simon Van Houtte, Mieke |
description | The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and Germany are partly determined by pupils' social background, studies that inquire into the causes of this social bias seem to be virtually inexistent. This study aims to examine whether teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders (northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) are also socially biased, and if so what causes these differentials in advice, using a mixed-methods design. We found the advice given by primary school teachers to be partly determined by pupils' social background. Analysis of the qualitative data suggests that teachers tend to evaluate pupils from low socio-economic status backgrounds less positively, due to their emphasis on specific pupil characteristics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01425692.2012.704720 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551002755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23357006</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23357006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-c0ab40998a102a622313b854cf3e887621195c7111f61acab9a94de516514e3f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtr3DAUhUVpodOk_6AFQSl048m9etlehRD6gkA3DVmaO7KMPdhWKmloZtW_XrmetNBFuxLS-c7RlQ5jrxC2CBVcACqhTS22AlBsS1ClgCdsg8roQkplnrLNghQL85y9iHEPAAY0btiPu_7IKTieHNneBR6c9dPk5pbS4OfIKfHUZznQHIfliHfBT_w-DBOFI0-ex-zIeN649mB_2Xj0dqBxPPLdQNG1l_yKT8ODa4vJpd63MV8THQXbn7NnHY3RvTytZ-z2w_uv15-Kmy8fP19f3RRWaZkKC7RTUNcVIQgyQkiUu0or20lXVaURiLW2JSJ2BsnSrqZatU6j0aic7OQZe7fm3gf_7eBiaqYhWjeONDt_iA1qjQCi1Pr_qKgEKCgVZvTNX-jeH8KcH5IpJaXRuhSZUitlg48xuK45_V6D0CwFNo8FNkuBzVpgtr09hVO0NHa5ATvE315RosjTqsy9Xrl9TD780aXUZa4565erPsydDxN992Fsm0TH0YfHUPnPSX4C8Wm3zQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1243365572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Boone, Simon ; Van Houtte, Mieke</creator><creatorcontrib>Boone, Simon ; Van Houtte, Mieke</creatorcontrib><description>The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and Germany are partly determined by pupils' social background, studies that inquire into the causes of this social bias seem to be virtually inexistent. This study aims to examine whether teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders (northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) are also socially biased, and if so what causes these differentials in advice, using a mixed-methods design. We found the advice given by primary school teachers to be partly determined by pupils' social background. Analysis of the qualitative data suggests that teachers tend to evaluate pupils from low socio-economic status backgrounds less positively, due to their emphasis on specific pupil characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3346</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2012.704720</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BJSEDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>allocation ; Belgium ; Bias ; Classes, stratification, mobility ; Educational sociology ; Elementary School Teachers ; Elementary schools ; Evaluation ; Flanders ; France ; Germany ; Individualized Instruction ; Inequality ; mixed-methods research ; Prejudice ; Primary education ; Pupils ; Research methods ; Secondary Education ; Social Background ; Social organization. Social system. Social structure ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic Status ; Sociology ; Sociology of Education ; Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education ; standards of evaluation ; Students ; Teachers ; Transitions</subject><ispartof>British journal of sociology of education, 2013-01, Vol.34 (1), p.20-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2013</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Taylor & Francis</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-c0ab40998a102a622313b854cf3e887621195c7111f61acab9a94de516514e3f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-c0ab40998a102a622313b854cf3e887621195c7111f61acab9a94de516514e3f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23357006$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23357006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,30976,33751,33752,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27125534$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boone, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Houtte, Mieke</creatorcontrib><title>Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research</title><title>British journal of sociology of education</title><description>The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and Germany are partly determined by pupils' social background, studies that inquire into the causes of this social bias seem to be virtually inexistent. This study aims to examine whether teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders (northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) are also socially biased, and if so what causes these differentials in advice, using a mixed-methods design. We found the advice given by primary school teachers to be partly determined by pupils' social background. Analysis of the qualitative data suggests that teachers tend to evaluate pupils from low socio-economic status backgrounds less positively, due to their emphasis on specific pupil characteristics.</description><subject>allocation</subject><subject>Belgium</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Classes, stratification, mobility</subject><subject>Educational sociology</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Elementary schools</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Flanders</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>mixed-methods research</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Primary education</subject><subject>Pupils</subject><subject>Research methods</subject><subject>Secondary Education</subject><subject>Social Background</subject><subject>Social organization. Social system. Social structure</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Status</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of Education</subject><subject>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</subject><subject>standards of evaluation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Transitions</subject><issn>0142-5692</issn><issn>1465-3346</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtr3DAUhUVpodOk_6AFQSl048m9etlehRD6gkA3DVmaO7KMPdhWKmloZtW_XrmetNBFuxLS-c7RlQ5jrxC2CBVcACqhTS22AlBsS1ClgCdsg8roQkplnrLNghQL85y9iHEPAAY0btiPu_7IKTieHNneBR6c9dPk5pbS4OfIKfHUZznQHIfliHfBT_w-DBOFI0-ex-zIeN649mB_2Xj0dqBxPPLdQNG1l_yKT8ODa4vJpd63MV8THQXbn7NnHY3RvTytZ-z2w_uv15-Kmy8fP19f3RRWaZkKC7RTUNcVIQgyQkiUu0or20lXVaURiLW2JSJ2BsnSrqZatU6j0aic7OQZe7fm3gf_7eBiaqYhWjeONDt_iA1qjQCi1Pr_qKgEKCgVZvTNX-jeH8KcH5IpJaXRuhSZUitlg48xuK45_V6D0CwFNo8FNkuBzVpgtr09hVO0NHa5ATvE315RosjTqsy9Xrl9TD780aXUZa4565erPsydDxN992Fsm0TH0YfHUPnPSX4C8Wm3zQ</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Boone, Simon</creator><creator>Van Houtte, Mieke</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research</title><author>Boone, Simon ; Van Houtte, Mieke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-c0ab40998a102a622313b854cf3e887621195c7111f61acab9a94de516514e3f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>allocation</topic><topic>Belgium</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Classes, stratification, mobility</topic><topic>Educational sociology</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Elementary schools</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Flanders</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>mixed-methods research</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Primary education</topic><topic>Pupils</topic><topic>Research methods</topic><topic>Secondary Education</topic><topic>Social Background</topic><topic>Social organization. Social system. Social structure</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Status</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of Education</topic><topic>Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education</topic><topic>standards of evaluation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Transitions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boone, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Houtte, Mieke</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>British journal of sociology of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boone, Simon</au><au>Van Houtte, Mieke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research</atitle><jtitle>British journal of sociology of education</jtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>20-38</pages><issn>0142-5692</issn><eissn>1465-3346</eissn><coden>BJSEDB</coden><abstract>The consequences of educational differentiation have been at the centre of research in sociology of education during the past decades. Processes of educational allocation have, however, received much less attention. Despite the fact that research has shown that teacher recommendations in France and Germany are partly determined by pupils' social background, studies that inquire into the causes of this social bias seem to be virtually inexistent. This study aims to examine whether teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education in Flanders (northern, Dutch-speaking part of Belgium) are also socially biased, and if so what causes these differentials in advice, using a mixed-methods design. We found the advice given by primary school teachers to be partly determined by pupils' social background. Analysis of the qualitative data suggests that teachers tend to evaluate pupils from low socio-economic status backgrounds less positively, due to their emphasis on specific pupil characteristics.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/01425692.2012.704720</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-5692 |
ispartof | British journal of sociology of education, 2013-01, Vol.34 (1), p.20-38 |
issn | 0142-5692 1465-3346 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1551002755 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | allocation Belgium Bias Classes, stratification, mobility Educational sociology Elementary School Teachers Elementary schools Evaluation Flanders France Germany Individualized Instruction Inequality mixed-methods research Prejudice Primary education Pupils Research methods Secondary Education Social Background Social organization. Social system. Social structure Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomic Status Sociology Sociology of Education Sociology of education. Educational systems. Lifelong education standards of evaluation Students Teachers Transitions |
title | Why are teacher recommendations at the transition from primary to secondary education socially biased? A mixed-methods research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T19%3A30%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20are%20teacher%20recommendations%20at%20the%20transition%20from%20primary%20to%20secondary%20education%20socially%20biased?%20A%20mixed-methods%20research&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20sociology%20of%20education&rft.au=Boone,%20Simon&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=20-38&rft.issn=0142-5692&rft.eissn=1465-3346&rft.coden=BJSEDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01425692.2012.704720&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E23357006%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1243365572&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23357006&rfr_iscdi=true |