Fiscal forecast errors: Governments versus independent agencies?

We present evidence pointing to the fact that international agencies' fiscal forecasts were affected to some extent by the same type of problems that the literature widely acknowledges for governmental ones. Informational shortages may lead independent agencies' staff to internalize “polit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European Journal of Political Economy 2013-12, Vol.32, p.285-299
Hauptverfasser: Merola, Rossana, Pérez, Javier J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 299
container_issue
container_start_page 285
container_title European Journal of Political Economy
container_volume 32
creator Merola, Rossana
Pérez, Javier J.
description We present evidence pointing to the fact that international agencies' fiscal forecasts were affected to some extent by the same type of problems that the literature widely acknowledges for governmental ones. Informational shortages may lead independent agencies' staff to internalize “political biases” in governmental forecasts when trying to grasp genuine “private information”. Our study is based on a real-time database of EC, OECD and national governments' public deficit forecasts for 15 European countries over the period 1999–2007 and four vintages of projections per forecasted year. Against this background, independent national fiscal institutions might be a natural option, to the extent that they may have better access to inside national information than international organizations. Our results also provide some support to policy positions that claim a closer monitoring of official budgetary projections, in particular as regards transparency requisites, accountability and the threat of sanctions. •International agencies’ fiscal forecasts are correlated with electoral cycles.•The influence of elections is stronger in the case of governments’ forecasts.•Access to private national information should be granted to independent institutions.•Monitoring of official projections should strengthen transparency and accountability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.09.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1550996057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0176268013000682</els_id><sourcerecordid>1519503363</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-f84ce8d31cd3f91809b4adb4473a542be30bb91451156580603071022f9dc4643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9PwzAMxSMEEtPYV0A9cmlxmj9NuDA0sYE0iQucozR1UaeuKUk3iW9P0OAMPtg-vPdk_wi5plBQoPJ2V-Bu9D06X5RAWQG6ACjPyIyqiuWiAnZOZkArmZdSwSVZxLiDVFyXSrMZWa676GyftT6gs3HKMAQf4l228UcMwx6HKWZpi4eYdUODI6Y2TJl9x8F1GO-vyEVr-4iLnzknb-vH19VTvn3ZPK8etrkToKa8Vdyhahh1DWs1VaBrbpua84pZwcsaGdS1plxQKqRQIIFBRaEsW904Ljmbk5tT7hj8xwHjZPbpcux7O6A_REOFAK0liOofUqoFMCZZksqT1AUfY8DWjKHb2_BpKJhvwGZnfgGbb8AGtEmAk3F5MmL6-dhhMDHhGBw2XQI5mcZ3f0V8AV_lhgM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1519503363</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fiscal forecast errors: Governments versus independent agencies?</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Merola, Rossana ; Pérez, Javier J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Merola, Rossana ; Pérez, Javier J.</creatorcontrib><description>We present evidence pointing to the fact that international agencies' fiscal forecasts were affected to some extent by the same type of problems that the literature widely acknowledges for governmental ones. Informational shortages may lead independent agencies' staff to internalize “political biases” in governmental forecasts when trying to grasp genuine “private information”. Our study is based on a real-time database of EC, OECD and national governments' public deficit forecasts for 15 European countries over the period 1999–2007 and four vintages of projections per forecasted year. Against this background, independent national fiscal institutions might be a natural option, to the extent that they may have better access to inside national information than international organizations. Our results also provide some support to policy positions that claim a closer monitoring of official budgetary projections, in particular as regards transparency requisites, accountability and the threat of sanctions. •International agencies’ fiscal forecasts are correlated with electoral cycles.•The influence of elections is stronger in the case of governments’ forecasts.•Access to private national information should be granted to independent institutions.•Monitoring of official projections should strengthen transparency and accountability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0176-2680</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.09.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EJECE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Central Government ; Data Banks ; Economic forecasts ; Error ; Errors ; Europe ; Fiscal forecasting ; Fiscal policies ; Fiscal policy ; Forecast errors ; International Organizations ; OECD ; Political economy ; Sanctions ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>European Journal of Political Economy, 2013-12, Vol.32, p.285-299</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-f84ce8d31cd3f91809b4adb4473a542be30bb91451156580603071022f9dc4643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-f84ce8d31cd3f91809b4adb4473a542be30bb91451156580603071022f9dc4643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.09.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Merola, Rossana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Javier J.</creatorcontrib><title>Fiscal forecast errors: Governments versus independent agencies?</title><title>European Journal of Political Economy</title><description>We present evidence pointing to the fact that international agencies' fiscal forecasts were affected to some extent by the same type of problems that the literature widely acknowledges for governmental ones. Informational shortages may lead independent agencies' staff to internalize “political biases” in governmental forecasts when trying to grasp genuine “private information”. Our study is based on a real-time database of EC, OECD and national governments' public deficit forecasts for 15 European countries over the period 1999–2007 and four vintages of projections per forecasted year. Against this background, independent national fiscal institutions might be a natural option, to the extent that they may have better access to inside national information than international organizations. Our results also provide some support to policy positions that claim a closer monitoring of official budgetary projections, in particular as regards transparency requisites, accountability and the threat of sanctions. •International agencies’ fiscal forecasts are correlated with electoral cycles.•The influence of elections is stronger in the case of governments’ forecasts.•Access to private national information should be granted to independent institutions.•Monitoring of official projections should strengthen transparency and accountability.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Central Government</subject><subject>Data Banks</subject><subject>Economic forecasts</subject><subject>Error</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Fiscal forecasting</subject><subject>Fiscal policies</subject><subject>Fiscal policy</subject><subject>Forecast errors</subject><subject>International Organizations</subject><subject>OECD</subject><subject>Political economy</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0176-2680</issn><issn>1873-5703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9PwzAMxSMEEtPYV0A9cmlxmj9NuDA0sYE0iQucozR1UaeuKUk3iW9P0OAMPtg-vPdk_wi5plBQoPJ2V-Bu9D06X5RAWQG6ACjPyIyqiuWiAnZOZkArmZdSwSVZxLiDVFyXSrMZWa676GyftT6gs3HKMAQf4l228UcMwx6HKWZpi4eYdUODI6Y2TJl9x8F1GO-vyEVr-4iLnzknb-vH19VTvn3ZPK8etrkToKa8Vdyhahh1DWs1VaBrbpua84pZwcsaGdS1plxQKqRQIIFBRaEsW904Ljmbk5tT7hj8xwHjZPbpcux7O6A_REOFAK0liOofUqoFMCZZksqT1AUfY8DWjKHb2_BpKJhvwGZnfgGbb8AGtEmAk3F5MmL6-dhhMDHhGBw2XQI5mcZ3f0V8AV_lhgM</recordid><startdate>20131201</startdate><enddate>20131201</enddate><creator>Merola, Rossana</creator><creator>Pérez, Javier J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7UB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131201</creationdate><title>Fiscal forecast errors: Governments versus independent agencies?</title><author>Merola, Rossana ; Pérez, Javier J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-f84ce8d31cd3f91809b4adb4473a542be30bb91451156580603071022f9dc4643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Central Government</topic><topic>Data Banks</topic><topic>Economic forecasts</topic><topic>Error</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Fiscal forecasting</topic><topic>Fiscal policies</topic><topic>Fiscal policy</topic><topic>Forecast errors</topic><topic>International Organizations</topic><topic>OECD</topic><topic>Political economy</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Merola, Rossana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, Javier J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>European Journal of Political Economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Merola, Rossana</au><au>Pérez, Javier J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fiscal forecast errors: Governments versus independent agencies?</atitle><jtitle>European Journal of Political Economy</jtitle><date>2013-12-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>32</volume><spage>285</spage><epage>299</epage><pages>285-299</pages><issn>0176-2680</issn><eissn>1873-5703</eissn><coden>EJECE3</coden><abstract>We present evidence pointing to the fact that international agencies' fiscal forecasts were affected to some extent by the same type of problems that the literature widely acknowledges for governmental ones. Informational shortages may lead independent agencies' staff to internalize “political biases” in governmental forecasts when trying to grasp genuine “private information”. Our study is based on a real-time database of EC, OECD and national governments' public deficit forecasts for 15 European countries over the period 1999–2007 and four vintages of projections per forecasted year. Against this background, independent national fiscal institutions might be a natural option, to the extent that they may have better access to inside national information than international organizations. Our results also provide some support to policy positions that claim a closer monitoring of official budgetary projections, in particular as regards transparency requisites, accountability and the threat of sanctions. •International agencies’ fiscal forecasts are correlated with electoral cycles.•The influence of elections is stronger in the case of governments’ forecasts.•Access to private national information should be granted to independent institutions.•Monitoring of official projections should strengthen transparency and accountability.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.09.002</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0176-2680
ispartof European Journal of Political Economy, 2013-12, Vol.32, p.285-299
issn 0176-2680
1873-5703
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1550996057
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Accountability
Central Government
Data Banks
Economic forecasts
Error
Errors
Europe
Fiscal forecasting
Fiscal policies
Fiscal policy
Forecast errors
International Organizations
OECD
Political economy
Sanctions
Transparency
title Fiscal forecast errors: Governments versus independent agencies?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T06%3A34%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fiscal%20forecast%20errors:%20Governments%20versus%20independent%20agencies?&rft.jtitle=European%20Journal%20of%20Political%20Economy&rft.au=Merola,%20Rossana&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.spage=285&rft.epage=299&rft.pages=285-299&rft.issn=0176-2680&rft.eissn=1873-5703&rft.coden=EJECE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2013.09.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1519503363%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1519503363&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0176268013000682&rfr_iscdi=true