Teacher assessment of grammatical ability in second language academic writing: A case study
•The article examines the construct of grammar assessed by teachers in L2 academic writing classrooms.•Essay exams were analyzed using grammatical accuracy and complexity measures.•Methods for developing grounded theory were used to analyze questionnaire and interview data.•Results point to accuracy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of second language writing 2014-06, Vol.24 (Jun), p.83-107 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107 |
---|---|
container_issue | Jun |
container_start_page | 83 |
container_title | Journal of second language writing |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Neumann, Heike |
description | •The article examines the construct of grammar assessed by teachers in L2 academic writing classrooms.•Essay exams were analyzed using grammatical accuracy and complexity measures.•Methods for developing grounded theory were used to analyze questionnaire and interview data.•Results point to accuracy as teachers’ primary assessment criterion.•Theoretical definition of grammatical ability at odds with construct assessed in L2 classrooms.
In the language assessment literature, grammatical ability is widely accepted as a key component of second language (L2) ability in general and L2 writing ability in particular. Indicators of grammatical ability have been investigated in L2 writing research, but the indicators L2 writing teachers attend to when determining grammatical ability levels of their students have not been studied. Furthermore, there is no research on what students know about their teachers’ assessment criteria and how that knowledge might affect their writing and learning process. This mixed methods triangulation study examines these questions in university L2 academic writing classes through a quantitative text-based analysis of academic essay exams, student questionnaires, and teacher and student interviews. The combined results of all data sources indicate that the teachers in this study focus primarily on accuracy when assessing grammatical ability. This leads to risk avoidance behaviour by students and may have a negative impact on their learning as students adapt their writing to meet above all their teachers’ expectations for grammatical accuracy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1550993330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1060374314000204</els_id><sourcerecordid>1550993330</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-21299d7e991a568ba9ef3ca0aac49905077e2604e81d7dabcdf1a6395663f0053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxRdRsH78A55y9LJ1kuxuGvEixS8QvNSThzBNZmvKfmhma-l_75Z6Fh7MHN5vmPey7ErCVIKsbtbTNTfbqQJZTGEUqKNsImdG57JQ6njcoYJcm0KfZmfMawAwsxIm2ceC0H9SEshMzC11g-hrsUrYtjhEj43AZWzisBOxE0y-74JosFttcEUCPQZqoxfbFIfYrW7FvfDIJHjYhN1FdlJjw3T5N8-z98eHxfw5f317epnfv-ZeGzPkSiprgyFrJZbVbImWau0REH1hLZRgDKkKCprJYAIufaglVtqWVaVrgFKfZ9eHu1-p_94QD66N7KkZ36R-w06WJVirtYbRqg5Wn3rmRLX7SrHFtHMS3L5Jt3b7Jt2-SQejQI3Q3QGiMcRPpOTYR-o8hZjIDy708T_8F1offQ4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1550993330</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teacher assessment of grammatical ability in second language academic writing: A case study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Neumann, Heike</creator><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Heike</creatorcontrib><description>•The article examines the construct of grammar assessed by teachers in L2 academic writing classrooms.•Essay exams were analyzed using grammatical accuracy and complexity measures.•Methods for developing grounded theory were used to analyze questionnaire and interview data.•Results point to accuracy as teachers’ primary assessment criterion.•Theoretical definition of grammatical ability at odds with construct assessed in L2 classrooms.
In the language assessment literature, grammatical ability is widely accepted as a key component of second language (L2) ability in general and L2 writing ability in particular. Indicators of grammatical ability have been investigated in L2 writing research, but the indicators L2 writing teachers attend to when determining grammatical ability levels of their students have not been studied. Furthermore, there is no research on what students know about their teachers’ assessment criteria and how that knowledge might affect their writing and learning process. This mixed methods triangulation study examines these questions in university L2 academic writing classes through a quantitative text-based analysis of academic essay exams, student questionnaires, and teacher and student interviews. The combined results of all data sources indicate that the teachers in this study focus primarily on accuracy when assessing grammatical ability. This leads to risk avoidance behaviour by students and may have a negative impact on their learning as students adapt their writing to meet above all their teachers’ expectations for grammatical accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1060-3743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSLWEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic writing ; Assessment criteria ; Grammatical ability ; Rating scales ; Second language writing</subject><ispartof>Journal of second language writing, 2014-06, Vol.24 (Jun), p.83-107</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-21299d7e991a568ba9ef3ca0aac49905077e2604e81d7dabcdf1a6395663f0053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-21299d7e991a568ba9ef3ca0aac49905077e2604e81d7dabcdf1a6395663f0053</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8977-7219</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Heike</creatorcontrib><title>Teacher assessment of grammatical ability in second language academic writing: A case study</title><title>Journal of second language writing</title><description>•The article examines the construct of grammar assessed by teachers in L2 academic writing classrooms.•Essay exams were analyzed using grammatical accuracy and complexity measures.•Methods for developing grounded theory were used to analyze questionnaire and interview data.•Results point to accuracy as teachers’ primary assessment criterion.•Theoretical definition of grammatical ability at odds with construct assessed in L2 classrooms.
In the language assessment literature, grammatical ability is widely accepted as a key component of second language (L2) ability in general and L2 writing ability in particular. Indicators of grammatical ability have been investigated in L2 writing research, but the indicators L2 writing teachers attend to when determining grammatical ability levels of their students have not been studied. Furthermore, there is no research on what students know about their teachers’ assessment criteria and how that knowledge might affect their writing and learning process. This mixed methods triangulation study examines these questions in university L2 academic writing classes through a quantitative text-based analysis of academic essay exams, student questionnaires, and teacher and student interviews. The combined results of all data sources indicate that the teachers in this study focus primarily on accuracy when assessing grammatical ability. This leads to risk avoidance behaviour by students and may have a negative impact on their learning as students adapt their writing to meet above all their teachers’ expectations for grammatical accuracy.</description><subject>Academic writing</subject><subject>Assessment criteria</subject><subject>Grammatical ability</subject><subject>Rating scales</subject><subject>Second language writing</subject><issn>1060-3743</issn><issn>1873-1422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxRdRsH78A55y9LJ1kuxuGvEixS8QvNSThzBNZmvKfmhma-l_75Z6Fh7MHN5vmPey7ErCVIKsbtbTNTfbqQJZTGEUqKNsImdG57JQ6njcoYJcm0KfZmfMawAwsxIm2ceC0H9SEshMzC11g-hrsUrYtjhEj43AZWzisBOxE0y-74JosFttcEUCPQZqoxfbFIfYrW7FvfDIJHjYhN1FdlJjw3T5N8-z98eHxfw5f317epnfv-ZeGzPkSiprgyFrJZbVbImWau0REH1hLZRgDKkKCprJYAIufaglVtqWVaVrgFKfZ9eHu1-p_94QD66N7KkZ36R-w06WJVirtYbRqg5Wn3rmRLX7SrHFtHMS3L5Jt3b7Jt2-SQejQI3Q3QGiMcRPpOTYR-o8hZjIDy708T_8F1offQ4</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Neumann, Heike</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-7219</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Teacher assessment of grammatical ability in second language academic writing: A case study</title><author>Neumann, Heike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-21299d7e991a568ba9ef3ca0aac49905077e2604e81d7dabcdf1a6395663f0053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Academic writing</topic><topic>Assessment criteria</topic><topic>Grammatical ability</topic><topic>Rating scales</topic><topic>Second language writing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neumann, Heike</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of second language writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neumann, Heike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teacher assessment of grammatical ability in second language academic writing: A case study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of second language writing</jtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>Jun</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>83-107</pages><issn>1060-3743</issn><eissn>1873-1422</eissn><coden>JSLWEC</coden><abstract>•The article examines the construct of grammar assessed by teachers in L2 academic writing classrooms.•Essay exams were analyzed using grammatical accuracy and complexity measures.•Methods for developing grounded theory were used to analyze questionnaire and interview data.•Results point to accuracy as teachers’ primary assessment criterion.•Theoretical definition of grammatical ability at odds with construct assessed in L2 classrooms.
In the language assessment literature, grammatical ability is widely accepted as a key component of second language (L2) ability in general and L2 writing ability in particular. Indicators of grammatical ability have been investigated in L2 writing research, but the indicators L2 writing teachers attend to when determining grammatical ability levels of their students have not been studied. Furthermore, there is no research on what students know about their teachers’ assessment criteria and how that knowledge might affect their writing and learning process. This mixed methods triangulation study examines these questions in university L2 academic writing classes through a quantitative text-based analysis of academic essay exams, student questionnaires, and teacher and student interviews. The combined results of all data sources indicate that the teachers in this study focus primarily on accuracy when assessing grammatical ability. This leads to risk avoidance behaviour by students and may have a negative impact on their learning as students adapt their writing to meet above all their teachers’ expectations for grammatical accuracy.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.002</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8977-7219</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1060-3743 |
ispartof | Journal of second language writing, 2014-06, Vol.24 (Jun), p.83-107 |
issn | 1060-3743 1873-1422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1550993330 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Academic writing Assessment criteria Grammatical ability Rating scales Second language writing |
title | Teacher assessment of grammatical ability in second language academic writing: A case study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A07%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teacher%20assessment%20of%20grammatical%20ability%20in%20second%20language%20academic%20writing:%20A%20case%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20second%20language%20writing&rft.au=Neumann,%20Heike&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=Jun&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=83-107&rft.issn=1060-3743&rft.eissn=1873-1422&rft.coden=JSLWEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1550993330%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1550993330&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1060374314000204&rfr_iscdi=true |