Evaluation of purified antigen fraction in the immunodiagnosis of cystic echinococcosis

Echinococcus granulosus antigen B fraction (AgB) was evaluated for its prognostic value in the serological follow-up of cystic echinococcosis (CE), compared to crude hydatid fluid (HF) as well as soluble somatic Echinococcus multilocularis antigen (Em). The sensitivity and specificity of enzyme-link...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Parasitology research (1987) 2014-08, Vol.113 (8), p.2861-2867
Hauptverfasser: Reiterová, Katarína, Auer, Herbert, Altintaś, Nazmiye, Yolasigmaz, Aysegul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2867
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2861
container_title Parasitology research (1987)
container_volume 113
creator Reiterová, Katarína
Auer, Herbert
Altintaś, Nazmiye
Yolasigmaz, Aysegul
description Echinococcus granulosus antigen B fraction (AgB) was evaluated for its prognostic value in the serological follow-up of cystic echinococcosis (CE), compared to crude hydatid fluid (HF) as well as soluble somatic Echinococcus multilocularis antigen (Em). The sensitivity and specificity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were compared examining 177 sera from patients with different clinical courses and outcome of CE and with other parasitic infections. AgB-ELISA in comparison to confirmed cystic echinococcosis has 96.4 % sensitivity and 97.2 % specificity, with 93.1 % positive predictive value and 98.6 % negative predictive value. The HF-ELISA was more sensitive than the AgB-ELISA, but its specificity was lower. Our results indicate that AgB-ELISA was more satisfactory for seroconfirmation of acute echinococcosis than HF-ELISA. Moreover, the AgB-ELISA has a potential key role in control measures implemented in patients undergoing surgery. In sera of patients more than 3 months after the treatment, no antibody response to antigen B was detected; however, with conventionally used HF-ELISA, they were still positive. The AgB is recommended for the confirmatory diagnosis. AgB-WB allocated low background with typical “triplet” bands at 8-12-16 kDa.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00436-014-3947-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1548639519</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A381057020</galeid><sourcerecordid>A381057020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-d3803b5a7435bacac7f0f41b47ad82bf8b102cbb239e3ae1136f91c69fd9c0b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFjEQh4Mo9rX6Abzogpdetk4y2T85llKrUPCgxWNIssk2ZTd5TXaFfnuzbhUEkRwSMs9vyOQh5DWFcwrQvc8AHNsaKK9R8K6GJ-RAObKaiqZ5Sg4gyhkoxRPyIud7ANq1nD8nJ4z3rEcuDuTb1Q81rWrxMVTRVcc1eeftUKmw-NGGyiVlfhV9qJY7W_l5XkMcvBpDzD5vGfOQF28qa-58iCYasxVekmdOTdm-etxPye2Hq6-XH-ubz9efLi9uatMgX-oBe0DdqI5jo5VRpnPgONW8U0PPtOs1BWa0ZigsKltGaZ2gphVuEAY04ik52_seU_y-2rzI2Wdjp0kFG9csacP7FkVDRUHf7eioJit9cHEpw224vMCeQtMBg0Kd_4Mqa7CzNzFY58v9XwG6B0yKOSfr5DH5WaUHSUFumuSuSRZNctMkt8ybx1everbDn8RvLwVgO5BLKYw2yfu4plB-8r9d3-4hp6JUY_JZ3n5hBSjieQvY4k9ucKYW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1548639519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of purified antigen fraction in the immunodiagnosis of cystic echinococcosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Reiterová, Katarína ; Auer, Herbert ; Altintaś, Nazmiye ; Yolasigmaz, Aysegul</creator><creatorcontrib>Reiterová, Katarína ; Auer, Herbert ; Altintaś, Nazmiye ; Yolasigmaz, Aysegul</creatorcontrib><description>Echinococcus granulosus antigen B fraction (AgB) was evaluated for its prognostic value in the serological follow-up of cystic echinococcosis (CE), compared to crude hydatid fluid (HF) as well as soluble somatic Echinococcus multilocularis antigen (Em). The sensitivity and specificity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were compared examining 177 sera from patients with different clinical courses and outcome of CE and with other parasitic infections. AgB-ELISA in comparison to confirmed cystic echinococcosis has 96.4 % sensitivity and 97.2 % specificity, with 93.1 % positive predictive value and 98.6 % negative predictive value. The HF-ELISA was more sensitive than the AgB-ELISA, but its specificity was lower. Our results indicate that AgB-ELISA was more satisfactory for seroconfirmation of acute echinococcosis than HF-ELISA. Moreover, the AgB-ELISA has a potential key role in control measures implemented in patients undergoing surgery. In sera of patients more than 3 months after the treatment, no antibody response to antigen B was detected; however, with conventionally used HF-ELISA, they were still positive. The AgB is recommended for the confirmatory diagnosis. AgB-WB allocated low background with typical “triplet” bands at 8-12-16 kDa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0113</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1955</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00436-014-3947-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24828349</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Helminth - blood ; Antigens ; Antigens, Helminth ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Blotting, Western ; control methods ; Echinococcosis ; Echinococcosis - diagnosis ; Echinococcus granulosus ; Echinococcus multilocularis ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Health aspects ; Host-parasite relationships ; Humans ; Immunologic Tests ; Immunology ; Lipoproteins ; Medical Microbiology ; Microbiological research ; Microbiology ; Original Paper ; patients ; Physiological aspects ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; serodiagnosis ; Serologic Tests - methods ; surgery</subject><ispartof>Parasitology research (1987), 2014-08, Vol.113 (8), p.2861-2867</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-d3803b5a7435bacac7f0f41b47ad82bf8b102cbb239e3ae1136f91c69fd9c0b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-d3803b5a7435bacac7f0f41b47ad82bf8b102cbb239e3ae1136f91c69fd9c0b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00436-014-3947-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00436-014-3947-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24828349$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reiterová, Katarína</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auer, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altintaś, Nazmiye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yolasigmaz, Aysegul</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of purified antigen fraction in the immunodiagnosis of cystic echinococcosis</title><title>Parasitology research (1987)</title><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><description>Echinococcus granulosus antigen B fraction (AgB) was evaluated for its prognostic value in the serological follow-up of cystic echinococcosis (CE), compared to crude hydatid fluid (HF) as well as soluble somatic Echinococcus multilocularis antigen (Em). The sensitivity and specificity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were compared examining 177 sera from patients with different clinical courses and outcome of CE and with other parasitic infections. AgB-ELISA in comparison to confirmed cystic echinococcosis has 96.4 % sensitivity and 97.2 % specificity, with 93.1 % positive predictive value and 98.6 % negative predictive value. The HF-ELISA was more sensitive than the AgB-ELISA, but its specificity was lower. Our results indicate that AgB-ELISA was more satisfactory for seroconfirmation of acute echinococcosis than HF-ELISA. Moreover, the AgB-ELISA has a potential key role in control measures implemented in patients undergoing surgery. In sera of patients more than 3 months after the treatment, no antibody response to antigen B was detected; however, with conventionally used HF-ELISA, they were still positive. The AgB is recommended for the confirmatory diagnosis. AgB-WB allocated low background with typical “triplet” bands at 8-12-16 kDa.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Helminth - blood</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Helminth</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Blotting, Western</subject><subject>control methods</subject><subject>Echinococcosis</subject><subject>Echinococcosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Echinococcus granulosus</subject><subject>Echinococcus multilocularis</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Host-parasite relationships</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunologic Tests</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>Lipoproteins</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbiological research</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>patients</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>serodiagnosis</subject><subject>Serologic Tests - methods</subject><subject>surgery</subject><issn>0932-0113</issn><issn>1432-1955</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFjEQh4Mo9rX6Abzogpdetk4y2T85llKrUPCgxWNIssk2ZTd5TXaFfnuzbhUEkRwSMs9vyOQh5DWFcwrQvc8AHNsaKK9R8K6GJ-RAObKaiqZ5Sg4gyhkoxRPyIud7ANq1nD8nJ4z3rEcuDuTb1Q81rWrxMVTRVcc1eeftUKmw-NGGyiVlfhV9qJY7W_l5XkMcvBpDzD5vGfOQF28qa-58iCYasxVekmdOTdm-etxPye2Hq6-XH-ubz9efLi9uatMgX-oBe0DdqI5jo5VRpnPgONW8U0PPtOs1BWa0ZigsKltGaZ2gphVuEAY04ik52_seU_y-2rzI2Wdjp0kFG9csacP7FkVDRUHf7eioJit9cHEpw224vMCeQtMBg0Kd_4Mqa7CzNzFY58v9XwG6B0yKOSfr5DH5WaUHSUFumuSuSRZNctMkt8ybx1everbDn8RvLwVgO5BLKYw2yfu4plB-8r9d3-4hp6JUY_JZ3n5hBSjieQvY4k9ucKYW</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Reiterová, Katarína</creator><creator>Auer, Herbert</creator><creator>Altintaś, Nazmiye</creator><creator>Yolasigmaz, Aysegul</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Evaluation of purified antigen fraction in the immunodiagnosis of cystic echinococcosis</title><author>Reiterová, Katarína ; Auer, Herbert ; Altintaś, Nazmiye ; Yolasigmaz, Aysegul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-d3803b5a7435bacac7f0f41b47ad82bf8b102cbb239e3ae1136f91c69fd9c0b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Helminth - blood</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Helminth</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Blotting, Western</topic><topic>control methods</topic><topic>Echinococcosis</topic><topic>Echinococcosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Echinococcus granulosus</topic><topic>Echinococcus multilocularis</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Host-parasite relationships</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunologic Tests</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>Lipoproteins</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbiological research</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>patients</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>serodiagnosis</topic><topic>Serologic Tests - methods</topic><topic>surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reiterová, Katarína</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Auer, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Altintaś, Nazmiye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yolasigmaz, Aysegul</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reiterová, Katarína</au><au>Auer, Herbert</au><au>Altintaś, Nazmiye</au><au>Yolasigmaz, Aysegul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of purified antigen fraction in the immunodiagnosis of cystic echinococcosis</atitle><jtitle>Parasitology research (1987)</jtitle><stitle>Parasitol Res</stitle><addtitle>Parasitol Res</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2861</spage><epage>2867</epage><pages>2861-2867</pages><issn>0932-0113</issn><eissn>1432-1955</eissn><abstract>Echinococcus granulosus antigen B fraction (AgB) was evaluated for its prognostic value in the serological follow-up of cystic echinococcosis (CE), compared to crude hydatid fluid (HF) as well as soluble somatic Echinococcus multilocularis antigen (Em). The sensitivity and specificity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were compared examining 177 sera from patients with different clinical courses and outcome of CE and with other parasitic infections. AgB-ELISA in comparison to confirmed cystic echinococcosis has 96.4 % sensitivity and 97.2 % specificity, with 93.1 % positive predictive value and 98.6 % negative predictive value. The HF-ELISA was more sensitive than the AgB-ELISA, but its specificity was lower. Our results indicate that AgB-ELISA was more satisfactory for seroconfirmation of acute echinococcosis than HF-ELISA. Moreover, the AgB-ELISA has a potential key role in control measures implemented in patients undergoing surgery. In sera of patients more than 3 months after the treatment, no antibody response to antigen B was detected; however, with conventionally used HF-ELISA, they were still positive. The AgB is recommended for the confirmatory diagnosis. AgB-WB allocated low background with typical “triplet” bands at 8-12-16 kDa.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>24828349</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00436-014-3947-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0932-0113
ispartof Parasitology research (1987), 2014-08, Vol.113 (8), p.2861-2867
issn 0932-0113
1432-1955
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1548639519
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Helminth - blood
Antigens
Antigens, Helminth
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Blotting, Western
control methods
Echinococcosis
Echinococcosis - diagnosis
Echinococcus granulosus
Echinococcus multilocularis
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Health aspects
Host-parasite relationships
Humans
Immunologic Tests
Immunology
Lipoproteins
Medical Microbiology
Microbiological research
Microbiology
Original Paper
patients
Physiological aspects
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
serodiagnosis
Serologic Tests - methods
surgery
title Evaluation of purified antigen fraction in the immunodiagnosis of cystic echinococcosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T11%3A50%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20purified%20antigen%20fraction%20in%20the%20immunodiagnosis%20of%20cystic%20echinococcosis&rft.jtitle=Parasitology%20research%20(1987)&rft.au=Reiterov%C3%A1,%20Katar%C3%ADna&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2861&rft.epage=2867&rft.pages=2861-2867&rft.issn=0932-0113&rft.eissn=1432-1955&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00436-014-3947-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA381057020%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1548639519&rft_id=info:pmid/24828349&rft_galeid=A381057020&rfr_iscdi=true