Microvascular effects of Photofrin® -induced photodynamic therapy

Summary Background and objective The object of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for complicated hemangiomas. The photosensitizing activities of Photofrin® have been used in vivo models for our goal of evaluation. Study design/materials and methods The in vivo bi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy 2007-06, Vol.4 (2), p.95-99
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Cheng-Jen, MD, PhD, Cheng, Sally M.H, Nelson, J. Stuart
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background and objective The object of our study is to evaluate the feasibility of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for complicated hemangiomas. The photosensitizing activities of Photofrin® have been used in vivo models for our goal of evaluation. Study design/materials and methods The in vivo biological activities of Photofrin® exposed to the total laser energy density of 100 J/cm2 with the power density of 100 or 120 mW/cm2 at 630 nm wavelength was studied. The amount of vascular damage produced in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) was evaluated. At 630 nm wavelength, those individual vessels with a diameter of 40 μm or less and those with a diameter between 40 and 100 μm were treated with Photofrin® at a concentration of about 2.5 mg/mL, and injected intraperitoneally at 2.5 mg/kg, illuminated at 100 and 120 mW/cm2 , respectively. Both exhibited coagulation. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (100 and 120 mW/cm2 ) on vessel damage grade 1. With vessel damage grades 2 and 3, the differences were statistically significant between two groups. Vessel damages between arterioles and venules also demonstrated differences in the 100 mW/cm2 treated group but not in the 120 mW/cm2 group. Statistically significant differences were also shown in arteriole and venules damage between 100 and 120 mW/cm2 treated groups. The severity of vessel damage between grades 1 and 2, 1 and 3, and 2 and 3, were compared. The differences were statistically significant in 100 mW/cm2 treated group. There was no statistically significant difference in 120 mW/cm2 treated group. Conclusion Photofrin® has the capabilities for destruction of microvascular vessels of CAM. Extension of this study to the second-generation photosensitizers is underway. The most important treatment variables seem to be the power density.
ISSN:1572-1000
1873-1597
DOI:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2007.03.003