The Biology and Evolution of Cohesive Gel and Shaped Implants
The introduction of the silicone gel implant in 1962 began the modern era of breast augmentation, and over the past 50 years, breast implants have evolved to encompass a wide array of commercially available implants today. In April 1992, the moratorium on silicone gel breast implants began, and much...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2014-07, Vol.134 (1S), p.6S-11S |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 11S |
---|---|
container_issue | 1S |
container_start_page | 6S |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Calobrace, M. Bradley Capizzi, Peter J. |
description | The introduction of the silicone gel implant in 1962 began the modern era of breast augmentation, and over the past 50 years, breast implants have evolved to encompass a wide array of commercially available implants today. In April 1992, the moratorium on silicone gel breast implants began, and much of the experience and development of the cohesive shaped implants occurred outside the United States. During this time, saline implants were used almost exclusively in North America, whereas silicone implants continued to be used throughout the rest of the world. In 2001, cohesive gel implants became available in the United States under an Investigational Device Exemption Study. Three companies have US Food and Drug Administration approval of fifth-generation implants: Sientra, Allergan, and Mentor. These implants are unique due to the texture of the shell, implant dimensions, gel-shell interaction, gel fill ratio, degree of cross-linking, and form stability. Although form stability is a relative term, it may best be reserved to describe the increased ability of the implant to maintain its basic, intended shape. The cross-linking, form stability, and cohesiveness of these fifth-generation implants provide surgeons with an innovative tool to more closely create a natural breast in both shape and softness. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000347 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1548632638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1548632638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-8e3e2d12154499ad42766657e61ba11529e1536c1034314710e34d96a5fe393e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtPwkAQxzdGI4h-A2N69FLc99KDByWIJCQawXOztFNb3bK120L49i4PH3Euk8zjP__5IXRJcJ_gSN08v8z6-G8wro5QlwgahZxyeoy6vkZDggXtoDPn3jEmiklxijpUYKGUYF10O88huC-ssW-bQC_TYLSypm0KuwxsFgxtDq5YQTAGs-vOcl1BGkzKyuhl487RSaaNg4tD7qHXh9F8-BhOn8aT4d00TJigPBwAA5oSSgTnUaRTTpWUUiiQZKHJ1jEQwWRC_A-McEUwMJ5GUosMWMSA9dD1Xreq7WcLronLwiVgvAmwrYu98EAyKtnAj_L9aFJb52rI4qouSl1vYoLjLbjYg4v_g_NrV4cL7aKE9Gfpm9Sv7tqaBmr3Ydo11HEO2jT5Tk8KxkOKCcfKkw63Jc6-AC9ldMI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1548632638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Biology and Evolution of Cohesive Gel and Shaped Implants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Calobrace, M. Bradley ; Capizzi, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Calobrace, M. Bradley ; Capizzi, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>The introduction of the silicone gel implant in 1962 began the modern era of breast augmentation, and over the past 50 years, breast implants have evolved to encompass a wide array of commercially available implants today. In April 1992, the moratorium on silicone gel breast implants began, and much of the experience and development of the cohesive shaped implants occurred outside the United States. During this time, saline implants were used almost exclusively in North America, whereas silicone implants continued to be used throughout the rest of the world. In 2001, cohesive gel implants became available in the United States under an Investigational Device Exemption Study. Three companies have US Food and Drug Administration approval of fifth-generation implants: Sientra, Allergan, and Mentor. These implants are unique due to the texture of the shell, implant dimensions, gel-shell interaction, gel fill ratio, degree of cross-linking, and form stability. Although form stability is a relative term, it may best be reserved to describe the increased ability of the implant to maintain its basic, intended shape. The cross-linking, form stability, and cohesiveness of these fifth-generation implants provide surgeons with an innovative tool to more closely create a natural breast in both shape and softness.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000347</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25057753</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Breast Implants - history ; Device Approval ; Female ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Prosthesis Design - history ; Silicone Elastomers ; Silicone Gels ; Surface Properties ; United States ; United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2014-07, Vol.134 (1S), p.6S-11S</ispartof><rights>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-8e3e2d12154499ad42766657e61ba11529e1536c1034314710e34d96a5fe393e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-8e3e2d12154499ad42766657e61ba11529e1536c1034314710e34d96a5fe393e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25057753$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calobrace, M. Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capizzi, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>The Biology and Evolution of Cohesive Gel and Shaped Implants</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>The introduction of the silicone gel implant in 1962 began the modern era of breast augmentation, and over the past 50 years, breast implants have evolved to encompass a wide array of commercially available implants today. In April 1992, the moratorium on silicone gel breast implants began, and much of the experience and development of the cohesive shaped implants occurred outside the United States. During this time, saline implants were used almost exclusively in North America, whereas silicone implants continued to be used throughout the rest of the world. In 2001, cohesive gel implants became available in the United States under an Investigational Device Exemption Study. Three companies have US Food and Drug Administration approval of fifth-generation implants: Sientra, Allergan, and Mentor. These implants are unique due to the texture of the shell, implant dimensions, gel-shell interaction, gel fill ratio, degree of cross-linking, and form stability. Although form stability is a relative term, it may best be reserved to describe the increased ability of the implant to maintain its basic, intended shape. The cross-linking, form stability, and cohesiveness of these fifth-generation implants provide surgeons with an innovative tool to more closely create a natural breast in both shape and softness.</description><subject>Breast Implants - history</subject><subject>Device Approval</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design - history</subject><subject>Silicone Elastomers</subject><subject>Silicone Gels</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Food and Drug Administration</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtPwkAQxzdGI4h-A2N69FLc99KDByWIJCQawXOztFNb3bK120L49i4PH3Euk8zjP__5IXRJcJ_gSN08v8z6-G8wro5QlwgahZxyeoy6vkZDggXtoDPn3jEmiklxijpUYKGUYF10O88huC-ssW-bQC_TYLSypm0KuwxsFgxtDq5YQTAGs-vOcl1BGkzKyuhl487RSaaNg4tD7qHXh9F8-BhOn8aT4d00TJigPBwAA5oSSgTnUaRTTpWUUiiQZKHJ1jEQwWRC_A-McEUwMJ5GUosMWMSA9dD1Xreq7WcLronLwiVgvAmwrYu98EAyKtnAj_L9aFJb52rI4qouSl1vYoLjLbjYg4v_g_NrV4cL7aKE9Gfpm9Sv7tqaBmr3Ydo11HEO2jT5Tk8KxkOKCcfKkw63Jc6-AC9ldMI</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Calobrace, M. Bradley</creator><creator>Capizzi, Peter J.</creator><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>The Biology and Evolution of Cohesive Gel and Shaped Implants</title><author>Calobrace, M. Bradley ; Capizzi, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-8e3e2d12154499ad42766657e61ba11529e1536c1034314710e34d96a5fe393e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Breast Implants - history</topic><topic>Device Approval</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design - history</topic><topic>Silicone Elastomers</topic><topic>Silicone Gels</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Food and Drug Administration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calobrace, M. Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capizzi, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calobrace, M. Bradley</au><au>Capizzi, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Biology and Evolution of Cohesive Gel and Shaped Implants</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1S</issue><spage>6S</spage><epage>11S</epage><pages>6S-11S</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>The introduction of the silicone gel implant in 1962 began the modern era of breast augmentation, and over the past 50 years, breast implants have evolved to encompass a wide array of commercially available implants today. In April 1992, the moratorium on silicone gel breast implants began, and much of the experience and development of the cohesive shaped implants occurred outside the United States. During this time, saline implants were used almost exclusively in North America, whereas silicone implants continued to be used throughout the rest of the world. In 2001, cohesive gel implants became available in the United States under an Investigational Device Exemption Study. Three companies have US Food and Drug Administration approval of fifth-generation implants: Sientra, Allergan, and Mentor. These implants are unique due to the texture of the shell, implant dimensions, gel-shell interaction, gel fill ratio, degree of cross-linking, and form stability. Although form stability is a relative term, it may best be reserved to describe the increased ability of the implant to maintain its basic, intended shape. The cross-linking, form stability, and cohesiveness of these fifth-generation implants provide surgeons with an innovative tool to more closely create a natural breast in both shape and softness.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>25057753</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000000347</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2014-07, Vol.134 (1S), p.6S-11S |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1548632638 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Breast Implants - history Device Approval Female History, 20th Century History, 21st Century Humans Prosthesis Design - history Silicone Elastomers Silicone Gels Surface Properties United States United States Food and Drug Administration |
title | The Biology and Evolution of Cohesive Gel and Shaped Implants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A46%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Biology%20and%20Evolution%20of%20Cohesive%20Gel%20and%20Shaped%20Implants&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Calobrace,%20M.%20Bradley&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1S&rft.spage=6S&rft.epage=11S&rft.pages=6S-11S&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1548632638%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1548632638&rft_id=info:pmid/25057753&rfr_iscdi=true |