Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series

The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2014-07, Vol.134 (1S), p.38S-46S
Hauptverfasser: Haws, Melinda J., Schwartz, Michael R., Berger, Lewis H., Daulton, Kimber L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 46S
container_issue 1S
container_start_page 38S
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 134
creator Haws, Melinda J.
Schwartz, Michael R.
Berger, Lewis H.
Daulton, Kimber L.
description The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeon are presented. This analysis used the data of 640 shaped implants in 321 primary augmentation patients implanted by 16 study surgeons through 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze safety endpoints. In addition, analysis is presented for a single surgeon's results of 213 shaped implants in 108 postapproval patients through up to 16 months of follow-up (9-month mean) using a separate frequency analysis. The overall risk of rupture for primary augmentation patients through 5 years was 0.4%, the risk of infection was 1.4%, and the risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) was 3.9%. Reported surgeon satisfaction was 100%, and patient satisfaction remained high. In the separate single-surgeon analysis, after 16 months, 4 of the 108 patients experienced a complication (3.7%) and 3 underwent a reoperation (2.8%). Complications included infection, ptosis (0.9%, each), and capsular contracture (1.9%). The results of Sientra's large clinical study and the postapproval data from a single surgeon demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Sientra's shaped implants. The review of the data and author's experience illustrate the ease of incorporating shaped implants into any surgical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000346
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1548630470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1548630470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-d0897223ccda7b3b2e0fa8902ab31eb87f53b026da1585f2cf9c7508793d0013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUctu1DAUjRAVHQp_gJCXbFz8iOOE3TAqbaVKHTXdsIqc5CZjcOJgOx264yP4PFZ8CQ5TKMIby9fnpXuS5BUlp5QU8u32pjwl_x6eZk-SFRWswClL2dNkFWcMUyLYcfLc-0-EUMkz8Sw5ZoIIKVO5Sn6UGsbgFNpaFzprtEW2Q6U2eoAWvXdqbFG5U1N8XA6TUWPwaK_DDl3ofofL4GDs42shNHYEdA7mHVojgT-Ccmjr9KDcPVrP_RBtVNB2RBujR90og8owt_fo7OsELoZoAC1mSxIf1DQ5excxj78_v32_AT-bGKBzdojAUo-9AVzOroeoS0mOt9EiGqFyIfkXyVGnjIeXD_dJcvvh7HZzga-uzy836yvccEJz3JK8kIzxpmmVrHnNgHQqLwhTNadQ57ITvCYsaxUVuehY0xWNFCSXBW_jTvlJ8uYgGzN_mcGHatC-ARO3BXb2FRVpnnGSShKh6QHaOOu9g66aDiuqKKmWWqtYa_V_rZH2-sFhrmMvf0l_enzU3VsTwPnPZt6Dq3agTNj91ssETzEjNCUyZsbLKOe_ABRosQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1548630470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Haws, Melinda J. ; Schwartz, Michael R. ; Berger, Lewis H. ; Daulton, Kimber L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haws, Melinda J. ; Schwartz, Michael R. ; Berger, Lewis H. ; Daulton, Kimber L.</creatorcontrib><description>The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeon are presented. This analysis used the data of 640 shaped implants in 321 primary augmentation patients implanted by 16 study surgeons through 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze safety endpoints. In addition, analysis is presented for a single surgeon's results of 213 shaped implants in 108 postapproval patients through up to 16 months of follow-up (9-month mean) using a separate frequency analysis. The overall risk of rupture for primary augmentation patients through 5 years was 0.4%, the risk of infection was 1.4%, and the risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) was 3.9%. Reported surgeon satisfaction was 100%, and patient satisfaction remained high. In the separate single-surgeon analysis, after 16 months, 4 of the 108 patients experienced a complication (3.7%) and 3 underwent a reoperation (2.8%). Complications included infection, ptosis (0.9%, each), and capsular contracture (1.9%). The results of Sientra's large clinical study and the postapproval data from a single surgeon demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Sientra's shaped implants. The review of the data and author's experience illustrate the ease of incorporating shaped implants into any surgical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25057747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast Implantation - methods ; Breast Implants ; Female ; Humans ; Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prosthesis Design ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Silicone Gels ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2014-07, Vol.134 (1S), p.38S-46S</ispartof><rights>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-d0897223ccda7b3b2e0fa8902ab31eb87f53b026da1585f2cf9c7508793d0013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25057747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haws, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Lewis H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daulton, Kimber L.</creatorcontrib><title>Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeon are presented. This analysis used the data of 640 shaped implants in 321 primary augmentation patients implanted by 16 study surgeons through 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze safety endpoints. In addition, analysis is presented for a single surgeon's results of 213 shaped implants in 108 postapproval patients through up to 16 months of follow-up (9-month mean) using a separate frequency analysis. The overall risk of rupture for primary augmentation patients through 5 years was 0.4%, the risk of infection was 1.4%, and the risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) was 3.9%. Reported surgeon satisfaction was 100%, and patient satisfaction remained high. In the separate single-surgeon analysis, after 16 months, 4 of the 108 patients experienced a complication (3.7%) and 3 underwent a reoperation (2.8%). Complications included infection, ptosis (0.9%, each), and capsular contracture (1.9%). The results of Sientra's large clinical study and the postapproval data from a single surgeon demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Sientra's shaped implants. The review of the data and author's experience illustrate the ease of incorporating shaped implants into any surgical practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Breast Implants</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Silicone Gels</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUctu1DAUjRAVHQp_gJCXbFz8iOOE3TAqbaVKHTXdsIqc5CZjcOJgOx264yP4PFZ8CQ5TKMIby9fnpXuS5BUlp5QU8u32pjwl_x6eZk-SFRWswClL2dNkFWcMUyLYcfLc-0-EUMkz8Sw5ZoIIKVO5Sn6UGsbgFNpaFzprtEW2Q6U2eoAWvXdqbFG5U1N8XA6TUWPwaK_DDl3ofofL4GDs42shNHYEdA7mHVojgT-Ccmjr9KDcPVrP_RBtVNB2RBujR90og8owt_fo7OsELoZoAC1mSxIf1DQ5excxj78_v32_AT-bGKBzdojAUo-9AVzOroeoS0mOt9EiGqFyIfkXyVGnjIeXD_dJcvvh7HZzga-uzy836yvccEJz3JK8kIzxpmmVrHnNgHQqLwhTNadQ57ITvCYsaxUVuehY0xWNFCSXBW_jTvlJ8uYgGzN_mcGHatC-ARO3BXb2FRVpnnGSShKh6QHaOOu9g66aDiuqKKmWWqtYa_V_rZH2-sFhrmMvf0l_enzU3VsTwPnPZt6Dq3agTNj91ssETzEjNCUyZsbLKOe_ABRosQI</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Haws, Melinda J.</creator><creator>Schwartz, Michael R.</creator><creator>Berger, Lewis H.</creator><creator>Daulton, Kimber L.</creator><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series</title><author>Haws, Melinda J. ; Schwartz, Michael R. ; Berger, Lewis H. ; Daulton, Kimber L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-d0897223ccda7b3b2e0fa8902ab31eb87f53b026da1585f2cf9c7508793d0013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Breast Implants</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Silicone Gels</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haws, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Lewis H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daulton, Kimber L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haws, Melinda J.</au><au>Schwartz, Michael R.</au><au>Berger, Lewis H.</au><au>Daulton, Kimber L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1S</issue><spage>38S</spage><epage>46S</epage><pages>38S-46S</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeon are presented. This analysis used the data of 640 shaped implants in 321 primary augmentation patients implanted by 16 study surgeons through 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze safety endpoints. In addition, analysis is presented for a single surgeon's results of 213 shaped implants in 108 postapproval patients through up to 16 months of follow-up (9-month mean) using a separate frequency analysis. The overall risk of rupture for primary augmentation patients through 5 years was 0.4%, the risk of infection was 1.4%, and the risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) was 3.9%. Reported surgeon satisfaction was 100%, and patient satisfaction remained high. In the separate single-surgeon analysis, after 16 months, 4 of the 108 patients experienced a complication (3.7%) and 3 underwent a reoperation (2.8%). Complications included infection, ptosis (0.9%, each), and capsular contracture (1.9%). The results of Sientra's large clinical study and the postapproval data from a single surgeon demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Sientra's shaped implants. The review of the data and author's experience illustrate the ease of incorporating shaped implants into any surgical practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>25057747</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000000346</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2014-07, Vol.134 (1S), p.38S-46S
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1548630470
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Breast Implantation - methods
Breast Implants
Female
Humans
Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology
Patient Satisfaction
Prosthesis Design
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Silicone Gels
Treatment Outcome
title Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sientra%20Portfolio%20of%20Silimed%20Brand%20Shaped%20Implants%20with%20High-Strength%20Silicone%20Gel:%20A%205-Year%20Primary%20Augmentation%20Clinical%20Study%20Experience%20and%20a%20Postapproval%20Experience%E2%80%94Results%20from%20a%20Single-Surgeon%20108-Patient%20Series&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Haws,%20Melinda%20J.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1S&rft.spage=38S&rft.epage=46S&rft.pages=38S-46S&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000346&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1548630470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1548630470&rft_id=info:pmid/25057747&rfr_iscdi=true