Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series
The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2014-07, Vol.134 (1S), p.38S-46S |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46S |
---|---|
container_issue | 1S |
container_start_page | 38S |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Haws, Melinda J. Schwartz, Michael R. Berger, Lewis H. Daulton, Kimber L. |
description | The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeon are presented.
This analysis used the data of 640 shaped implants in 321 primary augmentation patients implanted by 16 study surgeons through 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze safety endpoints. In addition, analysis is presented for a single surgeon's results of 213 shaped implants in 108 postapproval patients through up to 16 months of follow-up (9-month mean) using a separate frequency analysis.
The overall risk of rupture for primary augmentation patients through 5 years was 0.4%, the risk of infection was 1.4%, and the risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) was 3.9%. Reported surgeon satisfaction was 100%, and patient satisfaction remained high. In the separate single-surgeon analysis, after 16 months, 4 of the 108 patients experienced a complication (3.7%) and 3 underwent a reoperation (2.8%). Complications included infection, ptosis (0.9%, each), and capsular contracture (1.9%).
The results of Sientra's large clinical study and the postapproval data from a single surgeon demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Sientra's shaped implants. The review of the data and author's experience illustrate the ease of incorporating shaped implants into any surgical practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000346 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1548630470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1548630470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-d0897223ccda7b3b2e0fa8902ab31eb87f53b026da1585f2cf9c7508793d0013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUctu1DAUjRAVHQp_gJCXbFz8iOOE3TAqbaVKHTXdsIqc5CZjcOJgOx264yP4PFZ8CQ5TKMIby9fnpXuS5BUlp5QU8u32pjwl_x6eZk-SFRWswClL2dNkFWcMUyLYcfLc-0-EUMkz8Sw5ZoIIKVO5Sn6UGsbgFNpaFzprtEW2Q6U2eoAWvXdqbFG5U1N8XA6TUWPwaK_DDl3ofofL4GDs42shNHYEdA7mHVojgT-Ccmjr9KDcPVrP_RBtVNB2RBujR90og8owt_fo7OsELoZoAC1mSxIf1DQ5excxj78_v32_AT-bGKBzdojAUo-9AVzOroeoS0mOt9EiGqFyIfkXyVGnjIeXD_dJcvvh7HZzga-uzy836yvccEJz3JK8kIzxpmmVrHnNgHQqLwhTNadQ57ITvCYsaxUVuehY0xWNFCSXBW_jTvlJ8uYgGzN_mcGHatC-ARO3BXb2FRVpnnGSShKh6QHaOOu9g66aDiuqKKmWWqtYa_V_rZH2-sFhrmMvf0l_enzU3VsTwPnPZt6Dq3agTNj91ssETzEjNCUyZsbLKOe_ABRosQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1548630470</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Haws, Melinda J. ; Schwartz, Michael R. ; Berger, Lewis H. ; Daulton, Kimber L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haws, Melinda J. ; Schwartz, Michael R. ; Berger, Lewis H. ; Daulton, Kimber L.</creatorcontrib><description>The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeon are presented.
This analysis used the data of 640 shaped implants in 321 primary augmentation patients implanted by 16 study surgeons through 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze safety endpoints. In addition, analysis is presented for a single surgeon's results of 213 shaped implants in 108 postapproval patients through up to 16 months of follow-up (9-month mean) using a separate frequency analysis.
The overall risk of rupture for primary augmentation patients through 5 years was 0.4%, the risk of infection was 1.4%, and the risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) was 3.9%. Reported surgeon satisfaction was 100%, and patient satisfaction remained high. In the separate single-surgeon analysis, after 16 months, 4 of the 108 patients experienced a complication (3.7%) and 3 underwent a reoperation (2.8%). Complications included infection, ptosis (0.9%, each), and capsular contracture (1.9%).
The results of Sientra's large clinical study and the postapproval data from a single surgeon demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Sientra's shaped implants. The review of the data and author's experience illustrate the ease of incorporating shaped implants into any surgical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000346</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25057747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Adult ; Breast Implantation - methods ; Breast Implants ; Female ; Humans ; Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prosthesis Design ; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data ; Silicone Gels ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2014-07, Vol.134 (1S), p.38S-46S</ispartof><rights>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-d0897223ccda7b3b2e0fa8902ab31eb87f53b026da1585f2cf9c7508793d0013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25057747$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haws, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Lewis H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daulton, Kimber L.</creatorcontrib><title>Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeon are presented.
This analysis used the data of 640 shaped implants in 321 primary augmentation patients implanted by 16 study surgeons through 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze safety endpoints. In addition, analysis is presented for a single surgeon's results of 213 shaped implants in 108 postapproval patients through up to 16 months of follow-up (9-month mean) using a separate frequency analysis.
The overall risk of rupture for primary augmentation patients through 5 years was 0.4%, the risk of infection was 1.4%, and the risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) was 3.9%. Reported surgeon satisfaction was 100%, and patient satisfaction remained high. In the separate single-surgeon analysis, after 16 months, 4 of the 108 patients experienced a complication (3.7%) and 3 underwent a reoperation (2.8%). Complications included infection, ptosis (0.9%, each), and capsular contracture (1.9%).
The results of Sientra's large clinical study and the postapproval data from a single surgeon demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Sientra's shaped implants. The review of the data and author's experience illustrate the ease of incorporating shaped implants into any surgical practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Breast Implants</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Silicone Gels</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUctu1DAUjRAVHQp_gJCXbFz8iOOE3TAqbaVKHTXdsIqc5CZjcOJgOx264yP4PFZ8CQ5TKMIby9fnpXuS5BUlp5QU8u32pjwl_x6eZk-SFRWswClL2dNkFWcMUyLYcfLc-0-EUMkz8Sw5ZoIIKVO5Sn6UGsbgFNpaFzprtEW2Q6U2eoAWvXdqbFG5U1N8XA6TUWPwaK_DDl3ofofL4GDs42shNHYEdA7mHVojgT-Ccmjr9KDcPVrP_RBtVNB2RBujR90og8owt_fo7OsELoZoAC1mSxIf1DQ5excxj78_v32_AT-bGKBzdojAUo-9AVzOroeoS0mOt9EiGqFyIfkXyVGnjIeXD_dJcvvh7HZzga-uzy836yvccEJz3JK8kIzxpmmVrHnNgHQqLwhTNadQ57ITvCYsaxUVuehY0xWNFCSXBW_jTvlJ8uYgGzN_mcGHatC-ARO3BXb2FRVpnnGSShKh6QHaOOu9g66aDiuqKKmWWqtYa_V_rZH2-sFhrmMvf0l_enzU3VsTwPnPZt6Dq3agTNj91ssETzEjNCUyZsbLKOe_ABRosQI</recordid><startdate>20140701</startdate><enddate>20140701</enddate><creator>Haws, Melinda J.</creator><creator>Schwartz, Michael R.</creator><creator>Berger, Lewis H.</creator><creator>Daulton, Kimber L.</creator><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140701</creationdate><title>Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series</title><author>Haws, Melinda J. ; Schwartz, Michael R. ; Berger, Lewis H. ; Daulton, Kimber L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-d0897223ccda7b3b2e0fa8902ab31eb87f53b026da1585f2cf9c7508793d0013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Breast Implants</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Silicone Gels</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haws, Melinda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwartz, Michael R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Lewis H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daulton, Kimber L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haws, Melinda J.</au><au>Schwartz, Michael R.</au><au>Berger, Lewis H.</au><au>Daulton, Kimber L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2014-07-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>1S</issue><spage>38S</spage><epage>46S</epage><pages>38S-46S</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>The Sientra portfolio of silicone gel breast implants was approved by the Food and Drug Administration on March 9, 2012, and included the first approved shaped implants in the United States. The 5-year results from Sientra's Core Gel and Continued Access Study and the results of a single surgeon are presented.
This analysis used the data of 640 shaped implants in 321 primary augmentation patients implanted by 16 study surgeons through 5 years. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze safety endpoints. In addition, analysis is presented for a single surgeon's results of 213 shaped implants in 108 postapproval patients through up to 16 months of follow-up (9-month mean) using a separate frequency analysis.
The overall risk of rupture for primary augmentation patients through 5 years was 0.4%, the risk of infection was 1.4%, and the risk of capsular contracture (Baker grade III/IV) was 3.9%. Reported surgeon satisfaction was 100%, and patient satisfaction remained high. In the separate single-surgeon analysis, after 16 months, 4 of the 108 patients experienced a complication (3.7%) and 3 underwent a reoperation (2.8%). Complications included infection, ptosis (0.9%, each), and capsular contracture (1.9%).
The results of Sientra's large clinical study and the postapproval data from a single surgeon demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of Sientra's shaped implants. The review of the data and author's experience illustrate the ease of incorporating shaped implants into any surgical practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>25057747</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000000346</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2014-07, Vol.134 (1S), p.38S-46S |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1548630470 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Breast Implantation - methods Breast Implants Female Humans Implant Capsular Contracture - epidemiology Patient Satisfaction Prosthesis Design Reoperation - statistics & numerical data Silicone Gels Treatment Outcome |
title | Sientra Portfolio of Silimed Brand Shaped Implants with High-Strength Silicone Gel: A 5-Year Primary Augmentation Clinical Study Experience and a Postapproval Experience—Results from a Single-Surgeon 108-Patient Series |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A16%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sientra%20Portfolio%20of%20Silimed%20Brand%20Shaped%20Implants%20with%20High-Strength%20Silicone%20Gel:%20A%205-Year%20Primary%20Augmentation%20Clinical%20Study%20Experience%20and%20a%20Postapproval%20Experience%E2%80%94Results%20from%20a%20Single-Surgeon%20108-Patient%20Series&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Haws,%20Melinda%20J.&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=1S&rft.spage=38S&rft.epage=46S&rft.pages=38S-46S&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000346&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1548630470%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1548630470&rft_id=info:pmid/25057747&rfr_iscdi=true |