One-Month Test-Retest Reliability of the ImPACT Test Battery
In order to better understand the test-retest reliability of the ImPACT test battery, 25 undergraduate students completed two ImPACT tests across a time frame of 4 weeks between assessments. Participants had not previously completed ImPACT and had no history of concussion. Pearson's correlation...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of clinical neuropsychology 2013-08, Vol.28 (5), p.499-504 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 504 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 499 |
| container_title | Archives of clinical neuropsychology |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | SCHATZ, Philip FERRIS, Charles S |
| description | In order to better understand the test-retest reliability of the ImPACT test battery, 25 undergraduate students completed two ImPACT tests across a time frame of 4 weeks between assessments. Participants had not previously completed ImPACT and had no history of concussion. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were as follows: Verbal Memory = .66/.79 (r/ICC), Visual Memory = .43/.60, Visual Motor Speed = .78/.88, Reaction Time = .63/.77, and Total Symptoms = .75/.81. Dependent sample t-tests revealed significant improvement on only Visual Motor Speed composite scores. Reliable Change Indices showed a significant number of participants fell outside 80% and 95% confidence intervals for only Visual Motor Speed scores (but no other indices), whereas all scores were within 80% and 95% confidence intervals using regression-based measures. Results suggest that repeated exposure to the ImPACT test may result in significant improvements in the physical mechanics of how college students interact with the test (e.g., performance on Visual Motor Speed), but repeated exposure across 1 month does not result in practice effects in memory performance or reaction time. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/arclin/act034 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547860065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1547860065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-b9281fff5294c8c7aaa33aad5c2c8ea3b9b11f705862c19496f8776740589183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtLAzEUBeAgiq3VpVuZjeAmNu8HuKnFR6FSKbMfMmlCR6YzNUkX_fdOnapLVwcuH-fCAeAao3uMNB2bYOuqGRubEGUnYIiVpJArRk_BECklocBSDsBFjB8IIY4xOQcDQiUiQqoheFg0Dr61TVpnuYsJLl3qIlu6ujJlVVdpn7U-S2uXzTbvk2n-rbJHk5IL-0tw5k0d3dUxRyB_fsqnr3C-eJlNJ3NoqeYJlpoo7L3nRDOrrDTGUGrMiltilTO01CXGXiKuBLFYMy28klJI1l00VnQE7vrabWg_d93_YlNF6-raNK7dxQJzJpVASPD_KesYYQodWmFPbWhjDM4X21BtTNgXGBWHaYt-2qKftvM3x-pduXGrX_2zZQduj8BEa2ofTGOr-OekwEwgTL8ABNmArg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1400624808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>One-Month Test-Retest Reliability of the ImPACT Test Battery</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>SCHATZ, Philip ; FERRIS, Charles S</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHATZ, Philip ; FERRIS, Charles S</creatorcontrib><description>In order to better understand the test-retest reliability of the ImPACT test battery, 25 undergraduate students completed two ImPACT tests across a time frame of 4 weeks between assessments. Participants had not previously completed ImPACT and had no history of concussion. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were as follows: Verbal Memory = .66/.79 (r/ICC), Visual Memory = .43/.60, Visual Motor Speed = .78/.88, Reaction Time = .63/.77, and Total Symptoms = .75/.81. Dependent sample t-tests revealed significant improvement on only Visual Motor Speed composite scores. Reliable Change Indices showed a significant number of participants fell outside 80% and 95% confidence intervals for only Visual Motor Speed scores (but no other indices), whereas all scores were within 80% and 95% confidence intervals using regression-based measures. Results suggest that repeated exposure to the ImPACT test may result in significant improvements in the physical mechanics of how college students interact with the test (e.g., performance on Visual Motor Speed), but repeated exposure across 1 month does not result in practice effects in memory performance or reaction time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-6177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/arclin/act034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23702678</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ACNEET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Humans ; Injuries of the nervous system and the skull. Diseases due to physical agents ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychomotor Performance ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reproducibility of Results ; Time Factors ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2013-08, Vol.28 (5), p.499-504</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-b9281fff5294c8c7aaa33aad5c2c8ea3b9b11f705862c19496f8776740589183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-b9281fff5294c8c7aaa33aad5c2c8ea3b9b11f705862c19496f8776740589183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27614601$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23702678$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHATZ, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERRIS, Charles S</creatorcontrib><title>One-Month Test-Retest Reliability of the ImPACT Test Battery</title><title>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</title><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><description>In order to better understand the test-retest reliability of the ImPACT test battery, 25 undergraduate students completed two ImPACT tests across a time frame of 4 weeks between assessments. Participants had not previously completed ImPACT and had no history of concussion. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were as follows: Verbal Memory = .66/.79 (r/ICC), Visual Memory = .43/.60, Visual Motor Speed = .78/.88, Reaction Time = .63/.77, and Total Symptoms = .75/.81. Dependent sample t-tests revealed significant improvement on only Visual Motor Speed composite scores. Reliable Change Indices showed a significant number of participants fell outside 80% and 95% confidence intervals for only Visual Motor Speed scores (but no other indices), whereas all scores were within 80% and 95% confidence intervals using regression-based measures. Results suggest that repeated exposure to the ImPACT test may result in significant improvements in the physical mechanics of how college students interact with the test (e.g., performance on Visual Motor Speed), but repeated exposure across 1 month does not result in practice effects in memory performance or reaction time.</description><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the nervous system and the skull. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0887-6177</issn><issn>1873-5843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EtLAzEUBeAgiq3VpVuZjeAmNu8HuKnFR6FSKbMfMmlCR6YzNUkX_fdOnapLVwcuH-fCAeAao3uMNB2bYOuqGRubEGUnYIiVpJArRk_BECklocBSDsBFjB8IIY4xOQcDQiUiQqoheFg0Dr61TVpnuYsJLl3qIlu6ujJlVVdpn7U-S2uXzTbvk2n-rbJHk5IL-0tw5k0d3dUxRyB_fsqnr3C-eJlNJ3NoqeYJlpoo7L3nRDOrrDTGUGrMiltilTO01CXGXiKuBLFYMy28klJI1l00VnQE7vrabWg_d93_YlNF6-raNK7dxQJzJpVASPD_KesYYQodWmFPbWhjDM4X21BtTNgXGBWHaYt-2qKftvM3x-pduXGrX_2zZQduj8BEa2ofTGOr-OekwEwgTL8ABNmArg</recordid><startdate>20130801</startdate><enddate>20130801</enddate><creator>SCHATZ, Philip</creator><creator>FERRIS, Charles S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130801</creationdate><title>One-Month Test-Retest Reliability of the ImPACT Test Battery</title><author>SCHATZ, Philip ; FERRIS, Charles S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-b9281fff5294c8c7aaa33aad5c2c8ea3b9b11f705862c19496f8776740589183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the nervous system and the skull. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHATZ, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERRIS, Charles S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHATZ, Philip</au><au>FERRIS, Charles S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>One-Month Test-Retest Reliability of the ImPACT Test Battery</atitle><jtitle>Archives of clinical neuropsychology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Clin Neuropsychol</addtitle><date>2013-08-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>504</epage><pages>499-504</pages><issn>0887-6177</issn><eissn>1873-5843</eissn><coden>ACNEET</coden><abstract>In order to better understand the test-retest reliability of the ImPACT test battery, 25 undergraduate students completed two ImPACT tests across a time frame of 4 weeks between assessments. Participants had not previously completed ImPACT and had no history of concussion. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were as follows: Verbal Memory = .66/.79 (r/ICC), Visual Memory = .43/.60, Visual Motor Speed = .78/.88, Reaction Time = .63/.77, and Total Symptoms = .75/.81. Dependent sample t-tests revealed significant improvement on only Visual Motor Speed composite scores. Reliable Change Indices showed a significant number of participants fell outside 80% and 95% confidence intervals for only Visual Motor Speed scores (but no other indices), whereas all scores were within 80% and 95% confidence intervals using regression-based measures. Results suggest that repeated exposure to the ImPACT test may result in significant improvements in the physical mechanics of how college students interact with the test (e.g., performance on Visual Motor Speed), but repeated exposure across 1 month does not result in practice effects in memory performance or reaction time.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>23702678</pmid><doi>10.1093/arclin/act034</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0887-6177 |
| ispartof | Archives of clinical neuropsychology, 2013-08, Vol.28 (5), p.499-504 |
| issn | 0887-6177 1873-5843 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547860065 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Female Humans Injuries of the nervous system and the skull. Diseases due to physical agents Male Medical sciences Neuropsychological Tests Organic mental disorders. Neuropsychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychomotor Performance Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reproducibility of Results Time Factors Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents |
| title | One-Month Test-Retest Reliability of the ImPACT Test Battery |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A57%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=One-Month%20Test-Retest%20Reliability%20of%20the%20ImPACT%20Test%20Battery&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20clinical%20neuropsychology&rft.au=SCHATZ,%20Philip&rft.date=2013-08-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=504&rft.pages=499-504&rft.issn=0887-6177&rft.eissn=1873-5843&rft.coden=ACNEET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/arclin/act034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1547860065%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1400624808&rft_id=info:pmid/23702678&rfr_iscdi=true |