Comparing and modifying penaeid beam and otter trawls to improve ecological efficiencies

In an attempt to improve the selectivity and engineering performances of generic penaeid trawls, three established and one novel spreading‐mechanism configurations were assessed: otter boards attached (1) with and (2) without 3.15‐m sweeps to a 7.35‐m headline trawl, and a beam rigged directly to a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fisheries management and ecology 2014-08, Vol.21 (4), p.299-311
Hauptverfasser: McHugh, M. J., Broadhurst, M. K., Sterling, D. J., Millar, R. B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 311
container_issue 4
container_start_page 299
container_title Fisheries management and ecology
container_volume 21
creator McHugh, M. J.
Broadhurst, M. K.
Sterling, D. J.
Millar, R. B.
description In an attempt to improve the selectivity and engineering performances of generic penaeid trawls, three established and one novel spreading‐mechanism configurations were assessed: otter boards attached (1) with and (2) without 3.15‐m sweeps to a 7.35‐m headline trawl, and a beam rigged directly to a 9.19‐m trawl (3) with and (4) without a horizontal wire and plastic streamers. Despite more surface area (7.5 vs 6.0 m2), both beam‐trawl configurations had significantly lower drag than the otter trawls (≤30%). When catches were standardised to per ha, the otter trawl with sweeps retained significantly more (1.3–2.4 times) school prawns, Metapenaeus macleayi (Haswell), than the other three configurations. Within systems, removing sweeps or adding a horizontal wire significantly reduced the unwanted catches of a key teleost (southern herring, Herklotsichthys castelnaui Ogilby) by 41 and 48%. The results illustrate the utility of simple anterior modifications for independently addressing penaeid‐trawling environmental issues.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/fme.12079
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547851808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3365319681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3689-dffe406ff769cf588104a3920bfb52f1219cf56ca209991fbbe4a2622865d0913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcPfoOCL_rQLUnbtHmU4aayTRBlewtpexmZbVOTzrlvb7upD4IHx3F3v_9x_BG6JHhA2hiqEgaE4pgfoR4JWOTTEONj1MOccZ_zeHmKzpxbY4wZ4byHliNT1tLqauXJKvdKk2u167oaKgk691KQ5X5lmgas11i5LZzXGE-XtTUf4EFmCrPSmSw8UEpnGqo23Tk6UbJwcPFd--h1fPcyuvenT5OH0e3UzwKWcD9XCkLMlIoZz1SUJASHMuAUpyqNqCKUdGOWSYo550SlKYSSMkoTFuWYk6CPrg9322_eN-AaUWqXQVHICszGCRKFcRKRBCctevUHXZuNrdrvOioIScxJR90cqMwa5ywoUVtdSrsTBIvOY9F6LPYet-zwwG51Abv_QTGe3f0o_INCuwY-fxXSvgkWB3EkFvOJeFzMg2eOZyIKvgAWpoxS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1543417918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing and modifying penaeid beam and otter trawls to improve ecological efficiencies</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>McHugh, M. J. ; Broadhurst, M. K. ; Sterling, D. J. ; Millar, R. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>McHugh, M. J. ; Broadhurst, M. K. ; Sterling, D. J. ; Millar, R. B.</creatorcontrib><description>In an attempt to improve the selectivity and engineering performances of generic penaeid trawls, three established and one novel spreading‐mechanism configurations were assessed: otter boards attached (1) with and (2) without 3.15‐m sweeps to a 7.35‐m headline trawl, and a beam rigged directly to a 9.19‐m trawl (3) with and (4) without a horizontal wire and plastic streamers. Despite more surface area (7.5 vs 6.0 m2), both beam‐trawl configurations had significantly lower drag than the otter trawls (≤30%). When catches were standardised to per ha, the otter trawl with sweeps retained significantly more (1.3–2.4 times) school prawns, Metapenaeus macleayi (Haswell), than the other three configurations. Within systems, removing sweeps or adding a horizontal wire significantly reduced the unwanted catches of a key teleost (southern herring, Herklotsichthys castelnaui Ogilby) by 41 and 48%. The results illustrate the utility of simple anterior modifications for independently addressing penaeid‐trawling environmental issues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-997X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2400</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fme.12079</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FMAEEL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>beam trawls ; bycatch reduction ; drag ; Herklotsichthys ; Marine ; Metapenaeus macleayi ; modifications ; otter trawls ; penaeids ; Teleostei</subject><ispartof>Fisheries management and ecology, 2014-08, Vol.21 (4), p.299-311</ispartof><rights>2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3689-dffe406ff769cf588104a3920bfb52f1219cf56ca209991fbbe4a2622865d0913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3689-dffe406ff769cf588104a3920bfb52f1219cf56ca209991fbbe4a2622865d0913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffme.12079$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffme.12079$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McHugh, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broadhurst, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterling, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millar, R. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing and modifying penaeid beam and otter trawls to improve ecological efficiencies</title><title>Fisheries management and ecology</title><addtitle>Fish Manag Ecol</addtitle><description>In an attempt to improve the selectivity and engineering performances of generic penaeid trawls, three established and one novel spreading‐mechanism configurations were assessed: otter boards attached (1) with and (2) without 3.15‐m sweeps to a 7.35‐m headline trawl, and a beam rigged directly to a 9.19‐m trawl (3) with and (4) without a horizontal wire and plastic streamers. Despite more surface area (7.5 vs 6.0 m2), both beam‐trawl configurations had significantly lower drag than the otter trawls (≤30%). When catches were standardised to per ha, the otter trawl with sweeps retained significantly more (1.3–2.4 times) school prawns, Metapenaeus macleayi (Haswell), than the other three configurations. Within systems, removing sweeps or adding a horizontal wire significantly reduced the unwanted catches of a key teleost (southern herring, Herklotsichthys castelnaui Ogilby) by 41 and 48%. The results illustrate the utility of simple anterior modifications for independently addressing penaeid‐trawling environmental issues.</description><subject>beam trawls</subject><subject>bycatch reduction</subject><subject>drag</subject><subject>Herklotsichthys</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Metapenaeus macleayi</subject><subject>modifications</subject><subject>otter trawls</subject><subject>penaeids</subject><subject>Teleostei</subject><issn>0969-997X</issn><issn>1365-2400</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFFLwzAQx4MoOKcPfoOCL_rQLUnbtHmU4aayTRBlewtpexmZbVOTzrlvb7upD4IHx3F3v_9x_BG6JHhA2hiqEgaE4pgfoR4JWOTTEONj1MOccZ_zeHmKzpxbY4wZ4byHliNT1tLqauXJKvdKk2u167oaKgk691KQ5X5lmgas11i5LZzXGE-XtTUf4EFmCrPSmSw8UEpnGqo23Tk6UbJwcPFd--h1fPcyuvenT5OH0e3UzwKWcD9XCkLMlIoZz1SUJASHMuAUpyqNqCKUdGOWSYo550SlKYSSMkoTFuWYk6CPrg9322_eN-AaUWqXQVHICszGCRKFcRKRBCctevUHXZuNrdrvOioIScxJR90cqMwa5ywoUVtdSrsTBIvOY9F6LPYet-zwwG51Abv_QTGe3f0o_INCuwY-fxXSvgkWB3EkFvOJeFzMg2eOZyIKvgAWpoxS</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>McHugh, M. J.</creator><creator>Broadhurst, M. K.</creator><creator>Sterling, D. J.</creator><creator>Millar, R. B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Comparing and modifying penaeid beam and otter trawls to improve ecological efficiencies</title><author>McHugh, M. J. ; Broadhurst, M. K. ; Sterling, D. J. ; Millar, R. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3689-dffe406ff769cf588104a3920bfb52f1219cf56ca209991fbbe4a2622865d0913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>beam trawls</topic><topic>bycatch reduction</topic><topic>drag</topic><topic>Herklotsichthys</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Metapenaeus macleayi</topic><topic>modifications</topic><topic>otter trawls</topic><topic>penaeids</topic><topic>Teleostei</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McHugh, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broadhurst, M. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterling, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Millar, R. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fisheries management and ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McHugh, M. J.</au><au>Broadhurst, M. K.</au><au>Sterling, D. J.</au><au>Millar, R. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing and modifying penaeid beam and otter trawls to improve ecological efficiencies</atitle><jtitle>Fisheries management and ecology</jtitle><addtitle>Fish Manag Ecol</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>299</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>299-311</pages><issn>0969-997X</issn><eissn>1365-2400</eissn><coden>FMAEEL</coden><abstract>In an attempt to improve the selectivity and engineering performances of generic penaeid trawls, three established and one novel spreading‐mechanism configurations were assessed: otter boards attached (1) with and (2) without 3.15‐m sweeps to a 7.35‐m headline trawl, and a beam rigged directly to a 9.19‐m trawl (3) with and (4) without a horizontal wire and plastic streamers. Despite more surface area (7.5 vs 6.0 m2), both beam‐trawl configurations had significantly lower drag than the otter trawls (≤30%). When catches were standardised to per ha, the otter trawl with sweeps retained significantly more (1.3–2.4 times) school prawns, Metapenaeus macleayi (Haswell), than the other three configurations. Within systems, removing sweeps or adding a horizontal wire significantly reduced the unwanted catches of a key teleost (southern herring, Herklotsichthys castelnaui Ogilby) by 41 and 48%. The results illustrate the utility of simple anterior modifications for independently addressing penaeid‐trawling environmental issues.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/fme.12079</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0969-997X
ispartof Fisheries management and ecology, 2014-08, Vol.21 (4), p.299-311
issn 0969-997X
1365-2400
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547851808
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects beam trawls
bycatch reduction
drag
Herklotsichthys
Marine
Metapenaeus macleayi
modifications
otter trawls
penaeids
Teleostei
title Comparing and modifying penaeid beam and otter trawls to improve ecological efficiencies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A54%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20and%20modifying%20penaeid%20beam%20and%20otter%20trawls%20to%20improve%20ecological%20efficiencies&rft.jtitle=Fisheries%20management%20and%20ecology&rft.au=McHugh,%20M.%20J.&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=299&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=299-311&rft.issn=0969-997X&rft.eissn=1365-2400&rft.coden=FMAEEL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fme.12079&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3365319681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1543417918&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true