Comparative effect of technical and commercial formulations of methamidophos on sperm quality and DNA integrity in mice
Methamidophos (MET), widely used in developing countries, is a highly neurotoxic organophosphate pesticide that has been associated with male reproductive alterations. Commercial formulations of pesticides used by agricultural workers and urban sprayers are responsible for thousands of intoxications...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental toxicology 2014-08, Vol.29 (8), p.942-949 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 949 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 942 |
container_title | Environmental toxicology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Urióstegui‐Acosta, Mayrut Hernández‐Ochoa, Isabel de Jesús Solís‐Heredia, María Martínez‐Aguilar, Gerardo Quintanilla‐Vega, Betzabet |
description | Methamidophos (MET), widely used in developing countries, is a highly neurotoxic organophosphate pesticide that has been associated with male reproductive alterations. Commercial formulations of pesticides used by agricultural workers and urban sprayers are responsible for thousands of intoxications in developing countries and may not have the same effects as active pure ingredients. Therefore, we compared effects of MET technical (METt) and commercial (METc) grades on sperm quality and DNA integrity. Male mice were injected (intraperitoneal, i.p.) with METt or METc (3.75, 5, and 7 mg/kg bw/day/4 days) and sacrificed 24 h post‐treatment. Sperm cells collected from epididymis–vas deferens were evaluated for quality parameters, DNA damage by the comet assay, and lipoperoxidation by malondialdehyde (MDA) production. Erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was evaluated by acetylthiocholine inhibition as an index of overall toxicity. A dose‐dependent AChE inhibition was observed with both formulations. Sperm quality was decreased after treatment with both MET compounds, but the commercial formulation showed stronger effects; a similar profile was observed with the DNA damage, being METc more genotoxic. None MET formulation increased MDA, suggesting no peroxidative damage involved. In summary, the commercial formulation of MET was more reprotoxic and genotoxic than the active pure ingredient, highlighting that commercial formulations must be considered for more appropriate risk assessment of pesticide exposures. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 29: 942–949, 2014. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/tox.21822 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547847912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1547847912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4512-e8c85508753965d061fcac6c5277ba860dad405e47bdf96396aff9531e2c72bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtv1DAUhS0EoqWw4A9AJDZs0tpO_JhlNaUdpKqt1AfsLI9zzbjEcWo7tPPv8cyULlhYvr7-ztXRPQh9JPiQYEyPcng6pERS-grtE0ZpLaiQr7c1rlssyR56l9I9xnjGGX-L9mhDKCON3EeP8-BHHXV2f6ACa8HkKtgqg1kNzui-0kNXmeA9ROPK04bop77gYUgb0ENeae-6MK5CaQxVGiH66mHSvcvrrfrk4rhyQ4ZfcdNxQ-WdgffojdV9gg_P9wG6Pf12M1_U55dn3-fH57VpGaE1SCMZw1KwpljvMCfWaMMNo0IsteS4012LGbRi2dkZL5C2dsYaAtQIuuyaA_R1N3eM4WGClJV3yUDf6wHClBRhrZCtmBFa0C__ofdhikNxt6EoZZRzWahPz9S09NCpMTqv41r9W2kBjnbAo-th_fJPsNpkpUpWapuVurn8uS2Kot4pXMrw9KLQ8bfiohFM_bg4U6fXd3cLdrVQV4X_vOOtDkqXtSZ1e00xaXE5xaVs_gIOaZ83</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542252668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative effect of technical and commercial formulations of methamidophos on sperm quality and DNA integrity in mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Urióstegui‐Acosta, Mayrut ; Hernández‐Ochoa, Isabel ; de Jesús Solís‐Heredia, María ; Martínez‐Aguilar, Gerardo ; Quintanilla‐Vega, Betzabet</creator><creatorcontrib>Urióstegui‐Acosta, Mayrut ; Hernández‐Ochoa, Isabel ; de Jesús Solís‐Heredia, María ; Martínez‐Aguilar, Gerardo ; Quintanilla‐Vega, Betzabet</creatorcontrib><description>Methamidophos (MET), widely used in developing countries, is a highly neurotoxic organophosphate pesticide that has been associated with male reproductive alterations. Commercial formulations of pesticides used by agricultural workers and urban sprayers are responsible for thousands of intoxications in developing countries and may not have the same effects as active pure ingredients. Therefore, we compared effects of MET technical (METt) and commercial (METc) grades on sperm quality and DNA integrity. Male mice were injected (intraperitoneal, i.p.) with METt or METc (3.75, 5, and 7 mg/kg bw/day/4 days) and sacrificed 24 h post‐treatment. Sperm cells collected from epididymis–vas deferens were evaluated for quality parameters, DNA damage by the comet assay, and lipoperoxidation by malondialdehyde (MDA) production. Erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was evaluated by acetylthiocholine inhibition as an index of overall toxicity. A dose‐dependent AChE inhibition was observed with both formulations. Sperm quality was decreased after treatment with both MET compounds, but the commercial formulation showed stronger effects; a similar profile was observed with the DNA damage, being METc more genotoxic. None MET formulation increased MDA, suggesting no peroxidative damage involved. In summary, the commercial formulation of MET was more reprotoxic and genotoxic than the active pure ingredient, highlighting that commercial formulations must be considered for more appropriate risk assessment of pesticide exposures. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 29: 942–949, 2014.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-4081</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-7278</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/tox.21822</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23125138</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ETOXFH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons</publisher><subject>acetylcholinesterase ; Acetylcholinesterase - blood ; Animals ; Comet Assay ; developing countries ; DNA ; DNA - pharmacology ; DNA Damage ; erythrocytes ; Erythrocytes - drug effects ; Erythrocytes - enzymology ; farm labor ; genotoxicity ; ingredients ; Lipid Peroxidation ; Male ; male reproduction ; malondialdehyde ; Malondialdehyde - metabolism ; methamidophos ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred ICR ; neurotoxicity ; organophosphate pesticides ; Organothiophosphorus Compounds - toxicity ; Pesticides - toxicity ; Reproduction - drug effects ; risk assessment ; sperm DNA damage ; spermatozoa ; Spermatozoa - cytology ; Spermatozoa - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Environmental toxicology, 2014-08, Vol.29 (8), p.942-949</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley company</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley company.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4512-e8c85508753965d061fcac6c5277ba860dad405e47bdf96396aff9531e2c72bd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Ftox.21822$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Ftox.21822$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23125138$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Urióstegui‐Acosta, Mayrut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández‐Ochoa, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesús Solís‐Heredia, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Aguilar, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintanilla‐Vega, Betzabet</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative effect of technical and commercial formulations of methamidophos on sperm quality and DNA integrity in mice</title><title>Environmental toxicology</title><addtitle>Environ. Toxicol</addtitle><description>Methamidophos (MET), widely used in developing countries, is a highly neurotoxic organophosphate pesticide that has been associated with male reproductive alterations. Commercial formulations of pesticides used by agricultural workers and urban sprayers are responsible for thousands of intoxications in developing countries and may not have the same effects as active pure ingredients. Therefore, we compared effects of MET technical (METt) and commercial (METc) grades on sperm quality and DNA integrity. Male mice were injected (intraperitoneal, i.p.) with METt or METc (3.75, 5, and 7 mg/kg bw/day/4 days) and sacrificed 24 h post‐treatment. Sperm cells collected from epididymis–vas deferens were evaluated for quality parameters, DNA damage by the comet assay, and lipoperoxidation by malondialdehyde (MDA) production. Erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was evaluated by acetylthiocholine inhibition as an index of overall toxicity. A dose‐dependent AChE inhibition was observed with both formulations. Sperm quality was decreased after treatment with both MET compounds, but the commercial formulation showed stronger effects; a similar profile was observed with the DNA damage, being METc more genotoxic. None MET formulation increased MDA, suggesting no peroxidative damage involved. In summary, the commercial formulation of MET was more reprotoxic and genotoxic than the active pure ingredient, highlighting that commercial formulations must be considered for more appropriate risk assessment of pesticide exposures. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 29: 942–949, 2014.</description><subject>acetylcholinesterase</subject><subject>Acetylcholinesterase - blood</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Comet Assay</subject><subject>developing countries</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>DNA - pharmacology</subject><subject>DNA Damage</subject><subject>erythrocytes</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - drug effects</subject><subject>Erythrocytes - enzymology</subject><subject>farm labor</subject><subject>genotoxicity</subject><subject>ingredients</subject><subject>Lipid Peroxidation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>male reproduction</subject><subject>malondialdehyde</subject><subject>Malondialdehyde - metabolism</subject><subject>methamidophos</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred ICR</subject><subject>neurotoxicity</subject><subject>organophosphate pesticides</subject><subject>Organothiophosphorus Compounds - toxicity</subject><subject>Pesticides - toxicity</subject><subject>Reproduction - drug effects</subject><subject>risk assessment</subject><subject>sperm DNA damage</subject><subject>spermatozoa</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - cytology</subject><subject>Spermatozoa - drug effects</subject><issn>1520-4081</issn><issn>1522-7278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtv1DAUhS0EoqWw4A9AJDZs0tpO_JhlNaUdpKqt1AfsLI9zzbjEcWo7tPPv8cyULlhYvr7-ztXRPQh9JPiQYEyPcng6pERS-grtE0ZpLaiQr7c1rlssyR56l9I9xnjGGX-L9mhDKCON3EeP8-BHHXV2f6ACa8HkKtgqg1kNzui-0kNXmeA9ROPK04bop77gYUgb0ENeae-6MK5CaQxVGiH66mHSvcvrrfrk4rhyQ4ZfcdNxQ-WdgffojdV9gg_P9wG6Pf12M1_U55dn3-fH57VpGaE1SCMZw1KwpljvMCfWaMMNo0IsteS4012LGbRi2dkZL5C2dsYaAtQIuuyaA_R1N3eM4WGClJV3yUDf6wHClBRhrZCtmBFa0C__ofdhikNxt6EoZZRzWahPz9S09NCpMTqv41r9W2kBjnbAo-th_fJPsNpkpUpWapuVurn8uS2Kot4pXMrw9KLQ8bfiohFM_bg4U6fXd3cLdrVQV4X_vOOtDkqXtSZ1e00xaXE5xaVs_gIOaZ83</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Urióstegui‐Acosta, Mayrut</creator><creator>Hernández‐Ochoa, Isabel</creator><creator>de Jesús Solís‐Heredia, María</creator><creator>Martínez‐Aguilar, Gerardo</creator><creator>Quintanilla‐Vega, Betzabet</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Comparative effect of technical and commercial formulations of methamidophos on sperm quality and DNA integrity in mice</title><author>Urióstegui‐Acosta, Mayrut ; Hernández‐Ochoa, Isabel ; de Jesús Solís‐Heredia, María ; Martínez‐Aguilar, Gerardo ; Quintanilla‐Vega, Betzabet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4512-e8c85508753965d061fcac6c5277ba860dad405e47bdf96396aff9531e2c72bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>acetylcholinesterase</topic><topic>Acetylcholinesterase - blood</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Comet Assay</topic><topic>developing countries</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>DNA - pharmacology</topic><topic>DNA Damage</topic><topic>erythrocytes</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - drug effects</topic><topic>Erythrocytes - enzymology</topic><topic>farm labor</topic><topic>genotoxicity</topic><topic>ingredients</topic><topic>Lipid Peroxidation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>male reproduction</topic><topic>malondialdehyde</topic><topic>Malondialdehyde - metabolism</topic><topic>methamidophos</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred ICR</topic><topic>neurotoxicity</topic><topic>organophosphate pesticides</topic><topic>Organothiophosphorus Compounds - toxicity</topic><topic>Pesticides - toxicity</topic><topic>Reproduction - drug effects</topic><topic>risk assessment</topic><topic>sperm DNA damage</topic><topic>spermatozoa</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - cytology</topic><topic>Spermatozoa - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Urióstegui‐Acosta, Mayrut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández‐Ochoa, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jesús Solís‐Heredia, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Aguilar, Gerardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintanilla‐Vega, Betzabet</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Urióstegui‐Acosta, Mayrut</au><au>Hernández‐Ochoa, Isabel</au><au>de Jesús Solís‐Heredia, María</au><au>Martínez‐Aguilar, Gerardo</au><au>Quintanilla‐Vega, Betzabet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative effect of technical and commercial formulations of methamidophos on sperm quality and DNA integrity in mice</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Toxicol</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>942</spage><epage>949</epage><pages>942-949</pages><issn>1520-4081</issn><eissn>1522-7278</eissn><coden>ETOXFH</coden><abstract>Methamidophos (MET), widely used in developing countries, is a highly neurotoxic organophosphate pesticide that has been associated with male reproductive alterations. Commercial formulations of pesticides used by agricultural workers and urban sprayers are responsible for thousands of intoxications in developing countries and may not have the same effects as active pure ingredients. Therefore, we compared effects of MET technical (METt) and commercial (METc) grades on sperm quality and DNA integrity. Male mice were injected (intraperitoneal, i.p.) with METt or METc (3.75, 5, and 7 mg/kg bw/day/4 days) and sacrificed 24 h post‐treatment. Sperm cells collected from epididymis–vas deferens were evaluated for quality parameters, DNA damage by the comet assay, and lipoperoxidation by malondialdehyde (MDA) production. Erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity was evaluated by acetylthiocholine inhibition as an index of overall toxicity. A dose‐dependent AChE inhibition was observed with both formulations. Sperm quality was decreased after treatment with both MET compounds, but the commercial formulation showed stronger effects; a similar profile was observed with the DNA damage, being METc more genotoxic. None MET formulation increased MDA, suggesting no peroxidative damage involved. In summary, the commercial formulation of MET was more reprotoxic and genotoxic than the active pure ingredient, highlighting that commercial formulations must be considered for more appropriate risk assessment of pesticide exposures. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Environ Toxicol 29: 942–949, 2014.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons</pub><pmid>23125138</pmid><doi>10.1002/tox.21822</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1520-4081 |
ispartof | Environmental toxicology, 2014-08, Vol.29 (8), p.942-949 |
issn | 1520-4081 1522-7278 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547847912 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | acetylcholinesterase Acetylcholinesterase - blood Animals Comet Assay developing countries DNA DNA - pharmacology DNA Damage erythrocytes Erythrocytes - drug effects Erythrocytes - enzymology farm labor genotoxicity ingredients Lipid Peroxidation Male male reproduction malondialdehyde Malondialdehyde - metabolism methamidophos Mice Mice, Inbred ICR neurotoxicity organophosphate pesticides Organothiophosphorus Compounds - toxicity Pesticides - toxicity Reproduction - drug effects risk assessment sperm DNA damage spermatozoa Spermatozoa - cytology Spermatozoa - drug effects |
title | Comparative effect of technical and commercial formulations of methamidophos on sperm quality and DNA integrity in mice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A10%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20effect%20of%20technical%20and%20commercial%20formulations%20of%20methamidophos%20on%20sperm%20quality%20and%20DNA%20integrity%20in%20mice&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology&rft.au=Uri%C3%B3stegui%E2%80%90Acosta,%20Mayrut&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=942&rft.epage=949&rft.pages=942-949&rft.issn=1520-4081&rft.eissn=1522-7278&rft.coden=ETOXFH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/tox.21822&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1547847912%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542252668&rft_id=info:pmid/23125138&rfr_iscdi=true |