Enhancement of silicon solar cell efficiency by using back surface field in comparison of different antireflective coatings

•Effective Al–BSF solar cells were fabricated through simple technique.•TiO2 and SiO2 AR coatings were applied to BSF cells.•Results were compared each other as well as with the as-grown Si solar cell.•BSF solar cell with TiO2 AR coating showed best performance over other cells. Back surface field (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Solar energy 2014-03, Vol.101, p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: Ali, Khuram, Khan, Sohail A., Mat Jafri, M.Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Solar energy
container_volume 101
creator Ali, Khuram
Khan, Sohail A.
Mat Jafri, M.Z.
description •Effective Al–BSF solar cells were fabricated through simple technique.•TiO2 and SiO2 AR coatings were applied to BSF cells.•Results were compared each other as well as with the as-grown Si solar cell.•BSF solar cell with TiO2 AR coating showed best performance over other cells. Back surface field (BSF) (n+–p–p+) silicon (Si) solar cells were fabricated with and without TiO2 or SiO2 single layer antireflection (SLAR) coatings. The two cell types were obtained with non-texturized surfaces and compared with each other, as well as with an as-grown Si solar cell. The effective aluminium–BSF was fabricated through a simple thermal evaporation and alloying (850°C, 50min) technique. The effect of BSF and AR coatings on the performance of the solar cells were characterized through electrical (AM 1.5G, 100mW/cm2), optical, and morphological measurements. The BSF Si solar cells with TiO2 and SiO2 AR coatings and without AR coatings demonstrated increased efficiencies of about 168%, 115%, and 50%, respectively, compared with the as-grown Si solar cell. The addition of the TiO2 (AR) layer initiated 24% improvement in the efficiency of the monocrystalline BSF Si solar cells, compared with 6.9% of the SiO2 (AR) coated BSF Si solar cell. The results indicate the potential of combining the TiO2 SLAR coating with BSF in the improved production of high-efficiency, low-cost Si solar cells.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.solener.2013.12.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547847009</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0038092X1300546X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1547847009</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-eea2baef7a9b7571fb6d42581a72a00853482f8c5d2a748a3934e79f7bcb714e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9CUJABC_dppL0Jn0SWdYPWPCi4C1UpyuasScZk-6FwT9v2hk8ePGUy1NPqt63aZ4D74DD9et9V9JMkXInOMgORMcFPGh2oDS0IHr9sNlxLk3LB_H1cfOklD3noMHoXfPrNn7H6OhAcWHJsxLm4FJk1YiZOZpnRt4HFyi6ExtPbC0hfmMjuh-srNmjI-YDzRMLkbl0OGIOpc5X1RS8p7x5MS4hk5_JLeGeKoZLlZSnzSOPc6Fnl_eq-fLu9vPNh_bu0_uPN2_vWqc4X1oiFCOS1ziMutfgx-tJid4AaoGcm14qI7xx_SRQK4NykIr04PXoRg2K5FXz6uw95vRzpbLYQyjbaRgprcVCr7RRmvOhoi_-QfdpzbFuZ0ENmktd4Ur1Z8rlVEq9zB5zOGA-WeB2q8Tu7aUSu1ViQdhaSZ17ebFjcTj7XJMP5e-wMFIIabYt3pw5qqnch2opfwqgqcboFjul8J-ffgOmrqZC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1497037154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancement of silicon solar cell efficiency by using back surface field in comparison of different antireflective coatings</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ali, Khuram ; Khan, Sohail A. ; Mat Jafri, M.Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ali, Khuram ; Khan, Sohail A. ; Mat Jafri, M.Z.</creatorcontrib><description>•Effective Al–BSF solar cells were fabricated through simple technique.•TiO2 and SiO2 AR coatings were applied to BSF cells.•Results were compared each other as well as with the as-grown Si solar cell.•BSF solar cell with TiO2 AR coating showed best performance over other cells. Back surface field (BSF) (n+–p–p+) silicon (Si) solar cells were fabricated with and without TiO2 or SiO2 single layer antireflection (SLAR) coatings. The two cell types were obtained with non-texturized surfaces and compared with each other, as well as with an as-grown Si solar cell. The effective aluminium–BSF was fabricated through a simple thermal evaporation and alloying (850°C, 50min) technique. The effect of BSF and AR coatings on the performance of the solar cells were characterized through electrical (AM 1.5G, 100mW/cm2), optical, and morphological measurements. The BSF Si solar cells with TiO2 and SiO2 AR coatings and without AR coatings demonstrated increased efficiencies of about 168%, 115%, and 50%, respectively, compared with the as-grown Si solar cell. The addition of the TiO2 (AR) layer initiated 24% improvement in the efficiency of the monocrystalline BSF Si solar cells, compared with 6.9% of the SiO2 (AR) coated BSF Si solar cell. The results indicate the potential of combining the TiO2 SLAR coating with BSF in the improved production of high-efficiency, low-cost Si solar cells.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-092X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-1257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2013.12.021</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SRENA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anti reflection coating ; Applied sciences ; Back surface field ; Direct energy conversion and energy accumulation ; Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering ; Electrical power engineering ; Energy ; Energy efficiency ; Exact sciences and technology ; Natural energy ; Photoelectric conversion ; Photovoltaic cells ; Photovoltaic conversion ; Silicon solar cell ; Solar cells. Photoelectrochemical cells ; Solar energy</subject><ispartof>Solar energy, 2014-03, Vol.101, p.1-7</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Mar 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-eea2baef7a9b7571fb6d42581a72a00853482f8c5d2a748a3934e79f7bcb714e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-eea2baef7a9b7571fb6d42581a72a00853482f8c5d2a748a3934e79f7bcb714e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.12.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28322389$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ali, Khuram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Sohail A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mat Jafri, M.Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancement of silicon solar cell efficiency by using back surface field in comparison of different antireflective coatings</title><title>Solar energy</title><description>•Effective Al–BSF solar cells were fabricated through simple technique.•TiO2 and SiO2 AR coatings were applied to BSF cells.•Results were compared each other as well as with the as-grown Si solar cell.•BSF solar cell with TiO2 AR coating showed best performance over other cells. Back surface field (BSF) (n+–p–p+) silicon (Si) solar cells were fabricated with and without TiO2 or SiO2 single layer antireflection (SLAR) coatings. The two cell types were obtained with non-texturized surfaces and compared with each other, as well as with an as-grown Si solar cell. The effective aluminium–BSF was fabricated through a simple thermal evaporation and alloying (850°C, 50min) technique. The effect of BSF and AR coatings on the performance of the solar cells were characterized through electrical (AM 1.5G, 100mW/cm2), optical, and morphological measurements. The BSF Si solar cells with TiO2 and SiO2 AR coatings and without AR coatings demonstrated increased efficiencies of about 168%, 115%, and 50%, respectively, compared with the as-grown Si solar cell. The addition of the TiO2 (AR) layer initiated 24% improvement in the efficiency of the monocrystalline BSF Si solar cells, compared with 6.9% of the SiO2 (AR) coated BSF Si solar cell. The results indicate the potential of combining the TiO2 SLAR coating with BSF in the improved production of high-efficiency, low-cost Si solar cells.</description><subject>Anti reflection coating</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Back surface field</subject><subject>Direct energy conversion and energy accumulation</subject><subject>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Natural energy</subject><subject>Photoelectric conversion</subject><subject>Photovoltaic cells</subject><subject>Photovoltaic conversion</subject><subject>Silicon solar cell</subject><subject>Solar cells. Photoelectrochemical cells</subject><subject>Solar energy</subject><issn>0038-092X</issn><issn>1471-1257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU2LFDEQhhtRcFz9CUJABC_dppL0Jn0SWdYPWPCi4C1UpyuasScZk-6FwT9v2hk8ePGUy1NPqt63aZ4D74DD9et9V9JMkXInOMgORMcFPGh2oDS0IHr9sNlxLk3LB_H1cfOklD3noMHoXfPrNn7H6OhAcWHJsxLm4FJk1YiZOZpnRt4HFyi6ExtPbC0hfmMjuh-srNmjI-YDzRMLkbl0OGIOpc5X1RS8p7x5MS4hk5_JLeGeKoZLlZSnzSOPc6Fnl_eq-fLu9vPNh_bu0_uPN2_vWqc4X1oiFCOS1ziMutfgx-tJid4AaoGcm14qI7xx_SRQK4NykIr04PXoRg2K5FXz6uw95vRzpbLYQyjbaRgprcVCr7RRmvOhoi_-QfdpzbFuZ0ENmktd4Ur1Z8rlVEq9zB5zOGA-WeB2q8Tu7aUSu1ViQdhaSZ17ebFjcTj7XJMP5e-wMFIIabYt3pw5qqnch2opfwqgqcboFjul8J-ffgOmrqZC</recordid><startdate>20140301</startdate><enddate>20140301</enddate><creator>Ali, Khuram</creator><creator>Khan, Sohail A.</creator><creator>Mat Jafri, M.Z.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140301</creationdate><title>Enhancement of silicon solar cell efficiency by using back surface field in comparison of different antireflective coatings</title><author>Ali, Khuram ; Khan, Sohail A. ; Mat Jafri, M.Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-eea2baef7a9b7571fb6d42581a72a00853482f8c5d2a748a3934e79f7bcb714e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anti reflection coating</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Back surface field</topic><topic>Direct energy conversion and energy accumulation</topic><topic>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Natural energy</topic><topic>Photoelectric conversion</topic><topic>Photovoltaic cells</topic><topic>Photovoltaic conversion</topic><topic>Silicon solar cell</topic><topic>Solar cells. Photoelectrochemical cells</topic><topic>Solar energy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ali, Khuram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Sohail A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mat Jafri, M.Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ali, Khuram</au><au>Khan, Sohail A.</au><au>Mat Jafri, M.Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhancement of silicon solar cell efficiency by using back surface field in comparison of different antireflective coatings</atitle><jtitle>Solar energy</jtitle><date>2014-03-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>101</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>0038-092X</issn><eissn>1471-1257</eissn><coden>SRENA4</coden><abstract>•Effective Al–BSF solar cells were fabricated through simple technique.•TiO2 and SiO2 AR coatings were applied to BSF cells.•Results were compared each other as well as with the as-grown Si solar cell.•BSF solar cell with TiO2 AR coating showed best performance over other cells. Back surface field (BSF) (n+–p–p+) silicon (Si) solar cells were fabricated with and without TiO2 or SiO2 single layer antireflection (SLAR) coatings. The two cell types were obtained with non-texturized surfaces and compared with each other, as well as with an as-grown Si solar cell. The effective aluminium–BSF was fabricated through a simple thermal evaporation and alloying (850°C, 50min) technique. The effect of BSF and AR coatings on the performance of the solar cells were characterized through electrical (AM 1.5G, 100mW/cm2), optical, and morphological measurements. The BSF Si solar cells with TiO2 and SiO2 AR coatings and without AR coatings demonstrated increased efficiencies of about 168%, 115%, and 50%, respectively, compared with the as-grown Si solar cell. The addition of the TiO2 (AR) layer initiated 24% improvement in the efficiency of the monocrystalline BSF Si solar cells, compared with 6.9% of the SiO2 (AR) coated BSF Si solar cell. The results indicate the potential of combining the TiO2 SLAR coating with BSF in the improved production of high-efficiency, low-cost Si solar cells.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.solener.2013.12.021</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-092X
ispartof Solar energy, 2014-03, Vol.101, p.1-7
issn 0038-092X
1471-1257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547847009
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Anti reflection coating
Applied sciences
Back surface field
Direct energy conversion and energy accumulation
Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering
Electrical power engineering
Energy
Energy efficiency
Exact sciences and technology
Natural energy
Photoelectric conversion
Photovoltaic cells
Photovoltaic conversion
Silicon solar cell
Solar cells. Photoelectrochemical cells
Solar energy
title Enhancement of silicon solar cell efficiency by using back surface field in comparison of different antireflective coatings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T20%3A44%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhancement%20of%20silicon%20solar%20cell%20efficiency%20by%20using%20back%20surface%20field%20in%20comparison%20of%20different%20antireflective%20coatings&rft.jtitle=Solar%20energy&rft.au=Ali,%20Khuram&rft.date=2014-03-01&rft.volume=101&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=0038-092X&rft.eissn=1471-1257&rft.coden=SRENA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.solener.2013.12.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1547847009%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1497037154&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0038092X1300546X&rfr_iscdi=true