Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis

BACKGROUND To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy. METHODS Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Prostate 2014-09, Vol.74 (12), p.1183-1188
Hauptverfasser: Elshafei, Ahmed, Kartha, Ganesh, Li, Yonghong, S. Moussa, Ayman, Hatem, Asmaa, Gao, Tianming, Jones, J. Stephen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1188
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1183
container_title The Prostate
container_volume 74
creator Elshafei, Ahmed
Kartha, Ganesh
Li, Yonghong
S. Moussa, Ayman
Hatem, Asmaa
Gao, Tianming
Jones, J. Stephen
description BACKGROUND To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy. METHODS Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA)  10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy. RESULTS PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070–1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007–1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group. CONCLUSION Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa. Prostate 74:1183–1188, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pros.22834
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547525855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1547525855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-a9e0ac3cfab3c8be2e754c20b52a3971b5a968d73362e723c66354117a59ff8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgehSuPADkCUuCCnFH3GcHFFFF9qlRXyIozXxTiq3iZ3aXrX77_GybQ8cOFmyn3k14yHkNWdHnDHxYY4hHQnRyvoJWXDW6YqxWj0lCyY0q2ou9QF5kdIVY4Uz8ZwciLprREELElbhlkaXrukM2aHPifbocXCZDjFMFO9yxAkp-IzRhUhhdhZGmmCaR-cvafDUeZdduetdmNOWDkXtWsqQkVrwFiNdO7j0Ibn0kjwbYEz46v48JL9OPv08_lytLpZfjj-uKis7VVfQIQMr7QC9tG2PArWqrWC9EiA7zXsFXdOutZRNeRLSNo1UNecaVDcMrZWH5N0-t3Rys8GUzeSSxXEEj2GTDFe1VkK1ShX69h96FTbRl-6KUpIrxhpR1Pu9smW0FHEwc3QTxK3hzOzWYHYzm79rKPjNfeSmn3D9SB_-vQC-B7duxO1_osy37xc_HkKrfY1LGe8eayBem0ZLrczv86U5PTv7erI8VeZc_gFNsqLN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1553150062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Elshafei, Ahmed ; Kartha, Ganesh ; Li, Yonghong ; S. Moussa, Ayman ; Hatem, Asmaa ; Gao, Tianming ; Jones, J. Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Elshafei, Ahmed ; Kartha, Ganesh ; Li, Yonghong ; S. Moussa, Ayman ; Hatem, Asmaa ; Gao, Tianming ; Jones, J. Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy. METHODS Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) &lt; 10 ng/ml, normal digital rectal exam (DRE), and no lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)), and (2) higher risk of PCa (PSA &gt; 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy. RESULTS PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070–1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007–1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group. CONCLUSION Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa. Prostate 74:1183–1188, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-4137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pros.22834</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24962004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRSTDS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Biopsy - methods ; Databases, Factual ; extreme apical sampling ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; prostate biopsy ; Prostate cancer ; prostate cancer diagnosis ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - metabolism ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Retirement planning ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Specimen Handling - methods</subject><ispartof>The Prostate, 2014-09, Vol.74 (12), p.1183-1188</ispartof><rights>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-a9e0ac3cfab3c8be2e754c20b52a3971b5a968d73362e723c66354117a59ff8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-a9e0ac3cfab3c8be2e754c20b52a3971b5a968d73362e723c66354117a59ff8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpros.22834$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpros.22834$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24962004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elshafei, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartha, Ganesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yonghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S. Moussa, Ayman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatem, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Tianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, J. Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis</title><title>The Prostate</title><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy. METHODS Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) &lt; 10 ng/ml, normal digital rectal exam (DRE), and no lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)), and (2) higher risk of PCa (PSA &gt; 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy. RESULTS PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070–1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007–1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group. CONCLUSION Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa. Prostate 74:1183–1188, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>extreme apical sampling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>prostate biopsy</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate cancer diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - metabolism</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Retirement planning</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><issn>0270-4137</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgehSuPADkCUuCCnFH3GcHFFFF9qlRXyIozXxTiq3iZ3aXrX77_GybQ8cOFmyn3k14yHkNWdHnDHxYY4hHQnRyvoJWXDW6YqxWj0lCyY0q2ou9QF5kdIVY4Uz8ZwciLprREELElbhlkaXrukM2aHPifbocXCZDjFMFO9yxAkp-IzRhUhhdhZGmmCaR-cvafDUeZdduetdmNOWDkXtWsqQkVrwFiNdO7j0Ibn0kjwbYEz46v48JL9OPv08_lytLpZfjj-uKis7VVfQIQMr7QC9tG2PArWqrWC9EiA7zXsFXdOutZRNeRLSNo1UNecaVDcMrZWH5N0-t3Rys8GUzeSSxXEEj2GTDFe1VkK1ShX69h96FTbRl-6KUpIrxhpR1Pu9smW0FHEwc3QTxK3hzOzWYHYzm79rKPjNfeSmn3D9SB_-vQC-B7duxO1_osy37xc_HkKrfY1LGe8eayBem0ZLrczv86U5PTv7erI8VeZc_gFNsqLN</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Elshafei, Ahmed</creator><creator>Kartha, Ganesh</creator><creator>Li, Yonghong</creator><creator>S. Moussa, Ayman</creator><creator>Hatem, Asmaa</creator><creator>Gao, Tianming</creator><creator>Jones, J. Stephen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis</title><author>Elshafei, Ahmed ; Kartha, Ganesh ; Li, Yonghong ; S. Moussa, Ayman ; Hatem, Asmaa ; Gao, Tianming ; Jones, J. Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-a9e0ac3cfab3c8be2e754c20b52a3971b5a968d73362e723c66354117a59ff8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>extreme apical sampling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>prostate biopsy</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate cancer diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - metabolism</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Retirement planning</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elshafei, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartha, Ganesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yonghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S. Moussa, Ayman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatem, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Tianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, J. Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elshafei, Ahmed</au><au>Kartha, Ganesh</au><au>Li, Yonghong</au><au>S. Moussa, Ayman</au><au>Hatem, Asmaa</au><au>Gao, Tianming</au><au>Jones, J. Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1183</spage><epage>1188</epage><pages>1183-1188</pages><issn>0270-4137</issn><eissn>1097-0045</eissn><coden>PRSTDS</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy. METHODS Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) &lt; 10 ng/ml, normal digital rectal exam (DRE), and no lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)), and (2) higher risk of PCa (PSA &gt; 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy. RESULTS PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070–1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007–1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group. CONCLUSION Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa. Prostate 74:1183–1188, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24962004</pmid><doi>10.1002/pros.22834</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0270-4137
ispartof The Prostate, 2014-09, Vol.74 (12), p.1183-1188
issn 0270-4137
1097-0045
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547525855
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis
Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology
Adenocarcinoma - pathology
Aged
Biopsy
Biopsy - methods
Databases, Factual
extreme apical sampling
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
prostate biopsy
Prostate cancer
prostate cancer diagnosis
Prostate-Specific Antigen - metabolism
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis
Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Retirement planning
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Specimen Handling - methods
title Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T14%3A13%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20risk%20patients%20benefit%20from%20extreme%20anterior%20apical%20sampling%20on%20initial%20biopsy%20for%20prostate%20cancer%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=The%20Prostate&rft.au=Elshafei,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1183&rft.epage=1188&rft.pages=1183-1188&rft.issn=0270-4137&rft.eissn=1097-0045&rft.coden=PRSTDS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pros.22834&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1547525855%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1553150062&rft_id=info:pmid/24962004&rfr_iscdi=true