Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis
BACKGROUND To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy. METHODS Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate b...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Prostate 2014-09, Vol.74 (12), p.1183-1188 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1188 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1183 |
container_title | The Prostate |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Elshafei, Ahmed Kartha, Ganesh Li, Yonghong S. Moussa, Ayman Hatem, Asmaa Gao, Tianming Jones, J. Stephen |
description | BACKGROUND
To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy.
METHODS
Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy.
RESULTS
PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070–1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007–1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group.
CONCLUSION
Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa. Prostate 74:1183–1188, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pros.22834 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547525855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1547525855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-a9e0ac3cfab3c8be2e754c20b52a3971b5a968d73362e723c66354117a59ff8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgehSuPADkCUuCCnFH3GcHFFFF9qlRXyIozXxTiq3iZ3aXrX77_GybQ8cOFmyn3k14yHkNWdHnDHxYY4hHQnRyvoJWXDW6YqxWj0lCyY0q2ou9QF5kdIVY4Uz8ZwciLprREELElbhlkaXrukM2aHPifbocXCZDjFMFO9yxAkp-IzRhUhhdhZGmmCaR-cvafDUeZdduetdmNOWDkXtWsqQkVrwFiNdO7j0Ibn0kjwbYEz46v48JL9OPv08_lytLpZfjj-uKis7VVfQIQMr7QC9tG2PArWqrWC9EiA7zXsFXdOutZRNeRLSNo1UNecaVDcMrZWH5N0-t3Rys8GUzeSSxXEEj2GTDFe1VkK1ShX69h96FTbRl-6KUpIrxhpR1Pu9smW0FHEwc3QTxK3hzOzWYHYzm79rKPjNfeSmn3D9SB_-vQC-B7duxO1_osy37xc_HkKrfY1LGe8eayBem0ZLrczv86U5PTv7erI8VeZc_gFNsqLN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1553150062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Elshafei, Ahmed ; Kartha, Ganesh ; Li, Yonghong ; S. Moussa, Ayman ; Hatem, Asmaa ; Gao, Tianming ; Jones, J. Stephen</creator><creatorcontrib>Elshafei, Ahmed ; Kartha, Ganesh ; Li, Yonghong ; S. Moussa, Ayman ; Hatem, Asmaa ; Gao, Tianming ; Jones, J. Stephen</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy.
METHODS
Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml, normal digital rectal exam (DRE), and no lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)), and (2) higher risk of PCa (PSA > 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy.
RESULTS
PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070–1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007–1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group.
CONCLUSION
Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa. Prostate 74:1183–1188, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0270-4137</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pros.22834</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24962004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PRSTDS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis ; Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Biopsy ; Biopsy - methods ; Databases, Factual ; extreme apical sampling ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; prostate biopsy ; Prostate cancer ; prostate cancer diagnosis ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - metabolism ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Retirement planning ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Specimen Handling - methods</subject><ispartof>The Prostate, 2014-09, Vol.74 (12), p.1183-1188</ispartof><rights>2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-a9e0ac3cfab3c8be2e754c20b52a3971b5a968d73362e723c66354117a59ff8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-a9e0ac3cfab3c8be2e754c20b52a3971b5a968d73362e723c66354117a59ff8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpros.22834$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpros.22834$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24962004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elshafei, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartha, Ganesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yonghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S. Moussa, Ayman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatem, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Tianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, J. Stephen</creatorcontrib><title>Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis</title><title>The Prostate</title><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy.
METHODS
Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml, normal digital rectal exam (DRE), and no lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)), and (2) higher risk of PCa (PSA > 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy.
RESULTS
PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070–1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007–1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group.
CONCLUSION
Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa. Prostate 74:1183–1188, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>extreme apical sampling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>prostate biopsy</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate cancer diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - metabolism</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Retirement planning</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><issn>0270-4137</issn><issn>1097-0045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90U1v1DAQBmALgehSuPADkCUuCCnFH3GcHFFFF9qlRXyIozXxTiq3iZ3aXrX77_GybQ8cOFmyn3k14yHkNWdHnDHxYY4hHQnRyvoJWXDW6YqxWj0lCyY0q2ou9QF5kdIVY4Uz8ZwciLprREELElbhlkaXrukM2aHPifbocXCZDjFMFO9yxAkp-IzRhUhhdhZGmmCaR-cvafDUeZdduetdmNOWDkXtWsqQkVrwFiNdO7j0Ibn0kjwbYEz46v48JL9OPv08_lytLpZfjj-uKis7VVfQIQMr7QC9tG2PArWqrWC9EiA7zXsFXdOutZRNeRLSNo1UNecaVDcMrZWH5N0-t3Rys8GUzeSSxXEEj2GTDFe1VkK1ShX69h96FTbRl-6KUpIrxhpR1Pu9smW0FHEwc3QTxK3hzOzWYHYzm79rKPjNfeSmn3D9SB_-vQC-B7duxO1_osy37xc_HkKrfY1LGe8eayBem0ZLrczv86U5PTv7erI8VeZc_gFNsqLN</recordid><startdate>201409</startdate><enddate>201409</enddate><creator>Elshafei, Ahmed</creator><creator>Kartha, Ganesh</creator><creator>Li, Yonghong</creator><creator>S. Moussa, Ayman</creator><creator>Hatem, Asmaa</creator><creator>Gao, Tianming</creator><creator>Jones, J. Stephen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201409</creationdate><title>Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis</title><author>Elshafei, Ahmed ; Kartha, Ganesh ; Li, Yonghong ; S. Moussa, Ayman ; Hatem, Asmaa ; Gao, Tianming ; Jones, J. Stephen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3954-a9e0ac3cfab3c8be2e754c20b52a3971b5a968d73362e723c66354117a59ff8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>extreme apical sampling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>prostate biopsy</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate cancer diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - metabolism</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Retirement planning</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elshafei, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kartha, Ganesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yonghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>S. Moussa, Ayman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatem, Asmaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Tianming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, J. Stephen</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elshafei, Ahmed</au><au>Kartha, Ganesh</au><au>Li, Yonghong</au><au>S. Moussa, Ayman</au><au>Hatem, Asmaa</au><au>Gao, Tianming</au><au>Jones, J. Stephen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>The Prostate</jtitle><addtitle>Prostate</addtitle><date>2014-09</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1183</spage><epage>1188</epage><pages>1183-1188</pages><issn>0270-4137</issn><eissn>1097-0045</eissn><coden>PRSTDS</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND
To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy.
METHODS
Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml, normal digital rectal exam (DRE), and no lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)), and (2) higher risk of PCa (PSA > 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy.
RESULTS
PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070–1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007–1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group.
CONCLUSION
Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa. Prostate 74:1183–1188, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>24962004</pmid><doi>10.1002/pros.22834</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0270-4137 |
ispartof | The Prostate, 2014-09, Vol.74 (12), p.1183-1188 |
issn | 0270-4137 1097-0045 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1547525855 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - diagnosis Adenocarcinoma - epidemiology Adenocarcinoma - pathology Aged Biopsy Biopsy - methods Databases, Factual extreme apical sampling Humans Male Middle Aged prostate biopsy Prostate cancer prostate cancer diagnosis Prostate-Specific Antigen - metabolism Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - epidemiology Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Retirement planning Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Specimen Handling - methods |
title | Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T14%3A13%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Low%20risk%20patients%20benefit%20from%20extreme%20anterior%20apical%20sampling%20on%20initial%20biopsy%20for%20prostate%20cancer%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=The%20Prostate&rft.au=Elshafei,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2014-09&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1183&rft.epage=1188&rft.pages=1183-1188&rft.issn=0270-4137&rft.eissn=1097-0045&rft.coden=PRSTDS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pros.22834&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1547525855%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1553150062&rft_id=info:pmid/24962004&rfr_iscdi=true |