Transmission of the rose rosette disease agent to Rosa multiflora by Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae)

Transmission of the rose rosette disease agent to Rosa multiflora by Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae)

Tests proved that rose rosette disease (RRD) results from a pathogenic agent and is not a mite-induced response of multiflora rose. Graft transmission of the RRD agent to rooted cuttings of Rose multiflora required 45 to 80 days and was only 46% successful. Graft transmission to large vigorously gro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Entomological news 1989-01, Vol.99 (5), p.239-252
Hauptverfasser: Amrine, JW Jr, Hindal, D F, Stasny, T A, Williams, R L, Coffman, C C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Acari
Eriophyidae
Rosa multiflora
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 252
container_issue 5
container_start_page 239
container_title Entomological news
container_volume 99
creator Amrine, JW Jr
Hindal, D F
Stasny, T A
Williams, R L
Coffman, C C
description Tests proved that rose rosette disease (RRD) results from a pathogenic agent and is not a mite-induced response of multiflora rose. Graft transmission of the RRD agent to rooted cuttings of Rose multiflora required 45 to 80 days and was only 46% successful. Graft transmission to large vigorously growing transplants was more rapid (30-60 days) and 100% successful. Graft transmission showed the agent resides in roots of multiflora rose. Laboratory transmission of RRD by the eriophyid mite, Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae) to transplants in 1986 was 92.3% and symptoms appeared in 17-24 days. Transmission of RRD by mites to rooted cuttings was unsuccessful. In 1987, the rate of field transmission with P. fructiphilus was 12.5% and lab transmission was 20% with symptoms appearing in 30-279 days and 29-47 days respectively. Reduced laboratory transmission in 1987 was thought to be drought-induced. Attempts to transmit RRD with Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) were unsuccessful.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15468124</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15468124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_154681243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjrGKwlAQRV_hwuq6_zCVaCEkJqvBbhHFUsTCTsY42Yw8M9k384r8vYJ-gM09HDjF7bl-kqTZtFjMjp9uoHpNkqwosrzv9BCw0RursjQgFVhNEESfY0ZwYSV8OP5RY2ACe1GEW_TGlZeAcO5gV3feSymtkUIVYmnc1uyjwvi3xMBLWAeWtu74gjQZuo8KvdL3i19utFkfVttpG-Q_ktrp8ack77EhiXpKf_J5kc7y7O3wDsgfTzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15468124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transmission of the rose rosette disease agent to Rosa multiflora by Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae)</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Amrine, JW Jr ; Hindal, D F ; Stasny, T A ; Williams, R L ; Coffman, C C</creator><creatorcontrib>Amrine, JW Jr ; Hindal, D F ; Stasny, T A ; Williams, R L ; Coffman, C C</creatorcontrib><description>Tests proved that rose rosette disease (RRD) results from a pathogenic agent and is not a mite-induced response of multiflora rose. Graft transmission of the RRD agent to rooted cuttings of Rose multiflora required 45 to 80 days and was only 46% successful. Graft transmission to large vigorously growing transplants was more rapid (30-60 days) and 100% successful. Graft transmission showed the agent resides in roots of multiflora rose. Laboratory transmission of RRD by the eriophyid mite, Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae) to transplants in 1986 was 92.3% and symptoms appeared in 17-24 days. Transmission of RRD by mites to rooted cuttings was unsuccessful. In 1987, the rate of field transmission with P. fructiphilus was 12.5% and lab transmission was 20% with symptoms appearing in 30-279 days and 29-47 days respectively. Reduced laboratory transmission in 1987 was thought to be drought-induced. Attempts to transmit RRD with Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) were unsuccessful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-872X</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Acari ; Eriophyidae ; Rosa multiflora</subject><ispartof>Entomological news, 1989-01, Vol.99 (5), p.239-252</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Amrine, JW Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindal, D F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stasny, T A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffman, C C</creatorcontrib><title>Transmission of the rose rosette disease agent to Rosa multiflora by Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae)</title><title>Entomological news</title><description>Tests proved that rose rosette disease (RRD) results from a pathogenic agent and is not a mite-induced response of multiflora rose. Graft transmission of the RRD agent to rooted cuttings of Rose multiflora required 45 to 80 days and was only 46% successful. Graft transmission to large vigorously growing transplants was more rapid (30-60 days) and 100% successful. Graft transmission showed the agent resides in roots of multiflora rose. Laboratory transmission of RRD by the eriophyid mite, Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae) to transplants in 1986 was 92.3% and symptoms appeared in 17-24 days. Transmission of RRD by mites to rooted cuttings was unsuccessful. In 1987, the rate of field transmission with P. fructiphilus was 12.5% and lab transmission was 20% with symptoms appearing in 30-279 days and 29-47 days respectively. Reduced laboratory transmission in 1987 was thought to be drought-induced. Attempts to transmit RRD with Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) were unsuccessful.</description><subject>Acari</subject><subject>Eriophyidae</subject><subject>Rosa multiflora</subject><issn>0013-872X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjrGKwlAQRV_hwuq6_zCVaCEkJqvBbhHFUsTCTsY42Yw8M9k384r8vYJ-gM09HDjF7bl-kqTZtFjMjp9uoHpNkqwosrzv9BCw0RursjQgFVhNEESfY0ZwYSV8OP5RY2ACe1GEW_TGlZeAcO5gV3feSymtkUIVYmnc1uyjwvi3xMBLWAeWtu74gjQZuo8KvdL3i19utFkfVttpG-Q_ktrp8ack77EhiXpKf_J5kc7y7O3wDsgfTzs</recordid><startdate>19890101</startdate><enddate>19890101</enddate><creator>Amrine, JW Jr</creator><creator>Hindal, D F</creator><creator>Stasny, T A</creator><creator>Williams, R L</creator><creator>Coffman, C C</creator><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19890101</creationdate><title>Transmission of the rose rosette disease agent to Rosa multiflora by Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae)</title><author>Amrine, JW Jr ; Hindal, D F ; Stasny, T A ; Williams, R L ; Coffman, C C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_154681243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Acari</topic><topic>Eriophyidae</topic><topic>Rosa multiflora</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Amrine, JW Jr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hindal, D F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stasny, T A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, R L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffman, C C</creatorcontrib><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Entomological news</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Amrine, JW Jr</au><au>Hindal, D F</au><au>Stasny, T A</au><au>Williams, R L</au><au>Coffman, C C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transmission of the rose rosette disease agent to Rosa multiflora by Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae)</atitle><jtitle>Entomological news</jtitle><date>1989-01-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>239</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>239-252</pages><issn>0013-872X</issn><abstract>Tests proved that rose rosette disease (RRD) results from a pathogenic agent and is not a mite-induced response of multiflora rose. Graft transmission of the RRD agent to rooted cuttings of Rose multiflora required 45 to 80 days and was only 46% successful. Graft transmission to large vigorously growing transplants was more rapid (30-60 days) and 100% successful. Graft transmission showed the agent resides in roots of multiflora rose. Laboratory transmission of RRD by the eriophyid mite, Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae) to transplants in 1986 was 92.3% and symptoms appeared in 17-24 days. Transmission of RRD by mites to rooted cuttings was unsuccessful. In 1987, the rate of field transmission with P. fructiphilus was 12.5% and lab transmission was 20% with symptoms appearing in 30-279 days and 29-47 days respectively. Reduced laboratory transmission in 1987 was thought to be drought-induced. Attempts to transmit RRD with Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) were unsuccessful.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-872X
ispartof Entomological news, 1989-01, Vol.99 (5), p.239-252
issn 0013-872X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15468124
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Acari
Eriophyidae
Rosa multiflora
title Transmission of the rose rosette disease agent to Rosa multiflora by Phyllocoptes fructiphilus (Acari: Eriophyidae)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A16%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transmission%20of%20the%20rose%20rosette%20disease%20agent%20to%20Rosa%20multiflora%20by%20Phyllocoptes%20fructiphilus%20(Acari:%20Eriophyidae)&rft.jtitle=Entomological%20news&rft.au=Amrine,%20JW%20Jr&rft.date=1989-01-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=239&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=239-252&rft.issn=0013-872X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E15468124%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15468124&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true