Impact of closed minimal extracorporeal circulation on microvascular tissue perfusion during surgical aortic valve replacement: intravital imaging in a prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVES Closed minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) systems currently do not represent the standard of surgical care for open-heart surgery. Yet, considering the beneficial results reported for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, we used an MECC system in aortic valve replacement (A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery 2014-08, Vol.19 (2), p.211-217
Hauptverfasser: Donndorf, Peter, Park, Hannah, Vollmar, Brigitte, Alms, Angela, Gierer, Philipp, Steinhoff, Gustav, Kaminski, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 217
container_issue 2
container_start_page 211
container_title Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
container_volume 19
creator Donndorf, Peter
Park, Hannah
Vollmar, Brigitte
Alms, Angela
Gierer, Philipp
Steinhoff, Gustav
Kaminski, Alexander
description OBJECTIVES Closed minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) systems currently do not represent the standard of surgical care for open-heart surgery. Yet, considering the beneficial results reported for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, we used an MECC system in aortic valve replacement (AVR) and analysed the effects on intraoperative microvascular perfusion in comparison with conventional open extracorporeal circulation (CECC). METHODS In the current study, we analysed alterations in microvascular perfusion at 4 predefined time points (T1–T4) during surgical AVR utilizing orthogonal polarization spectral (OPS) imaging. Twenty patients were randomized for being operated on utilizing either MECC or CECC. Changes in functional capillary density (FCD, cm/cm2), mircovascular blood flow velocity (mm/s) and vessel diameter (μm) were analysed by a blinded investigator. RESULTS After the start of extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamping (T2), both groups showed a significant drop in FCD, but with a significantly higher FCD in the MECC group (153.1 ± 15.0 cm/cm² in the CECC group vs 160.8 ± 12.2 cm/cm² in the MECC group, P = 0.034). During the late phase of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (T3), the FCD was still significantly depressed in both treatment groups (153.5 ± 14.6 cm/cm² in the CECC group, P
doi_str_mv 10.1093/icvts/ivu131
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1546215887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/icvts/ivu131</oup_id><sourcerecordid>1546215887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1d711bbac14c5117c9ed0d609000020a285b319b2a924e05959f51daae0bc1f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EoqVw44x8gwNLPXGSXXOrKj4qVeIC52gynqyMkjj4I6L8Ln4gDlt6xLLksfW8M-N5hXgJ6h0ooy8drSleujWDhkfiHJrW7Ex1aB4_xEafiWcxflcKjNLqqTir6r1pta7Pxe-baUFK0g-SRh_ZysnNbsJR8s8UkHxYfOByJRcoj5icn2XZk6PgV4zbW5DJxZhZLhyGHDfC5uDmo4w5HB0VNfqQHMkVx5Vl4GVE4onn9F66uZRZXSpQKXvcVG6WKJfg48KU3CbA2frJ_SrdxZTt3XPxZMAx8ov780J8-_jh6_Xn3e2XTzfXV7c70i2kHdg9QN8jQU0NwJ4MW2VbZVRZlcIypF6D6Ss0Vc2qMY0ZGrCIrHqCwegL8eaUtzTzI3NM3eQi8TjizD7HDpq6raA5HPYFfXtCy1hiDDx0Syj_CXcdqG7zqfvrU3fyqeCv7jPnfmL7AP8zpgCvT4DPy_9T_QG2PaQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1546215887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of closed minimal extracorporeal circulation on microvascular tissue perfusion during surgical aortic valve replacement: intravital imaging in a prospective randomized study</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Donndorf, Peter ; Park, Hannah ; Vollmar, Brigitte ; Alms, Angela ; Gierer, Philipp ; Steinhoff, Gustav ; Kaminski, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Donndorf, Peter ; Park, Hannah ; Vollmar, Brigitte ; Alms, Angela ; Gierer, Philipp ; Steinhoff, Gustav ; Kaminski, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES Closed minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) systems currently do not represent the standard of surgical care for open-heart surgery. Yet, considering the beneficial results reported for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, we used an MECC system in aortic valve replacement (AVR) and analysed the effects on intraoperative microvascular perfusion in comparison with conventional open extracorporeal circulation (CECC). METHODS In the current study, we analysed alterations in microvascular perfusion at 4 predefined time points (T1–T4) during surgical AVR utilizing orthogonal polarization spectral (OPS) imaging. Twenty patients were randomized for being operated on utilizing either MECC or CECC. Changes in functional capillary density (FCD, cm/cm2), mircovascular blood flow velocity (mm/s) and vessel diameter (μm) were analysed by a blinded investigator. RESULTS After the start of extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamping (T2), both groups showed a significant drop in FCD, but with a significantly higher FCD in the MECC group (153.1 ± 15.0 cm/cm² in the CECC group vs 160.8 ± 12.2 cm/cm² in the MECC group, P = 0.034). During the late phase of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (T3), the FCD was still significantly depressed in both treatment groups (153.5 ± 14.6 cm/cm² in the CECC group, P &lt;0.05 vs ‘T1’; 159.5 ± 12.4 cm/cm² in the MECC group, P &lt;0.05 versus ‘T1’). After termination of CPB (T4), the FCD recovered in both groups to baseline values. Microvascular blood flow velocity tended to remain at a higher level in the MECC group, whereas haemodilution during CPB was significantly reduced in the MECC group. CONCLUSIONS The use of MECC in AVR did not affect procedural safety and, resulted in beneficial preservation of microvascular blood flow velocity and significantly reduced haemodilution during CPB. In contrast to CABG surgery, the use of MECC did not improve FCD during surgical AVR. Clinical advantages possibly resulting from attenuated haemodilution and preservation of microvascular blood flow velocity require further validation in larger patient cohorts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-9293</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1569-9285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu131</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24796334</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Valve - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects ; Female ; Germany ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Hemodilution ; Humans ; Male ; Microcirculation ; Microscopy, Polarization ; Microscopy, Video ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Intraoperative ; Mouth Mucosa - blood supply ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Regional Blood Flow ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2014-08, Vol.19 (2), p.211-217</ispartof><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved. 2014</rights><rights>The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1d711bbac14c5117c9ed0d609000020a285b319b2a924e05959f51daae0bc1f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1d711bbac14c5117c9ed0d609000020a285b319b2a924e05959f51daae0bc1f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivu131$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24796334$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donndorf, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmar, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alms, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinhoff, Gustav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminski, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of closed minimal extracorporeal circulation on microvascular tissue perfusion during surgical aortic valve replacement: intravital imaging in a prospective randomized study</title><title>Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery</title><addtitle>Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVES Closed minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) systems currently do not represent the standard of surgical care for open-heart surgery. Yet, considering the beneficial results reported for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, we used an MECC system in aortic valve replacement (AVR) and analysed the effects on intraoperative microvascular perfusion in comparison with conventional open extracorporeal circulation (CECC). METHODS In the current study, we analysed alterations in microvascular perfusion at 4 predefined time points (T1–T4) during surgical AVR utilizing orthogonal polarization spectral (OPS) imaging. Twenty patients were randomized for being operated on utilizing either MECC or CECC. Changes in functional capillary density (FCD, cm/cm2), mircovascular blood flow velocity (mm/s) and vessel diameter (μm) were analysed by a blinded investigator. RESULTS After the start of extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamping (T2), both groups showed a significant drop in FCD, but with a significantly higher FCD in the MECC group (153.1 ± 15.0 cm/cm² in the CECC group vs 160.8 ± 12.2 cm/cm² in the MECC group, P = 0.034). During the late phase of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (T3), the FCD was still significantly depressed in both treatment groups (153.5 ± 14.6 cm/cm² in the CECC group, P &lt;0.05 vs ‘T1’; 159.5 ± 12.4 cm/cm² in the MECC group, P &lt;0.05 versus ‘T1’). After termination of CPB (T4), the FCD recovered in both groups to baseline values. Microvascular blood flow velocity tended to remain at a higher level in the MECC group, whereas haemodilution during CPB was significantly reduced in the MECC group. CONCLUSIONS The use of MECC in AVR did not affect procedural safety and, resulted in beneficial preservation of microvascular blood flow velocity and significantly reduced haemodilution during CPB. In contrast to CABG surgery, the use of MECC did not improve FCD during surgical AVR. Clinical advantages possibly resulting from attenuated haemodilution and preservation of microvascular blood flow velocity require further validation in larger patient cohorts.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemodilution</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Microcirculation</subject><subject>Microscopy, Polarization</subject><subject>Microscopy, Video</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative</subject><subject>Mouth Mucosa - blood supply</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Regional Blood Flow</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1569-9293</issn><issn>1569-9285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EoqVw44x8gwNLPXGSXXOrKj4qVeIC52gynqyMkjj4I6L8Ln4gDlt6xLLksfW8M-N5hXgJ6h0ooy8drSleujWDhkfiHJrW7Ex1aB4_xEafiWcxflcKjNLqqTir6r1pta7Pxe-baUFK0g-SRh_ZysnNbsJR8s8UkHxYfOByJRcoj5icn2XZk6PgV4zbW5DJxZhZLhyGHDfC5uDmo4w5HB0VNfqQHMkVx5Vl4GVE4onn9F66uZRZXSpQKXvcVG6WKJfg48KU3CbA2frJ_SrdxZTt3XPxZMAx8ov780J8-_jh6_Xn3e2XTzfXV7c70i2kHdg9QN8jQU0NwJ4MW2VbZVRZlcIypF6D6Ss0Vc2qMY0ZGrCIrHqCwegL8eaUtzTzI3NM3eQi8TjizD7HDpq6raA5HPYFfXtCy1hiDDx0Syj_CXcdqG7zqfvrU3fyqeCv7jPnfmL7AP8zpgCvT4DPy_9T_QG2PaQA</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Donndorf, Peter</creator><creator>Park, Hannah</creator><creator>Vollmar, Brigitte</creator><creator>Alms, Angela</creator><creator>Gierer, Philipp</creator><creator>Steinhoff, Gustav</creator><creator>Kaminski, Alexander</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Impact of closed minimal extracorporeal circulation on microvascular tissue perfusion during surgical aortic valve replacement: intravital imaging in a prospective randomized study</title><author>Donndorf, Peter ; Park, Hannah ; Vollmar, Brigitte ; Alms, Angela ; Gierer, Philipp ; Steinhoff, Gustav ; Kaminski, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c361t-1d711bbac14c5117c9ed0d609000020a285b319b2a924e05959f51daae0bc1f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemodilution</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Microcirculation</topic><topic>Microscopy, Polarization</topic><topic>Microscopy, Video</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative</topic><topic>Mouth Mucosa - blood supply</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Regional Blood Flow</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donndorf, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vollmar, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alms, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gierer, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinhoff, Gustav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminski, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donndorf, Peter</au><au>Park, Hannah</au><au>Vollmar, Brigitte</au><au>Alms, Angela</au><au>Gierer, Philipp</au><au>Steinhoff, Gustav</au><au>Kaminski, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of closed minimal extracorporeal circulation on microvascular tissue perfusion during surgical aortic valve replacement: intravital imaging in a prospective randomized study</atitle><jtitle>Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>211-217</pages><issn>1569-9293</issn><eissn>1569-9285</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES Closed minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) systems currently do not represent the standard of surgical care for open-heart surgery. Yet, considering the beneficial results reported for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, we used an MECC system in aortic valve replacement (AVR) and analysed the effects on intraoperative microvascular perfusion in comparison with conventional open extracorporeal circulation (CECC). METHODS In the current study, we analysed alterations in microvascular perfusion at 4 predefined time points (T1–T4) during surgical AVR utilizing orthogonal polarization spectral (OPS) imaging. Twenty patients were randomized for being operated on utilizing either MECC or CECC. Changes in functional capillary density (FCD, cm/cm2), mircovascular blood flow velocity (mm/s) and vessel diameter (μm) were analysed by a blinded investigator. RESULTS After the start of extracorporeal circulation and aortic cross-clamping (T2), both groups showed a significant drop in FCD, but with a significantly higher FCD in the MECC group (153.1 ± 15.0 cm/cm² in the CECC group vs 160.8 ± 12.2 cm/cm² in the MECC group, P = 0.034). During the late phase of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (T3), the FCD was still significantly depressed in both treatment groups (153.5 ± 14.6 cm/cm² in the CECC group, P &lt;0.05 vs ‘T1’; 159.5 ± 12.4 cm/cm² in the MECC group, P &lt;0.05 versus ‘T1’). After termination of CPB (T4), the FCD recovered in both groups to baseline values. Microvascular blood flow velocity tended to remain at a higher level in the MECC group, whereas haemodilution during CPB was significantly reduced in the MECC group. CONCLUSIONS The use of MECC in AVR did not affect procedural safety and, resulted in beneficial preservation of microvascular blood flow velocity and significantly reduced haemodilution during CPB. In contrast to CABG surgery, the use of MECC did not improve FCD during surgical AVR. Clinical advantages possibly resulting from attenuated haemodilution and preservation of microvascular blood flow velocity require further validation in larger patient cohorts.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>24796334</pmid><doi>10.1093/icvts/ivu131</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1569-9293
ispartof Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2014-08, Vol.19 (2), p.211-217
issn 1569-9293
1569-9285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1546215887
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aortic Valve - physiopathology
Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - diagnosis
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - physiopathology
Aortic Valve Insufficiency - surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnosis
Aortic Valve Stenosis - physiopathology
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Blood Flow Velocity
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation - adverse effects
Female
Germany
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Hemodilution
Humans
Male
Microcirculation
Microscopy, Polarization
Microscopy, Video
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Intraoperative
Mouth Mucosa - blood supply
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Regional Blood Flow
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title Impact of closed minimal extracorporeal circulation on microvascular tissue perfusion during surgical aortic valve replacement: intravital imaging in a prospective randomized study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A20%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20closed%20minimal%20extracorporeal%20circulation%20on%20microvascular%20tissue%20perfusion%20during%20surgical%20aortic%20valve%20replacement:%20intravital%20imaging%20in%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20study&rft.jtitle=Interactive%20cardiovascular%20and%20thoracic%20surgery&rft.au=Donndorf,%20Peter&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=211-217&rft.issn=1569-9293&rft.eissn=1569-9285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icvts/ivu131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E1546215887%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1546215887&rft_id=info:pmid/24796334&rft_oup_id=10.1093/icvts/ivu131&rfr_iscdi=true