Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength
Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business research 2014-06, Vol.67 (6), p.1154-1161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1154 |
container_title | Journal of business research |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Giese, Joan L. Malkewitz, Keven Orth, Ulrich R. Henderson, Pamela W. |
description | Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effective in generating purchase intentions are counterintuitively not the most attractive and strongest, but rather designs tempered to be moderately attractive and very strong or very attractive and moderately strong. Such designs are visual representations closer to the aesthetic middle, thereby prompting more favorable consumer responses. This research empirically tests the aesthetic middle principle in two consumer field studies, using both simple (typeface) and complex (wine package) designs. In a subsequent controlled experiment, the strongest aesthetic middle effects emerge for hedonic (rather than utilitarian) products and when less product-related information is available. The effects of the aesthetic middle occur regardless of available cognitive resources or individual differences in design acumen. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544964899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0148296313002075</els_id><sourcerecordid>3248028181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-729ec3ea35b83f8d0c279584822edf2c4178473658ddb1afa2b36b8ff25fd29f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BCHgxUv3Vr66015kWdQVFrysFy8hnVRm0_SkxyQz4L83y-zJi6f3UE8V9T6EvGfQM2DD9dIv86lkLD0HJnpQPTD9guyYHkU3TqN-SXbApO74NIjX5E0pCwBwAL0jv2782SYX057WR6QWS4saHT1E71ekxxzb9LjiJ_qQrcduC6HQmKjHEveJ2lqzdTWeMWEp1CZPS82Y9vXxLXkV7Frw3XNekZ9fvzzc3nX3P759v72575wEVruRT-gEWqFmLYL24Pg4KS015-gDd5KNWo5iUNr7mdlg-SyGWYfAVfB8CuKKfLzcPebt96kVMIdYHK6rTbidimFKymmQepoa-uEfdNlOObXvGgWjBq0kb5S6UC5vpXkNplk42PzHMDBPxs1ino2bJ-MGlGnG297nyx62tueI2RQXMTn0MaOrxm_xPxf-Ap1-jS4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1507808542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Giese, Joan L. ; Malkewitz, Keven ; Orth, Ulrich R. ; Henderson, Pamela W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan L. ; Malkewitz, Keven ; Orth, Ulrich R. ; Henderson, Pamela W.</creatorcontrib><description>Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effective in generating purchase intentions are counterintuitively not the most attractive and strongest, but rather designs tempered to be moderately attractive and very strong or very attractive and moderately strong. Such designs are visual representations closer to the aesthetic middle, thereby prompting more favorable consumer responses. This research empirically tests the aesthetic middle principle in two consumer field studies, using both simple (typeface) and complex (wine package) designs. In a subsequent controlled experiment, the strongest aesthetic middle effects emerge for hedonic (rather than utilitarian) products and when less product-related information is available. The effects of the aesthetic middle occur regardless of available cognitive resources or individual differences in design acumen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-2963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aesthetic middle ; Aesthetics ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Design ; Design attractiveness ; Design strength ; Effectiveness studies ; Market strategy ; Package ; Products ; Trade-off ; Tradeoff analysis ; Typeface ; Utilities</subject><ispartof>Journal of business research, 2014-06, Vol.67 (6), p.1154-1161</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-729ec3ea35b83f8d0c279584822edf2c4178473658ddb1afa2b36b8ff25fd29f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-729ec3ea35b83f8d0c279584822edf2c4178473658ddb1afa2b36b8ff25fd29f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malkewitz, Keven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orth, Ulrich R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Pamela W.</creatorcontrib><title>Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength</title><title>Journal of business research</title><description>Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effective in generating purchase intentions are counterintuitively not the most attractive and strongest, but rather designs tempered to be moderately attractive and very strong or very attractive and moderately strong. Such designs are visual representations closer to the aesthetic middle, thereby prompting more favorable consumer responses. This research empirically tests the aesthetic middle principle in two consumer field studies, using both simple (typeface) and complex (wine package) designs. In a subsequent controlled experiment, the strongest aesthetic middle effects emerge for hedonic (rather than utilitarian) products and when less product-related information is available. The effects of the aesthetic middle occur regardless of available cognitive resources or individual differences in design acumen.</description><subject>Aesthetic middle</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design attractiveness</subject><subject>Design strength</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Market strategy</subject><subject>Package</subject><subject>Products</subject><subject>Trade-off</subject><subject>Tradeoff analysis</subject><subject>Typeface</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><issn>0148-2963</issn><issn>1873-7978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BCHgxUv3Vr66015kWdQVFrysFy8hnVRm0_SkxyQz4L83y-zJi6f3UE8V9T6EvGfQM2DD9dIv86lkLD0HJnpQPTD9guyYHkU3TqN-SXbApO74NIjX5E0pCwBwAL0jv2782SYX057WR6QWS4saHT1E71ekxxzb9LjiJ_qQrcduC6HQmKjHEveJ2lqzdTWeMWEp1CZPS82Y9vXxLXkV7Frw3XNekZ9fvzzc3nX3P759v72575wEVruRT-gEWqFmLYL24Pg4KS015-gDd5KNWo5iUNr7mdlg-SyGWYfAVfB8CuKKfLzcPebt96kVMIdYHK6rTbidimFKymmQepoa-uEfdNlOObXvGgWjBq0kb5S6UC5vpXkNplk42PzHMDBPxs1ino2bJ-MGlGnG297nyx62tueI2RQXMTn0MaOrxm_xPxf-Ap1-jS4</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Giese, Joan L.</creator><creator>Malkewitz, Keven</creator><creator>Orth, Ulrich R.</creator><creator>Henderson, Pamela W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength</title><author>Giese, Joan L. ; Malkewitz, Keven ; Orth, Ulrich R. ; Henderson, Pamela W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-729ec3ea35b83f8d0c279584822edf2c4178473658ddb1afa2b36b8ff25fd29f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aesthetic middle</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design attractiveness</topic><topic>Design strength</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Market strategy</topic><topic>Package</topic><topic>Products</topic><topic>Trade-off</topic><topic>Tradeoff analysis</topic><topic>Typeface</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malkewitz, Keven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orth, Ulrich R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Pamela W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giese, Joan L.</au><au>Malkewitz, Keven</au><au>Orth, Ulrich R.</au><au>Henderson, Pamela W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1154</spage><epage>1161</epage><pages>1154-1161</pages><issn>0148-2963</issn><eissn>1873-7978</eissn><abstract>Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effective in generating purchase intentions are counterintuitively not the most attractive and strongest, but rather designs tempered to be moderately attractive and very strong or very attractive and moderately strong. Such designs are visual representations closer to the aesthetic middle, thereby prompting more favorable consumer responses. This research empirically tests the aesthetic middle principle in two consumer field studies, using both simple (typeface) and complex (wine package) designs. In a subsequent controlled experiment, the strongest aesthetic middle effects emerge for hedonic (rather than utilitarian) products and when less product-related information is available. The effects of the aesthetic middle occur regardless of available cognitive resources or individual differences in design acumen.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-2963 |
ispartof | Journal of business research, 2014-06, Vol.67 (6), p.1154-1161 |
issn | 0148-2963 1873-7978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544964899 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aesthetic middle Aesthetics Consumer behavior Consumers Design Design attractiveness Design strength Effectiveness studies Market strategy Package Products Trade-off Tradeoff analysis Typeface Utilities |
title | Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A03%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advancing%20the%20aesthetic%20middle%20principle:%20Trade-offs%20in%20design%20attractiveness%20and%20strength&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20research&rft.au=Giese,%20Joan%20L.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1154&rft.epage=1161&rft.pages=1154-1161&rft.issn=0148-2963&rft.eissn=1873-7978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3248028181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1507808542&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0148296313002075&rfr_iscdi=true |