Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength

Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business research 2014-06, Vol.67 (6), p.1154-1161
Hauptverfasser: Giese, Joan L., Malkewitz, Keven, Orth, Ulrich R., Henderson, Pamela W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1161
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1154
container_title Journal of business research
container_volume 67
creator Giese, Joan L.
Malkewitz, Keven
Orth, Ulrich R.
Henderson, Pamela W.
description Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effective in generating purchase intentions are counterintuitively not the most attractive and strongest, but rather designs tempered to be moderately attractive and very strong or very attractive and moderately strong. Such designs are visual representations closer to the aesthetic middle, thereby prompting more favorable consumer responses. This research empirically tests the aesthetic middle principle in two consumer field studies, using both simple (typeface) and complex (wine package) designs. In a subsequent controlled experiment, the strongest aesthetic middle effects emerge for hedonic (rather than utilitarian) products and when less product-related information is available. The effects of the aesthetic middle occur regardless of available cognitive resources or individual differences in design acumen.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544964899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0148296313002075</els_id><sourcerecordid>3248028181</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-729ec3ea35b83f8d0c279584822edf2c4178473658ddb1afa2b36b8ff25fd29f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BCHgxUv3Vr66015kWdQVFrysFy8hnVRm0_SkxyQz4L83y-zJi6f3UE8V9T6EvGfQM2DD9dIv86lkLD0HJnpQPTD9guyYHkU3TqN-SXbApO74NIjX5E0pCwBwAL0jv2782SYX057WR6QWS4saHT1E71ekxxzb9LjiJ_qQrcduC6HQmKjHEveJ2lqzdTWeMWEp1CZPS82Y9vXxLXkV7Frw3XNekZ9fvzzc3nX3P759v72575wEVruRT-gEWqFmLYL24Pg4KS015-gDd5KNWo5iUNr7mdlg-SyGWYfAVfB8CuKKfLzcPebt96kVMIdYHK6rTbidimFKymmQepoa-uEfdNlOObXvGgWjBq0kb5S6UC5vpXkNplk42PzHMDBPxs1ino2bJ-MGlGnG297nyx62tueI2RQXMTn0MaOrxm_xPxf-Ap1-jS4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1507808542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Giese, Joan L. ; Malkewitz, Keven ; Orth, Ulrich R. ; Henderson, Pamela W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan L. ; Malkewitz, Keven ; Orth, Ulrich R. ; Henderson, Pamela W.</creatorcontrib><description>Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effective in generating purchase intentions are counterintuitively not the most attractive and strongest, but rather designs tempered to be moderately attractive and very strong or very attractive and moderately strong. Such designs are visual representations closer to the aesthetic middle, thereby prompting more favorable consumer responses. This research empirically tests the aesthetic middle principle in two consumer field studies, using both simple (typeface) and complex (wine package) designs. In a subsequent controlled experiment, the strongest aesthetic middle effects emerge for hedonic (rather than utilitarian) products and when less product-related information is available. The effects of the aesthetic middle occur regardless of available cognitive resources or individual differences in design acumen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-2963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aesthetic middle ; Aesthetics ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Design ; Design attractiveness ; Design strength ; Effectiveness studies ; Market strategy ; Package ; Products ; Trade-off ; Tradeoff analysis ; Typeface ; Utilities</subject><ispartof>Journal of business research, 2014-06, Vol.67 (6), p.1154-1161</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Jun 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-729ec3ea35b83f8d0c279584822edf2c4178473658ddb1afa2b36b8ff25fd29f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-729ec3ea35b83f8d0c279584822edf2c4178473658ddb1afa2b36b8ff25fd29f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malkewitz, Keven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orth, Ulrich R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Pamela W.</creatorcontrib><title>Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength</title><title>Journal of business research</title><description>Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effective in generating purchase intentions are counterintuitively not the most attractive and strongest, but rather designs tempered to be moderately attractive and very strong or very attractive and moderately strong. Such designs are visual representations closer to the aesthetic middle, thereby prompting more favorable consumer responses. This research empirically tests the aesthetic middle principle in two consumer field studies, using both simple (typeface) and complex (wine package) designs. In a subsequent controlled experiment, the strongest aesthetic middle effects emerge for hedonic (rather than utilitarian) products and when less product-related information is available. The effects of the aesthetic middle occur regardless of available cognitive resources or individual differences in design acumen.</description><subject>Aesthetic middle</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design attractiveness</subject><subject>Design strength</subject><subject>Effectiveness studies</subject><subject>Market strategy</subject><subject>Package</subject><subject>Products</subject><subject>Trade-off</subject><subject>Tradeoff analysis</subject><subject>Typeface</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><issn>0148-2963</issn><issn>1873-7978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BCHgxUv3Vr66015kWdQVFrysFy8hnVRm0_SkxyQz4L83y-zJi6f3UE8V9T6EvGfQM2DD9dIv86lkLD0HJnpQPTD9guyYHkU3TqN-SXbApO74NIjX5E0pCwBwAL0jv2782SYX057WR6QWS4saHT1E71ekxxzb9LjiJ_qQrcduC6HQmKjHEveJ2lqzdTWeMWEp1CZPS82Y9vXxLXkV7Frw3XNekZ9fvzzc3nX3P759v72575wEVruRT-gEWqFmLYL24Pg4KS015-gDd5KNWo5iUNr7mdlg-SyGWYfAVfB8CuKKfLzcPebt96kVMIdYHK6rTbidimFKymmQepoa-uEfdNlOObXvGgWjBq0kb5S6UC5vpXkNplk42PzHMDBPxs1ino2bJ-MGlGnG297nyx62tueI2RQXMTn0MaOrxm_xPxf-Ap1-jS4</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Giese, Joan L.</creator><creator>Malkewitz, Keven</creator><creator>Orth, Ulrich R.</creator><creator>Henderson, Pamela W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength</title><author>Giese, Joan L. ; Malkewitz, Keven ; Orth, Ulrich R. ; Henderson, Pamela W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-729ec3ea35b83f8d0c279584822edf2c4178473658ddb1afa2b36b8ff25fd29f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aesthetic middle</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design attractiveness</topic><topic>Design strength</topic><topic>Effectiveness studies</topic><topic>Market strategy</topic><topic>Package</topic><topic>Products</topic><topic>Trade-off</topic><topic>Tradeoff analysis</topic><topic>Typeface</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giese, Joan L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malkewitz, Keven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orth, Ulrich R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Pamela W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giese, Joan L.</au><au>Malkewitz, Keven</au><au>Orth, Ulrich R.</au><au>Henderson, Pamela W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1154</spage><epage>1161</epage><pages>1154-1161</pages><issn>0148-2963</issn><eissn>1873-7978</eissn><abstract>Key design properties of marketing artifacts that influence consumer response include perceived attractiveness (the valenced evaluative response to the artifact) and perceived strength (the artifact’s ability to capture attention). The aesthetic middle principle contends that the designs most effective in generating purchase intentions are counterintuitively not the most attractive and strongest, but rather designs tempered to be moderately attractive and very strong or very attractive and moderately strong. Such designs are visual representations closer to the aesthetic middle, thereby prompting more favorable consumer responses. This research empirically tests the aesthetic middle principle in two consumer field studies, using both simple (typeface) and complex (wine package) designs. In a subsequent controlled experiment, the strongest aesthetic middle effects emerge for hedonic (rather than utilitarian) products and when less product-related information is available. The effects of the aesthetic middle occur regardless of available cognitive resources or individual differences in design acumen.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-2963
ispartof Journal of business research, 2014-06, Vol.67 (6), p.1154-1161
issn 0148-2963
1873-7978
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544964899
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aesthetic middle
Aesthetics
Consumer behavior
Consumers
Design
Design attractiveness
Design strength
Effectiveness studies
Market strategy
Package
Products
Trade-off
Tradeoff analysis
Typeface
Utilities
title Advancing the aesthetic middle principle: Trade-offs in design attractiveness and strength
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A03%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Advancing%20the%20aesthetic%20middle%20principle:%20Trade-offs%20in%20design%20attractiveness%20and%20strength&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20research&rft.au=Giese,%20Joan%20L.&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1154&rft.epage=1161&rft.pages=1154-1161&rft.issn=0148-2963&rft.eissn=1873-7978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3248028181%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1507808542&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0148296313002075&rfr_iscdi=true