Muscle Activation During Various Hamstring Exercises

ABSTRACTMcAllister, MJ, Hammond, KG, Schilling, BK, Ferreria, LC, Reed, JP, and Weiss, LW. Muscle activation during various hamstring exercises. J Strength Cond Res 28(6)1573–1580, 2014—The dorsal muscles of the lower torso and extremities have often been denoted the “posterior chain.” These muscles...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2014-06, Vol.28 (6), p.1573-1580
Hauptverfasser: McAllister, Matt J, Hammond, Kelley G, Schilling, Brian K, Ferreria, Lucas C, Reed, Jacob P, Weiss, Lawrence W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1580
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1573
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 28
creator McAllister, Matt J
Hammond, Kelley G
Schilling, Brian K
Ferreria, Lucas C
Reed, Jacob P
Weiss, Lawrence W
description ABSTRACTMcAllister, MJ, Hammond, KG, Schilling, BK, Ferreria, LC, Reed, JP, and Weiss, LW. Muscle activation during various hamstring exercises. J Strength Cond Res 28(6)1573–1580, 2014—The dorsal muscles of the lower torso and extremities have often been denoted the “posterior chain.” These muscles are used to support the thoracic and lumbar spine and peripheral joints, including the hip, knee, and ankle on the dorsal aspect of the body. This study investigated the relative muscle activity of the hamstring group and selected surrounding musculature during the leg curl, good morning, glute-ham raise, and Romanian deadlift (RDL). Twelve healthy, weight-trained men performed duplicate trials of single repetitions at 85% 1-repetition maximum for each lift in random order, during which surface electromyography and joint angle data were obtained. Repeated measures analysis of variance across the 4 exercises was performed to compare the activity from the erector spinae (ES), gluteus medius (GMed), semitendinosus (ST), biceps femoris (BF), and medial gastrocnemius (MGas). Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were noted in eccentric muscle activity between exercise for the MGas (p < 0.027), ST (p < 0.001), BF (p < 0.001), and ES (p = 0.032), and in concentric muscle activity, for the ES (p < 0.001), BF (p = 0.010), ST (p = 0.009), MGas (p < 0.001), and the GMed (p = 0.018). Bonferroni post hoc analysis revealed significant pairwise differences during eccentric actions for the BF, ST, and MGas. Post hoc analysis also revealed significant pairwise differences during concentric actions for the ES, BF, ST, MGas, and GMed. Each of these showed effect sizes that are large or greater. The main findings of this investigation are that the ST is substantially more active than the BF among all exercises, and hamstring activity was maximized in the RDL and glute-ham raise. Therefore, athletes and coaches who seek to maximize the involvement of the hamstring musculature should consider focusing on the glute-ham raise and RDL.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000302
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544016825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3333109851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5292-f4bf5a65ca639d899add210bc5290bbb8801c7cc0af75c2692ef62a172f3f73f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwhFYsMmxc_EXlalUFARCx5by3FsmpI0xU4o_D0uLQh1gZiNR-MzV9e-ABwj2EcMifOb-2Ef_i4C8Q7oIkZITDFPd0MPExpziFAHHHg_gxAzxsg-6GCKqEgp7wJ623pdmmigm-JNNUU9jy5aV8yfoyflirr10VhVvvmajN6N04U3_hDsWVV6c7Q5e-DxcvQwHMeTu6vr4WASa4YFji3NLFMJ0yohIudCqDzHCGarW5hlGQ_WdKo1VDZlGicCG5tghVJsiU2JJT1wttZduPq1Nb6RVeG1KUs1N8GaRIxSiBKO2T9QzAkRSKCAnm6hs7p18_CQQBGGU0JJEii6prSrvXfGyoUrKuU-JIJyFYAMAcjtAMLayUa8zSqT_yx9_3gA-BpY1mVjnH8p26VxcmpU2Uz_1v4EttKPYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1535273436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Muscle Activation During Various Hamstring Exercises</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>McAllister, Matt J ; Hammond, Kelley G ; Schilling, Brian K ; Ferreria, Lucas C ; Reed, Jacob P ; Weiss, Lawrence W</creator><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Matt J ; Hammond, Kelley G ; Schilling, Brian K ; Ferreria, Lucas C ; Reed, Jacob P ; Weiss, Lawrence W</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACTMcAllister, MJ, Hammond, KG, Schilling, BK, Ferreria, LC, Reed, JP, and Weiss, LW. Muscle activation during various hamstring exercises. J Strength Cond Res 28(6)1573–1580, 2014—The dorsal muscles of the lower torso and extremities have often been denoted the “posterior chain.” These muscles are used to support the thoracic and lumbar spine and peripheral joints, including the hip, knee, and ankle on the dorsal aspect of the body. This study investigated the relative muscle activity of the hamstring group and selected surrounding musculature during the leg curl, good morning, glute-ham raise, and Romanian deadlift (RDL). Twelve healthy, weight-trained men performed duplicate trials of single repetitions at 85% 1-repetition maximum for each lift in random order, during which surface electromyography and joint angle data were obtained. Repeated measures analysis of variance across the 4 exercises was performed to compare the activity from the erector spinae (ES), gluteus medius (GMed), semitendinosus (ST), biceps femoris (BF), and medial gastrocnemius (MGas). Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were noted in eccentric muscle activity between exercise for the MGas (p &lt; 0.027), ST (p &lt; 0.001), BF (p &lt; 0.001), and ES (p = 0.032), and in concentric muscle activity, for the ES (p &lt; 0.001), BF (p = 0.010), ST (p = 0.009), MGas (p &lt; 0.001), and the GMed (p = 0.018). Bonferroni post hoc analysis revealed significant pairwise differences during eccentric actions for the BF, ST, and MGas. Post hoc analysis also revealed significant pairwise differences during concentric actions for the ES, BF, ST, MGas, and GMed. Each of these showed effect sizes that are large or greater. The main findings of this investigation are that the ST is substantially more active than the BF among all exercises, and hamstring activity was maximized in the RDL and glute-ham raise. Therefore, athletes and coaches who seek to maximize the involvement of the hamstring musculature should consider focusing on the glute-ham raise and RDL.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000302</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24149748</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anthropometry ; Comparative analysis ; Electromyography ; Exercise ; Exercise - physiology ; Exercise Test ; Humans ; Joints ; Leg - physiology ; Male ; Muscle Contraction - physiology ; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology ; Muscular system ; Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2014-06, Vol.28 (6), p.1573-1580</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association.</rights><rights>Copyright Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Jun 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5292-f4bf5a65ca639d899add210bc5290bbb8801c7cc0af75c2692ef62a172f3f73f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5292-f4bf5a65ca639d899add210bc5290bbb8801c7cc0af75c2692ef62a172f3f73f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24149748$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Matt J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Kelley G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Brian K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreria, Lucas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Jacob P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Lawrence W</creatorcontrib><title>Muscle Activation During Various Hamstring Exercises</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><description>ABSTRACTMcAllister, MJ, Hammond, KG, Schilling, BK, Ferreria, LC, Reed, JP, and Weiss, LW. Muscle activation during various hamstring exercises. J Strength Cond Res 28(6)1573–1580, 2014—The dorsal muscles of the lower torso and extremities have often been denoted the “posterior chain.” These muscles are used to support the thoracic and lumbar spine and peripheral joints, including the hip, knee, and ankle on the dorsal aspect of the body. This study investigated the relative muscle activity of the hamstring group and selected surrounding musculature during the leg curl, good morning, glute-ham raise, and Romanian deadlift (RDL). Twelve healthy, weight-trained men performed duplicate trials of single repetitions at 85% 1-repetition maximum for each lift in random order, during which surface electromyography and joint angle data were obtained. Repeated measures analysis of variance across the 4 exercises was performed to compare the activity from the erector spinae (ES), gluteus medius (GMed), semitendinosus (ST), biceps femoris (BF), and medial gastrocnemius (MGas). Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were noted in eccentric muscle activity between exercise for the MGas (p &lt; 0.027), ST (p &lt; 0.001), BF (p &lt; 0.001), and ES (p = 0.032), and in concentric muscle activity, for the ES (p &lt; 0.001), BF (p = 0.010), ST (p = 0.009), MGas (p &lt; 0.001), and the GMed (p = 0.018). Bonferroni post hoc analysis revealed significant pairwise differences during eccentric actions for the BF, ST, and MGas. Post hoc analysis also revealed significant pairwise differences during concentric actions for the ES, BF, ST, MGas, and GMed. Each of these showed effect sizes that are large or greater. The main findings of this investigation are that the ST is substantially more active than the BF among all exercises, and hamstring activity was maximized in the RDL and glute-ham raise. Therefore, athletes and coaches who seek to maximize the involvement of the hamstring musculature should consider focusing on the glute-ham raise and RDL.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise Test</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joints</subject><subject>Leg - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Muscle Contraction - physiology</subject><subject>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</subject><subject>Muscular system</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctOwzAQRS0EoqXwBwhFYsMmxc_EXlalUFARCx5by3FsmpI0xU4o_D0uLQh1gZiNR-MzV9e-ABwj2EcMifOb-2Ef_i4C8Q7oIkZITDFPd0MPExpziFAHHHg_gxAzxsg-6GCKqEgp7wJ623pdmmigm-JNNUU9jy5aV8yfoyflirr10VhVvvmajN6N04U3_hDsWVV6c7Q5e-DxcvQwHMeTu6vr4WASa4YFji3NLFMJ0yohIudCqDzHCGarW5hlGQ_WdKo1VDZlGicCG5tghVJsiU2JJT1wttZduPq1Nb6RVeG1KUs1N8GaRIxSiBKO2T9QzAkRSKCAnm6hs7p18_CQQBGGU0JJEii6prSrvXfGyoUrKuU-JIJyFYAMAcjtAMLayUa8zSqT_yx9_3gA-BpY1mVjnH8p26VxcmpU2Uz_1v4EttKPYg</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>McAllister, Matt J</creator><creator>Hammond, Kelley G</creator><creator>Schilling, Brian K</creator><creator>Ferreria, Lucas C</creator><creator>Reed, Jacob P</creator><creator>Weiss, Lawrence W</creator><general>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>Muscle Activation During Various Hamstring Exercises</title><author>McAllister, Matt J ; Hammond, Kelley G ; Schilling, Brian K ; Ferreria, Lucas C ; Reed, Jacob P ; Weiss, Lawrence W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5292-f4bf5a65ca639d899add210bc5290bbb8801c7cc0af75c2692ef62a172f3f73f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise Test</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joints</topic><topic>Leg - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Muscle Contraction - physiology</topic><topic>Muscle, Skeletal - physiology</topic><topic>Muscular system</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McAllister, Matt J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammond, Kelley G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schilling, Brian K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreria, Lucas C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reed, Jacob P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Lawrence W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McAllister, Matt J</au><au>Hammond, Kelley G</au><au>Schilling, Brian K</au><au>Ferreria, Lucas C</au><au>Reed, Jacob P</au><au>Weiss, Lawrence W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Muscle Activation During Various Hamstring Exercises</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><addtitle>J Strength Cond Res</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1573</spage><epage>1580</epage><pages>1573-1580</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACTMcAllister, MJ, Hammond, KG, Schilling, BK, Ferreria, LC, Reed, JP, and Weiss, LW. Muscle activation during various hamstring exercises. J Strength Cond Res 28(6)1573–1580, 2014—The dorsal muscles of the lower torso and extremities have often been denoted the “posterior chain.” These muscles are used to support the thoracic and lumbar spine and peripheral joints, including the hip, knee, and ankle on the dorsal aspect of the body. This study investigated the relative muscle activity of the hamstring group and selected surrounding musculature during the leg curl, good morning, glute-ham raise, and Romanian deadlift (RDL). Twelve healthy, weight-trained men performed duplicate trials of single repetitions at 85% 1-repetition maximum for each lift in random order, during which surface electromyography and joint angle data were obtained. Repeated measures analysis of variance across the 4 exercises was performed to compare the activity from the erector spinae (ES), gluteus medius (GMed), semitendinosus (ST), biceps femoris (BF), and medial gastrocnemius (MGas). Significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) were noted in eccentric muscle activity between exercise for the MGas (p &lt; 0.027), ST (p &lt; 0.001), BF (p &lt; 0.001), and ES (p = 0.032), and in concentric muscle activity, for the ES (p &lt; 0.001), BF (p = 0.010), ST (p = 0.009), MGas (p &lt; 0.001), and the GMed (p = 0.018). Bonferroni post hoc analysis revealed significant pairwise differences during eccentric actions for the BF, ST, and MGas. Post hoc analysis also revealed significant pairwise differences during concentric actions for the ES, BF, ST, MGas, and GMed. Each of these showed effect sizes that are large or greater. The main findings of this investigation are that the ST is substantially more active than the BF among all exercises, and hamstring activity was maximized in the RDL and glute-ham raise. Therefore, athletes and coaches who seek to maximize the involvement of the hamstring musculature should consider focusing on the glute-ham raise and RDL.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by the National Strength &amp; Conditioning Association</pub><pmid>24149748</pmid><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000000302</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2014-06, Vol.28 (6), p.1573-1580
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544016825
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Adult
Anthropometry
Comparative analysis
Electromyography
Exercise
Exercise - physiology
Exercise Test
Humans
Joints
Leg - physiology
Male
Muscle Contraction - physiology
Muscle, Skeletal - physiology
Muscular system
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
title Muscle Activation During Various Hamstring Exercises
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T06%3A17%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Muscle%20Activation%20During%20Various%20Hamstring%20Exercises&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=McAllister,%20Matt%20J&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1573&rft.epage=1580&rft.pages=1573-1580&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000000302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3333109851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1535273436&rft_id=info:pmid/24149748&rfr_iscdi=true