Use of multi-slice computed tomography in patients with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department

This study evaluates calcium scoring (CS) and computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) in patients >50 years with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department utilising CS as a “diagnostic filter” upfront. Results of CS and MSCTA performed by a 64-slice CT scanner were compared to invasive cor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2014, Vol.30 (1), p.145-153
Hauptverfasser: von Ziegler, Franz, Schenzle, Jan, Schiessl, Stephan, Greif, Martin, Helbig, Susanne, Tittus, Janine, Becker, Christoph, Becker, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153
container_issue 1
container_start_page 145
container_title International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
container_volume 30
creator von Ziegler, Franz
Schenzle, Jan
Schiessl, Stephan
Greif, Martin
Helbig, Susanne
Tittus, Janine
Becker, Christoph
Becker, Alexander
description This study evaluates calcium scoring (CS) and computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) in patients >50 years with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department utilising CS as a “diagnostic filter” upfront. Results of CS and MSCTA performed by a 64-slice CT scanner were compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). 289 consecutive symptomatic patients (185 men, mean age 71.3 ± 6.4 years) were included. In patients with CS = 0 (Group I; n = 60) or CS > 400 (Group III; n = 95) we refrained from MSCTA, whereas patients with CS 1–400 (Group II; n = 134) underwent subsequent MSCTA. ICA detected significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in 162 patients (56.1 %; male 98). None of Group I-patients showed CAD, but in Group III CAD prevalence increased to 82.1 %. In Group II, MSCTA correctly identified 177/190 significantly diseased vessel segments. Compared to CS alone, our approach increased sensitivity to 98.1 % (+1.8 %), specificity to 82.6 % (+27.5 %) and negative predictive value (NPV) to 97.2 % (+5.1 %) as well as positive predictive value to 87.8 % (+14.6 %), respectively. Overall DA was 91.3 %. Stratification of symptomatic patients into three different risk groups according to CS results with concomitantly increasing disease prevalence is possible. Zero calcium was found to exclude significant CAD, but needs further evaluation. Still server calcifications impair image quality in MSCTA. Thus direct referral to ICA might be a reasonable approach in case of high CS. In patients with intermediate CS, MSCTA is able to rule out significant CAD with a high NPV.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10554-013-0292-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544008531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1544008531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3bcf82407c2c5892be56be40cdef02a5a26b6a0f95c95a9747948c480f09759a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctqHDEQRUWI8fsDsgmCbLKRXXpNt5bBOLbB4I1nLdSa6uk2_YqkJszfW-OemBAIXkmizr1VpUvIFw5XHKC4jhy0Vgy4ZCCMYOYTOeW6yK9Cyc_7-8owXRh1Qs5ifAEAAUIekxOhQGaFPiXNOiIda9rPXWpZ7FqP1I_9NCfc0DT24za4qdnRdqCTSy0OKdLfbWqobzAmNrlciHPVt2kR0NQgxR7DFge_oxucXEh9ll2Qo9p1ES8P5zlZ_7x9vrlnj093Dzc_HplXoBOTla_LPF7hhdelERXqVYUK_AZrEE47sapWDmqjvdHOFCpvV3pVQg2m0MbJc_J98Z3C-GvOM9q-jR67zg04ztFyrRRAqSX_GFVGFEIqoTL67R_0ZZzDkBd5owSXHEym-EL5MMYYsLZTaHsXdpaD3Sdml8RsTszuE7N7zdeDc_5F3Lwr_kSUAbEAMZeGLYa_Wv_X9RWngaCc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492213109</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of multi-slice computed tomography in patients with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink</source><creator>von Ziegler, Franz ; Schenzle, Jan ; Schiessl, Stephan ; Greif, Martin ; Helbig, Susanne ; Tittus, Janine ; Becker, Christoph ; Becker, Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>von Ziegler, Franz ; Schenzle, Jan ; Schiessl, Stephan ; Greif, Martin ; Helbig, Susanne ; Tittus, Janine ; Becker, Christoph ; Becker, Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluates calcium scoring (CS) and computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) in patients &gt;50 years with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department utilising CS as a “diagnostic filter” upfront. Results of CS and MSCTA performed by a 64-slice CT scanner were compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). 289 consecutive symptomatic patients (185 men, mean age 71.3 ± 6.4 years) were included. In patients with CS = 0 (Group I; n = 60) or CS &gt; 400 (Group III; n = 95) we refrained from MSCTA, whereas patients with CS 1–400 (Group II; n = 134) underwent subsequent MSCTA. ICA detected significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in 162 patients (56.1 %; male 98). None of Group I-patients showed CAD, but in Group III CAD prevalence increased to 82.1 %. In Group II, MSCTA correctly identified 177/190 significantly diseased vessel segments. Compared to CS alone, our approach increased sensitivity to 98.1 % (+1.8 %), specificity to 82.6 % (+27.5 %) and negative predictive value (NPV) to 97.2 % (+5.1 %) as well as positive predictive value to 87.8 % (+14.6 %), respectively. Overall DA was 91.3 %. Stratification of symptomatic patients into three different risk groups according to CS results with concomitantly increasing disease prevalence is possible. Zero calcium was found to exclude significant CAD, but needs further evaluation. Still server calcifications impair image quality in MSCTA. Thus direct referral to ICA might be a reasonable approach in case of high CS. In patients with intermediate CS, MSCTA is able to rule out significant CAD with a high NPV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1569-5794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0743</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-8312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0292-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24030295</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJCIBI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angina Pectoris - diagnostic imaging ; Angina Pectoris - epidemiology ; Cardiac Imaging ; Cardiology ; Cardiology Service, Hospital - utilization ; Coronary Angiography - methods ; Coronary Angiography - utilization ; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Artery Disease - epidemiology ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multidetector Computed Tomography - utilization ; Original Paper ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prevalence ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Radiology ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging ; Vascular Calcification - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2014, Vol.30 (1), p.145-153</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3bcf82407c2c5892be56be40cdef02a5a26b6a0f95c95a9747948c480f09759a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3bcf82407c2c5892be56be40cdef02a5a26b6a0f95c95a9747948c480f09759a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10554-013-0292-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10554-013-0292-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24030295$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>von Ziegler, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenzle, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiessl, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greif, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helbig, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tittus, Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>Use of multi-slice computed tomography in patients with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department</title><title>International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><description>This study evaluates calcium scoring (CS) and computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) in patients &gt;50 years with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department utilising CS as a “diagnostic filter” upfront. Results of CS and MSCTA performed by a 64-slice CT scanner were compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). 289 consecutive symptomatic patients (185 men, mean age 71.3 ± 6.4 years) were included. In patients with CS = 0 (Group I; n = 60) or CS &gt; 400 (Group III; n = 95) we refrained from MSCTA, whereas patients with CS 1–400 (Group II; n = 134) underwent subsequent MSCTA. ICA detected significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in 162 patients (56.1 %; male 98). None of Group I-patients showed CAD, but in Group III CAD prevalence increased to 82.1 %. In Group II, MSCTA correctly identified 177/190 significantly diseased vessel segments. Compared to CS alone, our approach increased sensitivity to 98.1 % (+1.8 %), specificity to 82.6 % (+27.5 %) and negative predictive value (NPV) to 97.2 % (+5.1 %) as well as positive predictive value to 87.8 % (+14.6 %), respectively. Overall DA was 91.3 %. Stratification of symptomatic patients into three different risk groups according to CS results with concomitantly increasing disease prevalence is possible. Zero calcium was found to exclude significant CAD, but needs further evaluation. Still server calcifications impair image quality in MSCTA. Thus direct referral to ICA might be a reasonable approach in case of high CS. In patients with intermediate CS, MSCTA is able to rule out significant CAD with a high NPV.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angina Pectoris - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Angina Pectoris - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cardiac Imaging</subject><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Cardiology Service, Hospital - utilization</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - methods</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography - utilization</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multidetector Computed Tomography - utilization</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Vascular Calcification - epidemiology</subject><issn>1569-5794</issn><issn>1573-0743</issn><issn>1875-8312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctqHDEQRUWI8fsDsgmCbLKRXXpNt5bBOLbB4I1nLdSa6uk2_YqkJszfW-OemBAIXkmizr1VpUvIFw5XHKC4jhy0Vgy4ZCCMYOYTOeW6yK9Cyc_7-8owXRh1Qs5ifAEAAUIekxOhQGaFPiXNOiIda9rPXWpZ7FqP1I_9NCfc0DT24za4qdnRdqCTSy0OKdLfbWqobzAmNrlciHPVt2kR0NQgxR7DFge_oxucXEh9ll2Qo9p1ES8P5zlZ_7x9vrlnj093Dzc_HplXoBOTla_LPF7hhdelERXqVYUK_AZrEE47sapWDmqjvdHOFCpvV3pVQg2m0MbJc_J98Z3C-GvOM9q-jR67zg04ztFyrRRAqSX_GFVGFEIqoTL67R_0ZZzDkBd5owSXHEym-EL5MMYYsLZTaHsXdpaD3Sdml8RsTszuE7N7zdeDc_5F3Lwr_kSUAbEAMZeGLYa_Wv_X9RWngaCc</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>von Ziegler, Franz</creator><creator>Schenzle, Jan</creator><creator>Schiessl, Stephan</creator><creator>Greif, Martin</creator><creator>Helbig, Susanne</creator><creator>Tittus, Janine</creator><creator>Becker, Christoph</creator><creator>Becker, Alexander</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Use of multi-slice computed tomography in patients with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department</title><author>von Ziegler, Franz ; Schenzle, Jan ; Schiessl, Stephan ; Greif, Martin ; Helbig, Susanne ; Tittus, Janine ; Becker, Christoph ; Becker, Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3bcf82407c2c5892be56be40cdef02a5a26b6a0f95c95a9747948c480f09759a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angina Pectoris - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Angina Pectoris - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cardiac Imaging</topic><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Cardiology Service, Hospital - utilization</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - methods</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography - utilization</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multidetector Computed Tomography - utilization</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Vascular Calcification - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>von Ziegler, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schenzle, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiessl, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greif, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helbig, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tittus, Janine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becker, Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health &amp; Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>von Ziegler, Franz</au><au>Schenzle, Jan</au><au>Schiessl, Stephan</au><au>Greif, Martin</au><au>Helbig, Susanne</au><au>Tittus, Janine</au><au>Becker, Christoph</au><au>Becker, Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of multi-slice computed tomography in patients with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging</jtitle><stitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</stitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiovasc Imaging</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>145-153</pages><issn>1569-5794</issn><eissn>1573-0743</eissn><eissn>1875-8312</eissn><coden>IJCIBI</coden><abstract>This study evaluates calcium scoring (CS) and computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) in patients &gt;50 years with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department utilising CS as a “diagnostic filter” upfront. Results of CS and MSCTA performed by a 64-slice CT scanner were compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). 289 consecutive symptomatic patients (185 men, mean age 71.3 ± 6.4 years) were included. In patients with CS = 0 (Group I; n = 60) or CS &gt; 400 (Group III; n = 95) we refrained from MSCTA, whereas patients with CS 1–400 (Group II; n = 134) underwent subsequent MSCTA. ICA detected significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in 162 patients (56.1 %; male 98). None of Group I-patients showed CAD, but in Group III CAD prevalence increased to 82.1 %. In Group II, MSCTA correctly identified 177/190 significantly diseased vessel segments. Compared to CS alone, our approach increased sensitivity to 98.1 % (+1.8 %), specificity to 82.6 % (+27.5 %) and negative predictive value (NPV) to 97.2 % (+5.1 %) as well as positive predictive value to 87.8 % (+14.6 %), respectively. Overall DA was 91.3 %. Stratification of symptomatic patients into three different risk groups according to CS results with concomitantly increasing disease prevalence is possible. Zero calcium was found to exclude significant CAD, but needs further evaluation. Still server calcifications impair image quality in MSCTA. Thus direct referral to ICA might be a reasonable approach in case of high CS. In patients with intermediate CS, MSCTA is able to rule out significant CAD with a high NPV.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>24030295</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10554-013-0292-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1569-5794
ispartof International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2014, Vol.30 (1), p.145-153
issn 1569-5794
1573-0743
1875-8312
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544008531
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink
subjects Aged
Angina Pectoris - diagnostic imaging
Angina Pectoris - epidemiology
Cardiac Imaging
Cardiology
Cardiology Service, Hospital - utilization
Coronary Angiography - methods
Coronary Angiography - utilization
Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease - epidemiology
Cross-Sectional Studies
Emergency Service, Hospital - utilization
Female
Germany
Humans
Imaging
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Multidetector Computed Tomography - utilization
Original Paper
Predictive Value of Tests
Prevalence
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Radiology
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Vascular Calcification - diagnostic imaging
Vascular Calcification - epidemiology
title Use of multi-slice computed tomography in patients with chest-pain submitted to the emergency department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A01%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20multi-slice%20computed%20tomography%20in%20patients%20with%20chest-pain%20submitted%20to%20the%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Cardiovascular%20Imaging&rft.au=von%20Ziegler,%20Franz&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=145-153&rft.issn=1569-5794&rft.eissn=1573-0743&rft.coden=IJCIBI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10554-013-0292-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1544008531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492213109&rft_id=info:pmid/24030295&rfr_iscdi=true