Attitudes of Legal Guardians in the ICU – A qualitative report

Decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs) is often made by surrogates, since patients are unconscious or incompetent. In Israel, Legal Guardians (LGs), appointed by the court, are required to make these decisions. To qualitatively assess the attitudes of LGs required to make decisions on behalf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intensive & critical care nursing 2014-04, Vol.30 (2), p.86-92
Hauptverfasser: Kuniavsky, Michael, van Heerden, Peter V., Kadmon, Ilana, DeKeyser Ganz, Freda, Linton, David M., Sviri, Sigal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue 2
container_start_page 86
container_title Intensive & critical care nursing
container_volume 30
creator Kuniavsky, Michael
van Heerden, Peter V.
Kadmon, Ilana
DeKeyser Ganz, Freda
Linton, David M.
Sviri, Sigal
description Decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs) is often made by surrogates, since patients are unconscious or incompetent. In Israel, Legal Guardians (LGs), appointed by the court, are required to make these decisions. To qualitatively assess the attitudes of LGs required to make decisions on behalf of their relatives. Demographic and semi-structured questionnaires were used to assess the attitudes of LGs regarding difficulties, positive aspects and areas for improvement with regard to surrogate decision-making. The study sampled sixty-four LGs in two large Israeli hospitals. After reading and analysing the responses provided by the LGs, the authors categorised the pertinent topics raised using a thematic analysis. Themes were: bureaucratic and legal issues, unclear or unknown patient preferences and fear of outcomes. Family and medical staff support was stated as the most beneficial. Suggestions for improvement included alleviation of bureaucracy and improved communication with the medical staff. The importance of communication and bureaucratic difficulties, making the best decision for the patient and uncertainty regarding decision outcomes were found to be important issue for the LGs. The healthcare team should try and alleviate some of these burdens, mostly by improving communication with relatives, stressing and educating the importance of advance directives. Reporting the problems found in the decision making process of LGs to the legislators in order to revise and simplify the current legal requirements is advised.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.10.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544006522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0964339713000943</els_id><sourcerecordid>1494306005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-33399f6c87068ad38704356c0b1af5b4f645a68c41fdb34dd97ad0ba19f0c07c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9qGzEQh0VoSNy0L5BDEPSSi53RX6-ghxrTpgFDLvFZaCVtKrPedSRtILe8Q96wT1ItdnrooclpYPjmx8x8CJ0TmBEg8mozC9Z2MwqElcYMgB6hCRGMTjkw-QFNQEk-ZUzNT9HHlDYAoFglTtAp5ZQQ4GqCvi1yDnlwPuG-wSt_b1p8PZjogukSDh3Ovzy-Wa7x7-cXvMAPg2lDNjk8ehz9ro_5EzpuTJv850M9Q-sf3--WP6er2-ub5WI1tVxALlswpRppqznIyjhWKmdCWqiJaUTNG8mFkZXlpHE1486puXFQG6IasDC37Axd7nN3sX8YfMp6G5L1bWs63w9JE8E5gBSUvgOlwMr5rHob5YozkACioF_-QTf9ELty80hREAJgDKR7ysY-pegbvYtha-KTJqBHa3qjR2t6tDb2irUydHGIHuqtd39HXjUV4Ose8OXDj8FHnWzwnfUuRG-zdn34X_4fKDSlCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1492055008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attitudes of Legal Guardians in the ICU – A qualitative report</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kuniavsky, Michael ; van Heerden, Peter V. ; Kadmon, Ilana ; DeKeyser Ganz, Freda ; Linton, David M. ; Sviri, Sigal</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuniavsky, Michael ; van Heerden, Peter V. ; Kadmon, Ilana ; DeKeyser Ganz, Freda ; Linton, David M. ; Sviri, Sigal</creatorcontrib><description>Decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs) is often made by surrogates, since patients are unconscious or incompetent. In Israel, Legal Guardians (LGs), appointed by the court, are required to make these decisions. To qualitatively assess the attitudes of LGs required to make decisions on behalf of their relatives. Demographic and semi-structured questionnaires were used to assess the attitudes of LGs regarding difficulties, positive aspects and areas for improvement with regard to surrogate decision-making. The study sampled sixty-four LGs in two large Israeli hospitals. After reading and analysing the responses provided by the LGs, the authors categorised the pertinent topics raised using a thematic analysis. Themes were: bureaucratic and legal issues, unclear or unknown patient preferences and fear of outcomes. Family and medical staff support was stated as the most beneficial. Suggestions for improvement included alleviation of bureaucracy and improved communication with the medical staff. The importance of communication and bureaucratic difficulties, making the best decision for the patient and uncertainty regarding decision outcomes were found to be important issue for the LGs. The healthcare team should try and alleviate some of these burdens, mostly by improving communication with relatives, stressing and educating the importance of advance directives. Reporting the problems found in the decision making process of LGs to the legislators in order to revise and simplify the current legal requirements is advised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-3397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-4036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.10.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24211049</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Advance Directives ; Agreements ; Attitude ; Attitudes ; Communication ; Critical Care Nursing ; Critical Illness ; Decision Making ; Female ; Guardians ; Hospitals ; Humans ; ICU ; Informed consent ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units ; Israel ; Legal Guardian ; Legal Guardians - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; Ostomy ; Patients ; Qualitative research ; Surrogate decision making ; Surrogates</subject><ispartof>Intensive &amp; critical care nursing, 2014-04, Vol.30 (2), p.86-92</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Apr 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-33399f6c87068ad38704356c0b1af5b4f645a68c41fdb34dd97ad0ba19f0c07c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-33399f6c87068ad38704356c0b1af5b4f645a68c41fdb34dd97ad0ba19f0c07c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339713000943$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,12825,27901,27902,30976,30977,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24211049$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuniavsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Heerden, Peter V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadmon, Ilana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeKeyser Ganz, Freda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linton, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sviri, Sigal</creatorcontrib><title>Attitudes of Legal Guardians in the ICU – A qualitative report</title><title>Intensive &amp; critical care nursing</title><addtitle>Intensive Crit Care Nurs</addtitle><description>Decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs) is often made by surrogates, since patients are unconscious or incompetent. In Israel, Legal Guardians (LGs), appointed by the court, are required to make these decisions. To qualitatively assess the attitudes of LGs required to make decisions on behalf of their relatives. Demographic and semi-structured questionnaires were used to assess the attitudes of LGs regarding difficulties, positive aspects and areas for improvement with regard to surrogate decision-making. The study sampled sixty-four LGs in two large Israeli hospitals. After reading and analysing the responses provided by the LGs, the authors categorised the pertinent topics raised using a thematic analysis. Themes were: bureaucratic and legal issues, unclear or unknown patient preferences and fear of outcomes. Family and medical staff support was stated as the most beneficial. Suggestions for improvement included alleviation of bureaucracy and improved communication with the medical staff. The importance of communication and bureaucratic difficulties, making the best decision for the patient and uncertainty regarding decision outcomes were found to be important issue for the LGs. The healthcare team should try and alleviate some of these burdens, mostly by improving communication with relatives, stressing and educating the importance of advance directives. Reporting the problems found in the decision making process of LGs to the legislators in order to revise and simplify the current legal requirements is advised.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Advance Directives</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Attitude</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Critical Care Nursing</subject><subject>Critical Illness</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guardians</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ICU</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Legal Guardian</subject><subject>Legal Guardians - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Surrogate decision making</subject><subject>Surrogates</subject><issn>0964-3397</issn><issn>1532-4036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9qGzEQh0VoSNy0L5BDEPSSi53RX6-ghxrTpgFDLvFZaCVtKrPedSRtILe8Q96wT1ItdnrooclpYPjmx8x8CJ0TmBEg8mozC9Z2MwqElcYMgB6hCRGMTjkw-QFNQEk-ZUzNT9HHlDYAoFglTtAp5ZQQ4GqCvi1yDnlwPuG-wSt_b1p8PZjogukSDh3Ovzy-Wa7x7-cXvMAPg2lDNjk8ehz9ro_5EzpuTJv850M9Q-sf3--WP6er2-ub5WI1tVxALlswpRppqznIyjhWKmdCWqiJaUTNG8mFkZXlpHE1486puXFQG6IasDC37Axd7nN3sX8YfMp6G5L1bWs63w9JE8E5gBSUvgOlwMr5rHob5YozkACioF_-QTf9ELty80hREAJgDKR7ysY-pegbvYtha-KTJqBHa3qjR2t6tDb2irUydHGIHuqtd39HXjUV4Ose8OXDj8FHnWzwnfUuRG-zdn34X_4fKDSlCQ</recordid><startdate>201404</startdate><enddate>201404</enddate><creator>Kuniavsky, Michael</creator><creator>van Heerden, Peter V.</creator><creator>Kadmon, Ilana</creator><creator>DeKeyser Ganz, Freda</creator><creator>Linton, David M.</creator><creator>Sviri, Sigal</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201404</creationdate><title>Attitudes of Legal Guardians in the ICU – A qualitative report</title><author>Kuniavsky, Michael ; van Heerden, Peter V. ; Kadmon, Ilana ; DeKeyser Ganz, Freda ; Linton, David M. ; Sviri, Sigal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-33399f6c87068ad38704356c0b1af5b4f645a68c41fdb34dd97ad0ba19f0c07c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Advance Directives</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Attitude</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Critical Care Nursing</topic><topic>Critical Illness</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guardians</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ICU</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Legal Guardian</topic><topic>Legal Guardians - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Surrogate decision making</topic><topic>Surrogates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuniavsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Heerden, Peter V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadmon, Ilana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeKeyser Ganz, Freda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linton, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sviri, Sigal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Intensive &amp; critical care nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuniavsky, Michael</au><au>van Heerden, Peter V.</au><au>Kadmon, Ilana</au><au>DeKeyser Ganz, Freda</au><au>Linton, David M.</au><au>Sviri, Sigal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attitudes of Legal Guardians in the ICU – A qualitative report</atitle><jtitle>Intensive &amp; critical care nursing</jtitle><addtitle>Intensive Crit Care Nurs</addtitle><date>2014-04</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>86</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>86-92</pages><issn>0964-3397</issn><eissn>1532-4036</eissn><abstract>Decision-making in intensive care units (ICUs) is often made by surrogates, since patients are unconscious or incompetent. In Israel, Legal Guardians (LGs), appointed by the court, are required to make these decisions. To qualitatively assess the attitudes of LGs required to make decisions on behalf of their relatives. Demographic and semi-structured questionnaires were used to assess the attitudes of LGs regarding difficulties, positive aspects and areas for improvement with regard to surrogate decision-making. The study sampled sixty-four LGs in two large Israeli hospitals. After reading and analysing the responses provided by the LGs, the authors categorised the pertinent topics raised using a thematic analysis. Themes were: bureaucratic and legal issues, unclear or unknown patient preferences and fear of outcomes. Family and medical staff support was stated as the most beneficial. Suggestions for improvement included alleviation of bureaucracy and improved communication with the medical staff. The importance of communication and bureaucratic difficulties, making the best decision for the patient and uncertainty regarding decision outcomes were found to be important issue for the LGs. The healthcare team should try and alleviate some of these burdens, mostly by improving communication with relatives, stressing and educating the importance of advance directives. Reporting the problems found in the decision making process of LGs to the legislators in order to revise and simplify the current legal requirements is advised.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>24211049</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.iccn.2013.10.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-3397
ispartof Intensive & critical care nursing, 2014-04, Vol.30 (2), p.86-92
issn 0964-3397
1532-4036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544006522
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Advance Directives
Agreements
Attitude
Attitudes
Communication
Critical Care Nursing
Critical Illness
Decision Making
Female
Guardians
Hospitals
Humans
ICU
Informed consent
Intensive care
Intensive Care Units
Israel
Legal Guardian
Legal Guardians - psychology
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing
Ostomy
Patients
Qualitative research
Surrogate decision making
Surrogates
title Attitudes of Legal Guardians in the ICU – A qualitative report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T01%3A03%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attitudes%20of%20Legal%20Guardians%20in%20the%20ICU%20%E2%80%93%20A%20qualitative%20report&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20&%20critical%20care%20nursing&rft.au=Kuniavsky,%20Michael&rft.date=2014-04&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=86&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=86-92&rft.issn=0964-3397&rft.eissn=1532-4036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.iccn.2013.10.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1494306005%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1492055008&rft_id=info:pmid/24211049&rft_els_id=S0964339713000943&rfr_iscdi=true