Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: Ischial containment versus brimless

Highlights • The brimless design was equivalent to IRC in gait and balance outcome measures. • Brimless design showed significant improvements in subjective function and QOL. • Vacuum assisted suspension may offer improved prosthetic interface techniques. • Brimless interface design is a clinically...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gait & posture 2014-06, Vol.40 (2), p.315-320
Hauptverfasser: Kahle, Jason T, Highsmith, M. Jason
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 320
container_issue 2
container_start_page 315
container_title Gait & posture
container_volume 40
creator Kahle, Jason T
Highsmith, M. Jason
description Highlights • The brimless design was equivalent to IRC in gait and balance outcome measures. • Brimless design showed significant improvements in subjective function and QOL. • Vacuum assisted suspension may offer improved prosthetic interface techniques. • Brimless interface design is a clinically viable choice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.206
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544006001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966636214004974</els_id><sourcerecordid>1537595898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-edb947f7f50dba0fdab4644417ac9d6c84c907425d8f9a29469ce5e6a3dc26733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk1v1TAQtBCIPgp_ofKRQ_OwHceJOSBQxUelShwoZ8uxN9QhiYM3eej9DP4xjl7LgQuc1pZmZ3dmlpALzvaccfWq33-zYZkjLnvBuNwzmat6RHa8qXUhBNePyY5ppQpVKnFGniH2jDFZNuIpOROyqUTFmh35dZvshB2MMdmBhmmB1FkHSH-G5Y4erFvXkVrEgAt4iivOMGGIE3VxnG0KmJ-xo9syl7S1g50cXFI7bdi2B7eEA-SvHY6Z4jW9RncX8iAXp8WGaYRpoQdImZe2KYwDID4nTzo7ILy4r-fk64f3t1efipvPH6-v3t0UTlZqKcC3WtZd3VXMt5Z13rZSSSl5bZ32yjXSaVZLUfmm01ZoqbSDCpQtvROqLstz8vLEO6f4YwVczBjQwZAlQFzR8EpKxhRj_D-gZV3pqtFNhqoT1KWImKAzc9Zl09FwZrbkTG8ekjNbcobJXFVuvLifsbYj-D9tD1FlwNsTALIphwDJoAuQ7fYhZZ-Nj-HfM978ReGGMAVnh-9wBOzjmnJSWY9BYZj5st3Pdj48GyF1LcvfWFnGjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1537595898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: Ischial containment versus brimless</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kahle, Jason T ; Highsmith, M. Jason</creator><creatorcontrib>Kahle, Jason T ; Highsmith, M. Jason</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • The brimless design was equivalent to IRC in gait and balance outcome measures. • Brimless design showed significant improvements in subjective function and QOL. • Vacuum assisted suspension may offer improved prosthetic interface techniques. • Brimless interface design is a clinically viable choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24852508</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Amputee ; Amputees - rehabilitation ; Artificial Limbs ; Biomechanics ; Cross-Over Studies ; Female ; Gait - physiology ; Humans ; Ischium - physiology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Patient Satisfaction ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Prosthesis Design ; Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire ; Prosthetic ; Quality of Life ; Socket ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vacuum ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Gait &amp; posture, 2014-06, Vol.40 (2), p.315-320</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-edb947f7f50dba0fdab4644417ac9d6c84c907425d8f9a29469ce5e6a3dc26733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-edb947f7f50dba0fdab4644417ac9d6c84c907425d8f9a29469ce5e6a3dc26733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636214004974$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24852508$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kahle, Jason T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Highsmith, M. Jason</creatorcontrib><title>Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: Ischial containment versus brimless</title><title>Gait &amp; posture</title><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><description>Highlights • The brimless design was equivalent to IRC in gait and balance outcome measures. • Brimless design showed significant improvements in subjective function and QOL. • Vacuum assisted suspension may offer improved prosthetic interface techniques. • Brimless interface design is a clinically viable choice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Amputee</subject><subject>Amputees - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Artificial Limbs</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischium - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire</subject><subject>Prosthetic</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Socket</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vacuum</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0966-6362</issn><issn>1879-2219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk1v1TAQtBCIPgp_ofKRQ_OwHceJOSBQxUelShwoZ8uxN9QhiYM3eej9DP4xjl7LgQuc1pZmZ3dmlpALzvaccfWq33-zYZkjLnvBuNwzmat6RHa8qXUhBNePyY5ppQpVKnFGniH2jDFZNuIpOROyqUTFmh35dZvshB2MMdmBhmmB1FkHSH-G5Y4erFvXkVrEgAt4iivOMGGIE3VxnG0KmJ-xo9syl7S1g50cXFI7bdi2B7eEA-SvHY6Z4jW9RncX8iAXp8WGaYRpoQdImZe2KYwDID4nTzo7ILy4r-fk64f3t1efipvPH6-v3t0UTlZqKcC3WtZd3VXMt5Z13rZSSSl5bZ32yjXSaVZLUfmm01ZoqbSDCpQtvROqLstz8vLEO6f4YwVczBjQwZAlQFzR8EpKxhRj_D-gZV3pqtFNhqoT1KWImKAzc9Zl09FwZrbkTG8ekjNbcobJXFVuvLifsbYj-D9tD1FlwNsTALIphwDJoAuQ7fYhZZ-Nj-HfM978ReGGMAVnh-9wBOzjmnJSWY9BYZj5st3Pdj48GyF1LcvfWFnGjA</recordid><startdate>20140601</startdate><enddate>20140601</enddate><creator>Kahle, Jason T</creator><creator>Highsmith, M. Jason</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140601</creationdate><title>Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: Ischial containment versus brimless</title><author>Kahle, Jason T ; Highsmith, M. Jason</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-edb947f7f50dba0fdab4644417ac9d6c84c907425d8f9a29469ce5e6a3dc26733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Amputee</topic><topic>Amputees - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Artificial Limbs</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischium - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire</topic><topic>Prosthetic</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Socket</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vacuum</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kahle, Jason T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Highsmith, M. Jason</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kahle, Jason T</au><au>Highsmith, M. Jason</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: Ischial containment versus brimless</atitle><jtitle>Gait &amp; posture</jtitle><addtitle>Gait Posture</addtitle><date>2014-06-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>315</spage><epage>320</epage><pages>315-320</pages><issn>0966-6362</issn><eissn>1879-2219</eissn><abstract>Highlights • The brimless design was equivalent to IRC in gait and balance outcome measures. • Brimless design showed significant improvements in subjective function and QOL. • Vacuum assisted suspension may offer improved prosthetic interface techniques. • Brimless interface design is a clinically viable choice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24852508</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.206</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6362
ispartof Gait & posture, 2014-06, Vol.40 (2), p.315-320
issn 0966-6362
1879-2219
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544006001
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Amputee
Amputees - rehabilitation
Artificial Limbs
Biomechanics
Cross-Over Studies
Female
Gait - physiology
Humans
Ischium - physiology
Male
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Patient Satisfaction
Postural Balance - physiology
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire
Prosthetic
Quality of Life
Socket
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vacuum
Young Adult
title Transfemoral interfaces with vacuum assisted suspension comparison of gait, balance, and subjective analysis: Ischial containment versus brimless
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A49%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transfemoral%20interfaces%20with%20vacuum%20assisted%20suspension%20comparison%20of%20gait,%20balance,%20and%20subjective%20analysis:%20Ischial%20containment%20versus%20brimless&rft.jtitle=Gait%20&%20posture&rft.au=Kahle,%20Jason%20T&rft.date=2014-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=320&rft.pages=315-320&rft.issn=0966-6362&rft.eissn=1879-2219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.04.206&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1537595898%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1537595898&rft_id=info:pmid/24852508&rft_els_id=S0966636214004974&rfr_iscdi=true