The case for assessing cannabidiol in epilepsy

Summary Intractable epilepsies have an extraordinary impact on cognitive and behavioral function and quality of life, and the treatment of seizures represents a challenge and a unique opportunity. Over the past few years, considerable attention has focused on cannabidiol (CBD), the major nonpsychotr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Epilepsia (Copenhagen) 2014-06, Vol.55 (6), p.787-790
Hauptverfasser: Cilio, Maria Roberta, Thiele, Elizabeth A., Devinsky, Orrin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 790
container_issue 6
container_start_page 787
container_title Epilepsia (Copenhagen)
container_volume 55
creator Cilio, Maria Roberta
Thiele, Elizabeth A.
Devinsky, Orrin
description Summary Intractable epilepsies have an extraordinary impact on cognitive and behavioral function and quality of life, and the treatment of seizures represents a challenge and a unique opportunity. Over the past few years, considerable attention has focused on cannabidiol (CBD), the major nonpsychotropic compound of Cannabis sativa. Basic research studies have provided strong evidence for safety and anticonvulsant properties of CBD. However, the lack of pure, pharmacologically active compounds and legal restrictions have prevented clinical research and confined data on efficacy and safety to anecdotal reports. Pure CBD appears to be an ideal candidate among phytocannabinoids as a therapy for treatment‐resistant epilepsy. A first step in this direction is to systematically investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and interactions of CBD with other antiepileptic drugs and obtain an initial signal regarding efficacy at different dosages. These data can then be used to plan double‐blinded placebo‐controlled efficacy trials. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/epi.12635
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544003239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1535631629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4875-69b077e90712bc60f50370aa60c8ff04e238105ac71d288a5d945ac9b6c8a3ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E9LwzAYBvAgipvTg19ACl700O1N0vzpUcbUwUAP8xzS9K12dO1sLLJvb7ZOD4JgLiHhx5M3DyGXFMY0rAluyjFlkosjMqSC6ZhSqY7JEIDyOBUaBuTM-xUAKKn4KRmwRIsk4cmQjJdvGDnrMSqaNrLeo_dl_Rqu6tpmZV42VVTWUXihwo3fnpOTwlYeLw77iLzcz5bTx3jx9DCf3i1il2glYplmoBSmoCjLnIRCAFdgrQSniwISZFxTENYpmjOtrcjTJJzSTDptOSIfkZs-d9M27x36D7MuvcOqsjU2nTc0jA_AGU__QbmQnEq2o9e_6Krp2jp8ZK9ASskhqNteubbxvsXCbNpybdutoWB2fZvQhtn3HezVIbHL1pj_yO-CA5j04DMUuP07ycye533kF46Lhik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1535066630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The case for assessing cannabidiol in epilepsy</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Archive</source><source>IngentaConnect Open Access</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Cilio, Maria Roberta ; Thiele, Elizabeth A. ; Devinsky, Orrin</creator><creatorcontrib>Cilio, Maria Roberta ; Thiele, Elizabeth A. ; Devinsky, Orrin</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Intractable epilepsies have an extraordinary impact on cognitive and behavioral function and quality of life, and the treatment of seizures represents a challenge and a unique opportunity. Over the past few years, considerable attention has focused on cannabidiol (CBD), the major nonpsychotropic compound of Cannabis sativa. Basic research studies have provided strong evidence for safety and anticonvulsant properties of CBD. However, the lack of pure, pharmacologically active compounds and legal restrictions have prevented clinical research and confined data on efficacy and safety to anecdotal reports. Pure CBD appears to be an ideal candidate among phytocannabinoids as a therapy for treatment‐resistant epilepsy. A first step in this direction is to systematically investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and interactions of CBD with other antiepileptic drugs and obtain an initial signal regarding efficacy at different dosages. These data can then be used to plan double‐blinded placebo‐controlled efficacy trials. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9580</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1167</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/epi.12635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24854434</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPILAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anticonvulsants - adverse effects ; Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use ; Cannabidiol ; Cannabidiol - adverse effects ; Cannabidiol - therapeutic use ; Cannabis sativa ; Childhood ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy - drug therapy ; Humans ; Phytotherapy ; Plant Extracts - therapeutic use ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Epilepsia (Copenhagen), 2014-06, Vol.55 (6), p.787-790</ispartof><rights>Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2014 International League Against Epilepsy</rights><rights>Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2014 International League Against Epilepsy.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 International League Against Epilepsy</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4875-69b077e90712bc60f50370aa60c8ff04e238105ac71d288a5d945ac9b6c8a3ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4875-69b077e90712bc60f50370aa60c8ff04e238105ac71d288a5d945ac9b6c8a3ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fepi.12635$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fepi.12635$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24854434$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cilio, Maria Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devinsky, Orrin</creatorcontrib><title>The case for assessing cannabidiol in epilepsy</title><title>Epilepsia (Copenhagen)</title><addtitle>Epilepsia</addtitle><description>Summary Intractable epilepsies have an extraordinary impact on cognitive and behavioral function and quality of life, and the treatment of seizures represents a challenge and a unique opportunity. Over the past few years, considerable attention has focused on cannabidiol (CBD), the major nonpsychotropic compound of Cannabis sativa. Basic research studies have provided strong evidence for safety and anticonvulsant properties of CBD. However, the lack of pure, pharmacologically active compounds and legal restrictions have prevented clinical research and confined data on efficacy and safety to anecdotal reports. Pure CBD appears to be an ideal candidate among phytocannabinoids as a therapy for treatment‐resistant epilepsy. A first step in this direction is to systematically investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and interactions of CBD with other antiepileptic drugs and obtain an initial signal regarding efficacy at different dosages. These data can then be used to plan double‐blinded placebo‐controlled efficacy trials. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.</description><subject>Anticonvulsants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cannabidiol</subject><subject>Cannabidiol - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cannabidiol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cannabis sativa</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Epilepsy - drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Phytotherapy</subject><subject>Plant Extracts - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0013-9580</issn><issn>1528-1167</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0E9LwzAYBvAgipvTg19ACl700O1N0vzpUcbUwUAP8xzS9K12dO1sLLJvb7ZOD4JgLiHhx5M3DyGXFMY0rAluyjFlkosjMqSC6ZhSqY7JEIDyOBUaBuTM-xUAKKn4KRmwRIsk4cmQjJdvGDnrMSqaNrLeo_dl_Rqu6tpmZV42VVTWUXihwo3fnpOTwlYeLw77iLzcz5bTx3jx9DCf3i1il2glYplmoBSmoCjLnIRCAFdgrQSniwISZFxTENYpmjOtrcjTJJzSTDptOSIfkZs-d9M27x36D7MuvcOqsjU2nTc0jA_AGU__QbmQnEq2o9e_6Krp2jp8ZK9ASskhqNteubbxvsXCbNpybdutoWB2fZvQhtn3HezVIbHL1pj_yO-CA5j04DMUuP07ycye533kF46Lhik</recordid><startdate>201406</startdate><enddate>201406</enddate><creator>Cilio, Maria Roberta</creator><creator>Thiele, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Devinsky, Orrin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201406</creationdate><title>The case for assessing cannabidiol in epilepsy</title><author>Cilio, Maria Roberta ; Thiele, Elizabeth A. ; Devinsky, Orrin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4875-69b077e90712bc60f50370aa60c8ff04e238105ac71d288a5d945ac9b6c8a3ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anticonvulsants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cannabidiol</topic><topic>Cannabidiol - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cannabidiol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cannabis sativa</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Epilepsy - drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Phytotherapy</topic><topic>Plant Extracts - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cilio, Maria Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thiele, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devinsky, Orrin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Epilepsia (Copenhagen)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cilio, Maria Roberta</au><au>Thiele, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Devinsky, Orrin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The case for assessing cannabidiol in epilepsy</atitle><jtitle>Epilepsia (Copenhagen)</jtitle><addtitle>Epilepsia</addtitle><date>2014-06</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>790</epage><pages>787-790</pages><issn>0013-9580</issn><eissn>1528-1167</eissn><coden>EPILAK</coden><abstract>Summary Intractable epilepsies have an extraordinary impact on cognitive and behavioral function and quality of life, and the treatment of seizures represents a challenge and a unique opportunity. Over the past few years, considerable attention has focused on cannabidiol (CBD), the major nonpsychotropic compound of Cannabis sativa. Basic research studies have provided strong evidence for safety and anticonvulsant properties of CBD. However, the lack of pure, pharmacologically active compounds and legal restrictions have prevented clinical research and confined data on efficacy and safety to anecdotal reports. Pure CBD appears to be an ideal candidate among phytocannabinoids as a therapy for treatment‐resistant epilepsy. A first step in this direction is to systematically investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and interactions of CBD with other antiepileptic drugs and obtain an initial signal regarding efficacy at different dosages. These data can then be used to plan double‐blinded placebo‐controlled efficacy trials. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>24854434</pmid><doi>10.1111/epi.12635</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-9580
ispartof Epilepsia (Copenhagen), 2014-06, Vol.55 (6), p.787-790
issn 0013-9580
1528-1167
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1544003239
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals; MEDLINE; Wiley Free Archive; IngentaConnect Open Access; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Anticonvulsants - adverse effects
Anticonvulsants - therapeutic use
Cannabidiol
Cannabidiol - adverse effects
Cannabidiol - therapeutic use
Cannabis sativa
Childhood
Epilepsy
Epilepsy - drug therapy
Humans
Phytotherapy
Plant Extracts - therapeutic use
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome
title The case for assessing cannabidiol in epilepsy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20case%20for%20assessing%20cannabidiol%20in%20epilepsy&rft.jtitle=Epilepsia%20(Copenhagen)&rft.au=Cilio,%20Maria%20Roberta&rft.date=2014-06&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=790&rft.pages=787-790&rft.issn=0013-9580&rft.eissn=1528-1167&rft.coden=EPILAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/epi.12635&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1535631629%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1535066630&rft_id=info:pmid/24854434&rfr_iscdi=true