Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study
Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people li...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality of life research 2014-08, Vol.23 (6), p.1701-1711 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1711 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1701 |
container_title | Quality of life research |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Hall, Sue Beatty, Sharon |
description | Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people living in one of three nursing homes in London, UK, while they completed FACIT-Sp-12. We used cognitive interviewing methods to explore residents' responses. Our analysis was based on the Framework approach to qualitative analysis. We developed the framework of themes a priori. These comprised: comprehension of the question; retrieval from memory of relevant information; decision processes; and response processes. Results Ten residents completed the FACIT-Sp-12 with no missing data. Most problems involved comprehension and/or selecting response options. Twelve residents had problems with comprehension of at least one question, particularly with abstract concepts (e.g. harmony, productivity), or where there were assumptions inherent in the questions (e.g. they had an illness). When residents had problems comprehending the question, they also found it difficult to select a response. Thirteen residents had difficulties selecting responses (e.g. categories did not reflect their views or were not meaningful in the context of the statement). Some chose not to respond, others responded to the question as they understood it. Conclusions The FACIT-Sp-12 could provide valuable insights into the spiritual concerns of nursing home residents; however, data may be neither valid nor reliable if they do not comprehend the questions as intended and respond appropriately. Providing clear and detailed instructions, including definitions of abstract concepts, may improve the validity of this measure for this population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11136-014-0627-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1543285924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24727563</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24727563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-feb1b98d90fa888632037d0302d66798b0c3dfa7f30d5424dcef9b2b1a22ca043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3AAWeLCxTD-EyfhtlpRqFSph5azlcSTrVfZOHiSVj3zxcluCqp66Gmkmd97z9Zj7L2ELxIg_0pSSm0FSCPAqlzYF2wls1wLZU35kq2gtEqU2ugT9oZoBwBFCeo1O1HG5KCKYsX-rImQKPRbTkNIYZyqjt9h14kaD8vQ84QUPPYj8djyfkpH-CbukXgbE4-dx8QHjEOHfDoexxvkZ-vN-bW4GoRU33jFm7jtwxhucXYcMd0GvDtmjpO_f8tetVVH-O5hnrJfZ9-vNz_FxeWP8836QjTGmlG0WMu6LHwJbVUUhdUKdO5Bg_LW5mVRQ6N9W-WtBp8ZZXyDbVmrWlZKNRUYfco-L75Dir8npNHtAzXzX6se40ROZkarIivVAf30BN3FKfXz647UHGxAzpRcqCZFooStG1LYV-neSXCHhtzSkJsbcoeGnJ01Hx-cp3qP_r_iXyUzoBaA5lO_xfQo-hnXD4toR2NMj0xzlWdW67-TuKWB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1543037401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hall, Sue ; Beatty, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Hall, Sue ; Beatty, Sharon</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people living in one of three nursing homes in London, UK, while they completed FACIT-Sp-12. We used cognitive interviewing methods to explore residents' responses. Our analysis was based on the Framework approach to qualitative analysis. We developed the framework of themes a priori. These comprised: comprehension of the question; retrieval from memory of relevant information; decision processes; and response processes. Results Ten residents completed the FACIT-Sp-12 with no missing data. Most problems involved comprehension and/or selecting response options. Twelve residents had problems with comprehension of at least one question, particularly with abstract concepts (e.g. harmony, productivity), or where there were assumptions inherent in the questions (e.g. they had an illness). When residents had problems comprehending the question, they also found it difficult to select a response. Thirteen residents had difficulties selecting responses (e.g. categories did not reflect their views or were not meaningful in the context of the statement). Some chose not to respond, others responded to the question as they understood it. Conclusions The FACIT-Sp-12 could provide valuable insights into the spiritual concerns of nursing home residents; however, data may be neither valid nor reliable if they do not comprehend the questions as intended and respond appropriately. Providing clear and detailed instructions, including definitions of abstract concepts, may improve the validity of this measure for this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0627-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24470288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Chronic Disease - rehabilitation ; Chronic illnesses ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - psychology ; Cognitive impairment ; Decision Making ; Diseases ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological - methods ; Interviews ; Karnofsky performance status ; London ; Long term health care ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nursing homes ; Nursing Homes - utilization ; Older adults ; Older people ; Palliative care ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Public Health ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Quality of Life Research ; Questionnaires ; Religion ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sociology ; Spiritual belief systems ; Spirituality ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Validity ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2014-08, Vol.23 (6), p.1701-1711</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-feb1b98d90fa888632037d0302d66798b0c3dfa7f30d5424dcef9b2b1a22ca043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-feb1b98d90fa888632037d0302d66798b0c3dfa7f30d5424dcef9b2b1a22ca043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24727563$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24727563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24470288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hall, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beatty, Sharon</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people living in one of three nursing homes in London, UK, while they completed FACIT-Sp-12. We used cognitive interviewing methods to explore residents' responses. Our analysis was based on the Framework approach to qualitative analysis. We developed the framework of themes a priori. These comprised: comprehension of the question; retrieval from memory of relevant information; decision processes; and response processes. Results Ten residents completed the FACIT-Sp-12 with no missing data. Most problems involved comprehension and/or selecting response options. Twelve residents had problems with comprehension of at least one question, particularly with abstract concepts (e.g. harmony, productivity), or where there were assumptions inherent in the questions (e.g. they had an illness). When residents had problems comprehending the question, they also found it difficult to select a response. Thirteen residents had difficulties selecting responses (e.g. categories did not reflect their views or were not meaningful in the context of the statement). Some chose not to respond, others responded to the question as they understood it. Conclusions The FACIT-Sp-12 could provide valuable insights into the spiritual concerns of nursing home residents; however, data may be neither valid nor reliable if they do not comprehend the questions as intended and respond appropriately. Providing clear and detailed instructions, including definitions of abstract concepts, may improve the validity of this measure for this population.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological - methods</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Karnofsky performance status</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - utilization</subject><subject>Older adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Spiritual belief systems</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3AAWeLCxTD-EyfhtlpRqFSph5azlcSTrVfZOHiSVj3zxcluCqp66Gmkmd97z9Zj7L2ELxIg_0pSSm0FSCPAqlzYF2wls1wLZU35kq2gtEqU2ugT9oZoBwBFCeo1O1HG5KCKYsX-rImQKPRbTkNIYZyqjt9h14kaD8vQ84QUPPYj8djyfkpH-CbukXgbE4-dx8QHjEOHfDoexxvkZ-vN-bW4GoRU33jFm7jtwxhucXYcMd0GvDtmjpO_f8tetVVH-O5hnrJfZ9-vNz_FxeWP8836QjTGmlG0WMu6LHwJbVUUhdUKdO5Bg_LW5mVRQ6N9W-WtBp8ZZXyDbVmrWlZKNRUYfco-L75Dir8npNHtAzXzX6se40ROZkarIivVAf30BN3FKfXz647UHGxAzpRcqCZFooStG1LYV-neSXCHhtzSkJsbcoeGnJ01Hx-cp3qP_r_iXyUzoBaA5lO_xfQo-hnXD4toR2NMj0xzlWdW67-TuKWB</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Hall, Sue</creator><creator>Beatty, Sharon</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study</title><author>Hall, Sue ; Beatty, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-feb1b98d90fa888632037d0302d66798b0c3dfa7f30d5424dcef9b2b1a22ca043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological - methods</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Karnofsky performance status</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - utilization</topic><topic>Older adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Spiritual belief systems</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hall, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beatty, Sharon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hall, Sue</au><au>Beatty, Sharon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1701</spage><epage>1711</epage><pages>1701-1711</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people living in one of three nursing homes in London, UK, while they completed FACIT-Sp-12. We used cognitive interviewing methods to explore residents' responses. Our analysis was based on the Framework approach to qualitative analysis. We developed the framework of themes a priori. These comprised: comprehension of the question; retrieval from memory of relevant information; decision processes; and response processes. Results Ten residents completed the FACIT-Sp-12 with no missing data. Most problems involved comprehension and/or selecting response options. Twelve residents had problems with comprehension of at least one question, particularly with abstract concepts (e.g. harmony, productivity), or where there were assumptions inherent in the questions (e.g. they had an illness). When residents had problems comprehending the question, they also found it difficult to select a response. Thirteen residents had difficulties selecting responses (e.g. categories did not reflect their views or were not meaningful in the context of the statement). Some chose not to respond, others responded to the question as they understood it. Conclusions The FACIT-Sp-12 could provide valuable insights into the spiritual concerns of nursing home residents; however, data may be neither valid nor reliable if they do not comprehend the questions as intended and respond appropriately. Providing clear and detailed instructions, including definitions of abstract concepts, may improve the validity of this measure for this population.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>24470288</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-014-0627-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-9343 |
ispartof | Quality of life research, 2014-08, Vol.23 (6), p.1701-1711 |
issn | 0962-9343 1573-2649 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1543285924 |
source | MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Chronic Disease - rehabilitation Chronic illnesses Cognition & reasoning Cognition Disorders - diagnosis Cognition Disorders - psychology Cognitive impairment Decision Making Diseases Female Humans Interview, Psychological - methods Interviews Karnofsky performance status London Long term health care Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nursing homes Nursing Homes - utilization Older adults Older people Palliative care Patient Outcome Assessment Public Health Qualitative Research Quality of life Quality of Life - psychology Quality of Life Research Questionnaires Religion Reproducibility of Results Sociology Spiritual belief systems Spirituality Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Validity Wellbeing |
title | Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T00%3A22%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20spiritual%20well-being%20in%20residents%20of%20nursing%20homes%20for%20older%20people%20using%20the%20FACIT-Sp-12:%20a%20cognitive%20interviewing%20study&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Hall,%20Sue&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1701&rft.epage=1711&rft.pages=1701-1711&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-014-0627-6&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24727563%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1543037401&rft_id=info:pmid/24470288&rft_jstor_id=24727563&rfr_iscdi=true |