Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study

Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality of life research 2014-08, Vol.23 (6), p.1701-1711
Hauptverfasser: Hall, Sue, Beatty, Sharon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1711
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1701
container_title Quality of life research
container_volume 23
creator Hall, Sue
Beatty, Sharon
description Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people living in one of three nursing homes in London, UK, while they completed FACIT-Sp-12. We used cognitive interviewing methods to explore residents' responses. Our analysis was based on the Framework approach to qualitative analysis. We developed the framework of themes a priori. These comprised: comprehension of the question; retrieval from memory of relevant information; decision processes; and response processes. Results Ten residents completed the FACIT-Sp-12 with no missing data. Most problems involved comprehension and/or selecting response options. Twelve residents had problems with comprehension of at least one question, particularly with abstract concepts (e.g. harmony, productivity), or where there were assumptions inherent in the questions (e.g. they had an illness). When residents had problems comprehending the question, they also found it difficult to select a response. Thirteen residents had difficulties selecting responses (e.g. categories did not reflect their views or were not meaningful in the context of the statement). Some chose not to respond, others responded to the question as they understood it. Conclusions The FACIT-Sp-12 could provide valuable insights into the spiritual concerns of nursing home residents; however, data may be neither valid nor reliable if they do not comprehend the questions as intended and respond appropriately. Providing clear and detailed instructions, including definitions of abstract concepts, may improve the validity of this measure for this population.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11136-014-0627-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1543285924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24727563</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24727563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-feb1b98d90fa888632037d0302d66798b0c3dfa7f30d5424dcef9b2b1a22ca043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3AAWeLCxTD-EyfhtlpRqFSph5azlcSTrVfZOHiSVj3zxcluCqp66Gmkmd97z9Zj7L2ELxIg_0pSSm0FSCPAqlzYF2wls1wLZU35kq2gtEqU2ugT9oZoBwBFCeo1O1HG5KCKYsX-rImQKPRbTkNIYZyqjt9h14kaD8vQ84QUPPYj8djyfkpH-CbukXgbE4-dx8QHjEOHfDoexxvkZ-vN-bW4GoRU33jFm7jtwxhucXYcMd0GvDtmjpO_f8tetVVH-O5hnrJfZ9-vNz_FxeWP8836QjTGmlG0WMu6LHwJbVUUhdUKdO5Bg_LW5mVRQ6N9W-WtBp8ZZXyDbVmrWlZKNRUYfco-L75Dir8npNHtAzXzX6se40ROZkarIivVAf30BN3FKfXz647UHGxAzpRcqCZFooStG1LYV-neSXCHhtzSkJsbcoeGnJ01Hx-cp3qP_r_iXyUzoBaA5lO_xfQo-hnXD4toR2NMj0xzlWdW67-TuKWB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1543037401</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hall, Sue ; Beatty, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Hall, Sue ; Beatty, Sharon</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people living in one of three nursing homes in London, UK, while they completed FACIT-Sp-12. We used cognitive interviewing methods to explore residents' responses. Our analysis was based on the Framework approach to qualitative analysis. We developed the framework of themes a priori. These comprised: comprehension of the question; retrieval from memory of relevant information; decision processes; and response processes. Results Ten residents completed the FACIT-Sp-12 with no missing data. Most problems involved comprehension and/or selecting response options. Twelve residents had problems with comprehension of at least one question, particularly with abstract concepts (e.g. harmony, productivity), or where there were assumptions inherent in the questions (e.g. they had an illness). When residents had problems comprehending the question, they also found it difficult to select a response. Thirteen residents had difficulties selecting responses (e.g. categories did not reflect their views or were not meaningful in the context of the statement). Some chose not to respond, others responded to the question as they understood it. Conclusions The FACIT-Sp-12 could provide valuable insights into the spiritual concerns of nursing home residents; however, data may be neither valid nor reliable if they do not comprehend the questions as intended and respond appropriately. Providing clear and detailed instructions, including definitions of abstract concepts, may improve the validity of this measure for this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-9343</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0627-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24470288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Chronic Disease - rehabilitation ; Chronic illnesses ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - psychology ; Cognitive impairment ; Decision Making ; Diseases ; Female ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological - methods ; Interviews ; Karnofsky performance status ; London ; Long term health care ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nursing homes ; Nursing Homes - utilization ; Older adults ; Older people ; Palliative care ; Patient Outcome Assessment ; Public Health ; Qualitative Research ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Quality of Life Research ; Questionnaires ; Religion ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sociology ; Spiritual belief systems ; Spirituality ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Validity ; Wellbeing</subject><ispartof>Quality of life research, 2014-08, Vol.23 (6), p.1701-1711</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-feb1b98d90fa888632037d0302d66798b0c3dfa7f30d5424dcef9b2b1a22ca043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-feb1b98d90fa888632037d0302d66798b0c3dfa7f30d5424dcef9b2b1a22ca043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24727563$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24727563$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24470288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hall, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beatty, Sharon</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study</title><title>Quality of life research</title><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><description>Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people living in one of three nursing homes in London, UK, while they completed FACIT-Sp-12. We used cognitive interviewing methods to explore residents' responses. Our analysis was based on the Framework approach to qualitative analysis. We developed the framework of themes a priori. These comprised: comprehension of the question; retrieval from memory of relevant information; decision processes; and response processes. Results Ten residents completed the FACIT-Sp-12 with no missing data. Most problems involved comprehension and/or selecting response options. Twelve residents had problems with comprehension of at least one question, particularly with abstract concepts (e.g. harmony, productivity), or where there were assumptions inherent in the questions (e.g. they had an illness). When residents had problems comprehending the question, they also found it difficult to select a response. Thirteen residents had difficulties selecting responses (e.g. categories did not reflect their views or were not meaningful in the context of the statement). Some chose not to respond, others responded to the question as they understood it. Conclusions The FACIT-Sp-12 could provide valuable insights into the spiritual concerns of nursing home residents; however, data may be neither valid nor reliable if they do not comprehend the questions as intended and respond appropriately. Providing clear and detailed instructions, including definitions of abstract concepts, may improve the validity of this measure for this population.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological - methods</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Karnofsky performance status</subject><subject>London</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Nursing Homes - utilization</subject><subject>Older adults</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patient Outcome Assessment</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Spiritual belief systems</subject><subject>Spirituality</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Wellbeing</subject><issn>0962-9343</issn><issn>1573-2649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxS0EokvhA3AAWeLCxTD-EyfhtlpRqFSph5azlcSTrVfZOHiSVj3zxcluCqp66Gmkmd97z9Zj7L2ELxIg_0pSSm0FSCPAqlzYF2wls1wLZU35kq2gtEqU2ugT9oZoBwBFCeo1O1HG5KCKYsX-rImQKPRbTkNIYZyqjt9h14kaD8vQ84QUPPYj8djyfkpH-CbukXgbE4-dx8QHjEOHfDoexxvkZ-vN-bW4GoRU33jFm7jtwxhucXYcMd0GvDtmjpO_f8tetVVH-O5hnrJfZ9-vNz_FxeWP8836QjTGmlG0WMu6LHwJbVUUhdUKdO5Bg_LW5mVRQ6N9W-WtBp8ZZXyDbVmrWlZKNRUYfco-L75Dir8npNHtAzXzX6se40ROZkarIivVAf30BN3FKfXz647UHGxAzpRcqCZFooStG1LYV-neSXCHhtzSkJsbcoeGnJ01Hx-cp3qP_r_iXyUzoBaA5lO_xfQo-hnXD4toR2NMj0xzlWdW67-TuKWB</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Hall, Sue</creator><creator>Beatty, Sharon</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study</title><author>Hall, Sue ; Beatty, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-feb1b98d90fa888632037d0302d66798b0c3dfa7f30d5424dcef9b2b1a22ca043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological - methods</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Karnofsky performance status</topic><topic>London</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Nursing Homes - utilization</topic><topic>Older adults</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patient Outcome Assessment</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Spiritual belief systems</topic><topic>Spirituality</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Wellbeing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hall, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beatty, Sharon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hall, Sue</au><au>Beatty, Sharon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study</atitle><jtitle>Quality of life research</jtitle><stitle>Qual Life Res</stitle><addtitle>Qual Life Res</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1701</spage><epage>1711</epage><pages>1701-1711</pages><issn>0962-9343</issn><eissn>1573-2649</eissn><abstract>Purpose To detect any problems with completion of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Spiritual Well-being Scale (FACIT-Sp-12), to analyse the causes of such problems and to propose solutions to overcome them. Methods We audio-recorded face-to-face interviews with 17 older people living in one of three nursing homes in London, UK, while they completed FACIT-Sp-12. We used cognitive interviewing methods to explore residents' responses. Our analysis was based on the Framework approach to qualitative analysis. We developed the framework of themes a priori. These comprised: comprehension of the question; retrieval from memory of relevant information; decision processes; and response processes. Results Ten residents completed the FACIT-Sp-12 with no missing data. Most problems involved comprehension and/or selecting response options. Twelve residents had problems with comprehension of at least one question, particularly with abstract concepts (e.g. harmony, productivity), or where there were assumptions inherent in the questions (e.g. they had an illness). When residents had problems comprehending the question, they also found it difficult to select a response. Thirteen residents had difficulties selecting responses (e.g. categories did not reflect their views or were not meaningful in the context of the statement). Some chose not to respond, others responded to the question as they understood it. Conclusions The FACIT-Sp-12 could provide valuable insights into the spiritual concerns of nursing home residents; however, data may be neither valid nor reliable if they do not comprehend the questions as intended and respond appropriately. Providing clear and detailed instructions, including definitions of abstract concepts, may improve the validity of this measure for this population.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>24470288</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11136-014-0627-6</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-9343
ispartof Quality of life research, 2014-08, Vol.23 (6), p.1701-1711
issn 0962-9343
1573-2649
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1543285924
source MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Chronic Disease - rehabilitation
Chronic illnesses
Cognition & reasoning
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Cognition Disorders - psychology
Cognitive impairment
Decision Making
Diseases
Female
Humans
Interview, Psychological - methods
Interviews
Karnofsky performance status
London
Long term health care
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nursing homes
Nursing Homes - utilization
Older adults
Older people
Palliative care
Patient Outcome Assessment
Public Health
Qualitative Research
Quality of life
Quality of Life - psychology
Quality of Life Research
Questionnaires
Religion
Reproducibility of Results
Sociology
Spiritual belief systems
Spirituality
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Validity
Wellbeing
title Assessing spiritual well-being in residents of nursing homes for older people using the FACIT-Sp-12: a cognitive interviewing study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T00%3A22%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20spiritual%20well-being%20in%20residents%20of%20nursing%20homes%20for%20older%20people%20using%20the%20FACIT-Sp-12:%20a%20cognitive%20interviewing%20study&rft.jtitle=Quality%20of%20life%20research&rft.au=Hall,%20Sue&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1701&rft.epage=1711&rft.pages=1701-1711&rft.issn=0962-9343&rft.eissn=1573-2649&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11136-014-0627-6&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24727563%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1543037401&rft_id=info:pmid/24470288&rft_jstor_id=24727563&rfr_iscdi=true