Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained

BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use bu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nuclear medicine 2014-08, Vol.39 (8), p.690-693
Hauptverfasser: Hongwei, Si, Yingmao, Chen, Mingzhe, Shao, Guangyu, Ma, Baixuan, Xu, Jiahe, Tian, Yunshuang, Chen, Xuefeng, Sun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 693
container_issue 8
container_start_page 690
container_title Clinical nuclear medicine
container_volume 39
creator Hongwei, Si
Yingmao, Chen
Mingzhe, Shao
Guangyu, Ma
Baixuan, Xu
Jiahe, Tian
Yunshuang, Chen
Xuefeng, Sun
description BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use but has limitations. This study was designed to a better variable to scale GFR. METHODSWe measured 99mTc- diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid plasma clearance (uncorrected GFR, uGFR) for 322 healthy adults who were enrolled according to the SENIEUR protocol. The individuals were randomly grouped into A and B for regressing and validating the optimal variable, respectively. Nonlinear regression was performed against uGFR, and the selected independent variables were body weight, height, age, and sex. RESULTSAmong several tested models, the regression coefficients of weight-age formula (W-A) were in narrower 95% confidence interval (CI). The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR, as an indicator to explain the percentage of variations of GFR, was higher than that of other variables in both groups. The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR was 0.571, which was higher than that of BSA (0.203) or TBW (0.241). CONCLUSIONThe index variable, based on both body weight and age, has a better statistical relationship to uGFR and is a better variable to scale GFR in adults.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000501
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542651937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1542651937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-6a3a7e829f9432d1f41f3fc31190ac14e0567143e0aeae3512db272beb41d17b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5E9eknd2d1kG28itQoVoX5cwySZ2Og2qbsJ6sm_biRVxINzmWF43hl4GDsEMQYRm5PF_H4sflcoYIsNIVRRIKSMt9lQqEgFsYnkgO15_yQERBDpXTaQOjYTpWHIPhb06Mj7snrkWPGbdVOu0PIHdCWmlnhT89sMu2Fm6xW51qLjF6VtHDZlXfEFNnTKr2tHfeRr6XlZ_YPzsw6evq0tlhXl-2ynQOvpYNNH7P5iend-GcxvZlfnZ_MgUyaEIEKFhiYyLmKtZA6FhkIVmQKIBWagSYSRAa1IICGpEGSeSiNTSjXkYFI1Ysf93bWrX1ryTbIqfUbWYkV16xMItYxCiJXpUN2jmau9d1Qka9dJce8JiORLfdKpT_6q72JHmw9tuqL8J_TtugMmPfBa24acf7btK7lkSWib5f-3PwHMqJC_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542651937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Hongwei, Si ; Yingmao, Chen ; Mingzhe, Shao ; Guangyu, Ma ; Baixuan, Xu ; Jiahe, Tian ; Yunshuang, Chen ; Xuefeng, Sun</creator><creatorcontrib>Hongwei, Si ; Yingmao, Chen ; Mingzhe, Shao ; Guangyu, Ma ; Baixuan, Xu ; Jiahe, Tian ; Yunshuang, Chen ; Xuefeng, Sun</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use but has limitations. This study was designed to a better variable to scale GFR. METHODSWe measured 99mTc- diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid plasma clearance (uncorrected GFR, uGFR) for 322 healthy adults who were enrolled according to the SENIEUR protocol. The individuals were randomly grouped into A and B for regressing and validating the optimal variable, respectively. Nonlinear regression was performed against uGFR, and the selected independent variables were body weight, height, age, and sex. RESULTSAmong several tested models, the regression coefficients of weight-age formula (W-A) were in narrower 95% confidence interval (CI). The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR, as an indicator to explain the percentage of variations of GFR, was higher than that of other variables in both groups. The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR was 0.571, which was higher than that of BSA (0.203) or TBW (0.241). CONCLUSIONThe index variable, based on both body weight and age, has a better statistical relationship to uGFR and is a better variable to scale GFR in adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000501</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24978341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Body Surface Area ; Body Weight ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sex Factors ; Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - pharmacokinetics</subject><ispartof>Clinical nuclear medicine, 2014-08, Vol.39 (8), p.690-693</ispartof><rights>2014 by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-6a3a7e829f9432d1f41f3fc31190ac14e0567143e0aeae3512db272beb41d17b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24978341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hongwei, Si</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yingmao, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mingzhe, Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guangyu, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baixuan, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiahe, Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yunshuang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xuefeng, Sun</creatorcontrib><title>Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained</title><title>Clinical nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Clin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use but has limitations. This study was designed to a better variable to scale GFR. METHODSWe measured 99mTc- diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid plasma clearance (uncorrected GFR, uGFR) for 322 healthy adults who were enrolled according to the SENIEUR protocol. The individuals were randomly grouped into A and B for regressing and validating the optimal variable, respectively. Nonlinear regression was performed against uGFR, and the selected independent variables were body weight, height, age, and sex. RESULTSAmong several tested models, the regression coefficients of weight-age formula (W-A) were in narrower 95% confidence interval (CI). The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR, as an indicator to explain the percentage of variations of GFR, was higher than that of other variables in both groups. The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR was 0.571, which was higher than that of BSA (0.203) or TBW (0.241). CONCLUSIONThe index variable, based on both body weight and age, has a better statistical relationship to uGFR and is a better variable to scale GFR in adults.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Surface Area</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - pharmacokinetics</subject><issn>0363-9762</issn><issn>1536-0229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5E9eknd2d1kG28itQoVoX5cwySZ2Og2qbsJ6sm_biRVxINzmWF43hl4GDsEMQYRm5PF_H4sflcoYIsNIVRRIKSMt9lQqEgFsYnkgO15_yQERBDpXTaQOjYTpWHIPhb06Mj7snrkWPGbdVOu0PIHdCWmlnhT89sMu2Fm6xW51qLjF6VtHDZlXfEFNnTKr2tHfeRr6XlZ_YPzsw6evq0tlhXl-2ynQOvpYNNH7P5iend-GcxvZlfnZ_MgUyaEIEKFhiYyLmKtZA6FhkIVmQKIBWagSYSRAa1IICGpEGSeSiNTSjXkYFI1Ysf93bWrX1ryTbIqfUbWYkV16xMItYxCiJXpUN2jmau9d1Qka9dJce8JiORLfdKpT_6q72JHmw9tuqL8J_TtugMmPfBa24acf7btK7lkSWib5f-3PwHMqJC_</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Hongwei, Si</creator><creator>Yingmao, Chen</creator><creator>Mingzhe, Shao</creator><creator>Guangyu, Ma</creator><creator>Baixuan, Xu</creator><creator>Jiahe, Tian</creator><creator>Yunshuang, Chen</creator><creator>Xuefeng, Sun</creator><general>by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained</title><author>Hongwei, Si ; Yingmao, Chen ; Mingzhe, Shao ; Guangyu, Ma ; Baixuan, Xu ; Jiahe, Tian ; Yunshuang, Chen ; Xuefeng, Sun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-6a3a7e829f9432d1f41f3fc31190ac14e0567143e0aeae3512db272beb41d17b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Surface Area</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - pharmacokinetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hongwei, Si</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yingmao, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mingzhe, Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guangyu, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baixuan, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiahe, Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yunshuang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xuefeng, Sun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hongwei, Si</au><au>Yingmao, Chen</au><au>Mingzhe, Shao</au><au>Guangyu, Ma</au><au>Baixuan, Xu</au><au>Jiahe, Tian</au><au>Yunshuang, Chen</au><au>Xuefeng, Sun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>690-693</pages><issn>0363-9762</issn><eissn>1536-0229</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use but has limitations. This study was designed to a better variable to scale GFR. METHODSWe measured 99mTc- diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid plasma clearance (uncorrected GFR, uGFR) for 322 healthy adults who were enrolled according to the SENIEUR protocol. The individuals were randomly grouped into A and B for regressing and validating the optimal variable, respectively. Nonlinear regression was performed against uGFR, and the selected independent variables were body weight, height, age, and sex. RESULTSAmong several tested models, the regression coefficients of weight-age formula (W-A) were in narrower 95% confidence interval (CI). The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR, as an indicator to explain the percentage of variations of GFR, was higher than that of other variables in both groups. The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR was 0.571, which was higher than that of BSA (0.203) or TBW (0.241). CONCLUSIONThe index variable, based on both body weight and age, has a better statistical relationship to uGFR and is a better variable to scale GFR in adults.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>24978341</pmid><doi>10.1097/RLU.0000000000000501</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-9762
ispartof Clinical nuclear medicine, 2014-08, Vol.39 (8), p.690-693
issn 0363-9762
1536-0229
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542651937
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Body Surface Area
Body Weight
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Female
Glomerular Filtration Rate
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Sex Factors
Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - analogs & derivatives
Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - pharmacokinetics
title Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T11%3A51%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regressing%20an%20Optimal%20Variable%20to%20Scale%20Glomerular%20Filtration%20Rate:%20More%20Variations%20in%20Glomerular%20Filtration%20Rate%20Are%20Explained&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Hongwei,%20Si&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=690-693&rft.issn=0363-9762&rft.eissn=1536-0229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000501&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1542651937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542651937&rft_id=info:pmid/24978341&rfr_iscdi=true