Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained
BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use bu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical nuclear medicine 2014-08, Vol.39 (8), p.690-693 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 693 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 690 |
container_title | Clinical nuclear medicine |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Hongwei, Si Yingmao, Chen Mingzhe, Shao Guangyu, Ma Baixuan, Xu Jiahe, Tian Yunshuang, Chen Xuefeng, Sun |
description | BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use but has limitations. This study was designed to a better variable to scale GFR.
METHODSWe measured 99mTc- diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid plasma clearance (uncorrected GFR, uGFR) for 322 healthy adults who were enrolled according to the SENIEUR protocol. The individuals were randomly grouped into A and B for regressing and validating the optimal variable, respectively. Nonlinear regression was performed against uGFR, and the selected independent variables were body weight, height, age, and sex.
RESULTSAmong several tested models, the regression coefficients of weight-age formula (W-A) were in narrower 95% confidence interval (CI). The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR, as an indicator to explain the percentage of variations of GFR, was higher than that of other variables in both groups. The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR was 0.571, which was higher than that of BSA (0.203) or TBW (0.241).
CONCLUSIONThe index variable, based on both body weight and age, has a better statistical relationship to uGFR and is a better variable to scale GFR in adults. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000501 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542651937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1542651937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-6a3a7e829f9432d1f41f3fc31190ac14e0567143e0aeae3512db272beb41d17b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5E9eknd2d1kG28itQoVoX5cwySZ2Og2qbsJ6sm_biRVxINzmWF43hl4GDsEMQYRm5PF_H4sflcoYIsNIVRRIKSMt9lQqEgFsYnkgO15_yQERBDpXTaQOjYTpWHIPhb06Mj7snrkWPGbdVOu0PIHdCWmlnhT89sMu2Fm6xW51qLjF6VtHDZlXfEFNnTKr2tHfeRr6XlZ_YPzsw6evq0tlhXl-2ynQOvpYNNH7P5iend-GcxvZlfnZ_MgUyaEIEKFhiYyLmKtZA6FhkIVmQKIBWagSYSRAa1IICGpEGSeSiNTSjXkYFI1Ysf93bWrX1ryTbIqfUbWYkV16xMItYxCiJXpUN2jmau9d1Qka9dJce8JiORLfdKpT_6q72JHmw9tuqL8J_TtugMmPfBa24acf7btK7lkSWib5f-3PwHMqJC_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1542651937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Hongwei, Si ; Yingmao, Chen ; Mingzhe, Shao ; Guangyu, Ma ; Baixuan, Xu ; Jiahe, Tian ; Yunshuang, Chen ; Xuefeng, Sun</creator><creatorcontrib>Hongwei, Si ; Yingmao, Chen ; Mingzhe, Shao ; Guangyu, Ma ; Baixuan, Xu ; Jiahe, Tian ; Yunshuang, Chen ; Xuefeng, Sun</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use but has limitations. This study was designed to a better variable to scale GFR.
METHODSWe measured 99mTc- diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid plasma clearance (uncorrected GFR, uGFR) for 322 healthy adults who were enrolled according to the SENIEUR protocol. The individuals were randomly grouped into A and B for regressing and validating the optimal variable, respectively. Nonlinear regression was performed against uGFR, and the selected independent variables were body weight, height, age, and sex.
RESULTSAmong several tested models, the regression coefficients of weight-age formula (W-A) were in narrower 95% confidence interval (CI). The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR, as an indicator to explain the percentage of variations of GFR, was higher than that of other variables in both groups. The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR was 0.571, which was higher than that of BSA (0.203) or TBW (0.241).
CONCLUSIONThe index variable, based on both body weight and age, has a better statistical relationship to uGFR and is a better variable to scale GFR in adults.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-9762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-0229</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000501</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24978341</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Body Surface Area ; Body Weight ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Female ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Reference Values ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sex Factors ; Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - analogs & derivatives ; Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - pharmacokinetics</subject><ispartof>Clinical nuclear medicine, 2014-08, Vol.39 (8), p.690-693</ispartof><rights>2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-6a3a7e829f9432d1f41f3fc31190ac14e0567143e0aeae3512db272beb41d17b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24978341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hongwei, Si</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yingmao, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mingzhe, Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guangyu, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baixuan, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiahe, Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yunshuang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xuefeng, Sun</creatorcontrib><title>Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained</title><title>Clinical nuclear medicine</title><addtitle>Clin Nucl Med</addtitle><description>BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use but has limitations. This study was designed to a better variable to scale GFR.
METHODSWe measured 99mTc- diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid plasma clearance (uncorrected GFR, uGFR) for 322 healthy adults who were enrolled according to the SENIEUR protocol. The individuals were randomly grouped into A and B for regressing and validating the optimal variable, respectively. Nonlinear regression was performed against uGFR, and the selected independent variables were body weight, height, age, and sex.
RESULTSAmong several tested models, the regression coefficients of weight-age formula (W-A) were in narrower 95% confidence interval (CI). The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR, as an indicator to explain the percentage of variations of GFR, was higher than that of other variables in both groups. The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR was 0.571, which was higher than that of BSA (0.203) or TBW (0.241).
CONCLUSIONThe index variable, based on both body weight and age, has a better statistical relationship to uGFR and is a better variable to scale GFR in adults.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Surface Area</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glomerular Filtration Rate</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - pharmacokinetics</subject><issn>0363-9762</issn><issn>1536-0229</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3-A5E9eknd2d1kG28itQoVoX5cwySZ2Og2qbsJ6sm_biRVxINzmWF43hl4GDsEMQYRm5PF_H4sflcoYIsNIVRRIKSMt9lQqEgFsYnkgO15_yQERBDpXTaQOjYTpWHIPhb06Mj7snrkWPGbdVOu0PIHdCWmlnhT89sMu2Fm6xW51qLjF6VtHDZlXfEFNnTKr2tHfeRr6XlZ_YPzsw6evq0tlhXl-2ynQOvpYNNH7P5iend-GcxvZlfnZ_MgUyaEIEKFhiYyLmKtZA6FhkIVmQKIBWagSYSRAa1IICGpEGSeSiNTSjXkYFI1Ysf93bWrX1ryTbIqfUbWYkV16xMItYxCiJXpUN2jmau9d1Qka9dJce8JiORLfdKpT_6q72JHmw9tuqL8J_TtugMmPfBa24acf7btK7lkSWib5f-3PwHMqJC_</recordid><startdate>201408</startdate><enddate>201408</enddate><creator>Hongwei, Si</creator><creator>Yingmao, Chen</creator><creator>Mingzhe, Shao</creator><creator>Guangyu, Ma</creator><creator>Baixuan, Xu</creator><creator>Jiahe, Tian</creator><creator>Yunshuang, Chen</creator><creator>Xuefeng, Sun</creator><general>by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201408</creationdate><title>Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained</title><author>Hongwei, Si ; Yingmao, Chen ; Mingzhe, Shao ; Guangyu, Ma ; Baixuan, Xu ; Jiahe, Tian ; Yunshuang, Chen ; Xuefeng, Sun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3751-6a3a7e829f9432d1f41f3fc31190ac14e0567143e0aeae3512db272beb41d17b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Surface Area</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glomerular Filtration Rate</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - pharmacokinetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hongwei, Si</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yingmao, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mingzhe, Shao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guangyu, Ma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baixuan, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiahe, Tian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yunshuang, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xuefeng, Sun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nuclear medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hongwei, Si</au><au>Yingmao, Chen</au><au>Mingzhe, Shao</au><au>Guangyu, Ma</au><au>Baixuan, Xu</au><au>Jiahe, Tian</au><au>Yunshuang, Chen</au><au>Xuefeng, Sun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nuclear medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nucl Med</addtitle><date>2014-08</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>693</epage><pages>690-693</pages><issn>0363-9762</issn><eissn>1536-0229</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUNDTo compare glomerular filtration rate (GFR) among individuals, GFR is usually scaled to body surface area (BSA) based on the ratio method, which has been debated for its accuracy in recent years. Reference to the BSA as a normalization standard is the most common method currently in use but has limitations. This study was designed to a better variable to scale GFR.
METHODSWe measured 99mTc- diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid plasma clearance (uncorrected GFR, uGFR) for 322 healthy adults who were enrolled according to the SENIEUR protocol. The individuals were randomly grouped into A and B for regressing and validating the optimal variable, respectively. Nonlinear regression was performed against uGFR, and the selected independent variables were body weight, height, age, and sex.
RESULTSAmong several tested models, the regression coefficients of weight-age formula (W-A) were in narrower 95% confidence interval (CI). The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR, as an indicator to explain the percentage of variations of GFR, was higher than that of other variables in both groups. The coefficient of determination of the regression line between W-A and uGFR was 0.571, which was higher than that of BSA (0.203) or TBW (0.241).
CONCLUSIONThe index variable, based on both body weight and age, has a better statistical relationship to uGFR and is a better variable to scale GFR in adults.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>24978341</pmid><doi>10.1097/RLU.0000000000000501</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-9762 |
ispartof | Clinical nuclear medicine, 2014-08, Vol.39 (8), p.690-693 |
issn | 0363-9762 1536-0229 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542651937 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adult Age Factors Aged Body Surface Area Body Weight Data Interpretation, Statistical Female Glomerular Filtration Rate Humans Male Middle Aged Reference Values Reproducibility of Results Sex Factors Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - analogs & derivatives Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate - pharmacokinetics |
title | Regressing an Optimal Variable to Scale Glomerular Filtration Rate: More Variations in Glomerular Filtration Rate Are Explained |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T11%3A51%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Regressing%20an%20Optimal%20Variable%20to%20Scale%20Glomerular%20Filtration%20Rate:%20More%20Variations%20in%20Glomerular%20Filtration%20Rate%20Are%20Explained&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nuclear%20medicine&rft.au=Hongwei,%20Si&rft.date=2014-08&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=693&rft.pages=690-693&rft.issn=0363-9762&rft.eissn=1536-0229&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/RLU.0000000000000501&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1542651937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1542651937&rft_id=info:pmid/24978341&rfr_iscdi=true |