More on Gaining Reliable Knowledge: A Reply
Matter and Mannan (1989) interpret Romesburg (1981) as declaring that scientific methods are systematic, like shop manuals; and they state this is not so. I argue they are correct in what they believe, but incorrect in their interpretation. They also believe the test of the threshold-of-security hyp...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 1989-10, Vol.53 (4), p.1177-1180 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1180 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 1177 |
| container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
| container_volume | 53 |
| creator | Romesburg, H. Charles |
| description | Matter and Mannan (1989) interpret Romesburg (1981) as declaring that scientific methods are systematic, like shop manuals; and they state this is not so. I argue they are correct in what they believe, but incorrect in their interpretation. They also believe the test of the threshold-of-security hypothesis given in Romesburg (1981) is inappropriate; I argue it is not. I demonstrate that Matter and Mannan's (1989) claims do not weaken the validity or the importance of the message in Romesburg (1981). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3809630 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15425454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3809630</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3809630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-9fa0353aeab7ffe27707d9faa54ae5e107f92d2b57c9023048e6d27a120279b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1Kw0AUBeBBFIxVfIUsRBcSvfOXybgrpVaxIoiCu2GS3JSUaSbOpEjf3ki7dXXh8HG4HEIuKdwxDuqeF6BzDkckoZqrjBVUHZMEgLFMCvp1Ss5iXANwSos8IbevPmDqu3Rh267tVuk7utaWDtOXzv84rFf4kE7HtHe7c3LSWBfx4nAn5PNx_jF7ypZvi-fZdJlVjMoh040FLrlFW6qmQaYUqHoMrRQWJVJQjWY1K6WqNIwviwLzmilLGTClS8on5Hrf2wf_vcU4mE0bK3TOdui30VApmBRSjPBmD6vgYwzYmD60Gxt2hoL5G8Mcxhjl1V6u4-DDv-wXI_JZtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15425454</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>More on Gaining Reliable Knowledge: A Reply</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Romesburg, H. Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Romesburg, H. Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Matter and Mannan (1989) interpret Romesburg (1981) as declaring that scientific methods are systematic, like shop manuals; and they state this is not so. I argue they are correct in what they believe, but incorrect in their interpretation. They also believe the test of the threshold-of-security hypothesis given in Romesburg (1981) is inappropriate; I argue it is not. I demonstrate that Matter and Mannan's (1989) claims do not weaken the validity or the importance of the message in Romesburg (1981).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3809630</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Correlation coefficients ; Inductive reasoning ; Mannans ; Paradoxes ; Population estimates ; Retroduction ; Scientific method ; Stochastic processes ; Threshing ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 1989-10, Vol.53 (4), p.1177-1180</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1989 The Wildlife Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-9fa0353aeab7ffe27707d9faa54ae5e107f92d2b57c9023048e6d27a120279b13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3809630$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3809630$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romesburg, H. Charles</creatorcontrib><title>More on Gaining Reliable Knowledge: A Reply</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Matter and Mannan (1989) interpret Romesburg (1981) as declaring that scientific methods are systematic, like shop manuals; and they state this is not so. I argue they are correct in what they believe, but incorrect in their interpretation. They also believe the test of the threshold-of-security hypothesis given in Romesburg (1981) is inappropriate; I argue it is not. I demonstrate that Matter and Mannan's (1989) claims do not weaken the validity or the importance of the message in Romesburg (1981).</description><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Inductive reasoning</subject><subject>Mannans</subject><subject>Paradoxes</subject><subject>Population estimates</subject><subject>Retroduction</subject><subject>Scientific method</subject><subject>Stochastic processes</subject><subject>Threshing</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10M1Kw0AUBeBBFIxVfIUsRBcSvfOXybgrpVaxIoiCu2GS3JSUaSbOpEjf3ki7dXXh8HG4HEIuKdwxDuqeF6BzDkckoZqrjBVUHZMEgLFMCvp1Ss5iXANwSos8IbevPmDqu3Rh267tVuk7utaWDtOXzv84rFf4kE7HtHe7c3LSWBfx4nAn5PNx_jF7ypZvi-fZdJlVjMoh040FLrlFW6qmQaYUqHoMrRQWJVJQjWY1K6WqNIwviwLzmilLGTClS8on5Hrf2wf_vcU4mE0bK3TOdui30VApmBRSjPBmD6vgYwzYmD60Gxt2hoL5G8Mcxhjl1V6u4-DDv-wXI_JZtQ</recordid><startdate>19891001</startdate><enddate>19891001</enddate><creator>Romesburg, H. Charles</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891001</creationdate><title>More on Gaining Reliable Knowledge: A Reply</title><author>Romesburg, H. Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c215t-9fa0353aeab7ffe27707d9faa54ae5e107f92d2b57c9023048e6d27a120279b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Inductive reasoning</topic><topic>Mannans</topic><topic>Paradoxes</topic><topic>Population estimates</topic><topic>Retroduction</topic><topic>Scientific method</topic><topic>Stochastic processes</topic><topic>Threshing</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romesburg, H. Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romesburg, H. Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>More on Gaining Reliable Knowledge: A Reply</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>1989-10-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1177</spage><epage>1180</epage><pages>1177-1180</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><abstract>Matter and Mannan (1989) interpret Romesburg (1981) as declaring that scientific methods are systematic, like shop manuals; and they state this is not so. I argue they are correct in what they believe, but incorrect in their interpretation. They also believe the test of the threshold-of-security hypothesis given in Romesburg (1981) is inappropriate; I argue it is not. I demonstrate that Matter and Mannan's (1989) claims do not weaken the validity or the importance of the message in Romesburg (1981).</abstract><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3809630</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
| ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 1989-10, Vol.53 (4), p.1177-1180 |
| issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_15425454 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Correlation coefficients Inductive reasoning Mannans Paradoxes Population estimates Retroduction Scientific method Stochastic processes Threshing Wildlife management |
| title | More on Gaining Reliable Knowledge: A Reply |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A57%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=More%20on%20Gaining%20Reliable%20Knowledge:%20A%20Reply&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Romesburg,%20H.%20Charles&rft.date=1989-10-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1177&rft.epage=1180&rft.pages=1177-1180&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3809630&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3809630%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15425454&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3809630&rfr_iscdi=true |