Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test
Performance-based outcomes such as the T-Test, Edgren Side Step Test (ESST), and Illinois Agility Test (IAT) have been used to assess agility in athletes and nonathletes; however, the reliability and validity of these tests have not been established. The purpose of this study was to establish the re...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of rehabilitation research and development 2013-01, Vol.50 (7), p.951-960 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 960 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 951 |
| container_title | Journal of rehabilitation research and development |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Raya, Michele A Gailey, Robert S Gaunaurd, Ignacio A Jayne, Daniel M Campbell, Stuart M Gagne, Erica Manrique, Patrick G Muller, Daniel G Tucker, Christen |
| description | Performance-based outcomes such as the T-Test, Edgren Side Step Test (ESST), and Illinois Agility Test (IAT) have been used to assess agility in athletes and nonathletes; however, the reliability and validity of these tests have not been established. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and convergent construct validity of the ESST, T-Test, and IAT in young, nondisabled, physically active male servicemembers (SMs). Ninety-seven male Active Duty U.S. Army SMs completed the study. Statistically significant differences were not found between the ESST (p = 0.10), T-Test (p = 0.09), and IAT (p = 0.23) when administered twice within a 24 to 48 h period. These tests were found to have excellent interrater reliability and moderate to good test-retest reliability. A good positive relationship exists between the IAT and T-Test (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) and a moderate negative relationship exists between the ESST and both the T-Test (r = -0.69, p < 0.001) and IAT (r = -0.65, p < 0.001). The results suggest that these tests are valid measures of agility that uniquely assess movement in different planes, thus providing a comprehensive assessment of high-level mobility. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542374992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A352616503</galeid><sourcerecordid>A352616503</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-569ad8b175ba1954f4c26f1c321321c37f525400c555b6aacf0b5305d1cea7163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9rFDEUx4NY7Fr9A7xIwIuHzpqXnzPelm3VloLQrueQyWS2KTOTNcla-t83w64KXoTAO-TzfY_3Pgi9A7IEWdNP17e3F0tKgC6JWBLSyBdoAQ2rK2CCvkQLonhdKQVwil6n9EAIoYzCK3RKOSPAGV2gvA7jzkSfwoRDj_N9dA6brR98fsLZpZzwo8_3eDSDw8nFX9660Y2ti-kzvuy20U34zncO32W3w5sSOMeb6lDN1OGrYfBT8Amvjj3nrzfopDdDcm-P9Qz9-HK5WX-rbr5_vVqvbirLGcuVkI3p6haUaA00gvfcUtmDLTuUZ5nqBRWcECuEaKUxtietYER0YJ1RINkZ-njou4vh574M1qNP1g2DmVzYJw2CU6Z409D_o1wKqIHUUNAP_6APYR-nsshMKVkzVdd_qW25nPZTH3I0dm6qV8WOBCkIKxQcKBtDStH1ehf9aOKTBqJnx3p2rGfHmgg9Oy6Z98f5-3Z03Z_Eb6nsGUIknvM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1467683788</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test</title><source>U.S. Government Documents</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Raya, Michele A ; Gailey, Robert S ; Gaunaurd, Ignacio A ; Jayne, Daniel M ; Campbell, Stuart M ; Gagne, Erica ; Manrique, Patrick G ; Muller, Daniel G ; Tucker, Christen</creator><creatorcontrib>Raya, Michele A ; Gailey, Robert S ; Gaunaurd, Ignacio A ; Jayne, Daniel M ; Campbell, Stuart M ; Gagne, Erica ; Manrique, Patrick G ; Muller, Daniel G ; Tucker, Christen</creatorcontrib><description>Performance-based outcomes such as the T-Test, Edgren Side Step Test (ESST), and Illinois Agility Test (IAT) have been used to assess agility in athletes and nonathletes; however, the reliability and validity of these tests have not been established. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and convergent construct validity of the ESST, T-Test, and IAT in young, nondisabled, physically active male servicemembers (SMs). Ninety-seven male Active Duty U.S. Army SMs completed the study. Statistically significant differences were not found between the ESST (p = 0.10), T-Test (p = 0.09), and IAT (p = 0.23) when administered twice within a 24 to 48 h period. These tests were found to have excellent interrater reliability and moderate to good test-retest reliability. A good positive relationship exists between the IAT and T-Test (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) and a moderate negative relationship exists between the ESST and both the T-Test (r = -0.69, p < 0.001) and IAT (r = -0.65, p < 0.001). The results suggest that these tests are valid measures of agility that uniquely assess movement in different planes, thus providing a comprehensive assessment of high-level mobility.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-1352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24301432</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JRRDDB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Department of Veterans Affairs</publisher><subject>Adult ; Armed forces ; Comparative analysis ; Education ; Exercise Test - methods ; Human locomotion ; Humans ; Male ; Medical tests ; Military Personnel ; Movement - physiology ; Observer Variation ; Physical therapy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Testing ; United States ; Veterans ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2013-01, Vol.50 (7), p.951-960</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Department of Veterans Affairs</rights><rights>Copyright Superintendent of Documents 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-569ad8b175ba1954f4c26f1c321321c37f525400c555b6aacf0b5305d1cea7163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-569ad8b175ba1954f4c26f1c321321c37f525400c555b6aacf0b5305d1cea7163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24301432$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raya, Michele A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gailey, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunaurd, Ignacio A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayne, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Stuart M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagne, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique, Patrick G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Daniel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Christen</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test</title><title>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</title><addtitle>J Rehabil Res Dev</addtitle><description>Performance-based outcomes such as the T-Test, Edgren Side Step Test (ESST), and Illinois Agility Test (IAT) have been used to assess agility in athletes and nonathletes; however, the reliability and validity of these tests have not been established. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and convergent construct validity of the ESST, T-Test, and IAT in young, nondisabled, physically active male servicemembers (SMs). Ninety-seven male Active Duty U.S. Army SMs completed the study. Statistically significant differences were not found between the ESST (p = 0.10), T-Test (p = 0.09), and IAT (p = 0.23) when administered twice within a 24 to 48 h period. These tests were found to have excellent interrater reliability and moderate to good test-retest reliability. A good positive relationship exists between the IAT and T-Test (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) and a moderate negative relationship exists between the ESST and both the T-Test (r = -0.69, p < 0.001) and IAT (r = -0.65, p < 0.001). The results suggest that these tests are valid measures of agility that uniquely assess movement in different planes, thus providing a comprehensive assessment of high-level mobility.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Armed forces</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Human locomotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Military Personnel</subject><subject>Movement - physiology</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0748-7711</issn><issn>1938-1352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9rFDEUx4NY7Fr9A7xIwIuHzpqXnzPelm3VloLQrueQyWS2KTOTNcla-t83w64KXoTAO-TzfY_3Pgi9A7IEWdNP17e3F0tKgC6JWBLSyBdoAQ2rK2CCvkQLonhdKQVwil6n9EAIoYzCK3RKOSPAGV2gvA7jzkSfwoRDj_N9dA6brR98fsLZpZzwo8_3eDSDw8nFX9660Y2ti-kzvuy20U34zncO32W3w5sSOMeb6lDN1OGrYfBT8Amvjj3nrzfopDdDcm-P9Qz9-HK5WX-rbr5_vVqvbirLGcuVkI3p6haUaA00gvfcUtmDLTuUZ5nqBRWcECuEaKUxtietYER0YJ1RINkZ-njou4vh574M1qNP1g2DmVzYJw2CU6Z409D_o1wKqIHUUNAP_6APYR-nsshMKVkzVdd_qW25nPZTH3I0dm6qV8WOBCkIKxQcKBtDStH1ehf9aOKTBqJnx3p2rGfHmgg9Oy6Z98f5-3Z03Z_Eb6nsGUIknvM</recordid><startdate>20130101</startdate><enddate>20130101</enddate><creator>Raya, Michele A</creator><creator>Gailey, Robert S</creator><creator>Gaunaurd, Ignacio A</creator><creator>Jayne, Daniel M</creator><creator>Campbell, Stuart M</creator><creator>Gagne, Erica</creator><creator>Manrique, Patrick G</creator><creator>Muller, Daniel G</creator><creator>Tucker, Christen</creator><general>Department of Veterans Affairs</general><general>Superintendent of Documents</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130101</creationdate><title>Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test</title><author>Raya, Michele A ; Gailey, Robert S ; Gaunaurd, Ignacio A ; Jayne, Daniel M ; Campbell, Stuart M ; Gagne, Erica ; Manrique, Patrick G ; Muller, Daniel G ; Tucker, Christen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-569ad8b175ba1954f4c26f1c321321c37f525400c555b6aacf0b5305d1cea7163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Armed forces</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Human locomotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Military Personnel</topic><topic>Movement - physiology</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raya, Michele A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gailey, Robert S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaunaurd, Ignacio A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayne, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Stuart M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagne, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manrique, Patrick G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Daniel G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tucker, Christen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raya, Michele A</au><au>Gailey, Robert S</au><au>Gaunaurd, Ignacio A</au><au>Jayne, Daniel M</au><au>Campbell, Stuart M</au><au>Gagne, Erica</au><au>Manrique, Patrick G</au><au>Muller, Daniel G</au><au>Tucker, Christen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation research and development</jtitle><addtitle>J Rehabil Res Dev</addtitle><date>2013-01-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>951</spage><epage>960</epage><pages>951-960</pages><issn>0748-7711</issn><eissn>1938-1352</eissn><coden>JRRDDB</coden><abstract>Performance-based outcomes such as the T-Test, Edgren Side Step Test (ESST), and Illinois Agility Test (IAT) have been used to assess agility in athletes and nonathletes; however, the reliability and validity of these tests have not been established. The purpose of this study was to establish the reliability and convergent construct validity of the ESST, T-Test, and IAT in young, nondisabled, physically active male servicemembers (SMs). Ninety-seven male Active Duty U.S. Army SMs completed the study. Statistically significant differences were not found between the ESST (p = 0.10), T-Test (p = 0.09), and IAT (p = 0.23) when administered twice within a 24 to 48 h period. These tests were found to have excellent interrater reliability and moderate to good test-retest reliability. A good positive relationship exists between the IAT and T-Test (r = 0.76, p < 0.001) and a moderate negative relationship exists between the ESST and both the T-Test (r = -0.69, p < 0.001) and IAT (r = -0.65, p < 0.001). The results suggest that these tests are valid measures of agility that uniquely assess movement in different planes, thus providing a comprehensive assessment of high-level mobility.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Department of Veterans Affairs</pub><pmid>24301432</pmid><doi>10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0748-7711 |
| ispartof | Journal of rehabilitation research and development, 2013-01, Vol.50 (7), p.951-960 |
| issn | 0748-7711 1938-1352 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542374992 |
| source | U.S. Government Documents; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Adult Armed forces Comparative analysis Education Exercise Test - methods Human locomotion Humans Male Medical tests Military Personnel Movement - physiology Observer Variation Physical therapy Reproducibility of Results Testing United States Veterans Young Adult |
| title | Comparison of three agility tests with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and Illinois Agility Test |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T06%3A18%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20three%20agility%20tests%20with%20male%20servicemembers:%20Edgren%20Side%20Step%20Test,%20T-Test,%20and%20Illinois%20Agility%20Test&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rehabilitation%20research%20and%20development&rft.au=Raya,%20Michele%20A&rft.date=2013-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=951&rft.epage=960&rft.pages=951-960&rft.issn=0748-7711&rft.eissn=1938-1352&rft.coden=JRRDDB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1682/JRRD.2012.05.0096&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA352616503%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1467683788&rft_id=info:pmid/24301432&rft_galeid=A352616503&rfr_iscdi=true |