All tied up: Tied staying and tied migration within the United States, 1997 to 2007
This research develops a unique methodology to directly identify both tied migrants and tied stayers in order to investigate their frequency and determinants. Using data from the 1997 through 2009 US Panel Study of Income Dynamics, propensity score matching is used to match married individuals with...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Demographic research 2013-07, Vol.29, p.817-836 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 836 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 817 |
| container_title | Demographic research |
| container_volume | 29 |
| creator | Cooke, Thomas J. |
| description | This research develops a unique methodology to directly identify both tied migrants and tied stayers in order to investigate their frequency and determinants. Using data from the 1997 through 2009 US Panel Study of Income Dynamics, propensity score matching is used to match married individuals with comparable single individuals to create counterfactual migration behaviors: who moved but would not have moved had they been single (tied migrants) and who did not move but would have moved had they been single (tied stayers). Tied migration is relatively rare and not limited just to women: rates of tied migration are similar for men and women. However, tied staying is both more common than tied migration and equally experienced by men and women. Additional research is warranted to validate the unique methodology developed in this paper and to confirm its results. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.30 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542000239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A366239505</galeid><jstor_id>26348174</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A366239505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-1292b4a9b5017bb5025f78f1ddab5ac8a151e2ac2308e3c4b8c303a537fdacf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9LxDAQxYMouK5-AA_CghcPtk4ySdscF__DgiB6Dmmarlm67Zq0B7-9KRVRTxKYQPi9yZt5hJxSSDkIfnVjt882pAwopkymCHtkxjDDJIeM75MZ5SgSWeT0kByFsAFgwAXMyHzZNIve2Wox7I7JQa2bYE--7jl5vbt9uX5IVk_3j9fLVWJ4xvuEMslKrmUpgOZlrEzUeVHTqtKl0KbQVFDLtGEIhUXDy8IgoBaY15U2tcQ5uZj67nz3PtjQq60LxjaNbm03BEUFZxAd4n9QJiXyIhMRPf-DbrrBt3GQSMW1RIpBpNKJWuvGKtfWXe-1iaeyW2e61tYuvi8xy-L3Asa2lz8E5RBca0Mswa3f-rDWQwi_cTrhxncheFurnXdb7T8UBTUmpaak1JiUYlLh6Ols0mxC3_lvAcuiZZpz_AQqWYxy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1501334820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>All tied up: Tied staying and tied migration within the United States, 1997 to 2007</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Cooke, Thomas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><description>This research develops a unique methodology to directly identify both tied migrants and tied stayers in order to investigate their frequency and determinants. Using data from the 1997 through 2009 US Panel Study of Income Dynamics, propensity score matching is used to match married individuals with comparable single individuals to create counterfactual migration behaviors: who moved but would not have moved had they been single (tied migrants) and who did not move but would have moved had they been single (tied stayers). Tied migration is relatively rare and not limited just to women: rates of tied migration are similar for men and women. However, tied staying is both more common than tied migration and equally experienced by men and women. Additional research is warranted to validate the unique methodology developed in this paper and to confirm its results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2363-7064</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.30</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research</publisher><subject>Animal migration behavior ; Contrafactuals ; Demography ; Economic models ; Gender ; Gender roles ; Human capital ; Human migration ; Husbands ; Income ; Job hunting ; Labor market ; Men ; Migrants ; Migration ; Moving, Household ; Research Article ; Selective migration ; Studies ; United States of America ; Wives ; Women</subject><ispartof>Demographic research, 2013-07, Vol.29, p.817-836</ispartof><rights>2013 Thomas J. Cooke</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research</rights><rights>Copyright Max Planck Institut für Demografische Forschung Jul-Dec 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-1292b4a9b5017bb5025f78f1ddab5ac8a151e2ac2308e3c4b8c303a537fdacf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-1292b4a9b5017bb5025f78f1ddab5ac8a151e2ac2308e3c4b8c303a537fdacf93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26348174$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26348174$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,865,25358,27348,27928,27929,33778,33779,54528,54534</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><title>All tied up: Tied staying and tied migration within the United States, 1997 to 2007</title><title>Demographic research</title><description>This research develops a unique methodology to directly identify both tied migrants and tied stayers in order to investigate their frequency and determinants. Using data from the 1997 through 2009 US Panel Study of Income Dynamics, propensity score matching is used to match married individuals with comparable single individuals to create counterfactual migration behaviors: who moved but would not have moved had they been single (tied migrants) and who did not move but would have moved had they been single (tied stayers). Tied migration is relatively rare and not limited just to women: rates of tied migration are similar for men and women. However, tied staying is both more common than tied migration and equally experienced by men and women. Additional research is warranted to validate the unique methodology developed in this paper and to confirm its results.</description><subject>Animal migration behavior</subject><subject>Contrafactuals</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender roles</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Human migration</subject><subject>Husbands</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Job hunting</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Migrants</subject><subject>Migration</subject><subject>Moving, Household</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Selective migration</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Wives</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1435-9871</issn><issn>2363-7064</issn><issn>1435-9871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9LxDAQxYMouK5-AA_CghcPtk4ySdscF__DgiB6Dmmarlm67Zq0B7-9KRVRTxKYQPi9yZt5hJxSSDkIfnVjt882pAwopkymCHtkxjDDJIeM75MZ5SgSWeT0kByFsAFgwAXMyHzZNIve2Wox7I7JQa2bYE--7jl5vbt9uX5IVk_3j9fLVWJ4xvuEMslKrmUpgOZlrEzUeVHTqtKl0KbQVFDLtGEIhUXDy8IgoBaY15U2tcQ5uZj67nz3PtjQq60LxjaNbm03BEUFZxAd4n9QJiXyIhMRPf-DbrrBt3GQSMW1RIpBpNKJWuvGKtfWXe-1iaeyW2e61tYuvi8xy-L3Asa2lz8E5RBca0Mswa3f-rDWQwi_cTrhxncheFurnXdb7T8UBTUmpaak1JiUYlLh6Ols0mxC3_lvAcuiZZpz_AQqWYxy</recordid><startdate>20130701</startdate><enddate>20130701</enddate><creator>Cooke, Thomas J.</creator><general>Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research</general><general>Max Planck Institut für Demografische Forschung</general><scope>JFNAL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BFMQW</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130701</creationdate><title>All tied up</title><author>Cooke, Thomas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-1292b4a9b5017bb5025f78f1ddab5ac8a151e2ac2308e3c4b8c303a537fdacf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal migration behavior</topic><topic>Contrafactuals</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender roles</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Human migration</topic><topic>Husbands</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Job hunting</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Migrants</topic><topic>Migration</topic><topic>Moving, Household</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Selective migration</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Wives</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>JSTOR Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Continental Europe Database</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Demographic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cooke, Thomas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>All tied up: Tied staying and tied migration within the United States, 1997 to 2007</atitle><jtitle>Demographic research</jtitle><date>2013-07-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>29</volume><spage>817</spage><epage>836</epage><pages>817-836</pages><issn>1435-9871</issn><eissn>2363-7064</eissn><eissn>1435-9871</eissn><abstract>This research develops a unique methodology to directly identify both tied migrants and tied stayers in order to investigate their frequency and determinants. Using data from the 1997 through 2009 US Panel Study of Income Dynamics, propensity score matching is used to match married individuals with comparable single individuals to create counterfactual migration behaviors: who moved but would not have moved had they been single (tied migrants) and who did not move but would have moved had they been single (tied stayers). Tied migration is relatively rare and not limited just to women: rates of tied migration are similar for men and women. However, tied staying is both more common than tied migration and equally experienced by men and women. Additional research is warranted to validate the unique methodology developed in this paper and to confirm its results.</abstract><cop>Rostock</cop><pub>Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research</pub><doi>10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.30</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1435-9871 |
| ispartof | Demographic research, 2013-07, Vol.29, p.817-836 |
| issn | 1435-9871 2363-7064 1435-9871 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1542000239 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Animal migration behavior Contrafactuals Demography Economic models Gender Gender roles Human capital Human migration Husbands Income Job hunting Labor market Men Migrants Migration Moving, Household Research Article Selective migration Studies United States of America Wives Women |
| title | All tied up: Tied staying and tied migration within the United States, 1997 to 2007 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T07%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=All%20tied%20up:%20Tied%20staying%20and%20tied%20migration%20within%20the%20United%20States,%201997%20to%202007&rft.jtitle=Demographic%20research&rft.au=Cooke,%20Thomas%20J.&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.volume=29&rft.spage=817&rft.epage=836&rft.pages=817-836&rft.issn=1435-9871&rft.eissn=2363-7064&rft_id=info:doi/10.4054/DemRes.2013.29.30&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA366239505%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1501334820&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A366239505&rft_jstor_id=26348174&rfr_iscdi=true |