Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study
Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of affective disorders 2014-08, Vol.164, p.82-89 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 89 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | Journal of affective disorders |
container_volume | 164 |
creator | Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M Giltay, Erik J van Hemert, Albert M Zitman, Frans G de Waal, Margot W.M Van Rood, Yanda R Carlier, Ingrid V.E |
description | Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. We aimed to generate reference values for a healthy population and for a population of patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for at least one of BDD, hypochondriasis, and CFS, treated in specialized mental health care. Methods The healthy ROM reference-group ( n =648) was recruited through general practitioners. These subjects were matched for age and sex with the ROM patient-group ( n =823). To define limits (i.e., cut-off-values) for one-sided reference intervals (5th percentile [ P5 ] for ROM patient-group and 95th percentile [ P95 ] for ROM reference-group) the outermost 5% of observations were used. Discriminative powers were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses Results Cut-off-values ( P95 ROM reference-group) were 55 for the BICI, 6 for the WI, and 92 for the CIS-20R. These values differed for men and women, being mostly higher for women. The discriminative power of all three somatoform questionnaires was very high. Limitations Substantial non-response and limited generalizability. Conclusions For the BICI, WI, and CIS-20R a comprehensive set of reference values was obtained. The reference values may support clinical decisions regarding adjusting or terminating therapy, and possible referral. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541984325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165032714001153</els_id><sourcerecordid>1541984325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6ccd13f0fb7944d3d5efc326089d5e3e47734c979c789730bbaf16ef9feaf3993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt-KEzEUxgdR3Fp9AG8kN0IXnJpMJp2ZFQR38M9AZaFd2cuQJidtutNkTWaKfS2f0My2Knghe5WQ8_vOF875kuQlwVOCyeztdroVapphkk8xnWJCHyUjwgqaZowUj5NRZFiKaVacJc9C2GKMZ1WBnyZnWV6yGWPlKPm5AA0erAS0F20PAWnnUbcBdOnUATU7sQZUu1j3FjV2D7Zz_oAml03dnL-5B282poM2slbBDzS5Gd6FVfe1egPytjWhG6pmb1QvWrTsouG626BJ3SzTDC_OL9B1hOdgFFi0cH1nLKCrvpNuB-irsyaaGruOyl4dnidPtGgDvDid4-Tbp4_X9Zd0fvW5qT_MU8lw3qUzKRWhGutVUeW5ooqBljSb4bKKVwp5UdBcVkUli7IqKF6thCYz0JUGoWlV0XEyOfa98-57nEzHdyZIaFthwfWBE5aTqsxpxh6C4oxShosHoFlsmrPIjxNyRKV3IXjQ_M6bnfAHTjAfAsC3PAaADwHgmPIYgKh5dWrfr3ag_ih-bzwCr0-ACFK02gsrTfjLlSzLKooj9-7IQRzx3oDnQZohJ8p4kB1Xzvz3G-__UcvWWBMNb-EAYet6b-PuOOEh45gvh6QOQSU5xoQwSn8B36Tggw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1529844502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M ; Giltay, Erik J ; van Hemert, Albert M ; Zitman, Frans G ; de Waal, Margot W.M ; Van Rood, Yanda R ; Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M ; Giltay, Erik J ; van Hemert, Albert M ; Zitman, Frans G ; de Waal, Margot W.M ; Van Rood, Yanda R ; Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. We aimed to generate reference values for a healthy population and for a population of patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for at least one of BDD, hypochondriasis, and CFS, treated in specialized mental health care. Methods The healthy ROM reference-group ( n =648) was recruited through general practitioners. These subjects were matched for age and sex with the ROM patient-group ( n =823). To define limits (i.e., cut-off-values) for one-sided reference intervals (5th percentile [ P5 ] for ROM patient-group and 95th percentile [ P95 ] for ROM reference-group) the outermost 5% of observations were used. Discriminative powers were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses Results Cut-off-values ( P95 ROM reference-group) were 55 for the BICI, 6 for the WI, and 92 for the CIS-20R. These values differed for men and women, being mostly higher for women. The discriminative power of all three somatoform questionnaires was very high. Limitations Substantial non-response and limited generalizability. Conclusions For the BICI, WI, and CIS-20R a comprehensive set of reference values was obtained. The reference values may support clinical decisions regarding adjusting or terminating therapy, and possible referral.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24856558</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADID7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body dysmorphic disorder ; Body Dysmorphic Disorders - diagnosis ; Body Dysmorphic Disorders - psychology ; Body image ; Body Image - psychology ; Checklist ; Checklists ; Chronic fatigue syndrome ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - diagnosis ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - psychology ; Female ; General practice ; Generalizability ; Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases ; Humans ; Hypochondriasis ; Hypochondriasis - diagnosis ; Hypochondriasis - psychology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mood disorders ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Personality Inventory ; Platelet diseases and coagulopathies ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reference Values ; ROC Curve ; Routine outcome monitoring ; Self Report ; Somatoform disorders ; Somatoform disorders. Psychosomatics</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2014-08, Vol.164, p.82-89</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6ccd13f0fb7944d3d5efc326089d5e3e47734c979c789730bbaf16ef9feaf3993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6ccd13f0fb7944d3d5efc326089d5e3e47734c979c789730bbaf16ef9feaf3993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28522930$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24856558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giltay, Erik J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hemert, Albert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitman, Frans G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Waal, Margot W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Rood, Yanda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creatorcontrib><title>Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. We aimed to generate reference values for a healthy population and for a population of patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for at least one of BDD, hypochondriasis, and CFS, treated in specialized mental health care. Methods The healthy ROM reference-group ( n =648) was recruited through general practitioners. These subjects were matched for age and sex with the ROM patient-group ( n =823). To define limits (i.e., cut-off-values) for one-sided reference intervals (5th percentile [ P5 ] for ROM patient-group and 95th percentile [ P95 ] for ROM reference-group) the outermost 5% of observations were used. Discriminative powers were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses Results Cut-off-values ( P95 ROM reference-group) were 55 for the BICI, 6 for the WI, and 92 for the CIS-20R. These values differed for men and women, being mostly higher for women. The discriminative power of all three somatoform questionnaires was very high. Limitations Substantial non-response and limited generalizability. Conclusions For the BICI, WI, and CIS-20R a comprehensive set of reference values was obtained. The reference values may support clinical decisions regarding adjusting or terminating therapy, and possible referral.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body dysmorphic disorder</subject><subject>Body Dysmorphic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Body Dysmorphic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Body image</subject><subject>Body Image - psychology</subject><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Checklists</subject><subject>Chronic fatigue syndrome</subject><subject>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Generalizability</subject><subject>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypochondriasis</subject><subject>Hypochondriasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hypochondriasis - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mood disorders</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Platelet diseases and coagulopathies</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Routine outcome monitoring</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Somatoform disorders</subject><subject>Somatoform disorders. Psychosomatics</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt-KEzEUxgdR3Fp9AG8kN0IXnJpMJp2ZFQR38M9AZaFd2cuQJidtutNkTWaKfS2f0My2Knghe5WQ8_vOF875kuQlwVOCyeztdroVapphkk8xnWJCHyUjwgqaZowUj5NRZFiKaVacJc9C2GKMZ1WBnyZnWV6yGWPlKPm5AA0erAS0F20PAWnnUbcBdOnUATU7sQZUu1j3FjV2D7Zz_oAml03dnL-5B282poM2slbBDzS5Gd6FVfe1egPytjWhG6pmb1QvWrTsouG626BJ3SzTDC_OL9B1hOdgFFi0cH1nLKCrvpNuB-irsyaaGruOyl4dnidPtGgDvDid4-Tbp4_X9Zd0fvW5qT_MU8lw3qUzKRWhGutVUeW5ooqBljSb4bKKVwp5UdBcVkUli7IqKF6thCYz0JUGoWlV0XEyOfa98-57nEzHdyZIaFthwfWBE5aTqsxpxh6C4oxShosHoFlsmrPIjxNyRKV3IXjQ_M6bnfAHTjAfAsC3PAaADwHgmPIYgKh5dWrfr3ag_ih-bzwCr0-ACFK02gsrTfjLlSzLKooj9-7IQRzx3oDnQZohJ8p4kB1Xzvz3G-__UcvWWBMNb-EAYet6b-PuOOEh45gvh6QOQSU5xoQwSn8B36Tggw</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M</creator><creator>Giltay, Erik J</creator><creator>van Hemert, Albert M</creator><creator>Zitman, Frans G</creator><creator>de Waal, Margot W.M</creator><creator>Van Rood, Yanda R</creator><creator>Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</title><author>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M ; Giltay, Erik J ; van Hemert, Albert M ; Zitman, Frans G ; de Waal, Margot W.M ; Van Rood, Yanda R ; Carlier, Ingrid V.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6ccd13f0fb7944d3d5efc326089d5e3e47734c979c789730bbaf16ef9feaf3993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body dysmorphic disorder</topic><topic>Body Dysmorphic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Body Dysmorphic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Body image</topic><topic>Body Image - psychology</topic><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Checklists</topic><topic>Chronic fatigue syndrome</topic><topic>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Generalizability</topic><topic>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypochondriasis</topic><topic>Hypochondriasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hypochondriasis - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mood disorders</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Platelet diseases and coagulopathies</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Routine outcome monitoring</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Somatoform disorders</topic><topic>Somatoform disorders. Psychosomatics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giltay, Erik J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hemert, Albert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitman, Frans G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Waal, Margot W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Rood, Yanda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M</au><au>Giltay, Erik J</au><au>van Hemert, Albert M</au><au>Zitman, Frans G</au><au>de Waal, Margot W.M</au><au>Van Rood, Yanda R</au><au>Carlier, Ingrid V.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>164</volume><spage>82</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>82-89</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><coden>JADID7</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. We aimed to generate reference values for a healthy population and for a population of patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for at least one of BDD, hypochondriasis, and CFS, treated in specialized mental health care. Methods The healthy ROM reference-group ( n =648) was recruited through general practitioners. These subjects were matched for age and sex with the ROM patient-group ( n =823). To define limits (i.e., cut-off-values) for one-sided reference intervals (5th percentile [ P5 ] for ROM patient-group and 95th percentile [ P95 ] for ROM reference-group) the outermost 5% of observations were used. Discriminative powers were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses Results Cut-off-values ( P95 ROM reference-group) were 55 for the BICI, 6 for the WI, and 92 for the CIS-20R. These values differed for men and women, being mostly higher for women. The discriminative power of all three somatoform questionnaires was very high. Limitations Substantial non-response and limited generalizability. Conclusions For the BICI, WI, and CIS-20R a comprehensive set of reference values was obtained. The reference values may support clinical decisions regarding adjusting or terminating therapy, and possible referral.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24856558</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0165-0327 |
ispartof | Journal of affective disorders, 2014-08, Vol.164, p.82-89 |
issn | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541984325 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Adult and adolescent clinical studies Biological and medical sciences Body dysmorphic disorder Body Dysmorphic Disorders - diagnosis Body Dysmorphic Disorders - psychology Body image Body Image - psychology Checklist Checklists Chronic fatigue syndrome Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - diagnosis Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - psychology Female General practice Generalizability Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases Humans Hypochondriasis Hypochondriasis - diagnosis Hypochondriasis - psychology Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Mood disorders Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods Personality Inventory Platelet diseases and coagulopathies Psychiatry Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Reference Values ROC Curve Routine outcome monitoring Self Report Somatoform disorders Somatoform disorders. Psychosomatics |
title | Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A52%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reference%20values%20for%20the%20Body%20Image%20Concern%20Inventory%20(BICI),%20the%20Whitely%20Index%20(WI),%20and%20the%20Checklist%20Individual%20Strength%20(CIS-20R):%20The%20Leiden%20Routine%20Outcome%20Monitoring%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Schulte-van%20Maaren,%20Yvonne%20W.M&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=164&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=82-89&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft.coden=JADID7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1541984325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1529844502&rft_id=info:pmid/24856558&rft_els_id=S0165032714001153&rfr_iscdi=true |