Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study

Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of affective disorders 2014-08, Vol.164, p.82-89
Hauptverfasser: Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M, Giltay, Erik J, van Hemert, Albert M, Zitman, Frans G, de Waal, Margot W.M, Van Rood, Yanda R, Carlier, Ingrid V.E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 89
container_issue
container_start_page 82
container_title Journal of affective disorders
container_volume 164
creator Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M
Giltay, Erik J
van Hemert, Albert M
Zitman, Frans G
de Waal, Margot W.M
Van Rood, Yanda R
Carlier, Ingrid V.E
description Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. We aimed to generate reference values for a healthy population and for a population of patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for at least one of BDD, hypochondriasis, and CFS, treated in specialized mental health care. Methods The healthy ROM reference-group ( n =648) was recruited through general practitioners. These subjects were matched for age and sex with the ROM patient-group ( n =823). To define limits (i.e., cut-off-values) for one-sided reference intervals (5th percentile [ P5 ] for ROM patient-group and 95th percentile [ P95 ] for ROM reference-group) the outermost 5% of observations were used. Discriminative powers were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses Results Cut-off-values ( P95 ROM reference-group) were 55 for the BICI, 6 for the WI, and 92 for the CIS-20R. These values differed for men and women, being mostly higher for women. The discriminative power of all three somatoform questionnaires was very high. Limitations Substantial non-response and limited generalizability. Conclusions For the BICI, WI, and CIS-20R a comprehensive set of reference values was obtained. The reference values may support clinical decisions regarding adjusting or terminating therapy, and possible referral.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541984325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165032714001153</els_id><sourcerecordid>1541984325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6ccd13f0fb7944d3d5efc326089d5e3e47734c979c789730bbaf16ef9feaf3993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt-KEzEUxgdR3Fp9AG8kN0IXnJpMJp2ZFQR38M9AZaFd2cuQJidtutNkTWaKfS2f0My2Knghe5WQ8_vOF875kuQlwVOCyeztdroVapphkk8xnWJCHyUjwgqaZowUj5NRZFiKaVacJc9C2GKMZ1WBnyZnWV6yGWPlKPm5AA0erAS0F20PAWnnUbcBdOnUATU7sQZUu1j3FjV2D7Zz_oAml03dnL-5B282poM2slbBDzS5Gd6FVfe1egPytjWhG6pmb1QvWrTsouG626BJ3SzTDC_OL9B1hOdgFFi0cH1nLKCrvpNuB-irsyaaGruOyl4dnidPtGgDvDid4-Tbp4_X9Zd0fvW5qT_MU8lw3qUzKRWhGutVUeW5ooqBljSb4bKKVwp5UdBcVkUli7IqKF6thCYz0JUGoWlV0XEyOfa98-57nEzHdyZIaFthwfWBE5aTqsxpxh6C4oxShosHoFlsmrPIjxNyRKV3IXjQ_M6bnfAHTjAfAsC3PAaADwHgmPIYgKh5dWrfr3ag_ih-bzwCr0-ACFK02gsrTfjLlSzLKooj9-7IQRzx3oDnQZohJ8p4kB1Xzvz3G-__UcvWWBMNb-EAYet6b-PuOOEh45gvh6QOQSU5xoQwSn8B36Tggw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1529844502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M ; Giltay, Erik J ; van Hemert, Albert M ; Zitman, Frans G ; de Waal, Margot W.M ; Van Rood, Yanda R ; Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creator><creatorcontrib>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M ; Giltay, Erik J ; van Hemert, Albert M ; Zitman, Frans G ; de Waal, Margot W.M ; Van Rood, Yanda R ; Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. We aimed to generate reference values for a healthy population and for a population of patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for at least one of BDD, hypochondriasis, and CFS, treated in specialized mental health care. Methods The healthy ROM reference-group ( n =648) was recruited through general practitioners. These subjects were matched for age and sex with the ROM patient-group ( n =823). To define limits (i.e., cut-off-values) for one-sided reference intervals (5th percentile [ P5 ] for ROM patient-group and 95th percentile [ P95 ] for ROM reference-group) the outermost 5% of observations were used. Discriminative powers were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses Results Cut-off-values ( P95 ROM reference-group) were 55 for the BICI, 6 for the WI, and 92 for the CIS-20R. These values differed for men and women, being mostly higher for women. The discriminative power of all three somatoform questionnaires was very high. Limitations Substantial non-response and limited generalizability. Conclusions For the BICI, WI, and CIS-20R a comprehensive set of reference values was obtained. The reference values may support clinical decisions regarding adjusting or terminating therapy, and possible referral.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24856558</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JADID7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body dysmorphic disorder ; Body Dysmorphic Disorders - diagnosis ; Body Dysmorphic Disorders - psychology ; Body image ; Body Image - psychology ; Checklist ; Checklists ; Chronic fatigue syndrome ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - diagnosis ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - psychology ; Female ; General practice ; Generalizability ; Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases ; Humans ; Hypochondriasis ; Hypochondriasis - diagnosis ; Hypochondriasis - psychology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Mood disorders ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Personality Inventory ; Platelet diseases and coagulopathies ; Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Reference Values ; ROC Curve ; Routine outcome monitoring ; Self Report ; Somatoform disorders ; Somatoform disorders. Psychosomatics</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2014-08, Vol.164, p.82-89</ispartof><rights>Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6ccd13f0fb7944d3d5efc326089d5e3e47734c979c789730bbaf16ef9feaf3993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6ccd13f0fb7944d3d5efc326089d5e3e47734c979c789730bbaf16ef9feaf3993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28522930$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24856558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giltay, Erik J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hemert, Albert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitman, Frans G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Waal, Margot W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Rood, Yanda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creatorcontrib><title>Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. We aimed to generate reference values for a healthy population and for a population of patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for at least one of BDD, hypochondriasis, and CFS, treated in specialized mental health care. Methods The healthy ROM reference-group ( n =648) was recruited through general practitioners. These subjects were matched for age and sex with the ROM patient-group ( n =823). To define limits (i.e., cut-off-values) for one-sided reference intervals (5th percentile [ P5 ] for ROM patient-group and 95th percentile [ P95 ] for ROM reference-group) the outermost 5% of observations were used. Discriminative powers were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses Results Cut-off-values ( P95 ROM reference-group) were 55 for the BICI, 6 for the WI, and 92 for the CIS-20R. These values differed for men and women, being mostly higher for women. The discriminative power of all three somatoform questionnaires was very high. Limitations Substantial non-response and limited generalizability. Conclusions For the BICI, WI, and CIS-20R a comprehensive set of reference values was obtained. The reference values may support clinical decisions regarding adjusting or terminating therapy, and possible referral.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body dysmorphic disorder</subject><subject>Body Dysmorphic Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Body Dysmorphic Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Body image</subject><subject>Body Image - psychology</subject><subject>Checklist</subject><subject>Checklists</subject><subject>Chronic fatigue syndrome</subject><subject>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Generalizability</subject><subject>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypochondriasis</subject><subject>Hypochondriasis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hypochondriasis - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mood disorders</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Personality Inventory</subject><subject>Platelet diseases and coagulopathies</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Routine outcome monitoring</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Somatoform disorders</subject><subject>Somatoform disorders. Psychosomatics</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt-KEzEUxgdR3Fp9AG8kN0IXnJpMJp2ZFQR38M9AZaFd2cuQJidtutNkTWaKfS2f0My2Knghe5WQ8_vOF875kuQlwVOCyeztdroVapphkk8xnWJCHyUjwgqaZowUj5NRZFiKaVacJc9C2GKMZ1WBnyZnWV6yGWPlKPm5AA0erAS0F20PAWnnUbcBdOnUATU7sQZUu1j3FjV2D7Zz_oAml03dnL-5B282poM2slbBDzS5Gd6FVfe1egPytjWhG6pmb1QvWrTsouG626BJ3SzTDC_OL9B1hOdgFFi0cH1nLKCrvpNuB-irsyaaGruOyl4dnidPtGgDvDid4-Tbp4_X9Zd0fvW5qT_MU8lw3qUzKRWhGutVUeW5ooqBljSb4bKKVwp5UdBcVkUli7IqKF6thCYz0JUGoWlV0XEyOfa98-57nEzHdyZIaFthwfWBE5aTqsxpxh6C4oxShosHoFlsmrPIjxNyRKV3IXjQ_M6bnfAHTjAfAsC3PAaADwHgmPIYgKh5dWrfr3ag_ih-bzwCr0-ACFK02gsrTfjLlSzLKooj9-7IQRzx3oDnQZohJ8p4kB1Xzvz3G-__UcvWWBMNb-EAYet6b-PuOOEh45gvh6QOQSU5xoQwSn8B36Tggw</recordid><startdate>20140801</startdate><enddate>20140801</enddate><creator>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M</creator><creator>Giltay, Erik J</creator><creator>van Hemert, Albert M</creator><creator>Zitman, Frans G</creator><creator>de Waal, Margot W.M</creator><creator>Van Rood, Yanda R</creator><creator>Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140801</creationdate><title>Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</title><author>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M ; Giltay, Erik J ; van Hemert, Albert M ; Zitman, Frans G ; de Waal, Margot W.M ; Van Rood, Yanda R ; Carlier, Ingrid V.E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-6ccd13f0fb7944d3d5efc326089d5e3e47734c979c789730bbaf16ef9feaf3993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body dysmorphic disorder</topic><topic>Body Dysmorphic Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Body Dysmorphic Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Body image</topic><topic>Body Image - psychology</topic><topic>Checklist</topic><topic>Checklists</topic><topic>Chronic fatigue syndrome</topic><topic>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Generalizability</topic><topic>Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypochondriasis</topic><topic>Hypochondriasis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hypochondriasis - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mood disorders</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Personality Inventory</topic><topic>Platelet diseases and coagulopathies</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Routine outcome monitoring</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Somatoform disorders</topic><topic>Somatoform disorders. Psychosomatics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giltay, Erik J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hemert, Albert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitman, Frans G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Waal, Margot W.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Rood, Yanda R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlier, Ingrid V.E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schulte-van Maaren, Yvonne W.M</au><au>Giltay, Erik J</au><au>van Hemert, Albert M</au><au>Zitman, Frans G</au><au>de Waal, Margot W.M</au><au>Van Rood, Yanda R</au><au>Carlier, Ingrid V.E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><addtitle>J Affect Disord</addtitle><date>2014-08-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>164</volume><spage>82</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>82-89</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><coden>JADID7</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R) are three questionnaires often incorporated in routine outcome monitoring (ROM). Respectively, they assess symptom severity in patients with body dysmorphic disorder, hypochondriasis, and chronic fatigue syndrome. We aimed to generate reference values for a healthy population and for a population of patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for at least one of BDD, hypochondriasis, and CFS, treated in specialized mental health care. Methods The healthy ROM reference-group ( n =648) was recruited through general practitioners. These subjects were matched for age and sex with the ROM patient-group ( n =823). To define limits (i.e., cut-off-values) for one-sided reference intervals (5th percentile [ P5 ] for ROM patient-group and 95th percentile [ P95 ] for ROM reference-group) the outermost 5% of observations were used. Discriminative powers were evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses Results Cut-off-values ( P95 ROM reference-group) were 55 for the BICI, 6 for the WI, and 92 for the CIS-20R. These values differed for men and women, being mostly higher for women. The discriminative power of all three somatoform questionnaires was very high. Limitations Substantial non-response and limited generalizability. Conclusions For the BICI, WI, and CIS-20R a comprehensive set of reference values was obtained. The reference values may support clinical decisions regarding adjusting or terminating therapy, and possible referral.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>24856558</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0327
ispartof Journal of affective disorders, 2014-08, Vol.164, p.82-89
issn 0165-0327
1573-2517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541984325
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
Body dysmorphic disorder
Body Dysmorphic Disorders - diagnosis
Body Dysmorphic Disorders - psychology
Body image
Body Image - psychology
Checklist
Checklists
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - diagnosis
Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - psychology
Female
General practice
Generalizability
Hematologic and hematopoietic diseases
Humans
Hypochondriasis
Hypochondriasis - diagnosis
Hypochondriasis - psychology
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Mood disorders
Outcome Assessment (Health Care) - methods
Personality Inventory
Platelet diseases and coagulopathies
Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Reference Values
ROC Curve
Routine outcome monitoring
Self Report
Somatoform disorders
Somatoform disorders. Psychosomatics
title Reference values for the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI), the Whitely Index (WI), and the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS-20R): The Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A52%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reference%20values%20for%20the%20Body%20Image%20Concern%20Inventory%20(BICI),%20the%20Whitely%20Index%20(WI),%20and%20the%20Checklist%20Individual%20Strength%20(CIS-20R):%20The%20Leiden%20Routine%20Outcome%20Monitoring%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Schulte-van%20Maaren,%20Yvonne%20W.M&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.volume=164&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=82-89&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft.coden=JADID7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1541984325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1529844502&rft_id=info:pmid/24856558&rft_els_id=S0165032714001153&rfr_iscdi=true