The Liverpool Care Pathway for cancer patients dying in hospital medical wards: A before–after cluster phase II trial of outcomes reported by family members

Background: Hospital is the most common place of cancer death but concerns regarding the quality of end-of-life care remain. Aim: Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway on the quality of end-of-life care provided to adult cancer patients during their last week of l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Palliative medicine 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.10-17
Hauptverfasser: Costantini, Massimo, Pellegrini, Fabio, Di Leo, Silvia, Beccaro, Monica, Rossi, Carla, Flego, Guia, Romoli, Vittoria, Giannotti, Michela, Morone, Paola, Ivaldi, Giovanni P, Cavallo, Laura, Fusco, Flavio, Higginson, Irene J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 10
container_title Palliative medicine
container_volume 28
creator Costantini, Massimo
Pellegrini, Fabio
Di Leo, Silvia
Beccaro, Monica
Rossi, Carla
Flego, Guia
Romoli, Vittoria
Giannotti, Michela
Morone, Paola
Ivaldi, Giovanni P
Cavallo, Laura
Fusco, Flavio
Higginson, Irene J
description Background: Hospital is the most common place of cancer death but concerns regarding the quality of end-of-life care remain. Aim: Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway on the quality of end-of-life care provided to adult cancer patients during their last week of life in hospital. Design: Uncontrolled before–after intervention cluster trial. Settings/participants: The trial was performed within four hospital wards participating in the pilot implementation of the Italian version of the Liverpool Care Pathway programme. All cancer patients who died in the hospital wards 2–4 months before and after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway were identified. A total of 2 months after the patient’s death, bereaved family members were interviewed using the Toolkit After-Death Family Interview (seven 0–100 scales assessing the quality of end-of-life care) and the Italian version of the Views of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services (VOICES) (three items assessing pain, breathlessness and nausea-vomiting). Results: An interview was obtained for 79 family members, 46 (73.0%) before and 33 (68.8%) after implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway. Following Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway implementation, there was a significant improvement in the mean scores of four Toolkit scales: respect, kindness and dignity (+16.8; 95% confidence interval = 3.6–30.0; p = 0.015); family emotional support (+20.9; 95% confidence interval = 9.6–32.3; p < 0.001); family self-efficacy (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 0.3–28.2; p = 0.049) and coordination of care (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 4.2–24.3; p = 0.007). No significant improvement in symptom’ control was observed. Conclusions: These results provide the first robust data collected from family members of a preliminary clinically significant improvement, in some aspects, of quality of care after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway programme. The poor effect for symptom control suggests areas for further innovation and development.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0269216313487569
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541978988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0269216313487569</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1490750534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c91f44c6d6cb4130b385ce24d10053cf3bd007c423bcb0dc7738c86c49a2ffd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks2KFDEUhYMoTju6dyUBN25K81dJxd3QONrQoIsR3BVJ6tZ0hqpKmaRm6J3v4H4ezicxTY8iA6Krs7jfOZfLPQg9p-Q1pUq9IUxqRiWnXDSqlvoBWlGhVEU4-fIQrQ7j6jA_QU9SuiKEciLFY3TCuKxZI8gK3V7sAG_9NcQ5hAGvTQT8yeTdjdnjPkTszOQg4tlkD1NOuNv76RL7Ce9Cmn02Ax6h867ojYldeovPsIVihB_fvps-F6sblnTQeWcS4M0G5-gLHnocluzCCAlHmEPM0GFblprRD_uSOlqI6Sl61JshwbM7PUWfz99drD9U24_vN-uzbeWEVrlymvZCONlJZ0U50vKmdsBERwmpueu57QhRTjBunSWdU4o3rpHFbFjfdw0_Ra-OuXMMXxdIuR19cjAMZoKwpJbWgmrV6OZ_UFKzmmkp_40KTVTBuSjoy3voVVjiVG4ulCJaKqHqQpEj5WJIKULfztGPJu5bStpDI9r7jSiWF3fBiy2v-m34VYECVEcgmUv4Y-vfAn8Cw1y_JQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1470967475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Liverpool Care Pathway for cancer patients dying in hospital medical wards: A before–after cluster phase II trial of outcomes reported by family members</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Costantini, Massimo ; Pellegrini, Fabio ; Di Leo, Silvia ; Beccaro, Monica ; Rossi, Carla ; Flego, Guia ; Romoli, Vittoria ; Giannotti, Michela ; Morone, Paola ; Ivaldi, Giovanni P ; Cavallo, Laura ; Fusco, Flavio ; Higginson, Irene J</creator><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Massimo ; Pellegrini, Fabio ; Di Leo, Silvia ; Beccaro, Monica ; Rossi, Carla ; Flego, Guia ; Romoli, Vittoria ; Giannotti, Michela ; Morone, Paola ; Ivaldi, Giovanni P ; Cavallo, Laura ; Fusco, Flavio ; Higginson, Irene J</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Hospital is the most common place of cancer death but concerns regarding the quality of end-of-life care remain. Aim: Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway on the quality of end-of-life care provided to adult cancer patients during their last week of life in hospital. Design: Uncontrolled before–after intervention cluster trial. Settings/participants: The trial was performed within four hospital wards participating in the pilot implementation of the Italian version of the Liverpool Care Pathway programme. All cancer patients who died in the hospital wards 2–4 months before and after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway were identified. A total of 2 months after the patient’s death, bereaved family members were interviewed using the Toolkit After-Death Family Interview (seven 0–100 scales assessing the quality of end-of-life care) and the Italian version of the Views of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services (VOICES) (three items assessing pain, breathlessness and nausea-vomiting). Results: An interview was obtained for 79 family members, 46 (73.0%) before and 33 (68.8%) after implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway. Following Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway implementation, there was a significant improvement in the mean scores of four Toolkit scales: respect, kindness and dignity (+16.8; 95% confidence interval = 3.6–30.0; p = 0.015); family emotional support (+20.9; 95% confidence interval = 9.6–32.3; p &lt; 0.001); family self-efficacy (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 0.3–28.2; p = 0.049) and coordination of care (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 4.2–24.3; p = 0.007). No significant improvement in symptom’ control was observed. Conclusions: These results provide the first robust data collected from family members of a preliminary clinically significant improvement, in some aspects, of quality of care after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway programme. The poor effect for symptom control suggests areas for further innovation and development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2163</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-030X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0269216313487569</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23652840</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PAMDE2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Advance Care Planning - standards ; Advance Care Planning - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Aged ; Cancer ; Chronic Disease - mortality ; Chronic Disease - therapy ; Cluster Analysis ; Communication ; Confidence intervals ; Critical Pathways ; Family - psychology ; Family physicians ; Female ; Hospital Units - standards ; Hospital Units - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Italian version ; Italy ; Male ; Medicine ; Neoplasms - mortality ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - methods ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - standards ; Palliative Care ; Patients ; Pilot Projects ; Program Evaluation ; Quality improvement ; Quality of care ; Relatives ; Respiratory diseases ; Terminal Care - psychology ; Terminal Care - standards ; Terminal Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Palliative medicine, 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.10-17</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2013</rights><rights>SAGE Publications © Jan 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c91f44c6d6cb4130b385ce24d10053cf3bd007c423bcb0dc7738c86c49a2ffd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c91f44c6d6cb4130b385ce24d10053cf3bd007c423bcb0dc7738c86c49a2ffd83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0269216313487569$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0269216313487569$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12837,21810,27915,27916,30990,30991,43612,43613</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23652840$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrini, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Leo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beccaro, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flego, Guia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romoli, Vittoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannotti, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morone, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivaldi, Giovanni P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavallo, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fusco, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Irene J</creatorcontrib><title>The Liverpool Care Pathway for cancer patients dying in hospital medical wards: A before–after cluster phase II trial of outcomes reported by family members</title><title>Palliative medicine</title><addtitle>Palliat Med</addtitle><description>Background: Hospital is the most common place of cancer death but concerns regarding the quality of end-of-life care remain. Aim: Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway on the quality of end-of-life care provided to adult cancer patients during their last week of life in hospital. Design: Uncontrolled before–after intervention cluster trial. Settings/participants: The trial was performed within four hospital wards participating in the pilot implementation of the Italian version of the Liverpool Care Pathway programme. All cancer patients who died in the hospital wards 2–4 months before and after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway were identified. A total of 2 months after the patient’s death, bereaved family members were interviewed using the Toolkit After-Death Family Interview (seven 0–100 scales assessing the quality of end-of-life care) and the Italian version of the Views of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services (VOICES) (three items assessing pain, breathlessness and nausea-vomiting). Results: An interview was obtained for 79 family members, 46 (73.0%) before and 33 (68.8%) after implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway. Following Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway implementation, there was a significant improvement in the mean scores of four Toolkit scales: respect, kindness and dignity (+16.8; 95% confidence interval = 3.6–30.0; p = 0.015); family emotional support (+20.9; 95% confidence interval = 9.6–32.3; p &lt; 0.001); family self-efficacy (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 0.3–28.2; p = 0.049) and coordination of care (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 4.2–24.3; p = 0.007). No significant improvement in symptom’ control was observed. Conclusions: These results provide the first robust data collected from family members of a preliminary clinically significant improvement, in some aspects, of quality of care after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway programme. The poor effect for symptom control suggests areas for further innovation and development.</description><subject>Advance Care Planning - standards</subject><subject>Advance Care Planning - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - mortality</subject><subject>Chronic Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Cluster Analysis</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Critical Pathways</subject><subject>Family - psychology</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Units - standards</subject><subject>Hospital Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Italian version</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - methods</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - standards</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Quality improvement</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Relatives</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Terminal Care - psychology</subject><subject>Terminal Care - standards</subject><subject>Terminal Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0269-2163</issn><issn>1477-030X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks2KFDEUhYMoTju6dyUBN25K81dJxd3QONrQoIsR3BVJ6tZ0hqpKmaRm6J3v4H4ezicxTY8iA6Krs7jfOZfLPQg9p-Q1pUq9IUxqRiWnXDSqlvoBWlGhVEU4-fIQrQ7j6jA_QU9SuiKEciLFY3TCuKxZI8gK3V7sAG_9NcQ5hAGvTQT8yeTdjdnjPkTszOQg4tlkD1NOuNv76RL7Ce9Cmn02Ax6h867ojYldeovPsIVihB_fvps-F6sblnTQeWcS4M0G5-gLHnocluzCCAlHmEPM0GFblprRD_uSOlqI6Sl61JshwbM7PUWfz99drD9U24_vN-uzbeWEVrlymvZCONlJZ0U50vKmdsBERwmpueu57QhRTjBunSWdU4o3rpHFbFjfdw0_Ra-OuXMMXxdIuR19cjAMZoKwpJbWgmrV6OZ_UFKzmmkp_40KTVTBuSjoy3voVVjiVG4ulCJaKqHqQpEj5WJIKULfztGPJu5bStpDI9r7jSiWF3fBiy2v-m34VYECVEcgmUv4Y-vfAn8Cw1y_JQ</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Costantini, Massimo</creator><creator>Pellegrini, Fabio</creator><creator>Di Leo, Silvia</creator><creator>Beccaro, Monica</creator><creator>Rossi, Carla</creator><creator>Flego, Guia</creator><creator>Romoli, Vittoria</creator><creator>Giannotti, Michela</creator><creator>Morone, Paola</creator><creator>Ivaldi, Giovanni P</creator><creator>Cavallo, Laura</creator><creator>Fusco, Flavio</creator><creator>Higginson, Irene J</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>The Liverpool Care Pathway for cancer patients dying in hospital medical wards: A before–after cluster phase II trial of outcomes reported by family members</title><author>Costantini, Massimo ; Pellegrini, Fabio ; Di Leo, Silvia ; Beccaro, Monica ; Rossi, Carla ; Flego, Guia ; Romoli, Vittoria ; Giannotti, Michela ; Morone, Paola ; Ivaldi, Giovanni P ; Cavallo, Laura ; Fusco, Flavio ; Higginson, Irene J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c497t-c91f44c6d6cb4130b385ce24d10053cf3bd007c423bcb0dc7738c86c49a2ffd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Advance Care Planning - standards</topic><topic>Advance Care Planning - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - mortality</topic><topic>Chronic Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Cluster Analysis</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Critical Pathways</topic><topic>Family - psychology</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Units - standards</topic><topic>Hospital Units - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Italian version</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - methods</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - standards</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Quality improvement</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Relatives</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Terminal Care - psychology</topic><topic>Terminal Care - standards</topic><topic>Terminal Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costantini, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellegrini, Fabio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Leo, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beccaro, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flego, Guia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romoli, Vittoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giannotti, Michela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morone, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivaldi, Giovanni P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavallo, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fusco, Flavio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higginson, Irene J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Palliative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costantini, Massimo</au><au>Pellegrini, Fabio</au><au>Di Leo, Silvia</au><au>Beccaro, Monica</au><au>Rossi, Carla</au><au>Flego, Guia</au><au>Romoli, Vittoria</au><au>Giannotti, Michela</au><au>Morone, Paola</au><au>Ivaldi, Giovanni P</au><au>Cavallo, Laura</au><au>Fusco, Flavio</au><au>Higginson, Irene J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Liverpool Care Pathway for cancer patients dying in hospital medical wards: A before–after cluster phase II trial of outcomes reported by family members</atitle><jtitle>Palliative medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Palliat Med</addtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>10-17</pages><issn>0269-2163</issn><eissn>1477-030X</eissn><coden>PAMDE2</coden><abstract>Background: Hospital is the most common place of cancer death but concerns regarding the quality of end-of-life care remain. Aim: Preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the Liverpool Care Pathway on the quality of end-of-life care provided to adult cancer patients during their last week of life in hospital. Design: Uncontrolled before–after intervention cluster trial. Settings/participants: The trial was performed within four hospital wards participating in the pilot implementation of the Italian version of the Liverpool Care Pathway programme. All cancer patients who died in the hospital wards 2–4 months before and after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway were identified. A total of 2 months after the patient’s death, bereaved family members were interviewed using the Toolkit After-Death Family Interview (seven 0–100 scales assessing the quality of end-of-life care) and the Italian version of the Views of Informal Carers - Evaluation of Services (VOICES) (three items assessing pain, breathlessness and nausea-vomiting). Results: An interview was obtained for 79 family members, 46 (73.0%) before and 33 (68.8%) after implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway. Following Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway implementation, there was a significant improvement in the mean scores of four Toolkit scales: respect, kindness and dignity (+16.8; 95% confidence interval = 3.6–30.0; p = 0.015); family emotional support (+20.9; 95% confidence interval = 9.6–32.3; p &lt; 0.001); family self-efficacy (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 0.3–28.2; p = 0.049) and coordination of care (+14.3; 95% confidence interval = 4.2–24.3; p = 0.007). No significant improvement in symptom’ control was observed. Conclusions: These results provide the first robust data collected from family members of a preliminary clinically significant improvement, in some aspects, of quality of care after the implementation of the Italian version of Liverpool Care Pathway programme. The poor effect for symptom control suggests areas for further innovation and development.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23652840</pmid><doi>10.1177/0269216313487569</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-2163
ispartof Palliative medicine, 2014-01, Vol.28 (1), p.10-17
issn 0269-2163
1477-030X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541978988
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SAGE Journals Online
subjects Advance Care Planning - standards
Advance Care Planning - statistics & numerical data
Aged
Cancer
Chronic Disease - mortality
Chronic Disease - therapy
Cluster Analysis
Communication
Confidence intervals
Critical Pathways
Family - psychology
Family physicians
Female
Hospital Units - standards
Hospital Units - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Italian version
Italy
Male
Medicine
Neoplasms - mortality
Neoplasms - therapy
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - methods
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) - standards
Palliative Care
Patients
Pilot Projects
Program Evaluation
Quality improvement
Quality of care
Relatives
Respiratory diseases
Terminal Care - psychology
Terminal Care - standards
Terminal Care - statistics & numerical data
Treatment Outcome
title The Liverpool Care Pathway for cancer patients dying in hospital medical wards: A before–after cluster phase II trial of outcomes reported by family members
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A07%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Liverpool%20Care%20Pathway%20for%20cancer%20patients%20dying%20in%20hospital%20medical%20wards:%20A%20before%E2%80%93after%20cluster%20phase%20II%20trial%20of%20outcomes%20reported%20by%20family%20members&rft.jtitle=Palliative%20medicine&rft.au=Costantini,%20Massimo&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=10-17&rft.issn=0269-2163&rft.eissn=1477-030X&rft.coden=PAMDE2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0269216313487569&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1490750534%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1470967475&rft_id=info:pmid/23652840&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0269216313487569&rfr_iscdi=true