The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique

Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physiotherapy 2013-09, Vol.99 (3), p.241-246
Hauptverfasser: Antcliff, Deborah, Keeley, Philip, Campbell, Malcolm, Oldham, Jackie, Woby, Steve
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 246
container_issue 3
container_start_page 241
container_title Physiotherapy
container_volume 99
creator Antcliff, Deborah
Keeley, Philip
Campbell, Malcolm
Oldham, Jackie
Woby, Steve
description Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and conflicting research evidence into the efficacy of this strategy. There is no consensus on the interpretation of ‘pacing’ due to diverse descriptions, including strategies that encourage both increasing and decreasing activities. Furthermore, at present, there are few validated scales to measure how patients pace their activities. The aim of this study was to undertake the first stage in the development of a comprehensive tool that assesses the multi-faceted nature of pacing among patients with chronic conditions. Design Three-round Delphi technique. Participants Expert panel based in the UK including patients and clinicians. Results The 42 participants who completed three rounds of Delphi included 4 patients, 3 nurses, 26 physiotherapists and 9 occupational therapists. The 38 questions that reached consensus to be included in the questionnaire encompassed a number of different facets of pacing, for example, breaking down tasks, not over-doing activities, and gradually increasing activities. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that has engaged both patients and clinicians in a Delphi technique to develop an activity pacing questionnaire. In contrast to existing pacing scales, our questionnaire appears to contain a number of distinct facets of pacing. Further study is being undertaken to engage patients in the exploration of the validity, reliability and acceptability of the questionnaire.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541977264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0031940612001381</els_id><sourcerecordid>1541977264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-89f924dbba542c0a7ee7a3deb58b5722ec337269eff17c63835b85a5ef742cf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQgIMo7rj6D0Ry9NKzeXa6PQiy6wsWPLieQzpdmc7Yk7RJ98D8e9PO6sHLLhQEwlcP6iuEXlOypYTWV_vtNJyyj1tGKNuWIIQ_QRvaKF5RUcunaFN-aNUKUl-gFznvCWGSKvocXTDOW8lqvkG7uwFwD0cY43SAMOPosAnY2Nkf_XzCk7E-7PCvBfLsYwjGJ8AuJmyHFIO3BfAFD_1V-XNm9rsF3mGDb2CcBo9nsEPwJfsleubMmOHV_XuJfnz6eHf9pbr99vnr9Yfbykpaz1XTupaJvuuMFMwSowCU4T10sumkYgws54rVLThHla15w2XXSCPBqcI7xi_R23PdKcU_Q-uDzxbG0QSIS9ZUCtqqUkI8AuWiYYQ05BEoIaoVrG4eRgVVkjOh1lnFGbUp5pzA6Sn5g0knTYleHeu9PjvWq2NdohgtaW_uOyzdAfp_SX-lFuD9GYCy6KOHpLP1ECz0RZ6ddR_9Qx3-L2BHX2Sb8SecIO_jkkKRqKnOJUF_X-9sPTNatkV5Q_lvZBvN-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417532472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Antcliff, Deborah ; Keeley, Philip ; Campbell, Malcolm ; Oldham, Jackie ; Woby, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Antcliff, Deborah ; Keeley, Philip ; Campbell, Malcolm ; Oldham, Jackie ; Woby, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and conflicting research evidence into the efficacy of this strategy. There is no consensus on the interpretation of ‘pacing’ due to diverse descriptions, including strategies that encourage both increasing and decreasing activities. Furthermore, at present, there are few validated scales to measure how patients pace their activities. The aim of this study was to undertake the first stage in the development of a comprehensive tool that assesses the multi-faceted nature of pacing among patients with chronic conditions. Design Three-round Delphi technique. Participants Expert panel based in the UK including patients and clinicians. Results The 42 participants who completed three rounds of Delphi included 4 patients, 3 nurses, 26 physiotherapists and 9 occupational therapists. The 38 questions that reached consensus to be included in the questionnaire encompassed a number of different facets of pacing, for example, breaking down tasks, not over-doing activities, and gradually increasing activities. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that has engaged both patients and clinicians in a Delphi technique to develop an activity pacing questionnaire. In contrast to existing pacing scales, our questionnaire appears to contain a number of distinct facets of pacing. Further study is being undertaken to engage patients in the exploration of the validity, reliability and acceptability of the questionnaire.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23395263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Activity pacing ; Adult ; Chronic fatigue syndrome ; Chronic low back pain ; Chronic Pain - physiopathology ; Chronic Pain - rehabilitation ; Chronic sickness ; Consensus ; Coping strategies ; Delphi Technique ; Fatigue ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - physiopathology ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - rehabilitation ; Female ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Occupational Therapy ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapists ; Questionnaire ; Rehabilitation Nursing ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Tempo ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Physiotherapy, 2013-09, Vol.99 (3), p.241-246</ispartof><rights>Chartered Society of Physiotherapy</rights><rights>2012 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-89f924dbba542c0a7ee7a3deb58b5722ec337269eff17c63835b85a5ef742cf23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-89f924dbba542c0a7ee7a3deb58b5722ec337269eff17c63835b85a5ef742cf23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23395263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antcliff, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woby, Steve</creatorcontrib><title>The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique</title><title>Physiotherapy</title><addtitle>Physiotherapy</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and conflicting research evidence into the efficacy of this strategy. There is no consensus on the interpretation of ‘pacing’ due to diverse descriptions, including strategies that encourage both increasing and decreasing activities. Furthermore, at present, there are few validated scales to measure how patients pace their activities. The aim of this study was to undertake the first stage in the development of a comprehensive tool that assesses the multi-faceted nature of pacing among patients with chronic conditions. Design Three-round Delphi technique. Participants Expert panel based in the UK including patients and clinicians. Results The 42 participants who completed three rounds of Delphi included 4 patients, 3 nurses, 26 physiotherapists and 9 occupational therapists. The 38 questions that reached consensus to be included in the questionnaire encompassed a number of different facets of pacing, for example, breaking down tasks, not over-doing activities, and gradually increasing activities. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that has engaged both patients and clinicians in a Delphi technique to develop an activity pacing questionnaire. In contrast to existing pacing scales, our questionnaire appears to contain a number of distinct facets of pacing. Further study is being undertaken to engage patients in the exploration of the validity, reliability and acceptability of the questionnaire.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Activity pacing</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chronic fatigue syndrome</subject><subject>Chronic low back pain</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Chronic sickness</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Coping strategies</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Physical Therapists</subject><subject>Questionnaire</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Nursing</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Tempo</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0031-9406</issn><issn>1873-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQgIMo7rj6D0Ry9NKzeXa6PQiy6wsWPLieQzpdmc7Yk7RJ98D8e9PO6sHLLhQEwlcP6iuEXlOypYTWV_vtNJyyj1tGKNuWIIQ_QRvaKF5RUcunaFN-aNUKUl-gFznvCWGSKvocXTDOW8lqvkG7uwFwD0cY43SAMOPosAnY2Nkf_XzCk7E-7PCvBfLsYwjGJ8AuJmyHFIO3BfAFD_1V-XNm9rsF3mGDb2CcBo9nsEPwJfsleubMmOHV_XuJfnz6eHf9pbr99vnr9Yfbykpaz1XTupaJvuuMFMwSowCU4T10sumkYgws54rVLThHla15w2XXSCPBqcI7xi_R23PdKcU_Q-uDzxbG0QSIS9ZUCtqqUkI8AuWiYYQ05BEoIaoVrG4eRgVVkjOh1lnFGbUp5pzA6Sn5g0knTYleHeu9PjvWq2NdohgtaW_uOyzdAfp_SX-lFuD9GYCy6KOHpLP1ECz0RZ6ddR_9Qx3-L2BHX2Sb8SecIO_jkkKRqKnOJUF_X-9sPTNatkV5Q_lvZBvN-Q</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Antcliff, Deborah</creator><creator>Keeley, Philip</creator><creator>Campbell, Malcolm</creator><creator>Oldham, Jackie</creator><creator>Woby, Steve</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique</title><author>Antcliff, Deborah ; Keeley, Philip ; Campbell, Malcolm ; Oldham, Jackie ; Woby, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-89f924dbba542c0a7ee7a3deb58b5722ec337269eff17c63835b85a5ef742cf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Activity pacing</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chronic fatigue syndrome</topic><topic>Chronic low back pain</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Chronic sickness</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Coping strategies</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Physical Therapists</topic><topic>Questionnaire</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Nursing</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Tempo</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antcliff, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woby, Steve</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Physiotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antcliff, Deborah</au><au>Keeley, Philip</au><au>Campbell, Malcolm</au><au>Oldham, Jackie</au><au>Woby, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique</atitle><jtitle>Physiotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Physiotherapy</addtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>241-246</pages><issn>0031-9406</issn><eissn>1873-1465</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and conflicting research evidence into the efficacy of this strategy. There is no consensus on the interpretation of ‘pacing’ due to diverse descriptions, including strategies that encourage both increasing and decreasing activities. Furthermore, at present, there are few validated scales to measure how patients pace their activities. The aim of this study was to undertake the first stage in the development of a comprehensive tool that assesses the multi-faceted nature of pacing among patients with chronic conditions. Design Three-round Delphi technique. Participants Expert panel based in the UK including patients and clinicians. Results The 42 participants who completed three rounds of Delphi included 4 patients, 3 nurses, 26 physiotherapists and 9 occupational therapists. The 38 questions that reached consensus to be included in the questionnaire encompassed a number of different facets of pacing, for example, breaking down tasks, not over-doing activities, and gradually increasing activities. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that has engaged both patients and clinicians in a Delphi technique to develop an activity pacing questionnaire. In contrast to existing pacing scales, our questionnaire appears to contain a number of distinct facets of pacing. Further study is being undertaken to engage patients in the exploration of the validity, reliability and acceptability of the questionnaire.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23395263</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9406
ispartof Physiotherapy, 2013-09, Vol.99 (3), p.241-246
issn 0031-9406
1873-1465
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541977264
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Acceptability
Activity pacing
Adult
Chronic fatigue syndrome
Chronic low back pain
Chronic Pain - physiopathology
Chronic Pain - rehabilitation
Chronic sickness
Consensus
Coping strategies
Delphi Technique
Fatigue
Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - physiopathology
Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - rehabilitation
Female
Humans
Low Back Pain - physiopathology
Low Back Pain - rehabilitation
Male
Middle Aged
Motor Activity
Occupational Therapy
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Physical Therapists
Questionnaire
Rehabilitation Nursing
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Tempo
Young Adult
title The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A59%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20development%20of%20an%20activity%20pacing%20questionnaire%20for%20chronic%20pain%20and/or%20fatigue:%20a%20Delphi%20technique&rft.jtitle=Physiotherapy&rft.au=Antcliff,%20Deborah&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=241-246&rft.issn=0031-9406&rft.eissn=1873-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1541977264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417532472&rft_id=info:pmid/23395263&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0031940612001381&rfr_iscdi=true