The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique
Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physiotherapy 2013-09, Vol.99 (3), p.241-246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 246 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 241 |
container_title | Physiotherapy |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Antcliff, Deborah Keeley, Philip Campbell, Malcolm Oldham, Jackie Woby, Steve |
description | Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and conflicting research evidence into the efficacy of this strategy. There is no consensus on the interpretation of ‘pacing’ due to diverse descriptions, including strategies that encourage both increasing and decreasing activities. Furthermore, at present, there are few validated scales to measure how patients pace their activities. The aim of this study was to undertake the first stage in the development of a comprehensive tool that assesses the multi-faceted nature of pacing among patients with chronic conditions. Design Three-round Delphi technique. Participants Expert panel based in the UK including patients and clinicians. Results The 42 participants who completed three rounds of Delphi included 4 patients, 3 nurses, 26 physiotherapists and 9 occupational therapists. The 38 questions that reached consensus to be included in the questionnaire encompassed a number of different facets of pacing, for example, breaking down tasks, not over-doing activities, and gradually increasing activities. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that has engaged both patients and clinicians in a Delphi technique to develop an activity pacing questionnaire. In contrast to existing pacing scales, our questionnaire appears to contain a number of distinct facets of pacing. Further study is being undertaken to engage patients in the exploration of the validity, reliability and acceptability of the questionnaire. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541977264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0031940612001381</els_id><sourcerecordid>1541977264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-89f924dbba542c0a7ee7a3deb58b5722ec337269eff17c63835b85a5ef742cf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQgIMo7rj6D0Ry9NKzeXa6PQiy6wsWPLieQzpdmc7Yk7RJ98D8e9PO6sHLLhQEwlcP6iuEXlOypYTWV_vtNJyyj1tGKNuWIIQ_QRvaKF5RUcunaFN-aNUKUl-gFznvCWGSKvocXTDOW8lqvkG7uwFwD0cY43SAMOPosAnY2Nkf_XzCk7E-7PCvBfLsYwjGJ8AuJmyHFIO3BfAFD_1V-XNm9rsF3mGDb2CcBo9nsEPwJfsleubMmOHV_XuJfnz6eHf9pbr99vnr9Yfbykpaz1XTupaJvuuMFMwSowCU4T10sumkYgws54rVLThHla15w2XXSCPBqcI7xi_R23PdKcU_Q-uDzxbG0QSIS9ZUCtqqUkI8AuWiYYQ05BEoIaoVrG4eRgVVkjOh1lnFGbUp5pzA6Sn5g0knTYleHeu9PjvWq2NdohgtaW_uOyzdAfp_SX-lFuD9GYCy6KOHpLP1ECz0RZ6ddR_9Qx3-L2BHX2Sb8SecIO_jkkKRqKnOJUF_X-9sPTNatkV5Q_lvZBvN-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1417532472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Antcliff, Deborah ; Keeley, Philip ; Campbell, Malcolm ; Oldham, Jackie ; Woby, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Antcliff, Deborah ; Keeley, Philip ; Campbell, Malcolm ; Oldham, Jackie ; Woby, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and conflicting research evidence into the efficacy of this strategy. There is no consensus on the interpretation of ‘pacing’ due to diverse descriptions, including strategies that encourage both increasing and decreasing activities. Furthermore, at present, there are few validated scales to measure how patients pace their activities. The aim of this study was to undertake the first stage in the development of a comprehensive tool that assesses the multi-faceted nature of pacing among patients with chronic conditions. Design Three-round Delphi technique. Participants Expert panel based in the UK including patients and clinicians. Results The 42 participants who completed three rounds of Delphi included 4 patients, 3 nurses, 26 physiotherapists and 9 occupational therapists. The 38 questions that reached consensus to be included in the questionnaire encompassed a number of different facets of pacing, for example, breaking down tasks, not over-doing activities, and gradually increasing activities. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that has engaged both patients and clinicians in a Delphi technique to develop an activity pacing questionnaire. In contrast to existing pacing scales, our questionnaire appears to contain a number of distinct facets of pacing. Further study is being undertaken to engage patients in the exploration of the validity, reliability and acceptability of the questionnaire.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1465</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23395263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceptability ; Activity pacing ; Adult ; Chronic fatigue syndrome ; Chronic low back pain ; Chronic Pain - physiopathology ; Chronic Pain - rehabilitation ; Chronic sickness ; Consensus ; Coping strategies ; Delphi Technique ; Fatigue ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - physiopathology ; Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - rehabilitation ; Female ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - physiopathology ; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motor Activity ; Occupational Therapy ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapists ; Questionnaire ; Rehabilitation Nursing ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Tempo ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Physiotherapy, 2013-09, Vol.99 (3), p.241-246</ispartof><rights>Chartered Society of Physiotherapy</rights><rights>2012 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-89f924dbba542c0a7ee7a3deb58b5722ec337269eff17c63835b85a5ef742cf23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-89f924dbba542c0a7ee7a3deb58b5722ec337269eff17c63835b85a5ef742cf23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,31000,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23395263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Antcliff, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woby, Steve</creatorcontrib><title>The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique</title><title>Physiotherapy</title><addtitle>Physiotherapy</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and conflicting research evidence into the efficacy of this strategy. There is no consensus on the interpretation of ‘pacing’ due to diverse descriptions, including strategies that encourage both increasing and decreasing activities. Furthermore, at present, there are few validated scales to measure how patients pace their activities. The aim of this study was to undertake the first stage in the development of a comprehensive tool that assesses the multi-faceted nature of pacing among patients with chronic conditions. Design Three-round Delphi technique. Participants Expert panel based in the UK including patients and clinicians. Results The 42 participants who completed three rounds of Delphi included 4 patients, 3 nurses, 26 physiotherapists and 9 occupational therapists. The 38 questions that reached consensus to be included in the questionnaire encompassed a number of different facets of pacing, for example, breaking down tasks, not over-doing activities, and gradually increasing activities. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that has engaged both patients and clinicians in a Delphi technique to develop an activity pacing questionnaire. In contrast to existing pacing scales, our questionnaire appears to contain a number of distinct facets of pacing. Further study is being undertaken to engage patients in the exploration of the validity, reliability and acceptability of the questionnaire.</description><subject>Acceptability</subject><subject>Activity pacing</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Chronic fatigue syndrome</subject><subject>Chronic low back pain</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Chronic sickness</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Coping strategies</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Occupational Therapy</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Physical Therapists</subject><subject>Questionnaire</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Nursing</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Tempo</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0031-9406</issn><issn>1873-1465</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuLFDEQgIMo7rj6D0Ry9NKzeXa6PQiy6wsWPLieQzpdmc7Yk7RJ98D8e9PO6sHLLhQEwlcP6iuEXlOypYTWV_vtNJyyj1tGKNuWIIQ_QRvaKF5RUcunaFN-aNUKUl-gFznvCWGSKvocXTDOW8lqvkG7uwFwD0cY43SAMOPosAnY2Nkf_XzCk7E-7PCvBfLsYwjGJ8AuJmyHFIO3BfAFD_1V-XNm9rsF3mGDb2CcBo9nsEPwJfsleubMmOHV_XuJfnz6eHf9pbr99vnr9Yfbykpaz1XTupaJvuuMFMwSowCU4T10sumkYgws54rVLThHla15w2XXSCPBqcI7xi_R23PdKcU_Q-uDzxbG0QSIS9ZUCtqqUkI8AuWiYYQ05BEoIaoVrG4eRgVVkjOh1lnFGbUp5pzA6Sn5g0knTYleHeu9PjvWq2NdohgtaW_uOyzdAfp_SX-lFuD9GYCy6KOHpLP1ECz0RZ6ddR_9Qx3-L2BHX2Sb8SecIO_jkkKRqKnOJUF_X-9sPTNatkV5Q_lvZBvN-Q</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Antcliff, Deborah</creator><creator>Keeley, Philip</creator><creator>Campbell, Malcolm</creator><creator>Oldham, Jackie</creator><creator>Woby, Steve</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique</title><author>Antcliff, Deborah ; Keeley, Philip ; Campbell, Malcolm ; Oldham, Jackie ; Woby, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-89f924dbba542c0a7ee7a3deb58b5722ec337269eff17c63835b85a5ef742cf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Acceptability</topic><topic>Activity pacing</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Chronic fatigue syndrome</topic><topic>Chronic low back pain</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Chronic sickness</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Coping strategies</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Occupational Therapy</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Physical Therapists</topic><topic>Questionnaire</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Nursing</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Tempo</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Antcliff, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeley, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Malcolm</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woby, Steve</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>Physiotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Antcliff, Deborah</au><au>Keeley, Philip</au><au>Campbell, Malcolm</au><au>Oldham, Jackie</au><au>Woby, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique</atitle><jtitle>Physiotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Physiotherapy</addtitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>241-246</pages><issn>0031-9406</issn><eissn>1873-1465</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Activity pacing is frequently advised as a coping strategy for the management of chronic conditions (such as chronic low back pain, chronic widespread pain and chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis). Despite anecdotal support for activity pacing, there is limited and conflicting research evidence into the efficacy of this strategy. There is no consensus on the interpretation of ‘pacing’ due to diverse descriptions, including strategies that encourage both increasing and decreasing activities. Furthermore, at present, there are few validated scales to measure how patients pace their activities. The aim of this study was to undertake the first stage in the development of a comprehensive tool that assesses the multi-faceted nature of pacing among patients with chronic conditions. Design Three-round Delphi technique. Participants Expert panel based in the UK including patients and clinicians. Results The 42 participants who completed three rounds of Delphi included 4 patients, 3 nurses, 26 physiotherapists and 9 occupational therapists. The 38 questions that reached consensus to be included in the questionnaire encompassed a number of different facets of pacing, for example, breaking down tasks, not over-doing activities, and gradually increasing activities. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study that has engaged both patients and clinicians in a Delphi technique to develop an activity pacing questionnaire. In contrast to existing pacing scales, our questionnaire appears to contain a number of distinct facets of pacing. Further study is being undertaken to engage patients in the exploration of the validity, reliability and acceptability of the questionnaire.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23395263</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9406 |
ispartof | Physiotherapy, 2013-09, Vol.99 (3), p.241-246 |
issn | 0031-9406 1873-1465 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541977264 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Acceptability Activity pacing Adult Chronic fatigue syndrome Chronic low back pain Chronic Pain - physiopathology Chronic Pain - rehabilitation Chronic sickness Consensus Coping strategies Delphi Technique Fatigue Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - physiopathology Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic - rehabilitation Female Humans Low Back Pain - physiopathology Low Back Pain - rehabilitation Male Middle Aged Motor Activity Occupational Therapy Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Physical Therapists Questionnaire Rehabilitation Nursing Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires - standards Tempo Young Adult |
title | The development of an activity pacing questionnaire for chronic pain and/or fatigue: a Delphi technique |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T20%3A59%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20development%20of%20an%20activity%20pacing%20questionnaire%20for%20chronic%20pain%20and/or%20fatigue:%20a%20Delphi%20technique&rft.jtitle=Physiotherapy&rft.au=Antcliff,%20Deborah&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=241-246&rft.issn=0031-9406&rft.eissn=1873-1465&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.physio.2012.12.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1541977264%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1417532472&rft_id=info:pmid/23395263&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0031940612001381&rfr_iscdi=true |