Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories
Here, we describe the development of logic models depicting three theories of evaluation practice: Practical Participatory (Cousins & Whitmore, 1998), Values-engaged (Greene, 2005a, 2005b), and Emergent Realist (Mark et al., 1998). We begin with a discussion of evaluation theory and the particul...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Evaluation and program planning 2013-06, Vol.38, p.34-43 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 43 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 34 |
| container_title | Evaluation and program planning |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Hansen, Mark Alkin, Marvin C. Wallace, Tanner LeBaron |
| description | Here, we describe the development of logic models depicting three theories of evaluation practice: Practical Participatory (Cousins & Whitmore, 1998), Values-engaged (Greene, 2005a, 2005b), and Emergent Realist (Mark et al., 1998). We begin with a discussion of evaluation theory and the particular theories that were chosen for our analysis. We then outline the steps involved in constructing the models. The theoretical prescriptions and claims represented here follow a logic model template developed at the University Wisconsin-Extension (Taylor-Powell & Henert, 2008), which also closely aligns with Mark's (2008) framework for research on evaluation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.012 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541976312</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149718912000316</els_id><sourcerecordid>2923380981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-819afe15b49e9c188bd4c7067178aa43fe299ddfa07127f204f8c498bcdb76cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq2qqGxpXwGt2guXhBnHie3eKqAUCYkLnC3HmWy9ysaLnSDx9ni7C6o49TQa-Rv_Mx9j3xBKBGzO1yU92WEbw2o72LHkgLyEqszlA1ugklUhlYSPbAEodCFR6WP2OaU1AAgtxSd2zLloagl8weCStt5Nflwtpz-0HMLKu2XocxOJlruc2U4-jLvXED2lL-yot0Oir4d6wh5-Xd1f_C5u765vLn7eFq7mzVQo1LYnrFuhSTtUqu2Ek9BIlMpaUfXEte663oJELnsOoldOaNW6rpWNc9UJO9v_m-98nClNZuOToyFfTGFOBmuBWjYV8ox-f4euwxzHvJ3BClWTI-omUz_2lIshpUi92Ua_sfHZIJidV7M2_3o1O68GKgN_I04PEXO7oe5t9FVkBi73AGUnT56iSc7T6KjzkdxkuuD_J-cFYzqPEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1318607156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Hansen, Mark ; Alkin, Marvin C. ; Wallace, Tanner LeBaron</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Mark ; Alkin, Marvin C. ; Wallace, Tanner LeBaron</creatorcontrib><description>Here, we describe the development of logic models depicting three theories of evaluation practice: Practical Participatory (Cousins & Whitmore, 1998), Values-engaged (Greene, 2005a, 2005b), and Emergent Realist (Mark et al., 1998). We begin with a discussion of evaluation theory and the particular theories that were chosen for our analysis. We then outline the steps involved in constructing the models. The theoretical prescriptions and claims represented here follow a logic model template developed at the University Wisconsin-Extension (Taylor-Powell & Henert, 2008), which also closely aligns with Mark's (2008) framework for research on evaluation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7870</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22465702</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EPPLDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognitive models ; Colleges & universities ; Cousins ; Emergent realist evaluation ; Evaluation theory ; Humans ; Logic ; Logic modeling ; Models, Theoretical ; Performance evaluation ; Practical participatory evaluation ; Prescriptions ; Program Evaluation - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design ; Theory ; Values-engaged evaluation</subject><ispartof>Evaluation and program planning, 2013-06, Vol.38, p.34-43</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-819afe15b49e9c188bd4c7067178aa43fe299ddfa07127f204f8c498bcdb76cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-819afe15b49e9c188bd4c7067178aa43fe299ddfa07127f204f8c498bcdb76cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,30998,30999,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22465702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkin, Marvin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Tanner LeBaron</creatorcontrib><title>Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories</title><title>Evaluation and program planning</title><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><description>Here, we describe the development of logic models depicting three theories of evaluation practice: Practical Participatory (Cousins & Whitmore, 1998), Values-engaged (Greene, 2005a, 2005b), and Emergent Realist (Mark et al., 1998). We begin with a discussion of evaluation theory and the particular theories that were chosen for our analysis. We then outline the steps involved in constructing the models. The theoretical prescriptions and claims represented here follow a logic model template developed at the University Wisconsin-Extension (Taylor-Powell & Henert, 2008), which also closely aligns with Mark's (2008) framework for research on evaluation.</description><subject>Cognitive models</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Cousins</subject><subject>Emergent realist evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluation theory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Logic modeling</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Practical participatory evaluation</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Program Evaluation - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Values-engaged evaluation</subject><issn>0149-7189</issn><issn>1873-7870</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMFO3DAQhq2qqGxpXwGt2guXhBnHie3eKqAUCYkLnC3HmWy9ysaLnSDx9ni7C6o49TQa-Rv_Mx9j3xBKBGzO1yU92WEbw2o72LHkgLyEqszlA1ugklUhlYSPbAEodCFR6WP2OaU1AAgtxSd2zLloagl8weCStt5Nflwtpz-0HMLKu2XocxOJlruc2U4-jLvXED2lL-yot0Oir4d6wh5-Xd1f_C5u765vLn7eFq7mzVQo1LYnrFuhSTtUqu2Ek9BIlMpaUfXEte663oJELnsOoldOaNW6rpWNc9UJO9v_m-98nClNZuOToyFfTGFOBmuBWjYV8ox-f4euwxzHvJ3BClWTI-omUz_2lIshpUi92Ua_sfHZIJidV7M2_3o1O68GKgN_I04PEXO7oe5t9FVkBi73AGUnT56iSc7T6KjzkdxkuuD_J-cFYzqPEQ</recordid><startdate>20130601</startdate><enddate>20130601</enddate><creator>Hansen, Mark</creator><creator>Alkin, Marvin C.</creator><creator>Wallace, Tanner LeBaron</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130601</creationdate><title>Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories</title><author>Hansen, Mark ; Alkin, Marvin C. ; Wallace, Tanner LeBaron</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c526t-819afe15b49e9c188bd4c7067178aa43fe299ddfa07127f204f8c498bcdb76cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cognitive models</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Cousins</topic><topic>Emergent realist evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluation theory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Logic modeling</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Practical participatory evaluation</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Program Evaluation - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Values-engaged evaluation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alkin, Marvin C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Tanner LeBaron</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansen, Mark</au><au>Alkin, Marvin C.</au><au>Wallace, Tanner LeBaron</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories</atitle><jtitle>Evaluation and program planning</jtitle><addtitle>Eval Program Plann</addtitle><date>2013-06-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>34</spage><epage>43</epage><pages>34-43</pages><issn>0149-7189</issn><eissn>1873-7870</eissn><coden>EPPLDO</coden><abstract>Here, we describe the development of logic models depicting three theories of evaluation practice: Practical Participatory (Cousins & Whitmore, 1998), Values-engaged (Greene, 2005a, 2005b), and Emergent Realist (Mark et al., 1998). We begin with a discussion of evaluation theory and the particular theories that were chosen for our analysis. We then outline the steps involved in constructing the models. The theoretical prescriptions and claims represented here follow a logic model template developed at the University Wisconsin-Extension (Taylor-Powell & Henert, 2008), which also closely aligns with Mark's (2008) framework for research on evaluation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22465702</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.012</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0149-7189 |
| ispartof | Evaluation and program planning, 2013-06, Vol.38, p.34-43 |
| issn | 0149-7189 1873-7870 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1541976312 |
| source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Cognitive models Colleges & universities Cousins Emergent realist evaluation Evaluation theory Humans Logic Logic modeling Models, Theoretical Performance evaluation Practical participatory evaluation Prescriptions Program Evaluation - methods Reproducibility of Results Research Design Theory Values-engaged evaluation |
| title | Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T05%3A33%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Depicting%20the%20logic%20of%20three%20evaluation%20theories&rft.jtitle=Evaluation%20and%20program%20planning&rft.au=Hansen,%20Mark&rft.date=2013-06-01&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=43&rft.pages=34-43&rft.issn=0149-7189&rft.eissn=1873-7870&rft.coden=EPPLDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2012.03.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2923380981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1318607156&rft_id=info:pmid/22465702&rft_els_id=S0149718912000316&rfr_iscdi=true |